Showing posts with label new religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new religion. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Bowie on Buddhism, ETs, art: Life on Mars


David Bowie talks the internet, Buddhism, and space aliens | MTV
(MTV News) In this full MTV News 1997 interview, superstar David Bowie (davidbowie.com) discusses how the internet and Buddhism guides his work.

On second thought, I shoulda become a monk
As a teen, he intended to become a Buddhist monk, a lama in a Vajrayana temple in Europe, but his rinpoche saw that he was more interested in music and was better off pursuing his art rather than cloistering himself in a temple, which would have certainly helped him more in life while depriving the world of his songs. But he pursued an interest in Zen until a Zen master in Kyoto told him that [organized] religion is over and that it [the future] lies in the [visual and musical] arts. Are there aliens [other beings such as devas] in space? Bowie's interest is not in the hardware of UFOs, the corporeal reality of such beings, but rather their existence only ever represented spiritual search, more a metaphor for the otherness, isolation, and alienation. "But the idea, 'Is there life on Mars?' I could care less."

  • 0:04 David Bowie on music via the internet
  • 0:21 Aging and his album sales
  • 1:22 The potential of the internet
  • 3:17 Spirituality and Buddhism
  • 5:25 Bowie on the Dalai Lama
  • 6:15 Organized religion and the arts
  • 9:04 Bowie's opinion on ETs, space aliens
"Religion is over and it lies in the arts" - David Bowie on life’s purpose
I was once a shy conservative boy
(T&H - Inspiration & Motivation) This is a collection of profound and powerful messages on life's purpose by David Bowie (1947-2016) in honor of his genius. “I don’t know where I’m going from here, but I promise it won’t be boring,” Bowie stated. Gnosticism is a better approach to spirituality and religion than our Judeo-Christian background. Celebrities by T&H Motivation and Inspiration
  • David Bowie, 1/10/17; MTV, 1997; Seth Auberon, Shauna Schwartz (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Actress Julia Roberts becomes a Hindu

Religion is a private and personal affair
Vir Sanghvi (Express Buzz)
Julia Roberts has become a Hindu. In an interview given to promote her new movie "Eat Pray Love," the actress declared that she discovered the Hindu faith and adopted it while filming. (Part of the story was inspired by author Elizabeth Gilbert’s experiences at the Muktanand Ashram in Ganeshpuri).

Why the surprise when famous people become Hindus? Those who subscribe to cults are not regarded as being particularly Hindu. For instance, the Beatle George Harrison was an early convert of the Hare Krishna movement and had an on-off relationship with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. But Hindus regard Hare Krishnas as weird, not representative of mainstream Hinduism; Mahesh Yogi was a jet-set guru, not much of an advertisement for mainstream Hinduism.

Like Buddhism, Hinduism is a non-proselytizing, pluralistic faith. It does not seek "converts" nor does anyone need to join formally to practice. There are countless examples of prominent people in the West who have drawn inspiration from Eastern philosophy.

Hindus can deal with cultists and guru-worshippers since they do not follow mainstream Hinduism. But it is rare to find somebody who adopts mainstream Hinduism with its beguiling mixture of simplicity and complexity, ancient purity and latter-day practicality.

Hinduism may well be the oldest religion to come out of India but it is not the only one. Jainism is less well known outside of India. But Buddhism is probably better-known abroad than it is in India even though the Buddha was Indian.

The contrasts between Hinduism and Buddhism are interesting. Buddhism only became a global religion after King Ashoka converted to it after the conquest of Kalinga (around 273 BCE). Ashoka spread Buddhism throughout India and sent emissaries abroad to spread the Buddha’s teachings. It took a few centuries, but eventually Buddhism held sway in much of Asia: China, Japan, Thailand, and even Sri Lanka. Tibetan Buddhism took on a different form from Indian Buddhism and eventually Buddhist monks came to rule Tibet. (It is this tradition that the Dalai Lama is descended from.)

For some centuries Buddhism held sway in India till gradually Hinduism re-asserted itself and virtually pushed Buddhism out. (In contrast, Jainism which never spread globally retained its small and committed following within India.)

Vaguely conscious of this background, Hindus are not particularly surprised by the fervor with which Hollywood stars adopt Buddhism. Richard Gere is one of the Western world’s most famous Buddhists, and Uma Thurman was born into a family of Tibetan Buddhists. Buddhism welcomes converts and is more instantly appealing to followers of other religions.

Why has Hinduism — one of the world’s two oldest religions — remained an exclusively Indian religion? When Hindus are found abroad, they tend to be ethnic Indians rather than converts from other faiths. More>>

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Buddhism at Work


What is Work? Buddhist Discernment on the Job
Sharon Glassman

Note to readers: A few weeks ago, I got an email inviting me to part of a Green Books Campaign sponsored by Eco-Libris, a for-profit enterprise that promotes books printed on non-virgin paper and funds the planting of trees in Africa and Central America.

This review of Discernment: Educating Mind and Spirit (Lantern Books) is part of the Green Books campaign -- and a fitting next step in this ongoing series about Work. Some people read sports books to unwind. Other folks read cook-books, or travel books. I read books on Buddhism.

Reading about folks who meditate, or cross-culturally explore, or practice right livelihood is my version of armchair traveling. "Enlightenment" is not one of my recurring Work To-Do List items (although I have voiced the occasional, enlightened sounding character on TV). But I find comfort -- and practical work advice -- in the gap between The Buddhist Authors' Balanced Approach to Life and my Whirling Dervish approach to same. More>>

Monday, October 5, 2009

Spirituality Spot found in Brain

Robin Nixon (LiveScience.com)
What makes us feel spiritual? It could be the quieting of a small area in our brains, a new study suggests. The area in question — the right parietal lobe — is responsible for defining "Me," said researcher Brick Johnstone of Missouri University. It generates self-criticism, he said, and guides us through physical and social terrains by constantly updating our self-knowledge: my hand, my cocktail, my witty conversation skills, my new love interest...

People with less active Me-Definers are more likely to lead spiritual lives, reports the study in the current issue of the journal Zygon. Most previous research on neuro-spirituality has been based on brain scans of actively practicing adherents (i.e., meditating monks, praying nuns) and has resulted in broad and inconclusive findings. (Is the brain area lighting up in response to verse or spiritual experience?) More>>


Religious mystery may be solved
A scientist claims to reproduce the Shroud of Turin using ancient printing methods. Skeptics vs. believers
The white robed priests of Science defend an "objective" dogma:

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Is "Mahayana" a Different Religion?

Originally in Life Magazine (WQ update)
PHOTOS: 1. Mahayana "god" Amitabha in heaven (thezenfrog blog); 2. (yogilin.net); dogged Zen devotion (missfidget.com); iconic Japanese Buddha; mother goddess Western and Eastern form, Mariam and Kwan Yin.

From early times the type of Buddhism practiced in China and eventually in Japan (Zen) and Tibet (Lamaism) differed from the earlier practices of South and Southeast Asian Buddhists.

The difference was due to some extent to variations in national temperament. But it can be traced back to about 200 years after Gautama's passing, when a group of disciples disagreed on the interpretation of the Teaching and preached instead a doctrine that was less rigorous and more easily adapted to the needs of ordinary people.

This new, easier doctrine became known as Mahayana ("greater vehicle"). And its members disdainfully referred to the orthodox, original form of Buddhism as Hinayana ("lesser vehicle").

Shakyamuni (Siddhartha Gautama), who became the historical Buddha (or "fully enlightened teacher"), taught a Path to individual emancipation from continuous-rebirth (Samsara) and suffering (dukkha).

Mahayana, like Christianity, developed a messianic message of a savior who would provide for the "salvation" of others (variously: Maitreya, the prophesied future-buddha; Amitabha, a buddha in a heaven known as the Western Paradise; or any number of bodhisattvas). This salvation would not be into nirvana (the complete freedom from all further suffering) but into a "pure land" (heavenly abode) or simply more and improved rebirths.

So vast was the difference between original Buddhist doctrines and popular Mahayana innovations that it constituted almost a different religion. Some say it was a vastly different new religion with a Buddhist appearance and substantively Hindu doctrines.

Some go so far as to say that Mahayana is simply "Chinese Christianity" since the similarities are so striking and in line with the Buddhism Jesus was exposed to in India. (See previous entries on the Lost Years of Jesus).

Mahayana Buddhism, matured mainly in the free religious atmosphere of Tang Dynasty China, sought a way to make Buddhism a religion of the masses. It found the ascetic life of India and Southeast Asia too austere and demanding for ordinary people. And it searched for a method by which enlightenment might be achieved more simply than the historical Buddha had taught.

Whereas the new ideal of Mahayana was a saintly would-be savior figure known as a bodhisattva who vows to forego enlightenment and emancipation until he or she saves all other beings, the ideal Buddhist of the Hinayana was the arhat.

(Hinayana technically refers to sects like the Sarvastivada school that no longer exist but are somewhat close in character to the oldest surviving Buddhist tradition, the Theravada, or "Teaching of the Enlightened Elders," the Theras being the immediate disciples of the historical Buddha).

An arhat is a meditator who realizes enlightenment in this very life. But the bodhisattva-ideal of the Mahayana school became someone still stuck in Samsara. This became acceptable with the counter-intuitive leap in logic that Nirvana is Samsara, that is, the old Hindu idea that liberation is here now for immediate realization within suffering and rebirth. Bodhisattvas (which faithful Mahayana practitioners vow to be) elect to remain unenlightened (or at least not fully-enlightened, which would entail emancipation).

Thus, they do not achieve the liberating goal of Buddhism, at least as taught by the historical Buddha, which was always nirvana. That is, they will not accept freedom until everyone else achieves the goal. The belief is that this is what perfectly enlightened teachers (samma-sam-buddhas) do, in spite of the fact that the historical Buddha established the Teaching and was emancipated from rebirth.

Since meditation and even temporary asceticism are thought too demanding for the average person, Mahayana teaches that faith and devotion are enough. Salvation-by-faith (as in Christian and Hindu worship [bhakti]) became one of Mahayana's basic tenets. And the serene meditative example of Gautama was superseded by a glorious redeemer, a god known as the Amitabha Buddha or "Buddha of Infinite Light," to whom the prayers of the faithful were addressed.

Unlike the Buddha, Amitabha was not an actual historical person. So the dominant virtue changed from an emphasis on detached wisdom to engaged compassion, which further popularized the new Mahayana religion. Now that it had a Jesus/Jehovah figure, it adopted a Madonna or Mary (Hebrew "Miriam") in the form of a human mother goddess -- the embodiment of compassion and mercy -- Kwan Yin.