Showing posts with label Theory of Evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theory of Evolution. Show all posts

Sunday, February 2, 2025

Science of feelings: dating icks (NPR)



Did your date give you 'the ick'? Here's the science behind the feeling

"Ugh, eww, and ick! I'm out! H to the NO!"
The food was top-notch, the atmosphere was cozy, and my date aimed to entertain. I love a good personal story, so I invited him to relate one that he'd referenced in his profile. Good fodder for a first date, I thought.

At one point in the story, as he recounted it, a goat butted its head into an outdoor toilet that he happened to be using, shoving the door open.

That's sick, Barry! Get out!!
"ME-EH-EHH!!" said my date, braying like a goat and thrusting his neck in a reenactment that seemed just a little too accurate.

Something inside me recoiled. Any trace of romantic or sexual interest I had in this man disappeared in that moment.
You could say I got "the ick" — that feeling of disgust when someone you're dating does this one thing that you just can't get past. The term was used on Ally McBeal in the 1990s and then popularized more recently on the reality show Love Island and on Nobody Wants This.


Eews and icks
Ick, he said he listens to heavy metal garbage.
What gives me the ick and what gives you the ick can be worlds apart. From wearing acrylic nails to laughing too loud to using a Borat voice in the middle of a make-out session, a little internet searching will reveal a whole universe of "icks."

There's an idea in psychology that all emotions, from fear to disgust, were evolutionarily advantageous traits. But is the ick really serving us now?

One theory posits that disgust evolved to protect humans from pathogens that make us sick. And that kind of makes intuitive sense: If a piece of fruit or meat smells disgusting, you probably won't want to eat it.

But Professor of Psychology Josh Rottman, who studies disgust at Franklin & Marshall College, says disgust isn't just a biological function; it's a product of our socialization. And that means if you get the ick on a date, it might be time for some self-examination.
The key to flirting? It's not about youProf. Rottman spoke with It's Been a Minute host Brittany Luse about the psychology of disgust and the case for pushing past the ick when it comes to choosing a partner. Here are four takeaways from their conversation:

1. Little kids don't feel disgust — and that tells us something
Maybe innocence means not having disgust yet.
"Unlike many emotions that emerge within the first year of life or so, it seems like disgust doesn't really robustly come online until around 5, 6 years of age," Prof. Rottman says. (Think about the toddler who has no qualms about eating a stale Cheerio off the floor.)

If disgust were all about keeping us healthy, he says, researchers would see it in younger children. Instead, kids start experiencing disgust around the same time they start thinking about "cooties" — and who's in the "in" group and "out" group on the playground.

2. Disgust is more gut reaction than conscious thought process
If you're at the movies and you see your date pick her nose before reaching for your hand, you don't think, "This behavior is indicative of poor hygiene and lack of consideration." You just flinch and pull your hand away. This revulsion response happens almost instantly; it comes without any thought, says Prof. Rottman. And he says once you feel disgusted by something, it can be really difficult to overcome that feeling.

As host Luse of It's Been a Minute puts it, it's just "this tiny bit of disgust that you just can't look past or get over."

3. Disgust is related to social norms — often ugly ones
What's your attachment style? Take this quiz to find out"I think a lot of the specific icks that people have are reflections of social norms that we might want to challenge," says Prof. Rottman.

For instance, actress Millie Bobby Brown has said her "biggest ick" is when a man holds an umbrella, because "there's something about it that just feels really pathetic."

Prof. Rottman says Brown's ick might be an "aversion to the norm violation against masculinity."

And research shows that the consequences of disgust can get a lot worse than getting rejected on a date.

Mr. Prejudice, 1943 (US bigotry)
Prof. Rottman says that disgust may have served an evolutionary purpose in that it could help your reputation to distance yourself from people who your group considered undesirable. "I think disgust has evolved as a way to really embody a lot of xenophobia and bigotry," he says.

"There's a lot of good evidence that genocides and a lot of horrific things that have happened in society have been correlated in some way with disgust," Prof. Rottman says.

Tables turn on racist/implicitly biased Karen

Nazi princesses promoted by racist Disney
For example, Nazi propaganda used terms like "parasites" and "lice" to describe Jewish people. Disgust has been leveraged throughout history to create the feeling that certain people are "impure" or less than human.

"The ick is probably a much more minor version of that," Rottman says.

4. It's worth trying to get past the ick
Why can't I find my one and only perfect prince?
Prof. Rottman says that while it's difficult to completely shake a feeling of disgust about another person's particular behavior, getting the ick doesn't have to be a deal breaker.

And, he adds, there's good reason not to give it too much weight in dating: "I think…these feelings of ickiness are not going to be great signals of whether someone's going to be good for us and a good partner."


He shared that he even gets the ick from his partner from time to time — when she walks around barefoot in the garden, developing big calluses on her feet. "I think I can realize that…she's great in so many other ways, that that shouldn't be something to drive me away," Prof. Rottman says. (The professor said he got his wife's permission before sharing this story.)

As host Luse suggested to Prof. Rottman, perhaps "love is persevering against the ick."

So next time you get the ick, consider whether that says more about you than the other person.

And Luse says on It's Been a Minute, maybe "it's a you problem."

The triple plandemic ick at the coffee shop

Wednesday, December 20, 2023

Disclosure: Antarctica, tunnels, lost kids, ETs...

Disclosure (Unifyd.TV); Pat Macpherson, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Not everyone could handle the truth.
Gaia.com is great for disclosure content, but is there a new kid on the block? Unifyd.tv/disclosure might have something to say as it tries to carve out a niche in this space. Which space? The virtual space covering actual space and the being inhabiting it, meddling in human and animal affairs, guiding evolution, and who knows what. The Sumerians, Anunnaki, pre-biblical civilizations from which Judaism borrowed and appropriated so much of its sacred literature.

Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Mushrooms (Joe Rogan)

NDTBuzzFeed; Pat Macpherson, Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
I'm richer and get better drugs than you, Neil.
Tyson, an American [actor,] astrophysicist, author, and science communicator, shared one thing that keeps him up at night, leaving Rogan speechless.

On Tyson's TikTok, the famed astrophysicist, known for bringing science to the masses, shared a clip captioned, “We have more in common with mushrooms than you think.”

With his 4.8 million followers, it is no wonder that the clip quickly went viral. The comment section was on fire, with many making fun of the host [Joe Rogan].

One user wrote, “This is why I love Neil. He makes science understandable for everyone, even Joe Rogan.”

Another shared, “Joe Rogan had no idea what he was talking about during this whole interview, and it’s awesome.” More:

Monday, February 6, 2023

Earliest Irish were Black with blue eyes: DNA

Lindsey Charleston, History All Day via MSN.com, Feb. 6, 2023; Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly; RTE One via SnM Chanel, "Song of Our Ancestors" (video link)
How long have whites been covering this up? An inconvenient truth, so scientists kept quiet?
The earlier inhabitants were hunter-gatherers with blue eyes and dark skin, DNA reveals.

When we arrived from space to this rock...
"A historian makes a fascinating discovery that challenges everything we [say we] knew about early humans," MSN is reporting.

"(They looked nothing like we thought)," the mainstream media channel adds. [They were Black with blue eyes, but let's bury the lead and not say that right up front. A documentary reveals the shocking DNA evidence that confirms this unexpected finding.]

We weren't all pale gingers?
Many millennia ago, in the ancient [super green] forests of Ireland, early humans thrived in spite of competition from other predators like bears and wolves.

In the present day, the area, known as the Burren, is a rocky landscape with virtually no trees in sight. Still, traces of our [human] ancestors have managed to endure the ravages of time, making way for a discovery that challenges our current knowledge of human prehistory. More: MSN


Buddha, how did life begin on earth?
The Buddha, who knows and sees, was very wise.
[The Buddha explains the beginning of life on this planet as being a process of devolution, from the time some devas or light beings alighted here and began to become coarser and coarser as their karma (intentional deeds) worsened. Corrupted minds led to corrupt speech and actions, which have brought us down to our present day when we are short lived, struggle to eat and satisfy our many desires, and must cope with many diseases when previously the human race -- that is, the devolving space race -- had many fewer problems. This devolution does not contradict the presence of evolution, as all things are cyclical and a coming Goden Age is ahead of us, just as many are behind us. There are revolutions within revolutions, cycles within cycles. And this is what the ancient Vedas ("Knowledge Books" of proto-India preserved in Hinduism) call the Kali Yuga or "Dark Age." See DN 27, the Agganna Sutta, or "A Buddhist Genesis Sutra" for details.]
There were Blacks in Ireland before whites

Documentary hosted by Brendon Gleeson, published by RTE in 2021
The Burren is a place full of intrigue and mystery to filmmaker Dr. Katrina Costello, who has been working there for over 13 years. "It is not a landscape that gives up her secrets easily, but in every fold of rock and around every corner there is always a new surprise."

Her love for that landscape is obvious, which captures the raw and complicated beauty of the Burren using intimate natural history photography and the spontaneous insights of a cast of local contributors.

In The Burren: Heart of Stone, audiences are taken on a journey through the ages, tracing the genetic story of the Irish people.

It tells the story of the Black Irish hunter-gatherers and reveals what became of them. It asks if prehistoric farmers [who came second] irreversibly altered this landscape and if modern Irish society is descended from those who first lived here over 10,000 years ago?
  • Release date: April 11, 2021
  • Country: Ireland (Ireland)
  • Language: English
  • Filming locations: West Ireland, UK

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

How to evolve physically right now (video)

Scott Carney, Wim Hof (Kindle Edition); Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

(Evan Carmichael ft. Scott Carney) Does the Wim Hof Method actually work? #NeverSick, May 6, 2017: Does the "Iceman" Method work? Investigative journalist and author of What Doesn't Kill Us, Scott Carney wanted to debunk Hof. In this episode of How to Never Get Sick Again, we see the results.

What Doesn't Kill Us: How Freezing Water, Extreme Altitude, and Environmental Conditioning Will Renew Our Lost Evolutionary Strength
This New York Times bestseller traces our evolutionary journey back to a time when survival depended on how well we adapted to the environment around us.

Our ancestors crossed deserts, climbed mountains, and traversed oceans without even a whisper of what anyone today might consider modern technology.

Those feats of endurance now seem impossible in an age where we take comfort for granted. But what if we could regain some of our lost evolutionary strength by simulating the environmental conditions of our forebears?

Investigative journalist and anthropologist Scott Carney takes up the challenge to find out: Can we hack our bodies and use the environment to stimulate our inner biology?

Helping him in his search for the answers is Dutch fitness guru Wim Hof, whose ability to control his body temperature in extreme cold has sparked a whirlwind of scientific study.

Author Carney also enlists input from an Army scientist, a world-famous surfer, the founders of an obstacle course race movement, and ordinary people who have documented how they have cured autoimmune diseases, lost weight, and reversed diabetes.

The Way of the Iceman: How... (Wim Hof)
In the process, he chronicles his own transformational journey as he pushes his body and mind to the edge of endurance, a quest that culminates in a shirtless, record-breaking, 28-hour climb to the snowy peak of Mt. Kilimanjaro wearing nothing but a pair of running shorts and sneakers.

An ambitious blend of investigative reporting and participatory journalism, What Doesn't Kill Us explores the true connection between the mind and the body and reveals the science that allows us to push past our perceived limitations. More

Monday, April 13, 2020

Spiritualism: Evolution or Devolution?

Pat Macpherson and Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly Wikipedia edit
Hypnotic SĂŠance painting by Swedish artist Sven Richard Bergh 1887 (National Museum).
.
American Spiritualist pantheist Cora L. V. Scott
Theosophy opposes Spiritualism's interpretation of evolution. It instead teaches a metaphysical theory of evolution mixed with human devolution.

Buddhist sacred texts and Hindu Vedas agree: Humanity is not evolving but devolving, even as some individuals make meditative and karmic progress.
Madame Blavatsky was guided by the Masters
Spiritualists do not accept the devolution of the Theosophists.

To Theosophy, humanity (life on the human plane, which refers to an entire plane not just the miniscule portion of it on Earth) starts in a better state, one of presumed perfection (a Golden Age).

This, of course, is not actual perfection. It then falls into a process of progressive devolution -- materialization, density, coarseness, sickliness, shrinking lifespan, and so on -- which is not linear but punctuated by periods of progress and regress, with minor cycles within a much larger samsaric cycle, developing the intellect and losing spiritual consciousness.

Spiritualist Gerald Massey
After the gathering of experience and growth through repeated rebirths, humanity in general regains the original spiritual state (goes back to being like the superior deva plane), as individuals in specific may do at any time, which is one of self-conscious evolution that begins devolving again.

Theosophy and Spiritualism were both very popular metaphysical schools of thought especially in the early 20th century and were always clashing in their different beliefs.

Russian Madame Blavatsky was critical of Spiritualism; she distanced Theosophy from Spiritualism as far as she could and allied herself with eastern occultism (G. Baseden Butt, Madame Blavatsky, p. 120).

British Spiritualist Gerald Massey claimed that Darwin's theory of evolution was not wrong but incomplete (Concerning Evolution, p. 55). More

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

"Forbidden Archeology" Google talk (video)

Michael A. Cremo, Talks at Google, 10/7/14; Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson, Wisdom Quarterly
Some science is forbidden because new discoveries would upset everything we believe.


"Forbidden Archaeology" (Talks at Google)
Michael A. Cremo (mcremo.com) delves into "forbidden" archeology. Over the past two centuries, archeologists have found bones, footprints, and out of place artifacts proving that people like ourselves have existed on earth for hundreds of millions of years. This upsets the cart of the theory of evolution and so is actively suppressed by academics and ignored by everyone else.

Black budget scientists know all about it.
Many scientists have forgotten or actively ignored these remarkable facts -- even when they handled undeniable evidence. Why? It is primarily because some facts contradict the now dominant views and explanations about human origins, evolution, and extreme antiquity.

According to these popular views, humans like ourselves (Homo sapien sapiens, "modern humans") have existed for only about 100,000 or maybe 200,000 years, and before that there were only more primitive human ancestors.

This evolutionary paradigm, held by influential and vested groups of gatekeeper scientists, has acted as a "knowledge filter." This filtering -- conscious or not, intentional or not -- has left us with a radically incomplete set of facts for building our ideas about human origins.

Recovering the complete set of facts takes us on a fascinating expedition, across five continents to various archaeological sites, some long forgotten, some that are the center of ongoing controversy.

On the other hand, the complete set of facts is consistent with the accounts of extreme human antiquity found in the ancient Vedic Puranas and Buddhist texts (like the Buddhist Genesis Sutra) about our devolution, the historical writings of ancient India.

Who is Michael Cremo?
The evidence is there in the layers of earth.
BIO: Michael A. Cremo is research associate in history of archeology. He has been a member of the World Archaeological Congress (WAC) since 1993. His WAC3 paper "Puranic Time and the Archaeological Record" was published in the Routledge One World Archaeology series volume Time and Archaeology (1999), edited by Tim Murray. He is also a member of the European Association of Archaeologists (EAA).
 
In 2004 Cremo's paper "The Later Discoveries of Boucher de Perthes at Moulin Quignon and Their Impact on the Moulin Quignon Jaw Controversy," presented at the XXth International Congress for History of Science, Liege, Belgium, was published in a conference proceedings volume of this congress, by the scientific publisher Brepols. Cremo is the principal author of the book Forbidden Archeology, a comprehensive historical survey of archaeological anomalies. In a review in British Journal for History of Science, Tim Murray said the book "provides the historian of archaeology with a useful compendium of case studies in the history and sociology of scientific knowledge, which can be used to foster debate within archaeology about how to describe the epistemology of one's discipline." Cremo is particularly interested in examining the history of the archeology from the standpoint of alternative worldviews, particularly worldviews with foundations in ancient Indian thought. He has given invited lectures on his work at the Royal Institution in London, the Anthropology Department of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, the Archeology Department of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, and many other scientific institutions. He has also lectured on his work at universities throughout the world.

Friday, March 22, 2019

Christianity in "grave danger"

Palamedes PR via Irish Post, 3/22/19 (News); Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson, Wisdom Quarterly
Homo Lapsus: Sin, Evolution, and the God Who is Love is out now (Palamedes PR)
.
From gospel truth to fake news: Ignoring science poses "grave risk" to Christianity
Irish PostCHRISTIANITY is in danger of being dismissed as "fake news" unless its leaders start to engage with science and the debate on evolution, one of the world’s leading theologians warns.
 
The Catholic and Anglican Churches’ refusal to respond to anti-religious arguments that undermine their Faith’s validity is accelerating the decline of Christianity in all its forms on an “unprecedented scale.”

By remaining silent on the Creation versus Evolution debate, the Church is “rapidly losing ground” to high-profile evolutionary biologists like Richard Dawkins and is fueling the shift towards an atheistic, post-Christian society, it is claimed.
 
Its refusal to explain how doctrines like the Fall of Man hold-up against the latest scientific theories about the origins of modern humans is seen as “baseless arrogance” by an educated modern society that no longer accepts Biblical teachings without question.
 
If left unchecked, any arguments that counter core Christian beliefs could bring the Church to its knees within a century, Dr. Niamh Middleton of Dublin City University (DCU) said.
 
The Church’s position as a voice of authority on morality will “crumble,” and a skeptical public will write-off its teachings as “outdated, unproved, or even fake news,” Dr. Middleton said.
 
Dr. Niamh Middleton is a lecturer in Theology and Religious Studies at Dublin City University
 
Church leaders from all denominations must instead provide “robust and credible” answers by incorporating pro-Christian scientific theories -- of which there are many -- into doctrine.
 
The warnings follow a nationwide decline in religious affiliation and renewed calls for the UK government to cut the amount of public money going to the Church.
 
Dr. Middleton, an internationally respected authority on moral theology and human origins, said the rise of Scientism -- the view that only scientific claims are meaningful – poses the greatest threat to Christianity in its 2,000-year history.
 
Her pro-Christian views are shared in her new book, Homo Lapsus: Sin, Evolution, and the God Who Is Love, which is out now.
 
In it, she reconciles the Biblical story of creation and the concept of ‘original sin’ – Adam and Eve’s rebellion in Eden by eating forbidden fruit -- with the latest scientific thinking.
 
“Christianity is based on the fundamental principle that evil was a choice for mankind, and that this is represented symbolically in the Genesis account of Adam and Eve choosing to eat the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil,” she said.
 
“Leading evolutionary biologists are now claiming that this mythological explanation is invalid because evolution made it inevitable that the earliest modern humans would choose ‘wrong’ over ‘right.’
 
“Clearly, such harmful theories are capable of undermining the very foundations of Christianity, in a relatively short period of time, unless credible and compelling scientific arguments -- and there are many -- are put forward to the contrary.
 
“But the Church is failing to act, which is being viewed as baseless arrogance and leading to Christianity rapidly losing ground to atheistic evolutionary biologists.”
 
Christian leaders must engage with science's evolutionary debate, says Middleton (IP).

She added: “The outcome will be that the Church will lose all moral authority and Christian teachings, which have defined and guided society for centuries, will be dismissed by the public as outdated, unproved, or even fake news.”
 
Christianity has been losing ground to science since the mid-19th century when Charles Darwin first proposed his theory of biological evolution in his book, On the Origin of the Species.
 
Darwin, once a devout Christian, famously lost his faith because his own theories appeared to contradict traditional Biblical teachings on theodicy, or the origins of evil.
 
He came to believe that the origins of "evil" -- all negative traits like greed, anger and violence -- which lead to human suffering were inevitable because of natural selection and the survival of the fittest.
 
Today, a new wave of so-called neo-Darwinists continue to champion this view. It undermines the foundations of the Christian faith because it leaves two options: either there is no God at all, or God himself was responsible for mankind’s suffering by creating an evolutionary process that facilitated the evolution of evil.
 
But whilst neo-Darwinist theories receive the most publicity, others contradict it and support the Church’s position that evil was more likely the result of moral choice.
 
These include compelling studies in primatology and paleoanthropology which suggest that early man made a conscious decision to become aggressive and pursue short-term personal gains at the expense of the group after thousands of years of coexisting peacefully.
 
Dr. Middleton said supporting theories like this are going unreported and unrecognized because the Church refuses to acknowledge them or accept that science and religion can live side-by-side.
 
She said the Catholic and Anglican churches must listen to theologians and, on their advice, incorporate supporting theories into their doctrine and routinely taught in churches and in schools.
 
“Science is not incompatible with religion, but this must be declared and disseminated by the Churches among the clergy, such as through an encyclical, and taught in faith schools,” she added.
 
“If Christianity is not to be relegated to the status of fairy tale then the heads of the Catholic and Anglican Churches, Pope Francis and the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev. Justin Welby, must pay attention to their theologians, who are making significant strides in reconciling doctrine with science, and take seriously the challenge of Scientism and neo-Darwinists.
 
“In our increasingly secular world, an earnest engagement with science by Christianity will also refute the atheistic claim that religious adherents are ignorant, bigoted, or fanatical.”

Thursday, May 10, 2018

The Feather Thief: Obsession, Natural History


I'm no Wallace (Charles Darwin)
On a cool June evening in 2009, after performing a concert at London's Royal Academy of Music, 20-year-old American flutist Edwin Rist boarded a train for a suburban outpost of the British Museum of Natural History.

Home to one of the largest ornithological collections in the world, the Tring Museum was full of rare bird specimens whose gorgeous feathers were worth staggering amounts of money to the deadly men who shared Edwin's obsession: the Victorian sport of salmon fly-tying and -fishing.

Beauty, Obsession, the Heist of the Century
Once inside the museum, the champion fly-tier grabbed hundreds of bird skins.

Some of them had been collected 150 years earlier by a contemporary of Darwin's, Alfred Russel Wallace, who'd risked everything to gather them -- and escaped into the darkness.

Two years later, Kirk Wallace Johnson was waist high in a river in northern New Mexico when his fly-fishing guide told him about the heist.

He was soon consumed by the strange case of the feather thief. What would possess a person to steal dead birds? Had Edwin paid the price for his crime? What became of the missing skins?

In his search for answers, Johnson was catapulted into a years-long, worldwide investigation.

The gripping story of a bizarre and shocking crime, and one man's relentless pursuit of justice, The Feather Thief is also a fascinating exploration of obsession and man's destructive instinct to harvest/steal the beauty of nature. More

“Absorbing...Though it's non-fiction, The Feather Thief contains many of the elements of a classic thriller.”
—Maureen Corrigan, NPR’s Fresh Air
“One of the most peculiar and memorable true-crime books ever.”
 Christian Science Monitor
A rollicking true-crime adventure and a captivating journey into an underground world of fanatical fly-tiers and plume peddlers, for readers of The Stranger in the WoodsThe Lost City of Z, and The Orchid Thief.