(Original inflammatory art from Nana magazine, Israel)
Usually you don't hear a whiff of bad stuff about Buddhists, who number roughly 360 million worldwide. In fact, the Karmapa Lama, one of the most important spiritual leaders of Tibetan Buddhism, is in the United States now. Read about his visit. All of 22 years old, he may be the face of world Buddhism once the Dalai Lama passes from the scene.
And to page through the glossy pages of Tricycle magazine, one would think the religion is all kurta shirts, wrap pants, dharma-matchmaking services, and cool essays on the Heart Sutra and everyday nirvana.
I was then paging through a recent issue of Free Inquiry (I get lots and lots of religious publications) and came across an essay "pro-war" Buddhist monks in Sri Lanka. Buddhism is treated as a state religion in Sri Lanka, where Buddhist extremists [allegedly] attack Christian churches -- according to the State Department's annual religious freedom report. Not that Free Inquiry, which is a secular humanist publication, is all that concerned about Sri Lankan Christians.
Crisis, a Catholic magazine, ran a piece in 2005, "Buddha's Fist," about militant Buddhists in Sri Lanka who are [supposedly] trying to pass a law banning all conversions from Buddhism to another religion. Christians -- Protestant and Catholic alike -- are [said to be] routinely slandered and their churches closed.
Free Inquiry also made the point that pre-China-takeover Tibet was hardly a paradise; in fact it was a feudal, theocratic state based on the work of thousands and thousands of serfs who, informed by Buddhist teachings on karma, were [allegedly] told they had to accept their imprisoned station in life as punishment for something they did in their past lives.
How would Chinese Buddhists, then, explain, the horrible circumstances of the May 12 [2008] earthquake in Sichuan? Did those who die simply have bad karma? Is karma, a basic Buddhist principle, innately cruel? If so, what does that make Buddhism?
— Julia Duin, assistant national editor/religion, The Washington Times
Comments
By: Biblio
It's possible that Ms. Duin's posting was consciously prevocative, meant to provoke discussion. If so, it was successful to the degree that I would like to focus on the comments made at the end of her not, as to karma and cruelty. This may be an oblique reference to the small controversy on the offhand comments by Sharon Stone as to the cause of earthquakes in China.
It's possible that Ms. Duin's posting was consciously prevocative, meant to provoke discussion. If so, it was successful to the degree that I would like to focus on the comments made at the end of her not, as to karma and cruelty. This may be an oblique reference to the small controversy on the offhand comments by Sharon Stone as to the cause of earthquakes in China.
Karma as popularly understood consists of a kind of moral retribution system, one that ignores that many events -- including many natural catastrophes -- are not seen as karmic in origin. A deeper presentation of karma can be found in the BBC News Magazine postings on the topic, "What Is Karma?" [Posted below]
No comments:
Post a Comment