Tyranny? Never in America (video)

Paul Joseph Watson, InfoWars.com; Pfc. Sandoval, Ashley Wells, Wisdom Quarterly

(LINK) Advance to Minute 8:54 to see this already taking place in the US

 
 "Complete disarmament" of Americans?

The UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) that has been identified by observers as a threat to the Second Amendment, which Obama is determined to sign.

  

It has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee "complete disarmament" [citizen gun confiscation so that only government agents have them] of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The treaty is controversial because it outlines a plan to target "all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons," according to Forbes' Larry Bell.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement "is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control."

A letter sent [in May 2012] by 130 Republican House members to Pres. Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the "fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms." The letter adds that "...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights."

 

Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents, and "international crime syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing, which outlines a long-term agenda to carry out the confiscating of all legal guns.

 
Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds."

While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind will be governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal order," and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would require "agreed manpower."

 
"The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes," states the document. 

 

While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to usurp national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies, and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the Second Amendment has been in the works for decades.

As Bell points out in his Forbes' article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what previous Republican administrations have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the Second Amendment -- is by no means far fetched.

UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize US involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.