Showing posts with label Ayya Tataaloka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ayya Tataaloka. Show all posts

Monday, May 11, 2026

Eight added rules for nuns are untrue


Ayya Tathālokā: Venerable Bhikkhunī Tathālokā Mahātherī is an American-born Theravada Buddhist nun (bhikkhunī), scholar, and teacher.

She is the co-founder of the Dhammadharini monastic community in California, which includes Dhammadharini Monastery [Nunnery, Abbey, Hermitage] (formerly Dhammadharini Vihara), and Aranya Bodhi Hermitage [1].

She was the recipient of the 2006 Outstanding Women in Buddhism Award, a presenting scholar at the 2007 International Congress on Buddhist Women's Role in the Sangha, and was appointed preceptor for the historically-significant 2009 Bhikkhuni Ordination held in Perth, Australia [2, 3].

Early life
Born Heather Buske in Washington, D.C., in 1968, Ven. Tathālokā’s parents encouraged her to develop the skills necessary to look for what is true. She had early exposure to the texts of the Pali canon and was inspired by reading about the bhikkhunīs at the time of the historical Buddha. At the age of 19, she left college to pursue monastic life in Europe then in India... More:

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Evening with American nun Tathaaloka (Feb 4)

Ven. Tathaaloka; InsightLA.org; Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly


Join Ven. Tathaaloka at InsightLA's East Hollywood for meditation with a Dharma talk and discussion.


ABOUT: Ven. Tathaaloka Theri was born in Washington, DC in 1968 to environmentally-minded scientist parents. She followed her mother’s example by observing nature for answers and for peace and her father’s example of inquiry through scientific research and investigation. At 19, urgently inspired by the sudden death of someone with whom she’d been close, she left college and made her way to Europe and India, entering monastic life as a trainee-renunciate (anagarika). Later she met her female mentor in Buddhist monastic life in South Korea, Elder Myeong Seong Sunim, under whose guidance she trained for 10 years. Ven. Tathaaloka received her “going forth” with her nun mentor in 1993 and novice (samaneri) precepts in 1995. Returning to the US in early 1996, she received full nun ordination (bhikkhuni upasampada) with an international gathering of Monk and Nun Sanghas in Los Angeles in 1997, with the late Ven. Ratanasara Mahathera as her preceptor (pajjhaya). Since then she has focused on studying and practicing this Doctrine and Discipline (Dharma-Vinaya) and has conducted research in comparative nun's monastic discipline (vinaya) and world Nun's Order history, contributing articles on these subjects. Recognizing the growing number of Theravada nuns and novices in the US and the true value of coming together in harmony, she proposed and participated in the founding of the North American Bhikkhuni Association (NABA) in 2005. Several months later, she also participated in founding the Dhammadharini Vihara and the Dhammadharini Support Foundation. In 2009, she received the gift of use of a forest, coastal redwood land, for an off-the-grid women’s monastic hermitage called Aranya Bodhi. She currently resides as the abbess of Dhammadharini Vihara in Santa Rosa and the Aranya Bodhi Hermitage on the Sonoma Coast in Northern California, where she provides spiritual guidance and monastic training in conjunction with hermitage prioress Ven. Ayya Sobhana. Ven. Tathaaloka is the second Western woman to be designated as Theravada Bhikkhuni preceptor (pavattini/upajjhaya); she also serves as a senior monastic advisor to the Dhammadharini Support Foundation, the Alliance of Bhikkhunis, and Sakyadhita USA.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Buddhism in a Nutshell

Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, Crystal Quintero (eds.),  Wisdom Quarterly; Narada Maha Thera, Buddhism in a Nutshell (Budsas.org); photographer Cyrille Gibot, Sri Lanka
The historical Buddha carved in stone, Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka (Sallyrango/flickr.com)
.
Buddha and His Teachings
Buddhism in a Nutshell first appeared in 1933. Since then several editions have been published by various philanthropists for free distribution. For a fuller exposition of the subjects dealt with here, readers may refer to the revised and enlarged edition of The Buddha and His Teachings published in 1980.
— Ven. Narada, Vajirarama, Sri Lanka, May 7, 1982

Ordinarily the enjoyment of sensual pleasures is the highest and only happiness of the average person.

There is no doubt that there is a kind of momentary happiness in the anticipation, gratification, and retrospection of fleeting physical pleasures, albeit illusive and temporary, but craving and clinging to them cause a great deal of pain. According to the Buddha non-attachment is a greater bliss.
 
The Buddha did not expect followers to be constantly pondering unsatisfactoriness (dukkha, woe, ill, suffering, disappointment) and lead a miserable or unhappy life. He exhorts them to be always happy and cheerful, for joy (piti) is one of the Seven Factors of Enlightenment.
 
Real happiness is found within and is not defined in terms of wealth, children, honors, or fame. If such possessions are misdirected, forcibly or unjustly obtained, misappropriated, or even viewed with attachment, they will be a source of pain and sorrow to the possessors.
 
Instead of trying to rationalize the existence of suffering, Buddhism acknowledges it and seeks its cause to uproot it. Suffering exists as long as there is craving to some things based on ignorance and associated with aversion to other things. It can only be ended by practicing the Noble Eightfold Path and attaining the supreme peace and safety of nirvana.
 
Buddha Aukana, Sri Lanka (Cyrille Gibot/flickr)
The Four Nobe Truths -- that there is suffering, that it has a cause, that it can be brought to an end, and the path to its end -- can be verified by human experience.

So the Buddha-Dharma does not rely on a fear of the unknown, but is founded on a bedrock of facts that can be tested for oneself and verified by personal experience. Buddhism is therefore rational and intensely practical with a mystical side that can be experienced.
 
Such a rational and practical system cannot contain irresolvable mysteries or esoteric doctrines. Blind faith, therefore, has no place in Buddhism. Free of blind faith there can be no coercion or persecution or fanaticism.

To the unique credit of Buddhism is that throughout its peaceful march of 2,600 years no drop of blood was shed in the name of the Buddha, no mighty monarch wielded his powerful sword to propagate the Dharma (Teaching), and no conversion was made either by force or by repulsive methods. Yet, the Buddha was the first and the greatest missionary in history.
 
Aldous Huxley writes: "Alone of all the great world religions Buddhism made its way without persecution censorship or inquisition."
 
Lord Russell remarks: "Of the great religions of history, I prefer Buddhism, especially in its earliest forms; because it has had the smallest element of persecution."
 
In the name of Buddhism no altar was reddened with the blood of a Hypatia, no Bruno was burnt alive.
 
Buddhism appeals more to the intellect than to the emotion. It is concerned more with the character of the devotees than with their numerical strength.

Women visit Anuradhapura (Cyrille Gibot)
On one occasion Upali, a follower of Jainism's Mahavira (Nigantha Nataputta), approached the Buddha and was so pleased with the Buddha's exposition of the Dharma that he instantly expressed his desire to become a follower of the Buddha. But the Buddha cautioned him, saying:
 
"In truth, O householder, make a thorough investigation! It is good for a distinguished person like you to (first) make a thorough investigation."

Upali, who was overjoyed at this unexpected remark of the Buddha, responded: "Venerable sir, had I become a follower of another teaching, its adherents would have taken me around the streets in a procession proclaiming that such and such a millionaire has renounced his former faith and embraced theirs.

"But, venerable sir, your reverence advises me to investigate further. All the more pleased am I with this remark of yours. For the second time, venerable sir, I go for guidance to the Buddha, Dharma, and the Sangha [enlightened community]."
 
Buddhism is saturated with this spirit of free enquiry and complete tolerance. It is the teaching of the open mind and the sympathetic heart that, lighting and warming the whole universe with its twin rays of wisdom and compassion, sheds a genial glow on every being struggling in the ocean of birth and death.
 
The Buddha was so tolerant that he did not even exercise his power to give commandments to his lay followers. Instead of using the imperative, he said: "It behooves us to do this -- and it behooves us not to do that." He exhorts but does not command.
 
The Buddha in Kandy, near the relic of the tooth, Sri Lanka (Tam Church/flickr)
 
This tolerance the Buddha extended to men, women, children, and all living beings.
 
It was the Buddha who first attempted to abolish slavery and vehemently protested against the degrading caste system which was firmly rooted in India (the various independent kingdoms of the day). In the words of the Buddha, it is not by mere birth that one becomes an outcast or a noble, but by one's actions (karma). Caste or color does not preclude one from becoming a Buddhist or from entering the Monastic Order.

Fishermen, scavengers, courtesans, together with warriors and Brahmins were freely admitted to the Monastic Order and enjoyed equal privileges and were also given positions of rank. Upali, the barber, for instance, was made in preference to all others the chief in matters pertaining to monastic discipline (Vinaya).
  • Sunita, the timid  scavenger, who attained arhatship or full enlightenment, was admitted by the Buddha into the Monastic Order.
  • Angulimala, the mass murderer, was converted into a compassionate saint.
  • Alavaka the fierce yakkha went for guidance to the Buddha and became a saint.
  • Ambapali the courtesan entered the Monastic Order and attained arhatship.
Such instances could easily be multiplied from the Three Divisions, the Tipitaka, to show that the portals of Buddhism were wide open to all, irrespective of caste, color, rank, or riches.
 
Ayya Tathaloka (right) and other Buddhist nuns visit temple, Aug. 2010 (WR)
.
The Buddha raised the status of downtrodden women and not only brought them to a realization of their importance to society but also founded the first religious order for women with rules and regulations. (Mahavira and the Jains preceded the Buddha in this respect, but the Buddha was the first leader of a universal religion to give women this opportunity. It seems the monks soon made rules to subordinate women saying the Buddha had laid those eight "heavy rules" or garudhammas down, which is contradicted by textual evidence in the Bhikkhuni Vinaya. (See Ven. Tathaloka). 
The Buddha uplifted women, while recognizing gender differences. Seeing the innate good of people, he assigned them due places in his dispensation, such as assigning the nuns Khema and Uppalavanna as chief disciples who helped bring women to enlightenment the way the monks Sariputra and Maha Moggallana were doing at the men's monastery. Biological sex is no barrier to attaining sainthood, namely, the purified progressive stages of enlightenment.
 
Sometimes the Pali language term used to denote women is matugama, which means "mother-folk" or "society of mothers." Even the wife is regarded as the "best friend" (parama sakha) of the husband.
 
Buddha at Bentotagama vihara, Sri Lanka
Hasty critics are only making ex parte statements when they reproach Buddhism with being inimical to women. Although monks say that at first the Buddha refused to admit women into the Monastic Order, he yielded to the entreaties of his foster-mother, Pajapati Gotami, who became the world's first Buddhist nun and founder of the Nuns' Order.

In addition to the arhats and chief female disciples Khema and Uppalavanna, many other female disciples were named by the Buddha as his distinguished disciples.
 
On one occasion the Buddha said to King Kosala, who was displeased on hearing that a daughter was born to him: "A female child, O king, may prove even better offspring than a male."
Many women, who otherwise would have fallen into oblivion, distinguished themselves in various ways and gained their liberation by following the Dharma and entering the Monastic Order. In this new organization -- which later proved to be a great blessing to many women, queens, princesses, daughters of noble families, widows, bereaved mothers, destitute women, and poor courtesans -- all met on a common platform despite their caste or rank. In it they enjoyed perfect consolation and peace and breathed that free atmosphere which is denied to those cloistered in cottages and palatial mansions. More

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Buddhist monk on Gender Equality (video)

Claralynn N. (United Kingdom); Dhr. Seven, Ashley Wells, Seth Auberon, Amber Larson, Wisdom Quarterly; Abbot Ajahn Brahmavamso (BuddhistSocietyWA, June 27, 2014)

BuddhistSocietyWAPERTH, Western Australia - Ajahn Brahm -- an enlightened Western Buddhist monk from England living in Australia after a decade in Northeast Thailand (Isan) at Wat Pah Nanachat, the International Forest Monastery -- talks about the banning of his United Nations' speech on gender equity, equality of the sexes.

Viewers who support Wisdom Quarterly and women's right to full ordination in Theravada Buddhism as well as supporting Ajahn Brahm's work striving for the equality of females within all Buddhist schools, particularly his more traditional and monastic tradition, are encouraged to consider signing the online petition here.
  • Sangha: nuns, monks, female, male supporters.
    Traditionally, it was thought that women could no longer secured full ordination due to a rule the Buddha laid down when his foster mother ordained. However, evidence found in the background stories (Vibhanga) of the Nuns' Disciplinary Code (Bhikkhuni Vinaya), research by the Theravada nun Ayya Tathaloka, shows that those rules or garudhammas are a historical impossibility. Had the Buddha laid them down with all the fanfare in front of the Shakyan women as is claimed, questions would not have arisen regarding etiquette between male and female monastics and ordination, as those would have been settled issues. But that questions did arise, as recorded in the stories accompanying the formation of each rule, those sexist and patriarchal garudhammas could not have been preexisted. The function of these additional rules seems to be little more than to subordinate female Sangha members to males and was clearly in the interest of monks to have hastily inserted at some point in time.
Let's invite Ajahn Brahm to present his gender equality paper at the 2015 UNDV conference
United Nations Day of Vesak (UNDV): Invite Ajahn Brahm to present his gender equality paper @ the 2015 UNDV conference
3,242 signers so far. Let's reach 10,000 United Nations' Day of Vesak (UNDV)
 
Supporting Buddhist women at the U.N.
Nuns are necessary for a complete Sangha
We, the undersigned, are astounded and deeply disappointed by the banning of Ajahn Brahm's paper on gender equality at the 2014 United Nations' Day of Vesak (UNDV) conference in Vietnam.
 
The paper was clearly aligned with the UN’s Millennium Development Goal 3 (Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women), which the UNDV is committed to uphold through its connection with the UN. Moreover, Ajahn Brahm's paper had already been approved for presentation when it was suddenly banned 36 hours before its scheduled presentation.
 
We value free and open dialogue. We therefore ask that the UNDV, in accordance with Millennium Development Goal 3, promotes dialogue about the participation of women in contemporary Theravada Buddhism by inviting Ajahn Brahm to publicly present his gender equality paper at the next UNDV conference in 2015.
(To view signers, go to petition2014.org. This petition will remain open until October 1st, 2014. The petition can be read in Chinese (petition2014.org/2001325991.html), Thai and Vietnamese (petition2014.org/3616363436253634365236073618-vi7879t.html), and Sinhalese (petition2014.org/35233538345835243517.html).

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

"Unlawful Sexual Practices"

Maya, Ashley Wells, Wisdom Quarterly; "Ask Maya" with commentator Jeffery Kaung
Sex is bad? Don't look at it. Don't think about it. And whatever you do, don't wish for it. That's what our parents teach us, but that's not what the Buddha taught lay Buddhists.
  
According to an eminent abbot in Theravada Burma, the words "unlawful sexual practice" would be more clear and effective than simply "sexual misconduct" for defining the Pali term kamesu micchacara.

In the Pali language discourses expounded by the Buddha, he described altogether 20 types of females [not 10, Jeffery Kaung?] with whom males should avoid having penetrative sexual intercourse.
  • See Buddhism's "Sexual Misconduct" Defined for the ten types of females who are off limits, at least from the perspective of ancient Indian society and possibly universally. We are awaiting Kaung's list of 20.
What did the Buddha teach any why? (HSUN)
Every male who is engaged in these forms of sexual relations with any of these females was said to be guilty of dire misconduct that results in the worst kinds of karmic consequences.

But for females, not every female from the given group of 20 is similarly guilty. In other words, only 12 women from the group are guilty for engaging in sex, and most of these females have already been married off or become "owned" by a particular male and his family.

[It should not come as a surprise to Western readers that women were treated like chattel in European marriage contracts until very recently, and the practice is followed to this day in many places including Asia and India in particular.]

The rest of the females in the classification are not guilty since they are not married or have no contractual "owner" yet. Besides, in some of the Buddha's sutras, he encouraged most lay disciples to practice celibacy. 

Believe it or not, females have sexual agency
[We do not know of a single discourse that encourages lay celibacy except as an occasional practice for uposatha lunar observance days and periods of intensive Buddhist practice, such as meditation retreats, temporary ordination, or as the natural consequence of spiritual attainments such as the blissful absorptions and the permanent liberations beyond stream entry and once returning. Please specify, Kaung. We would be very happy to examine these sutra references.]

However, the Buddha said that if one fails to be completely celibate, because s/he is already married, then one should always refrain from "unlawful sexual practices" in his/her everyday life -- as a person with clean feet [avoids a puddle of urine on the road].

Besides, the Buddha also described four (4) features that lead a sexual relationship between a male and a female to be "unlawful conduct." In fact, the Buddha had already mentioned in his discourses how it was "noble" [enlightened] for one [with noble attainments] to stay celibate. However, he said that if one could not practice celibacy because he/she was already married...

[Kaung, if you cite these sutras, we can respond and clarify. Maybe the Buddha wants everyone to be happy, and maybe celibacy is the supreme vehicle/teaching (brahma-acharya) toward that, but it's not something he said lay Buddhists should do or had to do.

Living beings are reborn into this Kama Loka, this "Sensual Sphere," because of their sensual cravings. Denying them or forcing celibacy on people is not the way to transcend craving and make an end of suffering in this very life.

To be reborn into the more blissful Fine Material Sphere or the Immaterial Sphere or the supremely blissful attainment of making an end of all rebirth (enlightenment and nirvana) requires seeing things as they really are, seeing sensuality as it really is, penetrating the impermanence (anicca), disappointment (dukkha), and impersonal (anatta) nature of it articulated in the Four Ennobling Truths.

We want living beings to be happy, the Buddha wanted people to be happy, and you probably want people to be happy.

Truth is the way to that, not oppression and imposing rules on how people have to live. If we are wrong, please show us.

We can show how open-minded the Buddha was, how the Dharma is a path that avoids extremes and leads beyond sensual craving to super-sensual bliss and then insight and liberation from the bondage of all craving, aversion, and delusion.

We arrive there, step by step, not by behaving like ascetic renunciants. There is a much easier way to let go than brute force and self-denial -- and that way is "calm and insight," blissfully happy meditative absorptions and systematically contemplating the 12 links of Dependent Origination.

"There is no way to happiness; happiness is the way!"]
 
Males, Females, and Sex
Dhr. Seven and Amber Larson, Wisdom Quarterly (COMMENTARY)
The Buddha, Battambang, Cambodia, S.E. Asia (Kim Seng/captainkino.com/flickr)
 
We have already been responding to Jeffery Kaung's letter in brackets. But let us go more deeply.

Kaung, everybody should always avoid "unlawful sexual practices." One need not avoid sex; yet, one need always avoid misconduct in regard to satisfying one's sexual desires. And that is easy to do... except in a repressive society that denies one sexual access. Our societies, East and West, now deny us, or try to deny us, legitimate avenues of sexual expression outside of marriage. That may make sense in conservative parts of Asia, as in rural or small communities, but it does not make a lot of sense in urbanized city environments which emphasize the individual to the detriment of extended familial affiliations.

This has to apply to females just as much as males even if India was already a patriarchal and sexist society that assumed sexual agency only for males. Females have the same agency and, therefore, are liable to get in the same sort of karmic trouble as males. Who can believe that when, for example, a man has sex with a married woman, only she is guilty of cheating on her husband? From a literal and closed minded reading of Buddhist texts (i.e., AN X.206), only he would be guilty. She would be said to have seduced him into a great deal of karmic trouble, but no mention is made of her infidelity to her husband, presumably because she has no agency and therefore no ability to make an intentional choice to cheat, which of course is ridiculous.

And with regard to child molestation, which is a severe form of "sexual misconduct" or "unlawful sexual practices," a female can certainly molest just as a male can. Would anyone in this day and age think, "Oh, she's a female, she has no sexual agency, so she can't possibly be guilty of intentional sexual conduct, how much less misconduct"? It's preposterous. Wisdom Quarterly speculates that it was the sexism influencing the Dharma, and not the Dharma itself, which left us with this one-sided set of rules for males only. We hear precious little about the nuns, Buddhist females at the time of the Buddha, or Buddhist girls and women today. 

That is our era's sexism continuing to diminish women aided and abetted by the sexism of the past, and the male Monastic Order, the Bhikkhu Sangha, has much to answer for keeping this unequal state of affairs in place. The status quo, which the Buddha did so much to overturn, was quickly set back up and given legitimacy as if the Buddha had participated in oppressing females when he was the first world-teacher to elevate them to equal status. 

If one says that the Buddha didn't go quite that far, but instead subordinated them to the Monastic Order, then one has not read the Bhikkhuni Vinaya (The Nuns' Code of Discipline with its origin stories explaining each rule), which enumerates ahistorical garudhammas or "additional nuns' rules" that could NOT have come from the Buddha (see the scholarship of Ayya Tathaaloka). 
But we are all taught that he offered eight or more additional rules to his stepmother, Maha Pajapati, the world's first Buddhist nun, who gladly accepted them to wear like a beautifying head dress or hair piece. Someone, likely sexist male monastics, inserted those to ensure the supremacy of the male Monastic Order. The abbot from Burma you quote without naming is neither likely to realize that nor admit it if he does.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

The Fruits of Recluseship (sutra)

Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly; Tipitaka Network (Digha Nikaya 2)
Golden Buddha cloth hanging on city street (Georgie_girl/flickr.com)
  
(Matthew Ahmet/dailymail.co.uk)
The Samannaphala Sutta [samana = recluse, shaman, hermit, wandering ascetic, Buddhist monastic; phala=fruit; sutta=sutra, discourse] is second among the Long Discourses of the Buddha

This sutra gives the background and explains how an ancient Indian royal, King Ajatasattu, became a Buddhist lay disciple. It starts with the king in his palace seeking advice from his Brahmin ministers about which wandering ascetic or Brahmin to go see.
 
Ignoring the recommendations of those six ministers, the king turns to the royal physician Jivaka Komarabhacca for advice. Jivaka informs him that the Buddha is staying at a Mango Grove in Rajagaha, the capital of Magadha, and suggests visiting him there. 

Monks and novices in Theravada Thailand (T.O. Johnson/T.O.OtisPhoto/flickr.com)

Accepting this suggestion, Ajatasattu sets out on his royal mount together with Jivaka, a large number of women on elephants, and a procession of torch-bearing attendants.
 
Later, we learn that the king had already spoken to the other six ascetics his ministers recommended and was not pleased with their teachings.
 
According to the Buddha, on hearing the Dharma (the Buddha's teaching), King Ajatasattu would have become a stream-winner -- if it were not for his "heinous" karma, patricide, as he had recently killed and deposed his father, the beloved Buddhist King Bimbisara, who was himself a stream-winner. Such action is especially weighty karma with results that are certain to ripen in the very next rebirth. (Killing a stream-enterer is also very heavy karma to bear but is not among the Five Heinous Actions: harming a buddha, killing one's mother, killing one's father, killing an arhat, or creating a schism in the Sangha).
 
Japanese Zen (Arashiyama)
It is the night of Komudi, the full-moon day in the month of Kattika, at a time after Ajatasattu has already deposed his father Bimbisara, former king of Magadha, who was a devoted noble disciple of the Buddha (a stream enterer, the first stage of sainthood).
 
The dialogue is mainly between the Buddha and young Ajatasattu. Other personalities mentioned are Queen Vedehi, his mother, Prince Udayibhadda, his newborn son, and the six rival ascetic teachers of the Buddha's day. The six includes the founder of Jainism, Mahavira, who is known in Buddhist texts as the Nigantha Nataputta ["Possessionless Son-of-Nata"], whose family name is Aggivessana.

The Six Rival Teachers
The rival teachers mentioned are characterized as representative of various Indian philosophical movements at that time. They are Purana Kassapa, Makkhali Gosala, Ajita Kesakambala, Pakudha Kaccayana, Sancaya Belatthaputta, and Nigantha Nataputta (Mahavira, which like the name "the Buddha" is simply a title meaning "Great Hero," an epithet used for the Buddha in earlier times).

This discourse opens a window into their individual teachings, as reported by King Ajatasattu to the Buddha. Unfortunately, each of these accounts is very brief.

Respect of Ascetics
Novice with candle in Shwe Yan Pyay, Burma (UrsulasWeeklyWanders.com)

 
Indian culture respects ascetics. Here an "ascetic" (samana) refers to a person who has given up his or her family and social life to search for greater happiness by finding answers to the ultimate questions: Who am I? Where did I come from? Where am I going? What is the meaning of life?
 
This goal of asceticism was later expanded in Buddhism to include the greater happiness of the world. King Ajatasattu, one of the most powerful royals of the day in India, expressed his respect for recluses, even if that person was formerly his servant.

Prior to Mahavira and the Buddha accepting female disciples into their wandering ascetic orders (sanghas), all samanas were male. Mahavira was first to admit them. But the Buddha, whose mission was to establish the Dharma with male and female monastics and male and female lay disciples, was the first to do so as a world-religion, a universal teaching that spread all around the world. 

Jainism, on the other hand, though slightly older, never traveled beyond India to become a universal teaching. Jains did travel and therefore there are communities elsewhere but not Mahavira's teaching itself. 

Females were given the same duties and responsibilities as their male counterparts  in the Buddhist monastic order. (The widespread belief that the Buddha imposed eight additional rules on his stepmother, the first Buddhist nun, is not the case, as a textual analysis of the Bhikkhuni Vinaya reveals, according to Ven. Ayya Tathaaloka).

Fruits of becoming a Buddhist recluse
Theravada Buddhist nuns of California, with Ayya Tathaaloka, fourth on the right (AFB)
 
The title of the sutra literally means "recluseship-fruits," the benefits of becoming an wandering ascetic, a Buddhist monk or nun.

Basic rewards
When asked what these fruits are, the Buddha provides the king with satisfactory answers on the many rewards of practicing in accordance with the Buddha's Dharma and (Monastic) Discipline.
  • One is respected even by kings, as well as being provided with one's basic necessities, safety, and protection.
  • One is endowed with restraint and virtue (as explained in the The Net of All-Embracing Views).
  • One remains with guarded sense faculties.
  • One is mindful and clearly aware (sati-sampajana).
  • One is contented.
Intermediate rewards
Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhist nuns with prayer wheel and beads (colunas.epoca.globo.com)
 
By withdrawing and detaching from the Five Hindrances, further spiritual benefits arise as one succeeds in the practice of "meditation" (bhavana, jhana, jhaneti, kammathana):
  1. the first four meditative absorptions (rupa-jhanas),
  2. insight-knowledges (vipassanā-ñāṇa),
  3. advanced capacities.
The Highest reward
The highest reward, which is the ultimate goal of the Buddhist path, is the realization and full penetration of the Four Noble Truths, which leads to enlightenment and NIRVANA, which is complete freedom from samsara (the otherwise endless round of death and rebirth and suffering).

Bodhi Bytes and Campus News

The title of this sutra is from Bhikkhu Bodhi's translation. Other translations are "The Fruits of the Homeless Life" (Maurice Walshe), "The Fruits of the Life of a Recluse" (Rhys Davis), "The Fruits of the Life of a Samana" (BPA), and "The Rewards of Spiritual Practice" (by Ayya Khema in German as Die Früchte des spirituellen Lebens and Visible Here and Now in English), another German version is available from Pali Kanon.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Spiritual Makeover: Christine, Buddhist Nun

Thomas (ContemporaryNomad.com)
Raised in Alberta, Canada and a Buddhist for many years, she wanted to become a Tibetan nun, renouncing the household life, a life-altering decision made with confidence.

[Ani] Christine is only the second Western Buddhist nun I have ever met. The first nun, whom we met a couple of weeks ago at Dargye Gompa (monastery), was an ascetic, standoffish German woman who had no interest in talking to us.

Ani Christine is different. She would always have a smile on her face and say hi when we passed each other in the hostel. This was my chance to talk to her and satisfy my curiosity about who she was, so I approached her to find out.

I think she was surprised that I came up to her because many people, as she told me later, shied away from talking to her maybe out of fear of asking the wrong questions. I wasn’t afraid and asked all the wrong questions anyway:

She patiently answered my questions with a great deal of humor and did not seem to be insulted at all.

Ani Christine became a nun only two weeks ago. Her excitement about becoming a nun is so contagious that we can’t help but feel completely happy for her. While talking about her past, she eagerly showed us some “before pictures” of herself with long hair and Western clothes taken only a few weeks ago and admitted that she had never had short hair.

She looks totally cute, though, with her buzz cut and her red [Tibetan] nun outfit, which she recently bought in a clothes store catering to nuns and monks. More

What would Buddha do?
Thomas has kept the color confidential. But Wisdom Quarterly posed the same question to Theravada Buddhist monks who follow the ancient monastic tradition. We Americans are uptight Puritans when it comes to asking anything that might be embarassing. But the monks were very relaxed and amused (bemused?) We posed the question this way: "If we ordain, what underwear will we wear, what color?" They smiled, not understanding. "Westerners ask the strangest things," they confided. But we wanted a complete "spirtual makeover." So we pressed on until they laughed and assured us -- "Any kind you want, any color, whatever you need!" We were sad, of course. We were hoping to gird our loins with, I don't know, something that would make us part of the Brotherhood of the traveling robes. You know, ancient saffron wraps that aid meditation and reduce lust. A Hindu yogi later showed us an interesting orange adjustable girding. It looks like a headband. But he laughed when we tried to put it on our heads. It ties like a bikini wrap and can be used for zazen but probably not yoga due to shifting and loosening. Monastics are human and kinder than average folk.

Wandering and Wandering: Spiritual Travel