(Vengencefrom1979) If a picture is worth a thousand words, what's a whole video worth?
 |
| 9/11? America, like this white turkey, can eat my... - George W. Bush (choiceorlife.com) |
.
 |
| Yeah, we lied. All Governments Lie. |
What
"In Plane Site" accomplishes that no other video expose on 9/11 (September
11th, 2001) has to date done is to expose a barrage of news clips
from a majority of the mainstream media "news" outlets.
The "official story" of
9/11 was told on live TV by reporters, police, firefighters, and
other on-the-scene eyewitnesses. However, that footage was shown only ONCE on live television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and
then it was NEVER repeated again.
In the meantime, the stories changed, information was
enigmatically omitted, and what can only be described as officially
prescribed propaganda took the place of indisputable reality.
What about the Pentagon?
 |
| Me, too. Ditto for whatever Bush said. |
THE
PENTAGON: Some of the most damning evidence surrounding the alleged "attack"
on the Pentagon centers around substantial and incontrovertible video and
photographic evidence which gives incites viewers to ask crucial questions.
After all, the laws of physics cannot be suspended. Or can they?
One question many viewers ask is, "Why was America [i.e., the United States spoken of as if it were representative of the entire continent] and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon BEFORE the outer wall collapsed?"
One question many viewers ask is, "Why was America [i.e., the United States spoken of as if it were representative of the entire continent] and the rest of the world not shown the video footage and the photographs of the Pentagon BEFORE the outer wall collapsed?"
 |
| "Change"? I've changed. |
Many
people do not realize that the outer wall of the Pentagon did not
collapse until 20 minutes after the initial impact of what we were told
was a Boeing 757, which miraculously left no wreckage, fuel, fire, or forensic evidence.
Upon examining these photographs, one can clearly see a hole, which is only 16 feet. This begs the question: "How can a Boeing 757, which is over 44 feet in height and 124 feet in width, simply disappear without a trace into a hole that is only 16 ft. in diameter? Also, why is there no external damage to the Pentagon where the wings and the tail section would have impacted with the outer wall?
Upon examining these photographs, one can clearly see a hole, which is only 16 feet. This begs the question: "How can a Boeing 757, which is over 44 feet in height and 124 feet in width, simply disappear without a trace into a hole that is only 16 ft. in diameter? Also, why is there no external damage to the Pentagon where the wings and the tail section would have impacted with the outer wall?
Contrary to the video footage shown to the American [U.S.] public, photographs taken only moments after the impact show NOW WRECKAGE on the lawn of the Pentagon. Where is the plane? Where are the broken wings, the tail, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear, and the engines?
Most importantly, what happened to the passengers who were aboard that
plane?
America remembers the photographs that they were shown of tiny, indiscernible fragments, which were described as [or said to be] pieces of a Boeing 757. Were these fragments of a Boeing 757?
America remembers the photographs that they were shown of tiny, indiscernible fragments, which were described as [or said to be] pieces of a Boeing 757. Were these fragments of a Boeing 757?
Internal photographs
of the Pentagon taken by Jocelyn Augustino, a FEMA photographer, do not
show engine parts matching the description of a 757's engine turbofan
according to John W. Brown, a spokesperson for Rolls Royce.
Both Pratt
& Whitney and Rolls Royce manufacture the engines used on these
jetliners. The turbofans themselves are approximately 7 feet in
diameter. The FEMA photos show what appears to be a single turbofan
that is approximately 3 feet in diameter. This better fits the
descriptions of EYEWITNESSES who claim that they saw what could only be
described as a commuter plane capable of holding only 8 to 12
passengers.
This single piece of evidence also helps support other
reports from witnesses such as Lon Rains, editor for "Space News," who
was quoted as saying "I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound.
"I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast -- it sounded nothing like an airplane." Don Parkal said, "A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere." Tom Seibert said, "We heard what sounded like a missile."
"I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast -- it sounded nothing like an airplane." Don Parkal said, "A bomb had gone off. I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere." Tom Seibert said, "We heard what sounded like a missile."
No comments:
Post a Comment