Showing posts with label mahabhuta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mahabhuta. Show all posts

Saturday, September 9, 2023

Buddhism on the causes of great earthquakes

Ven. Sujato Bhikkhu (trans.) Mahāparinibbāna Sutta (DN 16), suttacentral.net; edited and expanded by Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson, and Pfc. Sandoval, Wisdom Quarterly

Mistranslated Buddha quote. (See Dhammapada)
In Buddhist texts, the Buddha gave eight causes of great (massive) earthquakes, the first so general that it could account for all of them: 

[The Buddha:] “Ānanda, there are these eight causes and reasons for a great earthquake. What are the eight? This great earth is grounded on water, the water is grounded on air, and the air stands in space. At a time when a great wind blows, it stirs the water, and the water stirs the earth.”
  • So far as it goes, this is a naturalistic explanation: The “water element” has the quality of [cohesion and] softening, while the “air element” is traditionally understood as “movement” [or flow]. Thus, in modern terms this [could mean], “When underground forces disturb a region of instability...”
“This is the first cause and reason for a great earthquake.”
  • (WQ) In Buddhism the four great "elements," dhatus or mahābhūta, are NOT really material "things," but rather qualities and characteristics of material things. (In Hinduism, they seem to be actual things). And those "material things" are called the rupa-kalapas (material particles or "atoms" in the original ancient Greek sense; in fact, it seems that the ancient Greeks got the idea of "atoms," or the smallest indivisible building blocks of materiality, from Buddhism and the Dharmic religions).
  • See Bhikkhu Bodhi (trans.) MN 140: "The Discourse on the Analysis of the Elements" or Dhātu Vibhaṅga Sutta (suttacentral.net)
  • The Four Great Elements refer to about 14 characteristics. (See the enlightened master Ven. Pa Auk Sayadaw's Four Elements Meditation to learn to discern them in this human body. It is so shockingly simple when described that it might throw one off. But if one persists in earnest practice, what was "simple" shows itself to be very difficult to master. That is, to attain absorption (jhana) using these characteristics as the object of focus until they become clear and wieldy is simple but not easy. With success, all doubt vanishes, and the profundity of the Buddha's liberating message becomes clear: These four elements are impersonal, impermanent, and disappointing; they are no basis for an eternal "self" or any kind of stable material world. That is why the self (atta or atman) and the world (material form) are always in flux.
  • The Four Great Elements are sometimes spoken of with three more, making for seven elements: earth (patthavi), water (apa), fire (teja), air (vayu); space (akasha), mind (vinñāna); and the unique "unconditioned-element" (asankhata-dhatu) nirvana.
“Furthermore, there is a wandering ascetic or Brahmin (temple priest) with psychic powers who has achieved mastery of the mind, or a shining one (deva) who is mighty and powerful. They’ve developed a limited perception of earth and a limitless perception of water. They make the earth shake and rock and tremble. This is the second cause and reason for a great earthquake.
  • The might of wandering ascetics was legendary in ancient India (e.g., MN 56:14.2). The meditation described here might be compared with the “dimensions of mastery” below (DN 16:3.25.1).
“Furthermore, when the being-intent-on-awakening [the Bodhisatta or Future-Buddha] passes away from the host of Joyful Devas [in the Tusita World], he is conceived of in his mother’s womb, mindful and aware. Then the earth shakes and rocks and trembles. This is the third cause and reason for a great earthquake....”
  • At DN 14:1.17.7 and MN 123:7.6 it is, rather, the entire galaxy [world-system or cakkavala] that trembles, perhaps indicating that the enhanced miracle is a later development [inserted into the embellished texts]. More
A disturbance in the Force

The Buddha was onto something
For the big tsunami that hit Aceh, Indonesia (2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami), Banda Aceh in particular, Western psychic Stewart Swerdlow (expansions.com) very clearly gave the unnatural reason for it.

He told us directly at Bodhi Tree Bookstore Annex in West Los Angeles, if we're remembering correctly:

The powers-that-be, that is, the military-industrial complex scientists working for covert alphabet agencies like the CIA, NSA, and NSC were trying to operate the Montauk chair, and this was causing a great disturbance.

A Disturbance in the Force (2023) - IMDb
Disturbance to what? Disturbance to the earth, water, air, and space this world is founded on. "The Force" is Star Wars speak for "Source" or "The All" that connects us like split particles bound by some force that sends information faster than the speed of light.

Shake the elements and one shakes the planet, our bhumi or platform. One may even shake the entire world-system (cakkavala) we are in.

In Buddhist cosmology, this plane we are on is bound by concentric mountainous walls, separating worlds from worlds, four or seven (Vedic Hinduism says seven) alongside each other, each with their own sun and moon (small nearby satellites of equal size), orbiting above each world within the system.

No doubt, we humans (at least those of us working for covert agencies inside black budget laboratories) are disturbing multiple neighboring dimensions.
It's natural, Honey. Just breathe it in.
When there were great quakes in China and Iran, people reported seeing strange HAARP phenomena in the sky; some even filmed it and put it on YouTube. Who knows how long it could stay posted before YouTube dutifully took it down due to some pretext of a violation when powerful parties request removal of anything for "national security."

Move along. Nuthin to see here, just condensation
"Buddha clouds" (iridescent petroleum-like colors) or isolated rainbow-colored mist from chemtrails, used in conjunction with HAARP technology, are characteristic of massive quakes to come.  Why? In general, HAARP heats up the air in space, disturbing the water and earth. Look up. What are they spraying?

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Why is rebirth not "reincarnation"?

Dharmacharis Seven and Ashley Wells, Wisdom Quarterly

Buddhism and Rebirth
Why does Buddhism call it rebirth instead of "reincarnation"? Surely these are synonyms, that is, two words that mean the exact same thing.

Incarnation means "into flesh" (carne). Re means "again." So what "reincarnation" implies is that a permanent soul or a constant self is traveling from life to life, taking up bodies on various planes of existence.

This is exactly what the Buddha taught does NOT happen -- in an ultimate sense. This is, however, what APPEARS to happen in a conventional sense. Conventionally speaking, as we use words in normal everyday language, we can say: "I will be reborn." We never question this "I." We take it for granted that it is some permanent, pleasing, personal thing.

If we did question it and investigate it (with a mind purified by right concentration and mindfulness) we would soon realize that the "self" we cling to for an entire lifetime is actually falling away every single moment. It is not the same for two consecutive moments. It does not stand even for a single moment. (It is in this sense that the Buddha speaks of radical impermanence).

Just as its factors (because the "self" is a composite not a unit) arise, they are already turning then falling. A leaf sprouts, yellows, and drops. Even as it is going from green to yellow, it is ripening to brown in an unbroken process. This is impermanence.

We are born, immediately begin aging, and fall away -- and this obvious process hides a very unobvious fact: The same thing is happening every single moment. We will not die; we are already dying. Every moment is a rebirth, a rearising.

And successively in that same moment, there is a turning and a falling away. We are always being reborn. And just as above (in an ultimate sense at the level of particle physics as understood by quantum mechanics) so below (in a conventional or Newtonian sense at the level of everyday visible objects).

  • Physically (bodily) the Four Great Elements (Mahabhuta, dhatus, or material qualities of solidity, cohesion, temperature, support) are constituents that rise and fall in a way that only physicists can normally appreciate.
  • Psychologically (mentally) the four constituents of mind (or mental activities of sensation, perception, volition [etc.], and consciousness) rise even more quickly in a way that only successful meditators can normally appreciate.

But if one is to ever achieve enlightenment (bodhi), touch nirvana, and be liberated from all suffering, one must have insight (vipassana) into why this is not what was ever happening.

There was never a "self" continuously wandering on through the Wheel of Life and Death (samsara).

We, of course, cling to our notion of an ego or a ME without seeing the truth. But it is only the truth that can set one free. What is the truth?

There are Five (ever-changing) Aggregates. They are unsatisfactory and impersonal. They arise and pass away. All claims of a self, whether in one life or across countless lives, are spoken of in relation to these five:

  1. forms (subtle or gross bodies)
  2. feelings
  3. perceptions
  4. formations
  5. consciousness

We imagine ourselves as them, apart from them, as the owner of them, and so on. We take them for granted instead of investigating them and seeing them for what each really is.


Insight means seeing (with knowledge-and-vision) directly. This is an experience not a thought experiment. It is brought about by insight practices establishing the Four Foundations of Mindfulness, which are 14 meditative exercises guaranteed to lead to enlightenment.

  • "Guaranteed"? In a remarkable statement, the Buddha concludes the Maha Satipatthana Sutra with the words: "Truly speaking, practitioners, for anyone who practices these four foundations of mindfulness in this manner for seven years then one of these two fruits may be expected: highest knowledge (full liberation) here and now or, if some remainder of clinging is yet present, the state of non-returning (the third of four stages of enlightenment). O practitioners, let alone seven years! Should any person practice these [unbroken and without intermission] for six years... five years... four years... three years... two years... one year... seven months... six months... five months... four months... three months... two months... a month... half a month... let alone half a month! Should any person practice these four foundations of mindfulness in this manner for a week then one of these two fruits may be expected: highest knowledge here and now or, if some remainder of clinging is yet present, the state of non-returning." Because of this it was said: "This is the direct way, practitioners, for the purification of beings, for the overcoming of sorrow and lamentation, for the destruction of suffering and grief, for reaching the right path, for the attainment of nirvana, namely the four foundations of mindfulness."

How to reach enlightenment
How is it done? One first develops serenity to the point of absorption (jhana) or access-concentration. Based on that secure and stable platform, which brings out what the mind is really capable of, one then takes up each of these four "foundations" to break through to freedom from all suffering.

  1. mindful contemplation of body
  2. mindful contemplation of feelings
  3. mindful contemplation of consciousness
  4. mindful contemplation of mind objects

How long does it take? It takes a week, but it may take seven years or more. It all depends on consistent practice and karma (action).

Monday, September 5, 2011

The Exposition of the Elements (Nirvana)

Wisdom Quarterly translation by Seven (Dhatuvibhanga sutra MN 140) guided by the Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli and Bhikkhu Bodhi translation
photo Big Buddha, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Thailand (Mariano Jimenez/Flickr)

1. Thus have I heard. On one occasion the Buddha was wandering in the Magadhan country. He eventually arrived at Rājagaha. And there he went to the potter Bhaggava and said to him:

2. “Bhaggava, if it is not inconvenient for you, I will stay one night in your workshop.” [This is a customary practice of wandering mendicants in India when they want lodging.]

“Venerable sir, it is not inconvenient for me. But there is a wanderer [homeless one, a spiritual mendicant] already staying there. If he agrees, venerable sir, then stay as long as you like.”

3. Now there was clansman [a fellow from the vicinity of the Buddha's birthplace] named Pukkusāti who had gone forth from the home life into homelessness out of confidence in the Buddha [without ever having met him].
  • [Pukkusāti was a warrior-caste king who had recently renounced his riches because his friend told him of the Buddha's virtues, teachings, and their benefits. That friend was King Bimbisara, the ruler of a distant country and one of the Buddha's greatest supporters. King Bimbisara ruled Magadha, the capital of which was Rajagaha, where Pukkusati was headed.]
On that occasion, he was already staying in the potter’s workshop. Then the Buddha went to Ven. Pukkusāti and said to him: “If it is not inconvenient for you, monastic (bhikkhu), I will stay one night in the workshop.”

“Friend, the potter’s workshop is large enough. Let the venerable one stay as long as he likes.”

4. Then the Blessed One entered the potter’s workshop, prepared a spread of grass [as a meditation cushion] at one end, and sat down. He folded his legs crosswise, setting his body erect, and established mindfulness in front of him.

Then the Buddha spent most of the night in seated meditation, and Ven. Pukkusāti also spent most of the night that way. Then the Buddha thought: “This clansman conducts himself in a way that inspires confidence. Suppose I were to question him.” So he asked Ven. Pukkusāti:

Buddha statue, Tashilhumpo Monastery, Shigatse, Tibet (Erwin1964/Flickr)

Who Is Your Teacher?

5. “Under whom have you gone forth, monastic? Who is your teacher? Whose doctrine (dharma) do you profess?”

“Friend, there is the recluse Gautama, the son of the Sakyans who went forth from a Sakyan clan. Now a good report of that Blessed Gautama has been spread to this effect:
  • ‘That Blessed One is accomplished, fully enlightened, perfect in true knowledge and conduct, sublime, knower of worlds, incomparable leader of persons to be tamed, teacher of devas and humans, enlightened, fortunate.’
I have gone forth under that Blessed One; that Blessed One is my teacher; I profess the doctrine
of that Blessed One.” [Without realizing it, of course, he was referring to the Buddha.]

Where Is Your Teacher?
“But, monastic, where is that Blessed One, accomplished and fully enlightened, now living?”

“Friend, there is a city in the northern country named Sāvatthī. The Blessed One, accomplished and fully enlightened, is now living there.”

“But, monastic, have you ever seen that Blessed One before? Would you recognize him if you saw him?”

“No, friend, I have never seen that Blessed One before, nor would I recognize him if I saw him.”

6. Then the Buddha thought: “This clansman has gone forth from the home life into homelessness under me. Suppose I were to teach him the Dharma.”

(equilibriumchemistry11 blog)

The Buddha Teaches the Elements-of-Being
So the Buddha addressed Ven. Pukkusāti thus: “Monastic, I will teach you the Dharma. Listen and attend closely to what I shall say.”

“Yes, friend,” Ven. Pukkusāti replied, and then the Buddha said:

7. “Monastic, this person consists of six elements, six bases of contact, 18 kinds of mental exploration, and has four foundations.

The tides of conceiving do not sweep over one who stands on these [foundations]. And when the tides of conceiving no longer sweep over him he is called a sage at peace. One should [for the sake of freedom and happiness] pursue wisdom, preserve truth, cultivate relinquishment, and train for peace. This is the summary of the exposition of the six elements.

8. “‘Monastic, this person consists of six elements.’ So it was said. With reference to what was this said?

There is the earth element, water element, fire element, air element, space element, and the consciousness element. It was said with reference to these.

9. “‘Monastic, this person consists of six bases of contact.’ So it was said. With reference to what was this said? There is the base of eye-contact, base of ear-contact, base of nose-contact, base of tongue-contact, base of body-contact, and the base of mind-contact. It was said with reference to these.

10. “‘Monastic, this person consists of 18 kinds of mental exploration.’ So it was said. With reference to what was this said? On seeing a form with the eye, one explores a form productive of joy [pleasant sensation], one explores a form productive of grief [unpleasant sensation], one explores a form productive of equanimity [neutral sensation].

On hearing a sound with the ear… smelling an odor with the nose… tasting a flavor with the tongue… touching a tangible with the body… cognizing a mind-object with the mind, one explores a mind-object productive of joy, one explores a mind-object productive of grief, one explores a mind-object productive of equanimity.

So it was with reference to these that it was said: ‘Monastic, this person consists of 18 kinds of mental exploration.’

Four Foundations

11. “‘Monastic, this person has four foundations.’ So it was said. With reference to what? There are these foundations:
  • wisdom
  • truth
  • relinquishment
  • peace
12. “‘One should pursue wisdom, preserve truth, cultivate relinquishment, and train for peace.’ So it was said. With reference to what?

13. “How, monastic, does one pursue [not neglect] wisdom? There are these six [aforementioned] elements.

Earth Element

14. “What is the earth element? It is either internal or external. What is the internal? Whatever, belonging to oneself, is solid, tangible, and clung-to -- that is, head-hairs, body-hairs, nails, teeth, skin, flesh, sinews, bones, bone-marrow, kidneys, heart, liver, diaphragm, spleen, lungs, intestines, mesentery, contents of the stomach, feces, or whatever else internally, belonging to oneself, is solid, solidified, and clung-to -- is called the internal earth element.

“Now both the internal and the external earth element are simply earth element. And that should be seen as it actually is with proper wisdom: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.’

“When one sees it as it actually is with proper wisdom, one becomes disenchanted [disillusioned] with the earth element. And the mind becomes dispassionate toward earth [does not cling to it].

Water Element

15. “What is the water element? It is either internal or external. Whatever internally, belonging to oneself, is fluid, liquid, and clung-to -- that is, bile, phlegm, pus, blood, sweat, fat, tears, grease, spittle, snot, oil-of-the-joints, urine, or whatever else internally, belonging to oneself, is fluid, liquid, and clung-to -- is called the internal water element.

“Now both the internal and the external are simply water element. And that should be seen as it actually is with proper wisdom: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.’

“When one sees it as it actually is with proper wisdom, one becomes disenchanted with the water element. And the mind becomes dispassionate toward water [does not cling to it].

Fire Element
16. “What is the fire element? It is either internal or external. Whatever internally, belonging to oneself, is fire [related to temperature, whether cold or hot], ripening [breaking down], and clung-to -- that is, that by which one is warmed, ages, and is consumed, and that by which what is eaten, drunk, consumed, and tasted gets completely digested, or whatever else internally, belonging to oneself, is fire, ripening, and clung-to -- is called the internal fire element.

“Now both the internal and the external are simply fire element. And that should be seen as it actually is with proper wisdom: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.’

“When one sees it as it actually is with proper wisdom, one becomes disenchanted with the fire element. And the mind becomes dispassionate toward fire [does not cling to it].

Air Element

17. “What is the air element? It may be either internal or external. Whatever internally, belonging to oneself, is air [various qualities that allow for movement, support, etc.], gaseous, and clung-to -- that is, up-going winds, down-going winds, winds in the belly, winds in the bowels, winds that course through the limbs [that, ultimately, make movement possible], in-breath and out-breath, or whatever else internally, belonging to oneself, is air, airy, and clung-to -- is called the internal air element.

“Now both the internal and the external are simply air element. And that should be seen as it actually is with proper wisdom: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.’

“When one sees it as it actually is with proper wisdom, one becomes disenchanted with the air element. And the mind becomes dispassionate toward air [does not cling to it].

Space Element
18. “What is the space element? It may be either internal or external. Whatever internally, belonging to oneself, is space [delimiting solids], open, and clung-to -- that is, the openings of the ears, the nostrils, the door of the mouth, and those openings whereby what is eaten, drunk, consumed, and tasted gets swallowed, and where they collect, and whereby they are excreted from below, or whatever else internally, belonging to oneself, is space, open, and clung-to -- is called the internal space element.

“Now both the internal and the external are simply space element. And that should be seen as it actually is with proper wisdom: ‘This is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.’

“When one sees it as it actually is with proper wisdom, one becomes disenchanted with the space element. And the mind becomes dispassionate toward space.


Consciousness
19. “Then there remains only consciousness, purified and bright [naturally luminous]. What does one cognize with that consciousness?

“One cognizes: ‘[This is] pleasant’; one cognizes: ‘[This is] painful’; one cognizes: ‘[This is] neither-painful-nor-pleasant [neutral].’

“In dependence on a contact to be felt as pleasant there arises a pleasant feeling. When one feels a pleasant feeling, one understands: ‘I feel a pleasant feeling.’

“One further understands: ‘With the cessation of that same contact to be felt as pleasant, its corresponding feeling -- the pleasant feeling that arose in dependence on that contact -- ceases and subsides.’

“In dependence on a contact to be felt as painful there arises a painful feeling....

“In dependence on a contact to be felt as neither-painful-nor-pleasant there arises a neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling....

“Just as from contact and friction between two fire-sticks heat is generated and fire is produced -- and with the separation of the fire-sticks, the corresponding heat ceases and subsides -- so too, in dependence on a contact… to be felt as painful… to be felt as neither-painful-nor-pleasant there arises a neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling… One understands: ‘With the cessation of that same contact... [and] its corresponding feeling… ceases and subsides.’

Equanimity

20. “Then there remains only equanimity, purified and bright, malleable, wieldy, and radiant. Suppose a skilled goldsmith or an apprentice were to prepare a furnace, heat a crucible, grasp gold with tongs, and put it into the crucible.

“From time to time he would blow on it. From time to time he would sprinkle water on it. And from time to time he would just look on. [In this way] that gold would become refined, well refined, completely refined, faultless, rid of dross, malleable, wieldy, and radiant.

“Then whatever kind of ornament he wished to make, whether a golden chain or earrings or a necklace or a golden garland, it would serve this purpose.

“So, too, there remains only equanimity, purified and bright, malleable, wieldy, and radiant.

21. “One understands: ‘If I were to direct this equanimity, so purified and bright, to the base of boundless space and to develop my mind accordingly, then this equanimity of mine, supported by that base, clinging to it, would remain for a very long time.

“If I were to direct this equanimity, so purified and bright, to the base of boundless consciousness… to the base of nothingness… to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception and to develop my mind accordingly, then this equanimity of mine, supported by that base, clinging to it, would remain for a very long time.’

22. “One understands: ‘If I were to direct this equanimity, so purified and bright, to the base of boundless space and to develop my mind accordingly, this would be conditioned [dependent on conditions, arising in complete dependence on conditions].

“If I were to direct this equanimity, so purified and bright, to the base of boundless consciousness… to the base of nothingness… to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception and to develop my mind accordingly, this would be conditioned.’

Nirvana (the Unconditioned Element)

“One does not form any condition or generate any volition tending toward either being or non-being. Since one does not form any condition or generate any volition tending toward either being or non-being, one does not cling to anything in this world.

“When one does not cling, one is not agitated. When one is not agitated, one personally experiences nirvana.

“One understands: ‘Birth is destroyed, the high life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more coming to any state.’

23. “If one feels [experiences] a pleasant feeling, one understands: ‘It is impermanent; there is no holding on to it; there is no delight in it.’

“If he feels a painful feeling, one understands: ‘It is impermanent; there is no holding on to it; there is no delight in it.’

“If one feels a neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling, one understands: ‘It is impermanent; there is no holding on to it; there is no delight in it.’

24. “If one feels a pleasant feeling, one feels it detached; if one feels a painful feeling, one feels it detached; if one feels a neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling, one feels it detached.

“When one feels a feeling terminating with the body, one understands: ‘I feel a feeling terminating with the body.’ When one feels a feeling terminating with life, one understands: ‘I feel a feeling terminating with life.’

“One understands: ‘On the dissolution of the body, with the ending of life, all that is felt, not being delighted in, will become cool [nirvanered because nirvana is not a thing or place but a quenching, a cooling, a slaking, a fading, a going out, an ending of all suffering] right here.’

“Just as an oil-lamp [with an ultimately illusory flame] burns in dependence on oil and a wick, and when the oil and wick are used up, if it does not get any more fuel, it is extinguished from lack of fuel. So, too, when one feels a feeling terminating with the body… a feeling terminating with life, one understands: ‘I feel a feeling terminating with life.’

“One understands: ‘On the dissolution of the body, with the ending of life, all that is felt, not being delighted in, will become cool right here.’

25. “Therefore a practitioner possessing [this wisdom] possesses the supreme foundation of wisdom. For this is the supreme noble wisdom, namely, the knowledge of the destruction of all suffering.

26. “One's deliverance, being founded upon truth, is unshakable. For that is false which has a deceptive nature, and that is true which has an undeceptive nature -- nirvana.

“Therefore a practitioner possessing [this truth] possesses the supreme foundation of truth. For this is the supreme noble truth, namely, nirvana, which has an undeceptive nature.



Complete Freedom

27. “Formerly, when one was ignorant, one undertook and accepted acquisitions [grasped at things one mistook as I, me, or mine]. Now one has abandoned them, cut them off at the root, made them like a palm stump [which will not regenerate, unlike other trees which with roots intact will grow again], done away with them so that they are no longer subject to arising in the future.

“Therefore a practitioner possessing [this relinquishment] possesses the supreme foundation of relinquishment. For this is the supreme noble relinquishment, namely, the relinquishing [abandoning] of all acquisitions.

28. “Formerly, when one was ignorant, one experienced covetousness [greed], desire, and lust. Now one has abandoned them, cut them off at the root, made them like a palm stump, done away with them so that they are no longer subject to arising in the future.

“Formerly, when one was ignorant, one experienced anger, ill will, and hate. Now one has abandoned them, cut them off at the root, made them like a palm stump, done away with them so that they are no longer subject to arising in the future.

“Formerly, when one was ignorant, one experienced ignorance and delusion [with regard to the Four Noble Truths and complete liberation from suffering]. Now one has abandoned them, cut them off at the root, made them like a palm stump, done away with them so that they are no longer subject to arising in the future.

Peace

“Therefore a practitioner possessing [this peace] possesses the supreme foundation of peace. For this is the supreme noble peace, namely, the pacification [appeasing] of lust, hate, and delusion.

29. “So it was with reference to this that it was said: ‘One should [for the sake of freedom and happiness] pursue wisdom, preserve truth, cultivate relinquishment, and train for peace.’

30. “‘The tides of conceiving do not sweep over one who stands on these [foundations]. And when the tides of conceiving no longer sweep over one, that person is called a sage at peace.’ So it was said. With reference to what was this said?

Conceiving

31. “Monastic, ‘I am’ is a conceiving;
  • ‘I am this’ is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall be’ is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall not be’ is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall be possessed of form’ is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall be formless’ [on a formless plane of existence] is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall be percipient’ is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall be non-percipient’ [on an unconscious plane of existence] is a conceiving;
  • ‘I shall be neither-percipient-nor-non-percipient’ is a conceiving.
“Conceiving is a disease, conceiving is a tumor, conceiving is a dart. By overcoming all conceivings [deluded conceptions, "thought coverings"], monastic, one is called a sage at peace.

“And the sage at peace is not reborn, does not age, does not die; one is not shaken and is not agitated. For [what can upset as is asked in the Heart Sutra] there is nothing present in one by which one might be reborn.

“Not being reborn, how could one age? Not aging, how could one die? Not dying, how could one be shaken? Not being shaken, why should one be agitated?

32. “So it was with reference to this that it was said: ‘The tides of conceiving do not sweep over one who stands on these [foundations]. And when the tides of conceiving no longer sweep over one, that person is called a sage at peace.’

“Monastic, bear in mind this brief exposition of the six elements.”

33. Thereupon, Ven. Pukkusāti thought: “Indeed, the Teacher has come to me! The Sublime One has come to me! The Fully Enlightened One has come to me!”

Then he rose from his seat, arranged his upper robe over one shoulder, and prostrating himself with his head at the Buddha’s feet [all customary marks of respect in ancient India], he said:

“Venerable sir, a transgression overcame me, in that foolishly, confused and blundering, I presumed to address the Blessed One as ‘friend.’ Venerable sir, may the Blessed One forgive my transgression seen as such for the sake of restraint in the future.”

“Surely, monastic, a transgression overcame you, in that foolishly, confused and blundering, you presumed to address me as ‘friend.’ But since you see your transgression as such and make amends in accordance with the Dharma [Doctrine and Discipline], it is forgiven. For it is growth in the Noble One’s Discipline when one sees one’s transgression as such, makes amends in accordance with the Dharma, and undertakes restraint in the future.”

34. “Venerable sir, I would receive the full admission [which would make Pukkusati not a monastic, as the Buddha has been addressing him, but an Indian sannyasi or a Buddhist novice at best] under the Blessed One.”

“But are your bowl and robes complete, monastic?”

“Venerable sir, my bowl and robes are not complete.”

“Monastic, Tathāgatas [Buddhas] do not give the full admission to anyone whose bowl and robes are not complete.”

35. Then Ven. Pukkusāti, having delighted and rejoiced in the Buddha’s words, rose from his seat. And after paying homage to the Buddha and keeping him on his right [more signs of respect], he departed search of bowl and robes.

But while he was searching for bowl and robes, a stray cow killed him.

36. Then a number of monastics went to the Buddha. And after paying their respects to him, they sat down at one side and told him: “Venerable sir, the clansman Pukkusāti, who was given brief instruction by the Blessed One, has died. What is his destination? What is his future course [of rebirth]?”

“Monastics, the clansman Pukkusāti was wise. He practiced in accordance with the Dharma and did not trouble me in the interpretation of the Dharma. With the destruction of the five lower fetters, the clansman Pukkusāti has reappeared spontaneously [in the Pure Abodes] and will attain final nirvana there without ever returning from that world.”

That is what the Enlightened One said. The monastics were satisfied and delighted in the Blessed One’s words.

Thursday, September 24, 2009