Showing posts with label mahavira. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mahavira. Show all posts

Thursday, September 26, 2024

Jain or Shiva Temple, Tamil Nadu, India


Jain holy site or unseen cave temple of Shiva? Sathrumalleswaram, India
(PraveenMohan) Sept. 26, 2024: There is an ancient cave temple in a remote village called Dalavanur, India. The name of this megalithic site is Sathrumalleswaram and was built in 6th or 7th century AD. Inside there is a giant lingam, which is usually a symbol of [the extraterrestrial being] Shiva. But how could ancient builders have created such a marvel?

Join the channel to get access to perks: @realpraveenmohan. Hugh Newman's Megalithomania Channel: ‪@MegalithomaniaUK‬. Whatsapp channel: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9U... Instagram: praveenet. Facebook: praveenmohanfans. Twitter: iampraveenmohan. Email ID: info.praveenmohan@gmail.com. Patreon account to support: praveenmohan. #praveenmohan #hughnewman #harharmahadev

Monday, April 1, 2024

Difference between Jainism/Buddhism

Who are these figures? Mahavira is shown on the left, the Buddha Gautama on the right.
.
Not the Buddha, this is Mahavira. Same person?
QUESTION: Jainism sounds GREAT. Why doesn't Wisdom Quarterly convert to Jainism like the April Fools' article claims? 

ANSWER: Excellent question! Jainism is great. We love it, along with Buddhism's fellow Dharmic religions, Hinduism (in its many varieties, particularly the Eightfold Path of Yoga), Sikhism, and even Dharma-adjacent traditions like mystical Indian Sufism, Zoroastrianism, and Kurdistan-Iraqi Yazidism. But there is fault to be found with all of them. Fault can be found with anything. It isn't normal fault, like how adherents behave or anything like that. There's a fatal flaw in the philosophy of sweet wandering ascetic and great teacher Mahavira (Nigantha Nattaputta). So great are other religions that, if we didn't have Buddhism, we would find another spiritual tradition in India to content us until Maitreya (the Future Buddha) arose to reveal the true Buddha-Dharma. What could that flaw be? It's subtle, but it comes down to the belief in self and the nature of what qualifies as real "liberation" (moksha). All Indian traditions use the word moksha, but no one defines it the way the Buddha does. To them their "liberation" is good enough, but to the Buddha it was not enough.

What made Siddhartha the Buddha (the "Awakened One") was that he awoke to the utmost. He checked and checked if there were something higher. The Buddhist definition of nirvana is the ultimate, and one knows it when it is attained. (Sadly, when it is not yet attained, it is easy to be confused and mistake what one has realized as nirvana).

The peace of cessation, nirodha, knowing-and-seeing the deconstruction of all formations is rest, unending peace, the ultimate, because the cause has been known and the cure implemented. The problem has been seen (dukkha) and the path to its cessation traveled. Sadly, other teachers and doctrines loosely use this word "nirvana" and mean something else by it.

Those definitions were flawed, leading again to samsara (the Cycle of Rebirth) after a long respite or an exalted and sublime rebirth in one of the many heavens. There is only one class of heavenly worlds worth being reborn into, and those are called the Pure Abodes? Why?

I really thought I found what the Buddha found.
They are limited to only partially enlightened inhabitants. (There are stages of enlightenment, and until one is an arhat, full enlightened, one is only partially enlightened).

And from those worlds beings are completely liberated. As it is, few people can tell the difference between Hinduism (or the much older Vedic religion and Brahmanism) and Buddhism. But they are different enough to merit entirely separate traditions.

The former are mainly limited to India, whereas Buddhism is universal, not limited to India, not even really from India except that that's where the Buddha taught, having been born next door in Gandhara on the northwest frontier of proto-India. There was no "India" when the Buddha taught. There were kingdoms and republics, great territories and family holdings (with at least 16 mahajanapadas).

All liberations are not alike

All mokshas, "liberations," are not alike. In one hair raising sutra, the Buddha says to some monastics, "See over there," and he points to wandering ascetics of another school (and there were at least six "heretical" schools). They see a teacher regarded as full enlightened and his disciples. The Buddha says, "There is no enlightened person over there, not of the first stage, second stage..." This is a shocking statement because the Buddha is saying not only is there no fully enlightened person (arhat) person in that school, there's not even someone who has entered this first stage of enlightenment nor one who is even on the path to the first stage. Similarly, he points around to other teachers and other schools with their disciples and says the same thing. Then he clarifies by saying that here, in this school, there are people on the path, and those who have reached the first stage, second stage...and arhats. Then he makes the big reveal. "And why is that?" the Buddha asks. He answers, "because over [in that dharma with that teacher], they do not understand anatta [the doctrine of all things being impersonal]." And because of that, they do not have disciples on the path to enlightenment, at the first stage, second stage...nor arhats. This was shocking to those monastics because those teachers and their dharmas and disciplines, their schools, were widely regarded as enlightened. They were famous and regarded as such -- and this would have included the great Mahavira, Vardhamana, the Nigantha Nattaputta, the Jina (Arihant), the Tirthankara, the founder of Jainism. But the Buddha is declaring that they are not arahants and not even on the path to becoming arahants. He seems to be exalting himself and denigrating them.

Every part of Buddhist India has Jain temples. This is Mahavira, not the Buddha. The most Buddhist place in India is Bodh Gaya ("Enlightenment Grove") in Bihar, but legend has it that's where Mahavira was born. In a sense, that's where "the Buddha" was born (because that is the site of his great awakening for which he is called "the Awakened One"). It is therefore another odd coincidence that Mahavira would have literally been born in this far off rural area.
 
Magnificent statue of naked Mahavira in India
But what is actually happening is that the Buddha is saying, of course, they may have wisdom, psychic powers, rebirth in heaven and be showing the path to rebirth in heaven, good teachings (such as teaching karma and morality), fine reputations, miracles, followers who are both humans and devas, and so on. They may well be "saints" as that word is understood in the world (usually meaning that someone has attained samadhi, "stillness, mental coherence, concentration" or "superconsciousness," and shows the signs of it, which sometimes includes superhuman feats and magical displays). But what they do not have, have not understood, have not reached to true, unending peace. They have not made an end of samsara (the Wheel of Death and Rebirth) and therefore not made a complete end of all suffering, which are the cornerstones of nirvana. So if one is satisfied with that, then those teachers are appropriate, should be followed, and no one should be surprised to find themselves reborn in some heaven or another thinking they are all done with rebirth or all done with karma or all done with suffering. But they will not be. After a very long time, when the karma that brought them to that rebirth is exhausted, they fall from that lofty perch and carry on according to their just desserts (an endless store of past karma), toiling and cycling in samsara in search of delights, first here then there, never satisfied, wishing to return to those excellent heavens, experiencing rebirth in the hells, among animals, with ghosts, among other creatures, with humans, as lowly deities (devas), as divinities (brahmas), as gods (devas, yes, the word has a wide range of meaning that even encompasses all brahmas). So rare in the world is the arising of a supremely enlightened buddha (samma-sam-buddha) that one should pay attention, give ear to the Dharma, and contemplate what is being said. There is no need to give up one's previous teacher or teaching, guru or dharma, but one should open one's mind to what the Buddha is saying. And hearing that, there is no reason to resort to Hinduism (the teachings prevalent around the Indus River valley) or teachings from heaven (avatars) or the Vedas (ancient Knowledge Books), and so on.

With a teacher like that, why are there different Buddhisms?

The Buddha's Teaching, the Dhamma or Dharma, goes against the stream of our assumptions. Often, people will take the Teaching and twist it to accord with their preferences and views. This would happen all the time when the Buddha was around, and he would teach and teach to correct them and bring their view to perfection. Right view (samma ditthi) is established with practice and direct realization not by debate, argument, thinking, or mere reasoning. How could we ever accept that there is no "self"? That's just out of the question. That's impossible. That's st*pid. That's not worth considering. But it's True. It's the highest Truth. There's no reason to "believe" it, but rest assured if it has not been understood, the first stage of enlightenment (bodhi as defined in Buddhism) has not been reached. That is the crucial teaching (see an explanation) and the heart of the Heart Sutra. What is at the heart of perfect wisdom (prajna paramita)? The perfection of wisdom consists of seeing the Five Aggregates (the skandhas, khandas, the heaps) as "empty," as devoid of self or substance. The Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara sees that and explains it to the strawman Sariputra (mocked by Mahayana as "foremost in wisdom" when they prefer other make believe "Cosmic Buddhas" and bodhisattvas and mahasattvas and all sorts of Brahminical, Vedic, and Hindu interpolations) to show that this is not an intellectual grasping but a direct experience of the ultimate Truth.

So, in conclusion, Jainism is great. Hinduism is great. But they are not Buddhism. They have not understood what the Buddha taught. They, therefore, cling to ideas and tenets of an eternal soul and do not see what the Buddha taught as Dependent Origination and the Five Aggregates clung to as self (soul, atman, atta, ego, personality, essence). So when they are asked, they cannot accurately represent what the Buddha taught or what makes Buddhism different from all spiritual and philosophical teachings there have ever been in the world. So they mock it, parody it, or revere it in ignorance. They praise the Buddha for minor things (morality, austerities, etc.) and remain ignorant of major things (the wisdom he found and communicated).

Sunday, March 31, 2024

Wisdom Quarterly to convert to Jainism

This famous picture of the Buddha is said to actually be Mahavira, who is usually depicted bald.

Oh, you April Fool's Day pranksters!

Who had the first nuns?
One of the most remarkable, and largely inexplicable, things about Jainism is how similar it is to Buddhism, how much the life of the Buddha mirrors the life of Mahavira -- so much so that the British in India translating the ancient texts always assumed the stories were talking about one person. In fact, even though we know better now, it is very reasonable to postulate that the reason they are so similar is because they were the same historical figure and a schism divided Buddhism between strict vegetarian wandering ascetic purists (the Jains) and more reasonable (Middle Way) sectarians. Each built up its own camp and back story.

Bald, naked ascetic under a tree: Mahavira
While this may sound preposterous, note the curious detail that Siddhartha was not always called the Buddha ("Awakened One") but was previously called Mahavira ("Great Hero"), a common epithet, just like Bhagavan ("Blessed One") or Tathagata ("Wayfarer"). They both led sramana (wanderer) traditions that rebelled against the supremacy of the Vedas (ancient "wisdom books") of the temple-bound Brahmin priests. Both talked incessantly about karma (deeds). Both emphasized the necessity of direct experience of the Truth, not mere faith (saddha), moral observances (sila), book learning (suta), or scholarship or relying on intermediary "priests" to dispense blessings, boons, good luck charms, viewings (darshan), or magical transmissions, as they have come to do because people for ages have been looking for an easier and easier Path to Freedom.

Jainism explained
(Cogito) Jainism, some call it the world’s most peaceful religion. Mahavira (the Nigantha Nattaputta as he is known in Buddhism) was a contemporary of the historical and slightly younger Siddhartha Gautama who became the Buddha. They led the two "wandering ascetic" Indian traditions to survive to the present.

Mahavira meets a naga (MGP)
[Most peaceful? Except perhaps for the fact that as Jains do not engage in any harmful work, many have become investors investing in the worst trades weapons, alcohol, drugs, funding every kind of harm known to humankind. Is it wrong to invest and profit from arms sales? Cattle raising? Big Pharma sorcery? Pesticides? Weapons R&D? AI technology?]

Jain monastics (sramanas or wandering ascetics, both nuns and monks, and there are possibly more females since Mahavira was the first to ordain women) are famous worldwide for their strict adherence to ahimsa or “non-harming,” “non-violence.”

Going as far as to sweep the floor with a dust broom as they walk to avoid stepping on any tiny lifeforms, covering their mouths as to not swallow [small bugs] or breathe hot air on [unseen] living creatures, and following a strict vegetarian diet that bans:
  • all meat,
  • all fish,
  • all eggs
  • all potatoes (and root vegetables and some fruits).
Who wouldn't prefer naked founder?
So what is Jainism, and why is it considered the world’s most peaceful religion?

The ancient Jain philosophy has garnered the eye of the modern world as their ideas of non-violence, strict vegetarianism (with many now becoming vegans), and what could be called an environmentalist outlook are strikingly relevant.

Jains have been highly influential in India for thousands of years, shaping its vegetarian-friendly diet and lending the concept of ahimsa to Gandhi's independence movement against the colonial British empire.

Naked Jain monk honors 24 Tirthankaras of history, jinas and mahaviras, Jains and great heroes

Hey, Mahavira, really is naked.
A “Jain” (Jaina) is someone who accepts the teachings of the Tirthankaras, the “Ford-makers or Ford-finders.”

“Jainism” comes from the word Jina. Tirthankaras, those who cross over and bridge this dangerous side of the river and that safe side, allowing followers to move from samsara to moksha, from endless-rebirth to liberation.

They, the teachers, are the most important people in Jainism. They have removed all attachments to the world and during their lifetimes have managed to break free from the endless cycle of rebirth and death. It is this cycle, this endlessly turning wheel (samsara), that Jains believe keeps souls trapped in the world, going from one birth to another.

[Naked? White-clad versus sky-clad]
White clad vs. sky clad? Mahavira
There are two kinds of Jains, the Svetambaras and the Digambaras, the more mellow reformed and the strict orthodox. Some wear white cotton robes, whereas the others go about naked like severe ascetics from the time of the Buddha. They own nothing (niganthas), cling to nothing, not even castoff bark cloth rags to protect against the elements and for the sake of modesty. These "sky-clad" ascetics and their followers were the vegetarian gymnosophists mentioned by the ancient Greeks. (Gymnos means "nude," which is what one did in the ancient Greek gymnasium, and sophist means "philosopher" or "teacher" as in sophistry or philo-Sophia, the "love of wisdom").

Sources
(Amazon.com put a copy limit on this, so I couldn't export my notes, and it took me hours to do it manually, and it made me angry, and this is the only way I can vent. Good book though 8/10, 9/10 with rice).
COMMENTS
  • There's got to be a better way
    QUESTION (John D.): How could Wisdom Quarterly turn their backs on the truth and follow some other dharma teacher?
  • ANSWER (Ashley W.): Well, it was either Mahavira and Jainism or Apollonius of Tyana the wandering sage of Saint Issa/Jesus' time and Mysticism. No one voted for Judaism, even the Ultra-Orthodox kind or the mystical Kabbalah, and Shamanism, which did get a lot of votes, is just so amorphous. We don't need more Occult mumbo-jumbo or Seeking but an actual path.
  • QUESTION (Jane D.): Why not become Unitarian Universalists or Quakers? They're really liberal and open minded
  • ANSWER (Ashley W.): It's true. There is no shortage of options. We also considered Vaishnavism Yoga, Celtic Nature Worship/Witchcraft/Paganism, the Flying Spaghetti Monster religion, Esoterica in general, Theosophy in specific, and our ever-present default option Animism, our fallback Atheism (or better still Dharmic Atheism), and our on-the-fence Syncretism or Agnosticism. But we love India (Bharat) and think that's the heart of the planet's spirituality.
  • QUESTION (Reese Tarded): Have you thought about your future and God's plan for your salvation? I'd like to talk to you about eternity and the love waiting for you if you just accept this short little creed.
  • ANSWER (Ashley W.): Take a hike, Reese.
  • QUESTION (Reese Tarded): Are you saying Wisdom Quarterly is NOT converting to Jainism or anything else?
  • ANSWER (Ashley W.): Yes, yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Happy April Fools' Day. I still think we should have gone with the wandering sage Apollonius of Tyana personally; then it might have been more obvious we were being facetious. But Jainism is nice and Mahavira, if it weren't for the Buddha, would have been the greatest teacher of his day.
Follow on twitter: cogitoedu, Reddit r/cogitoedu, Facebook @Cogito, YouTube. Patreon: cogitoedu. Merch: cogitostore.teemill.com.

Go to https://nordvpn.org/cogito and use code cogito to get 75% off a 3-year plan and an extra month for free. Last chance to get this deal for $2.99! Watch ad-free over on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/cogito-yt-wh...

Why have you scrolled this far down? No one reads down here. #India #Jain #Jainism #IndianHistory #Jains #VPN #NordVPN Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com/creator. All images are taken from Creative Commons or used in accordance with fair use. If an image has been used without proper attribution, please contact by email or on twitter, and that will instantly bed resolved.
  • Cogito (video), Aug. 31, 2019; Editors, Wisdom Quarterly: American Jain Journal, April 1, 2024

Friday, October 7, 2022

Enlightened nun "Beautiful Curly-Hair"

G.P. Malalasekera (Pali Proper Names); Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Black and Buddhist (Faith Adiele)
Ven. Bhaddā-Kundalakesā was an enlightened elder nun or 
therī (one who has gone forth for at least ten rains retreats).

She was deemed "foremost in swift intuition" among the nuns (comparable to Bahiya of the Barkcloth among the monks).

She was reborn in the family of a treasurer of wealthy Rājagaha, the royal city ringed by seven hills where the Buddha frequently stayed at Vulture's Peak.

On the same day as she was born, a son was born to the king's chaplain under an astrological constellation favorable to highway robbers, who was therefore called Sattuka.

One day, through her balcony lattice, beautiful Bhaddā saw Sattuka being led by the city guard to execution on a charge of robbery. She at once fell in love with him and refused to live without him.

Her father, out of his love for her, bribed the guard to release Sattuka. He ordered him bathed in perfumed water, and brought him home, where Bhaddā, decked in jewels, waited upon him.

Sattuka soon began to covet her expensive jewels and conceived of a lie to steal them. He told her that he had made a vow to the deity of Robbers' Cliff that, should he escape execution, he would bring the deity an offering in thanks.

She trusted him and, and putting together an offering, went with him arrayed in all her lovely ornaments. On arriving at the top of the cliff, he told her of his real purpose. She, undaunted, begged him to let her embrace him just one more time. He agreed to this. Then, pretending to embrace him from behind, she pushed him over the cliff.

The deity of the mountain praised her presence of mind, saying that men were not in all cases wiser than women. Unwilling to return home after what had happened, she joined the Order of the White Clad Niganthas [Jains, as the founder Mahavira allowed female ascetics before the Buddha accepted nuns].

As she wished to practice extreme austerities (tapas) as penance, they yanked her hair out with a palmyra wood comb. Her hair grew back in close curls, so they called her Kundala-kesā ("Curly-hair").

.
Unsatisfied with the doctrine (dharma) of the Niganthas, she left them, and going for guidance to various teachers, she became very proficient in philosophical discussion and eager to debate.

She would enter a village and, making a heap of sand at the gate, set up a tree branch of rose apple saying, "Whoever wishes to debate me, let him trample on this branch."

One day, Sāriputra -- the Buddha's chief disciple declared "foremost in wisdom" -- seeing the branch outside of Sāvatthi's gate, asked some children to trample it.

Bhaddā then went to Jetavana accompanied by a large crowd of spectators she invited to be present at the debate.

Sāriputra suggested that Bhaddā should first ask him questions. To all of these he replied skillfully until she fell silent.

Would that there were a teacher so wise as me.
It was then his turn, and he asked her, "One, what is that?" (The meaning of this was probably, "State any one fact that is true for everyone.")

Unable to answer, she asked him to be her teacher. But Sāriputra sent her to the Buddha, who taught her. He added verses, stating that it were better to know one single stanza bringing calm and peace than 1,000 verses bringing no profit.

At the end of this sutra, Bhaddā attained full enlightenment, and the Buddha himself ordained her as a nun afterward.

In the time of Padumuttara Buddha, she had heard him teach and declare as foremost among nuns one whose intuition was swift (khippābhiññā). She vowed that this rank should one day be hers.

Later, when Kassapa was Buddha, she was one of the seven daughters of Kikī, King of Benares, and was named Bhikkhadāyikā (v.l. Bhikkhudāsikā).

For 20,000 years she remained celibate and built a dwelling for the Monastic Order (A.i.25; AA.i.200ff.; ThigA.99ff.; Ap.ii.560ff).

The DhA. account (ii. 217 ff.) differs in various details. There Bhaddā is shut up by her parents at the top of a seven storied building with only a single woman to wait on her, for "girls when young, burn for men!"

It was thus that she saw the robber. In the "Verses of the Enlightened Nuns or Therīgāthā (Thig.vss.107-11) are included several verses spoken by her when she had been a wandering ascetic Jain nun for 50 years, wandering about in Anga, Magadha, Kāsi, and Kosala, living on the people's alms.

Saturday, September 24, 2022

Buddha wasn't "Buddhist." What was he?

Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Wisdom Quarterly
On the left is not the Buddha but Mahavira. The Buddha is on the right. That's how alike they are.
.
Jain wandering ascetic nun, 20th century
The historical Buddha, the former Prince Siddhartha Gautama, the Sage of the Scythians, was not only called the "Buddha" at the time. He had many epithets and monikers, the Tathagata, Mahavira, Bhagwan, Bhante, Sramana, and so on ("Wayfarer," "Thus Come One," "Well Gone One," "Great Hero," "Venerable," "Wandering Ascetic," etc.).

He was all of these and more, but The Buddha or "The Awakened One" stuck, and the name of the Dharma (Doctrine) he taught came to be called "Awakenism" (Buddh-ism).

In his day, however, he was referred to as a Karmavadin, a "teacher of the efficacy of intentional actions," a person who taught action/karma. (He was certainly NOT a "Hindu," as Hinduism or "Indus-ism," had not yet been invented or coined by British Orientalists working in British India (part of East India Company or Brittania/British Empire or the Realm).

There were previous buddhas.
There was not even an "India" yet. What there was was a Great Bharat, Brahmanism, the ancient Vedas, all of which modern Hinduism claims as its own. The Buddha, however, and therefore Buddhism's various schools, remember previous samma-sam-buddhas, or Supremely Enlightened Teachers, extending back aeons or kalpas, which is a term that varies in meaning from ordinary lifespan of a person to incalculable periods of geologic time. So the Buddha-Dharma or Teaching of these extraordinary beings on earth and in other galaxies did not begin with the historical Buddha Shakyamuni, the muni or sage/mendicant of the Indo-Sakas/Shakyas or Scythians of the northwest frontier region of old Gandhara in Central Asia, next to what would later become India under the unifying influence of the Buddhist Emperor Ashoka, who converted to Buddhism and gave up war and killing and conquest by force, instead choosing to be a kind of legendary chakravartin world-monarch, the "world" being the known world of the Rose Apple Land (Jambudvipa) or this planet in the sea of space, this (sub)continent, this extent of land surrounded by sea as far as ancient cartographers yet knew.

In an ultimate sense, Buddhism teaches that there is no "soul" (self, atman, essence), but in a conventional sense, of course there is one, and the Buddha taught the nature of it in exacting detail. That is how he came to know its ultimate nature as impersonal, empty, impermanent, and unsatisfactory. Those without understanding will become very confused and misguided. Distinguish ultimate from conventional truth at all times (Jainism).
.
Jain shape of the universe
He made such a big deal about the importance of what we allow ourselves think, say, and do -- our deeds of mind, speech, and body -- that he was called a Teacher of Karma. Karma was not taken for granted and many of us seem to think today. Some seers (rishis) knew that beings died and were reborn in accordance with their deeds, but this was not clearly understood or taught by other teachers.

Mahavira (the Nigantha Nataputta or Vardhamana) was the founder of Jainism (Jina Dharma) -- the only other surviving wandering ascetic (sramana) tradition from proto-India, the other five popular ones having gone extinct.

The Buddha explained the unfathomable working out of karma (deeds and their results), making generalizations and rules of thumb about what is, in fact, an imponderable subject. What is important is that all that we do comes back to us. It is not lost unless and until we make the ground of ripening infertile by our awakening.

This has led to many Points of Controversy, such as...

Friday, February 7, 2020

The Great Quest for Enlightenment, Pt. 2

Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson (eds.), Maha-Saccaka Sutra: "The Longer Discourse to Saccaka" (MN 36) based on Ven. Thanissaro translation, Wisdom Quarterly SEE PART 1


How did the prince become the Buddha?
The Buddha continued: (Part 1) "I thought, 'Suppose I were to practice going altogether without food.' Then devas came to me and said, 'Dear sir, please do not practice going altogether without food. If you go altogether without food, we will infuse subtle (deva-) nourishment through your pores, and you will survive on that.'

"I thought, 'If I were to claim to be completely fasting while these devas were infusing subtle nourishment through my pores, I would be lying.' So I dismissed them, saying, 'Enough.'

"I thought, 'Suppose I were to take only a little food at a time, only a handful of bean (dhal) soup, lentil soup, vetch soup, or pea soup.' So I took only a little food at a time, only a handful of bean soup, lentil soup, vetch soup, or pea soup. My body became extremely emaciated. From eating so little, my limbs became like the jointed segments of vine stems or bamboo stems...

"'My backside became like a camel's hoof... My spine stood out like a string of beads... My ribs jutted out like the jutting rafters of an old, run down barn... The gleam of my eyes appeared to be sunk deep in their sockets like the gleam of water deep in a well... My scalp shriveled and withered like a green bitter gourd, shriveled and withered in the heat and the wind... The skin of my belly became so stuck to my spine that when I touched my belly, I grabbed hold of my spine. And when I touched my spine, I grabbed hold of the skin of my belly...

"'If I urinated or defecated, I fell over on my face right there... From my eating so little, if I tried to ease my body by rubbing my limbs, the hair — shriveled at the root — fell from my body as I rubbed from eating so little.

"People seeing me would say, 'The wandering ascetic Gautama is black.' Others would say, 'He isn't black, he's brown.' Others would say, 'He is neither black nor brown, he's golden skinned.' So much had the clear, bright color of my skin deteriorated from eating so little.

"I thought, 'Whatever Brahmins or wandering ascetics in the past have felt painful, racking, piercing feelings due to their striving, this is the utmost. None have been greater than this. Whatever Brahmins or wandering ascetics in the future will feel painful, racking, piercing feelings due to striving, this is the utmost. None will be greater than this.

"'Whatever Brahmins or wandering ascetics in the present are feeling painful, racking, piercing feelings due to striving, this is the utmost. None is greater than this. But with this racking practice of austerities I have not attained any superior human state, any distinction in knowledge or vision worthy of the noble [enlightened] ones. Could there be another path to enlightenment?'


"I thought, 'I recall once, when my father the Scythian (Shakyian) was busy, and I was sitting in the cool shade of a rose apple tree [after which this world is named Jambu-dvipa], then — secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful states — I entered and remained in the first absorption (jhana) characterized by rapture [supersensual bliss] and pleasure born of [mental] seclusion [withdrawal of the senses], accompanied by applied and sustained attention.

Wandering and wandering
"'Could this be the path to enlightenment?' Then following that memory came the realization, 'This is the path to enlightenment.'

"I thought, 'So why am I afraid of pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality, nothing to do with unskillful states [such as lust, anger, delusion]?'

"I thought, 'I am no longer afraid of pleasure that has nothing to do with sensuality, nothing to do with unskillful states. But that pleasure is not easy to achieve with a body so extremely emaciated. Suppose I were to take solid food, like rice and porridge.'

"I took solid food, rice and porridge. Now five ascetics had been attending on me thinking, 'If the wandering ascetic Gautama achieves some higher state, he will tell us.'

"But when they saw me taking solid food — rice and porridge — they were disgusted and left me thinking, 'He is living luxuriously. He has abandoned his exertion and is backsliding into luxurious living.'

"When I had taken solid food and regained my strength then — secluded from sensuality, secluded from unskillful states, I entered and remained in the first absorption characterized by rapture and pleasure born of seclusion, accompanied by applied and sustained attention. But the pleasant feeling that arose in this way did not invade my mind or remain there.

"With the stilling of applied and sustained attention, I entered and remained in the second absorption characterized by rapture and pleasure born of concentration, unification (coherence) of mind, free of applied and sustained attention — internal assurance.

"But the pleasant feeling that arose in this way did not invade my mind or remain there. With the fading of rapture I remained equanimous, mindful, and alert, with pleasure experienced by the body. I entered and remained in the third absorption, of which the noble ones say, 'One has a pleasant abiding who is equanimous and mindful.'

"But the pleasant feeling that arose in this way did not invade my mind or remain there. With the abandoning of pleasure and pain — as with the earlier disappearance of elation and distress — I entered and remained in the fourth absorption characterized by purity of equanimity and mindfulness, beyond pleasure and pain. But the pleasant [neutral] feeling that arose in this way did not invade my mind or remain there.

"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, freed of defilements, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of recollecting past lives. I recollected my manifold past lives -- that is, one birth, two...five, 10...500, 100, 1,000, 100,000, many aeons of world contraction, many aeons of world expansion, many aeons of world contraction and expansion:

"'There I had such a name, belonged to such a family (extended clan), had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I reappeared there. There, too, I had such a name, belonged to such a family, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure and pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I reappeared here.' Thus I remembered my manifold past lives in general and in detail.

Light arose, knowledge arose!
"This was the knowledge attained in the first watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; light arose; darkness was dispelled — as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, and resolute. But the pleasant feeling that arose in this way did not invade my mind or remain there.

"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, freed of defilements, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of the passing away and reappearance of beings.

"I saw — by means of the divine eye [third eye], purified and surpassing the human — beings passing away and reappearing, and I understood how they are inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, fortunate and unfortunate in accordance with their karma: 'These beings — 
  • who engaged in unskillful conduct of body, speech, and mind
  • who reviled the noble ones
  • held wrong views, and
  • undertook actions (karma) under the influence of wrong views
"'— with the breakup of the body, after death, have reappeared on the plane of deprivation, the unfortunate destination, the lower realms, even in hell. But these other beings —
  • who engaged in skillful conduct of body, speech, and mind
  • who did not revile the noble ones
  • who held right views and undertook actions (karma) under the influence of right views
"'— with the breakup of the body, after death, have reappeared in the fortunate destinations, even in heavenly worlds.'

"Thus — by means of the divine eye, purified and surpassing the human — I saw beings passing away and reappearing, and I understood how they are inferior and superior, beautiful and ugly, fortunate and unfortunate in accordance with their karma.

"This was the second knowledge attained in the second watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was dispelled; light arose — as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, and resolute. But the pleasant feeling that arose in this way did not invade my mind or remain there.

The mental defilements 
Stuck in mud and defiled, we called it fun.
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, freed of defilements, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of the ending of mental defilements (avasas).

"I understood as it actually is that,
  1. 'This is suffering (disappointment, dukkha)…
  2. This is its origin...
  3. This is its cessation...
  4. This is the way (the path) leading to its cessation...
"These are defilements... This is their origin... This is their cessation... This is the way leading to their cessation.' My heart, knowing thus, seeing thus, was released from the defilement of [craving for, obsession with, addiction to] sensuality, released from the defilement of becoming, released from the defilement of ignorance.

"With this release came the knowledge, 'Released!' Discerned was this knowledge: 'Rebirth is ended, the supreme life fulfilled has been lived out, and the task is done, and therefore there is nothing more for this world.'

"This was the third knowledge attained in the third watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; light arose; darkness was dispelled — as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, and resolute. But the pleasant feeling that arose in this way did not invade mind or remain there.


"I recall having taught the Dharma to an assembly of many hundreds, and yet each one of them assumed, 'The wandering ascetic Gautama is teaching the Dharma just to me [as if it were an attack or criticism],' but it should not be seen this way.

"The Tathagata [the "One Arrived at Things Just the Way They Are"] rightly teaches them the Dharma simply for the purpose of imparting wisdom [so that the liberating knowledge and vision of hearers may arise].

"At the end of that very talk, mind was inwardly steadied, settled, concentrated, and unified on the same object of concentration as before, on which was almost constantly dwelled."

Saccaka said (with some sarcasm): "That is quite believable for Master Gautama, as would be the case for one who is worthy and rightly self-enlightened. But does the Master Gautama recall sleeping during the day?"

"Aggivessana, in the last month of the hot season, returning from alms round, after the midday meal, setting out outer robe folded in four, lying down on the right side, and falling asleep while mindful and clearly comprehending."

Saccaka added: "There are some Brahmins and wandering ascetics, Master Gautama, who would call that dwelling in delusion."

"It is not to that extent that one is deluded or undeluded, Aggivessana. As to how one is deluded or undeluded, listen and pay close attention to this."

"As you say, Master Gautama," Saccaka replied, "as you say."

The Blessed One explained: "In whomever the effluents that defile, that lead to renewed becoming, that give rise to trouble, that ripen in suffering (dukkha, disappointment), and lead to future rebirth, aging, and death are unabandoned, that person I call deluded. For it is from not abandoning the defilements that one is deluded.

"In whomever the effluents that defile, that lead to renewed becoming, that give rise to trouble, that ripen in suffering, and lead to future rebirth, aging, and death are abandoned, that person I call undeluded. For it is from abandoning the defilements that one is undeluded.

Palmyra tree stumps will not grow again.
"In the Tathagata, Aggivessana, the effluents that defile, that lead to renewed becoming, that give rise to trouble, that ripen in suffering, and lead to future rebirth, aging, and death have been abandoned, their roots destroyed, made like a palmyra tree stump [that cannot resprout once cut down], deprived of the conditions of becoming, not destined for future reappearance.

"Just as a palmyra cut off at the crown is incapable of further growth, in the same way in the Tathagata the effluents that defile, that lead to renewed becoming, that give rise to trouble, that ripen in suffering, and lead to future rebirth, aging, and death have been abandoned, their roots destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of further becoming, not destined for future reappearance."

Reaction
The Buddha's golden skin brightened.
When this was said, Saccaka the Nigantha (Jain) declared: "It is amazing, Master Gautama! It is astounding that when Master Gautama is addressed rudely — again and again and is assailed by presumptuous courses of speech — the color of his skin brightens, the color of his face clears, as would be the case with one who is worthy and rightly awakened to the utmost.

"I recall engaging Purana Kassapa in debate. He, when engaged in debate by me, spoke evasively and led the discussion astray, displayed irritation, aversion, and upset.

"But when Master Gautama is addressed rudely again and again, is assailed by presumptuous courses of speech, the color of his skin brightens, the color of his face clears, as would be the case with one who is worthy and rightly fully enlightened.

Bhikkhu Bodhi smiles in LA (WQ)
"I recall engaging Makkhali Gosala... Ajita Kesakambala... Pakudha Kaccayana... Sañjaya Velatthaputta... Nigantha Nattaputta [Mahavira, the founder of Jainism] [called the Six False Teachers in the sutras and commentaries] in debate.

"[They], when engaged in debate by me, spoke evasively and led the discussion astray, displayed irritation, aversion, and upset.

"But when Master Gautama is addressed rudely again and again, is assailed by presumptuous courses of speech, the color of his skin brightens, the color of his face clears, as would be the case with one who is worthy and rightly fully enlightened.

"And now, Master Gautama, I will go. Many are my duties, many my responsibilities."

"Then, Aggivessana, do what you think it is now time to do [as you see fit]."

So Saccaka the Nigantha, delighting in and approving of the Blessed One's words, got up from his seat and departed [Note 4].
  • 4. The sutras do not record what happened to Saccaka after this conversation. The Commentary, however, states that he was reborn many years later in Sri Lanka, where he became an arhat.