Chemtrails in the sky: What and why? (video)

Dane Wigington (geoengineeringwatch.org); Pat Macpherson, Pfc. Sandoval, Seth Auberon, CC Liu (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly; Truthmediaproductions.us

Fake CGI livestream from NASA feed with fatal flaws and bloopers. See video below.

GEOENGINEERING

What the Hades are they spraying up there?

Geoengineering is the artificial modification of earth's climate systems through two primary ideologies, solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR).

 

CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL (CDR)

Carbon dioxide removal and sequestration uses artificial means, trees, ocean fertilization, and so on. These projects are for the most part declassified. This method of geoengineering is NOT the focus of GeoEngineeringWatch.org.
 
SOLAR RADIATION MANAGEMENT (SRM)

I have no idea. It looks like nano-aluminum.

Solar radiation management (SRM) is reflecting or blocking sunlight before it reaches the planet (as with cloud cover, particulate matter, "global cooling" strategies.

 

STRATOSPHERIC SULFATE AEROSOLS GEO-ENGINEERING (SAG-SRM)

Chemtrails high over the Los Angeles skyline, cloud cover, mist, and smog (scpr.org)

• What in the World Are They Spraying? The Chemtrail/Geo-Engineering Coverup Revealed: We can see crisscrossing (crosshatch, hashtag) streaks of white "clouds" trailing behind jet aircraft, from horizon to horizon, eventually [absorbing moisture and] turning the sky into a murky, gauzy haze. Something tells us these are not the condensation vapor trails (contrails) from hot jet engines. Let's probe two questions, Who and why is someone doing this? This video explains a rapidly growing industry called "geo-engineering." It is driven by governments, corporations, and nonpublic scientists intent on altering the global climate, controlling the weather, and changing the chemical composition of soil [making it too alkaline to grow plants] and water [making it too contaminated to safely drink] -- all supposedly for the betterment of humankind. Though some officials insist these programs are only in the discussion phase, evidence is plentiful that they have been underway since about 1990. The effects have been devastating on crops, wildlife, and human health. We are being sprayed with toxic substances (nano particles) without our consent. And to add insult to injury, they are lying about it. Produced by G. Edward Griffin, Michael Murphy, and Paul Wittenberger (realityzone.com/whatspray....). Make copies and freely distribute; order DVDs at truthmediaproductions.us.

What Are They Spraying? Investigate

The ability of stratospheric sulfate aerosols to create a global dimming (and cooling) effects has made them a candidate for geoengineering projects.

The purpose would be to limit the effect and impact of climate change due to rising levels of greenhouse gases [particularly methane, which in the short run if up to 1,000 times more heat-trapping than carbon dioxide].

Delivery of precursor sulfide gases such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) by artillery, aircraft, and balloons has been proposed.

 

Tom Wigley calculated the impact of injecting sulfate particles, or aerosol dispersants, every one to four years into the stratosphere in amounts equal to those lofted by the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991.

But Wigley did not address the many technical and political challenges involved in potential geoengineering efforts. If found to be economically, environmentally, and technologically viable, such injections could provide a “grace period” of up to 20 years before major cutbacks in greenhouse gas emissions would be required, he concludes.

WARNING: You will look up, you will question, you will be ridiculed and dismissed!

(Truthmediaproduction) Now that we know WHAT, the question to ask is WHY?

• Why In The World Are They Spraying: People around the world are noticing that our planet's weather is dramatically changing. They are also beginning to notice the long lingering trails left behind airplanes. This has lead millions to accept that chemtrail spraying/geoengineering programs are a reality. Could there be a connection between chemtrails and severe weather? While there are many agendas associated with these damaging programs, evidence is now abundant that proves that geoengineering can be used to control weather. This documentary shows how aerosols sprayed into our sky are used in conjunction with other technologies to control our weather... Directed/produced by Michael J. Murphy. Produced/edited by Barry Kolsky. Written by Michael J. Murphy and Barry Kolsky (witwats.com).

Paul Crutzen proposes direct delivery of precursors. This would typically be achieved using sulfide gases such as dimethyl sulfide, sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbonyl sulfide, or hydrogen sulfide (H2S).

These compounds would be delivered using artillery, aircraft (such as the high-flying F15C), or balloons. Use would result in the formation of compounds with the sulfate anion SO42.

According to estimates by the Council on Foreign Relations, “one kilogram of well placed sulfur in the stratosphere would roughly offset the warming effect of several hundred thousand kilograms of carbon dioxide.”

 

CHEMTRAILING

Chemtrailing is the public's term for the classified and ONGOING artificial modification of earth's climate systems using reflective nano-materials (aerosols, particulate matter) to reflect sunlight. These aerosols are dispersed via jet aircraft trails that expand into reflective artificial clouds. More

But NASA and NOAA wouldn't lie to us

• geoengineeringwatch.org
• iTunes.Apple.com/us/app/geoengineering-watch

Elusive "Antimatter" trapped in Lab

LiveScience.com (June 6, 2011) According to the laws of physics, the world should not exist. To explain why we're here, scientists are re-creating the universe's fiery beginnings by pitting matter against antimatter and watching them annihilate (popsci.com).

Antimatter, an elusive type of matter [Buddhist, rupa] that's rare in the universe, has now been trapped for more than 16 minutes -- an eternity in particle physics.

In fact, scientists who've been trapping antihydrogen atoms at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva say isolating the exotic particles has become so routine that they expect to soon begin experiments on this rare substance.

Antimatter is like a mirror image of matter. For every matter particle (a hydrogen atom, for example), a matching antimatter particle is thought to exist (in this case, an antihydrogen atom) with the same mass, but the opposite charge.

"We've trapped antihydrogen atoms for as long as 1,000 seconds, which is forever" in the world of high-energy particle physics, said Joel Fajans, a University of California, Berkeley professor of physics who is a faculty scientist at California's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a member of the ALPHA (Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus) experiment at CERN.

All matter (gross and fine, sensual and supersensual) is subordinate to mind; yet, mind and matter are interdependent everywhere except the four immaterial (arupa) planes, which are mind only. See Buddhist cosmology's 31 Planes of Existence.

Trapping antimatter is difficult, because when it comes into contact with matter, the two annihilate each other. So a container for antimatter can't be made of regular matter, but is usually formed with magnetic fields. More

Strange Quarks and Muons, Oh my! Nature's tiniest particles dissected
Wacky Physics: The coolest little particles in nature
Twisted Physics: 7 mind-blowing findings

Danger: Incense

Long-Term Exposure to Incense Raises Cancer Risk

Amanda Gardner (HealthDay News 8/25/08)

Exposure to burning incense over long periods of time raises the risk of developing cancers of the upper respiratory tract, a new study shows.

Interestingly, the practice did not increase the overall risk of lung cancer.

"Given that our results are backed by numerous experimental studies showing that incense is a powerful producer of particulate matter and that incense smoke contains carcinogenic substances, I believe incense should be used with caution," said study author Dr. Jeppe Friborg, of the department of epidemiology research at Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. "That is, frequent use in rooms where people live should be minimized, or at least sufficient ventilation should be secured. In our study, we find the increased risk of cancer to be present in individuals reporting frequent use of incense for many years, thus, repeated exposure for years should probably be avoided."

Some believe that incense does more than brighten a room with fragrance (Spiritual Science Research Foundation).

Others echoed the thought. "The American Lung Association is going to add it as a risk factor," said Dr. Norman Edelman, chief medical officer of the association. "It's not nearly the danger of smoking a pack a day for 20 years, but it's a danger."

Not only is incense burned regularly as part of daily life in large swaths of Asia, the practice is also popular among certain segments in the West.

Incense burning produces particulate matter and is known to contain possible carcinogens such as polyaromatic hyodrcarbons (PAHs), carbonyls and benzene.

There have also been reports linking the burning of incense with cancer but the results have been inconsistent.

For this study, researchers conducted face-to-face interviews with more than 61,000 Singapore Chinese aged 45 to 74 who were cancer-free at the beginning of the study.

Incense burning almost doubled the risk of developing squamous cell upper respiratory tract carcinomas including nasal/sinus, tongue, mouth, and laryngeal. There was an increased risk both in smokers and in nonsmokers, pointing to an independent effect of incense smoke.

There was no overall increased risk of lung cancer, but it did heighten the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Will incense go the way of tobacco? Not necessarily, said some experts.

"Certainly I think bathing yourself in particles is probably not the smartest thing in the world . . . but I think very few people fill up their room with incense," said Dr. Arthur Frankel, a professor of medicine at Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine and director of the Cancer Center, Cancer Research Institute and Division of Hematology/Oncology at Scott & White in Temple.

The findings, which are in the Oct. 1 issue of Cancer, might also point researchers toward other household practices that should be investigated.

"It's a population-based study, which means that you can make an association but not necessarily a conclusion," said Dr. Erin Fleener, a clinical assistant professor in internal medicine at the Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine and an oncologist at the Bryan-College Station Cancer Clinic. "It probably promotes more work in the area of routine household items and things we need to be looking at more prospectively to make a clear cause-and-effect relationship."

In general, though, it's not a bad idea to avoid environmental pollutants of various types.

"Anything that affects air quality negatively is not a good thing," said Dr. Len Horvitz, a pulmonary specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "Burning in general and the release of smoke, these things are certainly to be avoided. At the very least, chemical irritants will set off asthma, and that's reversible. Cancer is not reversible."

"This is not unlike the type of risk that one experiences from secondhand tobacco smoke," said Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. "At the end of the day, people who use incense casually, I don't think that's a cause for major concern, but those cultures which embrace incense as part of their daily lifestyles have to consider this has a real potential risk for cancer."

More information
Visit the National Cancer Institute for more on respiratory cancers.