Showing posts with label relativity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label relativity. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Truth about time: We've been lied to


What does Buddhism have to say about "time"? One thing's sure, there is anionic time called the Eternal Now. There is only now, and there only ever has been now.

But that is hard to understand until one experiences it then it suddenly seems obvious. Ask Eckhart Tolle. He experienced it and wrote The Power of Now with just one message for the world, talk after talk.

Ram Dass on LSD saw love
Ram Dass (Harvard Jew turned Hindu Dr. Richard Alpert) wrote the classic Be Here Now, having also realized this truth about time. There are wonderful stories in ancient Indian texts about time that say that time is NOT simultaneous. It is relative. It differs from plane to plane in Buddhism's 31 Planes of Existence.

Ancient India understood that time in terms of kalpas (aeons) explained by akasha devas (space entities). It moves differently in heavenly worlds, lasting so much longer than our time -- but possibly happening at the same time. Time will feel very long, even eternal, in other worlds, on other planes. But though that much time may move that slowly there, it will not simultaneously move that way on earth.

Physics: Time does not exist

Whoa, perhaps too much thinking doesn't pay and I should just be attentive to now and accept.
.
The ancient Vedas speak of time travel?
One Vedic Sanskrit tale speaks of a king and his daughter who were visited by ETs and invited to visit their world/planet. They boarded a vimana (UFO), flew there very quickly, enjoyed a day there, then asked to return home. They were told they could be returned home, but a great deal of time would have passed on earth while they were visiting. When they returned, everyone they ever knew would be long dead and forgotten.

Our time metaphor is a little backwards

The Time Paradox: Psychology
But this is all I have to say about time. I learned it in college as an anecdote in the social sciences. I laughed at how backward some human societies can be until I suddenly realized they were right. We were wrong and we had always been wrong. You know how we say time is an arrow moving from left to right?

We can, and often do, picture time like a boat moving west on a river. The boat relentlessly move from the past (on the left) through the present (in the middle) into the future (on the right). That may all be true. What this society saw is the opposite of what we see, and that is:

Which way am I facing in the arrow of time?
Where are we standing on this boat moving through time?

WEST'S ANSWER: Of course, we're toward the front of the boat, in the driver's seat, looking forward into the future, the present all around us, and the past vanishing into the distance behind us.

THEIR ANSWER
: Of course, we are in the back of the boat only ever looking backward into the past. We can never see the future (other than with premonitions, omens, or exhibitions of psychic power) because the boat hasn't gotten there yet (and of course never really does because everything always stays in the present, which is all there is).

What time is it? - Look carefully.
But, we might argue, what about the past? I'm always living in the past, except for the time I "spend" (metaphorically like a limited amount of money) living in the future.

I spend next to no time here, now, just being.

I ruminate and am sad about the past, or I worry and am nervous about the future. I more or less ignore the present -- except when meditating, practicing mindfulness (sati), or listening to the Dhamma, the Buddha's Teachings.

Time travel will confuse us more
The truth is, if we think about it, even when we are "living" in the past or future, we only ever actually do that NOW. We don't go back to the past, and we don't actually "go" to the future. Those are just designations, so that the only time we ever are when we look is in the present. We are not present for the present, but that's where we actually are. Virtually, we're wasting away in the imaginary past or imaginary future, being imagined right NOW. But where are we on that imaginary boat in the example?

That's right, they're right. We've been wrong and haven't been seeing it correctly. We are not in the front part looking forward, and we certainly aren't in the driver's seat (controlling all that's coming at us). We are being carried along, not knowing where we're going, and only finding out after the fact.

I'm bored being here now. Let's talk future.
It could well be that this "now" business is not just a designation. Like a book or album, all time may already be. The story might already be set but we just haven't read it or heard it yet. So we imagine we have perfect freewill and will find out as things transpire.

Time exists, but how it exists -- not as a natural and integral part of the universe, but an artificial and imposed screening device -- is the real question. In a book, there is no time. It is all there all at once. In reading it or flipping through the pages, we create a kind of time or sequencing, ordering, stacking. We can read slowly or jump around very quickly, but wherever we go (in the book), there we are. When? Now. Only ever now.
Paradox?
Screening psych applicants for Stanford Prison
This is the first paradox of time: Our attitudes toward time have a profound impact on our lives and world, yet we seldom recognize it. The authors' goal is to help reclaim yesterday, enjoy today, and master tomorrow with new ways of seeing and working with our past, present, and future. Just as Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences permanently altered our understanding of intelligence and Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink gave us an appreciation for the adaptive unconscious, Prof. of Social Psychology Philip Zimbardo (infamous for his Stanford Prison Experiment) and Dr. John Boyd’s book changes the way we think about and experience time.
  • Astropyre (video); text by Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

The Dark Side of JewBu Albert Einstein

Did scientist and mathematician Einstein really praise Buddhism as the way of the future?


The dark side of Albert Einstein

If incest is good enough for the Rothschilds
Jewish (possible JewBu) Albert Einstein is regarded as one of the greatest physicists of all time, but he has also become a pop culture icon.
 
Alby's groundbreaking theory of special relativity turned him into one of the most important figures in history.

Icon like MaryMarilyn, Elvis, Dolly, MartinGidget, Bruce?

You and Freud both like the Buddha.
Though, just like with other famous and eccentric personalities, there are real facts mixed with myths that survive to this day. Is he another Ashkenazi Jew guilty of incest? Or was he a crossdresser who married himself?

Having married his manly looking cousin, who grew to look more and more exactly like him, does not bolster his case for good judgment. But she may have been instrumental in his fame and his math.

I should be the icon! It's sexism and bias!
Suburban Lawns' sexy Einstein A-bomb song

Has the next Einstein already been born? - Yes
In this gallery let's debunk some of the myths and bring a number of surprising facts about Al that most have probably never heard. Browse through and learn more about the supposed genius that was Dr. Einstein (who had no doctoral degree of any kind). More: msn.com

There are two Einsteins, aren't there? Not Mr. and Mrs., but rather like Jesus (Yeshua) the real person and the pop icon (Christ). Reza Aslan was emphatic about this distinction. Everyone knows about the popular fantasy, and very few bother to learn about a possible historical figure in the context of his cultural milieu.

Old Einstein loved a good joke: my driver


Seeing Into the Life of Things
During the historic dialogue between rabbis and the Dalai Lama, as told in his international bestseller The Jew in the Lotus, Rodger Kamenetz heard a penetrating question to the rabbis: "How does your spiritual practice purify afflictive emotions?"

To Kamenetz, this seemed the most fundamental question to ask of any religion or philosophy of life. How do your practices help you with negative emotions like anxiety, envy, resentment, and shame?

You support our cause, right Mr. Lama?
Taking the listener with him on an exhilarating intellectual and emotional journey, he finds a natural spiritual path in the imagination. Kamenetz connects daily life to spiritual longing, from the musical rhythms of his beloved New Orleans to his tender bond with Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi, visionary founder of Jewish Renewal and a central figure in the Dharamsala, India (where the Dalai Lama lives in exile), dialogue.

China says I'm [a] Devil. Wrathful spirit?
Embedded in a rich poetic narrative, Seeing Into the Life of Things: Imagination and the Sacred Encounter offers down to earth practices from "count your blessings," to savoring perception, from dwelling on powerful memories, to the sacred encounters in dreams.

Kamenetz shows how giving birth to our images restores us to an imagination of the sacred.
  • #AlbertEinstein #Buddha #Zen #shorts #Buddhism
  • Shauna Schwartz, Sheldon S., Seth Auberon, CC Liu (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, September 9, 2024

A new theory of everything emerges

Fraulein Sabine, authors did not account for my quote on Buddhism so could not see big picture

A new theory of everything just dropped
(Wisecrack) The philosophy of Everything Everywhere All At Once, a kind of "theory of everything"

(Sabine Hossenfelder) Sept. 9, 2024: Queen Sabine got a bunch of requests to comment on a new attempt at a theory of everything (unified field theory) that supposedly combines quantum physics with general relativity.

She had a look, a laugh, and this quick comment: It's basically a first reaction since she didn't get very far into the paper, as viewers will see. She is sorry if she appears unkind, but this kind of junk science really p*ss*s her off. It's junk, worse than junk, not peer reviewed by assigned reviewers, not even copyedited (corrected for simple errors), just "cr*p,"

🤓 See the paper here, nerds: sciencedirect.com/science...

Sabine, you don't believe in freewill? So they had to write it and you pan it?

Check out Mean Sabine's new quiz app, Dummkopfsquizwithit.com. 💌 Support her on DonorBox ➜ donorbox.org/swtg 📝 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ sciencewtg.substack.com 👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ sabine 📩 Free weekly science newsletter ➜ sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle... 👂 Audio only podcast ➜ open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXl... 🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜ @sabinehossenfelder 🖼️ On instagram ➜ sciencewtg

Members first on September 9, 2024 #science #sciencenews #physics. Learn maths and science on Brilliant! Use this link and get the first 30 days free, plus get 20% off an annual premium subscription ➜ brilliant.org/sabine.

Sunday, June 30, 2024

Anniversary of Einstein's theory of relativity

I'd rather be happy than right any day! - And are you? - No, that's where it all falls down of course

Did Alvie Einstein really say Buddhism is the best religion for modern needs? It is said he did.

How to put the genie back?
Is the theory of relativity true? Probably not, but the Suburban Lawns seem to think so, and that's all that really matters. If it helped some scientists do some scientificky things and work out some assumptions with numbers, all the better. No one can deny Albert gets credit for E=MC2, part of his equation for making mountains out of molehills. Why if it were not for him, how could we have built nuclear bombs to drop on Zen Buddhists in Japan, at Nagasaki and Hiroshima, and threaten the world ever since? Sure, he regretted it, but that's pure research for ya, never thinking of consequences. At least he had a social conscience and sense of humor. The US Department of War has to take most of the responsibility.


Einstein quotes we should know before we get old
(Wisdom) Albert Einstein was a German-born Jew, and possibly an aspiring Buddhist, theoretical physicist, widely acknowledged to be one of the greatest and most influential physicists of all time.

What's the secret, Al? - Be yourself.

Einstein is best known for developing the theory of relativity, which he revealed on June 30, 1905, but he also made important contributions to the development of the theory of quantum mechanics. This video contains Albert Einstein quotes.

This collection of quotations is made up of his best quotes, and we hope that his life quotes will inspire you to think about many things in your life.

The quotes from Albert Einstein are well worth your time. Don't forget to save screenshots of the quotes you like to add to your inspiring quotes collection. Thank you for viewing yet another video with quotes, this time by Albert Einstein.


#quotes #alberteinstein #wisdom #quotetruths. 🔥 Become a Wisdom fan today 👉 @wisdom-- Purchases made through links may provide compensation to the publisher.

Terrence Howard tried to warn us. Math is?
  • Wisdom, June 4, 2022; Sue Tissue, Suburban Lawns, "Janitors"; Sheldon S., Seth Auberon, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, March 4, 2024

Einstein errs, gravity pushes, math sucks

Dr. Michio Kaku; Neil Degrasse Tyson; Sheldon S., CC Liu, Wisdom Quarterly
O, Buddha, how does the universe work, and can I figure it out with math to make bombs?
"If there is any religion that would cope with modern scientific needs, it would be Buddhism."

Friday, May 6, 2016

Questioning "reality" when NASA lies (video)

Give us science, give us evidence we can see with our own eyes rather than CGI and hoaxes

Remember the Space Shuttle "disaster"
If this is true, NASA has a lot of explaining to do. No manned missions into space, just rocket with a jet plane piggy backing which we are assured is just a "glider," which would be silent but one can hear the jet engines on reentry. We are not regularly going into space on a shuttle, nor have we been in space by conventional means in decades. NASA continues to hoax.


(Captain Obvious) This video debunks globe spinning earth. Read: amazon.com
The actual shape of the earth, disputing gravity and math models as explanation, NASA

Friday, January 9, 2015

Our reality may NOT be real ("The Principle")

Pat Macpherson, Seth Auberon, Pfc. Sandoval, Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly; Rick DeLano (ThePrincipleMovie.com, facebook), coasttocoastam.com, Jan. 7, 2015; Forward Boldly
Artist’s conception of an Earth-like planet orbiting an evolved star with a stunning “planetary nebula.” Earlier in its life, this planet may have been like one of the eight newly discovered worlds orbiting in the habitable zones of their suns (darkgovernment.com).
(ThePrincipleMovie.com) "The Principle" Twitter: @PrincipleMovie, #AreYouSignificant. It will come to the AMC in LA and OC then branch out to other outlets. (See the movie).
 
Where in the world [system] is Earth (Bhumi)?
Everyone knows that the ancient idea of Earth in the center of the universe is a ridiculous holdover from a superstitious age, right? Modern science has proven that we are nothing special.

We inhabit, in Carl Sagan's words, "an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people."

Well, prepare to be shocked! "The Principle" is destined to become one of the most controversial films of our time. It brings to the public the astonishing results of recent large-scale surveys of our universe -- surveys that disclose unexpected evidence of a preferred direction in the cosmos, aligned with our Earth.

"The Principle" includes narration by Kate Mulgrew ("Star Trek Voyager," "Orange is the New Black," "Ryan's Hope"), stunning animations by BUF Compagnie Paris ("Life of Pi," "Thor"), and commentary from prominent scientists including George Ellis, Professor Michio Kaku, Julian Barbour, Lawrence Krauss, and Max Tegmark.
 
Attempt to get to Space X cheap.
Tracing the development of cosmology from its inception (Stonehenge, the Great Pyramid at Giza) through Copernicus' great revolution, to the astonishing new discoveries of Earth-oriented alignments in the largest structures of our visible universe, "The Principle" brings us face-to-face with the question and the challenge, What does this mean for the future of humankind on Earth?

NOW PLAYING! (AMC LA, OC, Seattle)

Maya: The "Illusion"
Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Ashley Wells, Wisdom Quarterly, BUDDHISM IN A NUTSHELL

Well of course our reality is NOT real. It is maya, illusiory. How so? Three things appear in every obvious way to be true and reliable such that we can take them for granted. But things are not as they seem.

Joy! It's all unreal, a dream. Wake up! (AS)
One, things seem stable, continuous, lasting, more or less permanent. In fact, they are radically (at their root, at the most fundamental level) impermanent. This does not mean they eventually fall away as all things must. It means they are falling apart, hurtling toward destruction, at every moment. They are ceaselessly phasing through three submoments -- arising, turning, and falling -- within each moment. They pass away at every moment. Nothing survives the moment, but what replaces it at the very next moment is nearly identical, nearly. It is not identical. It does not have continuity. It does not have identity. Therefore, all "things" (conditioned formations) are impermanent (anicca).

Joy, joy, jump for joy! Having realized it's all impermanent and disappointing, what a marvel that it's an illusion, a dream to wake up from. Enjoy it then wake up (epicparent.tv).
.
Two, things seem able to satisfy, to please, to bring fulfillment, to be pleasing. In fact, they are unsatisfactory, lack the ability to fulfill us. They are disappointing. This does not mean they eventually will get tired and old. Striving for them in their absence is distressing. Getting them is disappointing. Worrying about losing them as we attempt to cling to them is unpleasant. And losing them -- or realizing we never really had them under our control because they, too, are impermanent -- is unpleasant, painful, disappointing, a cause of woe and lamentation. Even getting them, getting our heart's desire, to find out they did not, would not, could not fulfill us, that has got to be the worst thing of all -- not that we will know it, because the mind/heart will quickly switch to something else to crave and hanker after. All things, all conditioned phenomena, are unsatisfactory (dukkha). [But there is one thing, that is, one "unconditioned element" the Buddha called nirvana, which is not a "thing" and not like any other thing, so it is difficult to conceive. The Buddha called it the end of all woe, but one knows-and-sees it only by way of enlightenment or bodhi).]
  • WARNING: This third ultimate truth is dangerous because, without wisdom, it is easy to mis-grasp. To grasp it incorrectly is like taking hold of a snake by the tail. It will quickly spring back to bite. The Dharma misunderstood is similarly dangerous because it will drag one -- by entering a thicket of rong views and speculations -- rather than liberate one as the Buddha intended. Conventional truth is not ultimate truth and vice-versa. Why? What is ultimately true in physics about matter, that it is mostly empty space, does not matter when it is coming at you. Step aside. For to say "I did not step aside because there, ultimately, there was no 'I' and nothing to fear from 'mostly empty space' will be ridiculous and a foolish misunderstanding of what is being said and what is not being said by Buddhism or physics. Buddhist physics, moreover, has much to say about the impersonal qualities of materiality, spoken of as "ultimate materiality" described and analyzed in terms of particles (kalapas) and mind-moments (cittas), which ultimately seem less physical than conceptual or interdependent with perception.
Zen zero or ensō (Stanoin/etsy.com/WQ)
Three, things seem personal, I, me, and mine. In fact, all things are impersonal, lack essence, are phenomenal. We take forms (materiality), sensations, perceptions, mental formations (such as volitions), and above all consciousness to be "self," our ego, our personality, our "soul." We do not see these things as they really are, falling away, unable to satisfy, and not-self. What?! This is the biggest shock. One could reason it. But it must be seen directly, experienced directly, for such a realization to lead to spiritual liberation, the end of treading this painful and otherwise endless round of rebirth and disappointment. Things are not-self (anatta).

Kwan Yin as Avalokitesvara (Heart Sutra)
In what is arguably the most famous Buddhist discourse, at least of the Mahayana school of Buddhism, the Heart (of Wisdom) Sutra, which is the epitome of the "Perfection of Wisdom" (Prajna Paramita, Sanskrit Prajñāpāramitā) literature, it is said: "Gone, gone, gone beyond, gone altogether beyond, enlightenment, yes!" What did Avalokiteshvara (a deva whose name means "One Who Looks Down From On High," who came to be regarded as Kwan Yin, Goddess or Bodhisattva of Mercy) just realize and explain to the Buddha's chief male disciple foremost in wisdom before uttering this paean? The realization was this ultimate truth: These five things, these "heaps" or "aggregates" or "groups" (form, feeling, perception, formations, consciousness) are empty, that is, devoid of self. They are impersonal. O, what an awakening. (Due to ignorance, most beings who hear this think it is the worst news ever. But when enlightenment dawns, one sees things just as they are, and the Truth sets one free).

Buddhist cosmology: Earth and space
There are worlds (exoplanets) upon worlds upon worlds in space, and gov'ts know it.
 
Buddhist cosmology: Countless worlds, 31 planes
Buddhism, like modern Hinduism (along with earlier Vedic Brahmanism) and Jainism, have very sophisticated views of space (akasha) and space worlds (akasha deva lokas). This Earth, known as Bhumi (like Tierra, "ground," Gaia) is only one world (loka) in the Human Plane in the lowest of Three Spheres, the Sensual Sphere. There are many deva worlds in addition to other planets with "humans" or humanoids who are not earthlings. The devas, or "shining ones," inhabit this sphere in celestial or "heavenly" worlds which are very advanced technologically and able to visit Earth and take humans there, as happens.

The other two spheres -- the Fine Material (Rupa) and Immaterial (Arupa) -- are harder to conceive. They can be visited but, moreover, one can be reborn there as a being among those beings.

In the long course of samsara, the "wandering on" through countless worlds, one has likely already been reborn in nearly all 31 planes, with the exception of a few exclusive worlds known as the "Pure Abodes" (suddhavasa). One has not been there because one has not yet entered upon the stages of enlightenment (from stream-entry to arhatship) or overcome the fetters that bind one to this realm in this sphere.
.
UFO monument built by ETs or with knowledge of ETs at Cambodia's Angkor Wat bas relief showing a war in "heaven," that is, in space (samcambodiatours.yolasite.com)
.
ETs and UFOs called "myths"
Above the exalted sensual worlds are fine-material worlds inhabited by greater, more glorious devas, brighter, living longer lives, enjoying pleasures greater than those found in sense strand worlds. We would regard these worlds as invisible due to the fineness of the material of which they are composed. Over and above that are rarefied worlds known as "immaterial" or "formless" planes, beyond physicality even of the subtlest sort. This is nearly impossible for us to think about because everywhere else body and mind are interdependent and inseparable, as illustrated in the analysis of the Five Aggregates of Clinging (an explanation of who we are as living beings or "souls," selves, egos, personalities).

There are beings on Earth who are invisible to our normal faculty of vision, visible with the "divine eye" (dibba cakkhu), pineal gland or third eye. Devas (sylphs, woodland spirits), creatures (overseen by the Four Great Sky Rulers of the four directions of the sky), monsters, ghosts, hellions, inimical spirits, and others. There are many more, shapeshifters and light-emitting beings, who live in other worlds even within this solar system and galaxy. Read about some of them in The 31 Planes of Existence.

Commentary
Get your head out of the sand! Face reality.
Wisdom Quarterly: American Buddhist Journal editors are not geocentrists (believers that Earth is at the center). Rahter, we think science has much to answer for and must stop acting like a faith, a religion with its white-labcoat-clad "priests" who feel they are above reproach and cannot have their work questioned, even when what they at times publicly claim (like inventing dark matter to get their equations to work) is foolish and demonstrably wrong. But no one gets beyond the gatekeepers of Academe without believing or publicly acquiescing to certain nonsense. Let science be "science" rather than a biased load of bollocks. Let us all question science and scientific authority just as we question spirituality and its "leaders."



Those d-mn Christians!
(Church Militant TV) Robert Sungenis and Rick DeLano on the controversy surrounding the release of their documentary film on cosmology and the Copernican theory. Scientists that were interviewed for the film are now trying to distance themselves from the movie because it dares to suggest that the Earth is significant and unusual. Is it geocentric? The scandal was started by an outside Catholic blogger who "tipped off" the scientists in the film possibly out of "pure malice." It may have backfired because the blogger generated a lot of free publicity for the film makers in associating geocentrism with anti-semitism.

Rick DeLano, producer of "The Principle," interviewed on Catholic radio "Forward Boldly" with Christine Niles to give him a chance to clear the air about the nature of his film and respond to critics who say he is a Christian nut or angainst science.

Challenging the Copernican Principle
Exciting guest Rick DeLano, insipid host George Noory, coasttocoastam, Jan. 7, 2015
UFOs in ancient Christian iconography, spacecraft paintings (misija.com)
We earthlings are not of Earth, but we've been here a long time. So have other beings.
 
Overnight, Rick DeLano discussed his work researching current theories of astronomy and Copernicus and how this material has raised controversies related to his new documentary, "The Principle."
 
Slice of space, akasha deva loka (space.com)
"There is a crisis in [Western] cosmology," states Dr. Michio Kaku. Physics has never been able to provide us with any scientific experimental proof of Copernicus' principle that the Earth travels around the Sun, and it could just be the opposite case -- that the Sun travels around the Earth, DeLano explains, but to say so causes of firestorm in the scientific community whose faith in in Copernicus without proof.
 
While the Copernican argument is plausible, there has never been any scientific demonstration of it because "physics can only talk about relative motion," DeLano says. "The other possibility is that the Earth is actually at rest in the center of the universe, just as every human being [has] essentially believed for thousands of years."
 
My, what secret crafts you have, Uncle Sam!
For his new film he interviewed such scientists as Dr. Michio Kaku, who cite a crisis in cosmology in that the theory of relativity does NOT gel with quantum theory.

And this is the greatest contradiction between theory and observation in the history of science.
 
Prof. Kaku, physicist Lawrence Krauss, narrator Kate Mulgrew, and other participants in the documentary have claimed that although they consented to be in the film, they did not know there was a "geocentric" agenda. For an overview of the media barrage against "The Principle," see this page on DeLano's site.
 
Triangle UFO in NASA footage (NASA)
Rick DeLano concludes that we are alone in the universe using faulty logic: If other "planets are perfectly good for life, and life is everywhere, and they're billions of years older than us, somebody should have turned us into a parking lot, long since...We see an astonishingly silent universe, at least according to the sensors like SETI," he philosophizes.
 
Look up nightly and see the wars.
Apparently he has not been looking in the night sky with night vision goggles or seen NASA footage of how crowded space is just above Earth with UFO traffic, no matter how hard NASA TV tries to keep it out of the frame. We are definitely not alone in space, but no one can say so within respectable science, such as the university system, until we have not only documented evidence, of which there is a great deal, but also replicable proof. (Even then one will not be allowed to say it until the gatekeepers say it is all right). More + AUDIO
 
NASA footage of UFOs
(EPS) NASA video and audio footage of UFOs sighted by astronauts on board during various Space Shuttle missions orbiting Earth.
(LunaCognita) NASA: Alien anomalies caught on film, a compilation of stunning UFO footage from NASA's own archives, most of which are kept secret from the public.

Coast to Coast AUDIO: listen with Windows Player  High  Low, download MP3s: Hour 1   Hour 2   Hour 3   Hour 4. Note: Some mobile devices do not download MP3s, so use a desktop.