Thursday, April 10, 2025
How all life began: Big Bangs by Bashar
Thursday, July 11, 2024
Slo-Mo Battle: Eckhart Tolle vs. Ram Dass
- [The Buddha taught that samma samadhi, "right concentration or stillness," while very beneficial and leading to saintly qualities is not nearly enough for the attainment of actual awakening (bodhi) and liberation (nirvana). It may seem a fine distinction, but the Buddha's whole reason for teaching was to establish the Dharma in the world that had been lost for thousands of years or much long, in spite of the fact that we had the Vedas and Brahmanism and Indian teachers all of that time. If those things had been enough to bring people to enlightenment, he would have had no reason to establish "right view" and a "path of purification" that leads to a real/permanent state of moksha or "liberation." While Hinduism literally uses the exact same words -- nirvana, moksha, samadhi, karma, and the like, they mean very different things in the Teachings of the historical Buddha. Mahayana Buddhism, on the other hand, seems to have bought into the Hindu definitions and acts as a kind of popular sect of Hinduism more than as a form of Buddhism. But the average person will never know this without studying it deeply. Indeed, other religions have "salvation" and "liberation," but it is only because they are defining those words differently. From an Early Buddhist standpoint, the terms are being misapplied to impermanent states, to forms of rebirth in heaven or in the company of Brahma, as if one would stay there forever and therefore be free of samsara when someone was actually still fully immersed in the problem the Buddha found a final solution to.]
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
Sutra series (SN 25:1-10) abbreviated
![]() |
| The eye that see, the third eye that knows? |
Thursday, February 16, 2023
Women's bodies are weird: doctors' beliefs
![]() |
| I swear I was just doing it for longevity, Dear. |
![]() |
| The Buddha gave us a way out of misery. |
Wednesday, October 5, 2022
Mother Goddess Durga ceremony (video)
Friday, May 6, 2016
To Be An Island Unto Yourself (sutra)
- 1. Atta-dipa: dipa means both "island" and "lamp" (Sanskrit dvipa and dipa). The meaning "island" is well-established here. "Self" refers to the pronoun "oneself" (cf. SN 3.8, n. 1).
- 2. It is necessary to withdraw, to be "an island to unto oneself," at least for a time (as any meditator knows), not because it is "selfish" but precisely to make a profound introspective investigation. Buddhists in another sense would, of course, agree with John Donne that "No man is an island."
"Change occurs in this person's body (form), and it becomes different. On account
of this change and difference, disappointment, crying, pain, grief, and
despair arise.- 3. Woodward remarks (in the Book of the Kindred Sayings, the PTS translation of SN, Vol. III, 1924) that one would expect to find here the words he inserts in the text: "The well-taught [noble] disciple," as in many passages. For if one in fact directly sees these things and reflects on them as stated in the text, one will cease to be an ordinary uninstructed "worldling" and become a noble (enlightened) disciple.
- 4. Viraga, "dispassion" (SN 12.16, n. 2), is waning.
![]() |
| California's remote San Nicolas Island |
- 5. Tadanganibbuto means rather more than Woodward's "one who is rid of all that."
Monday, September 30, 2013
Bridging Science and Spirituality (Dr. Pert)
![]() |
Dr. Pert passed away on Sept. 12, 2013 and memorial services will be held on Oct. 27, 2013 at 10:00 am at the Historic Jewish Synagogue, Sixth & I, Washington, D.C.
|
![]() |
| Psychosomatic Wellness (soundstrue.com) |
![]() |
| Energetic meditation for health |
Monday, March 21, 2011
Sex, robots, and what is "consciousness"?
(T2) Gynoids and actroids, female robots, are advancing rapidly to serve humans.
Buddhist phenomenology and psychology in the Abhidharma defines "self," or the ego-soul-individual, as a coherent and interdependent set of aggregates, "heaps," or grouped components. There are many such components. But for simplicity they are usually defined as five groups: (1) form, (2) sensation, (3) perception, (4) other mental formations, volition being the most salient, and (5) consciousness."Form" usually means body. But it is not limited to visible or tangible bodies. It is called "form" because it includes subtle bodies not seen by the denser eye faculty but visible to the refined mental faculty. The form group actually includes four things, qualities of materiality spoken of for the sake of simplicity as the Four Great Elements (solidity, extension, energy, cohesion) and derived elements. These subatomic elements can be seen directly in deep meditation and understood at the profoundest level without recourse to high tech equipment.
- Anyone is capable of becoming a buddha. But to do so is such a herculean endeavor as to be almost impossible. It is enough to make the best use of the Buddha's Teachings. That is to say, if we all wished for it, vowed to complete it, and strove diligently from this day forward, it would be aeons before even one of us were able to accomplish that kind of supreme teachable enlightenment. We would have to wait until this dispensation ended, then rediscover the ultimate truth, and revealing it by establishing a new dispensation of the Dharma in the world, which would have long since forgotten the Teachings of the historical Buddha.
"Consciousness" (viññana or vijnana) in a very technical sense is defined pragmatically as being of six kinds. Consciousness is awareness through the six sense. "Mind" is not a thing but rather a dynamic process. If form or materiality is only the interplay of the Four Great Elements (the major qualities and their derivatives) then mind or mentality is only the interplay of these four formless constituents of being. Together they comprise the Five Aggregates of Clinging.
This is a fancy way of saying that mental processes are interdependent: They interact with one another, arising based on a material (kama) and, more importantly, a fine-material (rupa) base.
With impingement on a physical and/or a fine-material base (which means impingement is not limited to the gross flesh we touch and are well aware of but rather to more subtle conceptions of form), there arises sensation (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral). The brain, which is not the contents of the skull, is also a sense organ: It receives mental impressions not available to five ordinary senses.
Interestingly the development of "higher" faculties, what we commonly refer to as "psychic" abilities, depends in part on the physical base. The physical eye-base is responsible, when activated and developed, for clairvoyance, the ear clairaudience, and so on.
Of course, subtle sights and subtle sounds are not perceived through the eyes and ears. But they share a base of derived-materiality such that their subtle forms are discerned by the mind, a faculty capable of perception with a physical basis not in the cranium. But it is a matter of degree, for they are received in the same way, as impulses that eventually get processed in the brain like ordinary sights and sounds.
The base of consciousness is not in the head. The "mind door" is very specifically located in another part of the body, which cultures throughout the world have long known, but which we are led away from by modern neuroscience that increasingly focuses us to search above the neck.
- But rather than thinking about, speculating on, or merely contemplating these things and whether they are true or not, it is far more useful to develop (bhavana) direct-knowledge (jnana). The Dharma is here for realization not for wholesome discussion, and especially not for unwholesome discussion. The Truth will not do a person good who does not put that Truth into practice as truth. To talk about it without practicing for realization is like reading a menu without ever eating.
This depth of Buddhist teaching is alive and well in Burma, which more than any other country, more so since it was blocked off from the world by a police state dictatorship, preserved, practiced, and developed the Abhidharma.
See in particular the freely available teachings of the modern enlightened Buddhist master Pa Auk Sayadaw, paauk.org. We cannot say nearly as much for the dominant Burmese dry-insight tradition advocated by Mahasi Sayadaw, which ignores the Buddha's emphasis on "right concentration," (samma-samadhi) defined by the Buddha as the development of the first four absorptions (dhyana) as the basis for successful insight (vipassana).
- Kokoro: kokoro-dreams.co.jp
- Sanrio: sanrio.co.jp
- Inst. of Advanced Industrial Science and Tech."HRP-4C": video
- Press release: aist.go.jp
- Intelligent Robotics Lab: is.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp
- Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? engadget.com
Monday, December 27, 2010
How Yoga is "Totally Zen"
What is "Zen"? Zen is a Japanese word derived from the Chinese word Chán, which itself is derived from the Sanskrit word dhyāna, which means jhana (absorption), "meditation," or "deep meditative state."
Meditation is the next layer to add to a yoga practice once one has become established in yoga postures and breathing.
Moments of time connected by nothing but breath and clear presence [or mindfulness of breathing and clear comprehension, as described in the Satipatthana Sutra] are the crux of meditation.
When we were babies we had no constant ticker tape of thoughts trailing our every move. We can return to that pure, innocent awareness. More>>
Thursday, August 13, 2009
"Spiritual" Sex?
- pleasurable sights
- pleasurable sounds
- pleasurable savorings
- pleasurable scents
- pleasurable sensations
The height of pleasure for beings in the Sensuous Realm, where beings enjoy these Five Cords, seems to be the practice of sex (methuna-dhamma, DN 27.16). It engrosses us. And sex is able to stay within the Five Precepts. - How to Make your Sex Life Spiritual
(Feb. 26, 2008) People blame philosopher Rene Descartes for the modern idea that spirit and body are two separate and antagonistic entities. I don't. - Spiritual Sex: Begin the Practice
(Aug. 10, 2009) When we rouse sexual energy, it is like a sleeping serpent come to life: Kundalini. Sexuality is much more than a physical act. - Spiritual Sex: Ecstatic Love Beyond the Physical
(Jul. 31, 2009) Eleven minutes: that's the estimated time most couples spend making love. We're stuck with a model of sex that I call: The Performance Model. - VIDEO: How Yoga Strengthens Your Sex Life
(Apr. 4, 2008) (We're not just talking flexibility here). That's because sex and yoga are a divine pairing.
For those who prefer to stick with the guilt and shame model (recovering Catholics, Jews, and Fundamentalists of every stripe), here are three specially selected stories:- Bruce Wilson: Ensign Church head endorsed Sex-with-Succubus
(Jul. 25, 2009) Why are all Fundies -- of all religions -- so obsessed with sex?
*Buddhist Cosmology
Brahma-world: in the widest sense, a name for the Fine-material world of Form (rūpa-loka) and the immaterial or Formless world (arūpa-loka) beyond it; in a narrower sense, however, it is a designation only for the first three heavens of the Fine-material world. Cf. Brahma-kāyika-deva.
Brahma-kāyika-deva: The "heavenly beings of the Brahma-world" inhabit the first three heavens of the Fine-material world (rūpa-loka), corresponding to the First Absorption (jhāna). The highest ruler of them is called Great Brahma (Mahā-Brahmā). Cynically he is said (DN 11.81) to pretend: "I am Brahma, the Great Brahmā, the Most High, the Invincible One, the Omniscient One, the Ruler, the Lord, the Creator, the Maker, the Perfect One, the Preserver, the Controller, the Father of all that was and will be." Cf. deva (II. 1-3).
Graphic as seen on a Sri Lankan Buddhist monk's blog (prevaids.org)
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Thai Protesters Form Political Party
PATHUM THANI, Thailand -- Members of Thailand's yellow-shirt protest movement voted to form a political party: Thai Protest Group Votes to Form a Political Party
- Protesters to form political party in Thailand The Epoch Times
- Thai protest group to form a political party eTaiwan News
Friday, May 22, 2009
Alan Watts on Buddhism
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Koan: There is No Self
Genjo Koan Section X, Part I
"A person riding along on a boat looks around, sees the shore, and mistakenly thinks that the bank is moving. But if looking directly at the boat, one discovers that it is the boat, not the bank, that is moving.
"Likewise, with confused thoughts about body and mind, holding to discrimination of myriad phenomena (dharmas), one mistakenly thinks one's own mind and nature are permanent.
"If intimately engaged in daily activities, one returns to right here, the principle that the myriad phenomena have no self is clear."
From here Dogen Zenji warns us against the view that the mind is permanent and only phenomenal appearances perish. He points out the fact that myriad phenomena [form, feelings, perceptions, volitions, and consciousness] are without self.
The view of permanence of the mind and the perishing of phenomenal appearances, to state it simply, is the view that the body changes and passes away, but the spirit eternally abides unchanging. It is a view that is generally easy for those of a simple faith to fall into.
The metaphor "a person riding along on a boat" means just what it says and can be understood by anybody.
"With confused thoughts about body and mind, holding to discrimination of the various dharmas, one mistakenly thinks one's own mind and nature are permanent."
An unenlightened person is completely confused about body and mind. As long as one has not clearly seen that the five conditions (materiality, sensation, conception, discrimination, and awareness) are all empty.
No matter how great a scholar one may be, one is confused about body and mind. As a result one falls either into a view of permanence or a view of annihilation. Many people of a simplistic faith fall into a view of permanence. Many second-rate scientists fall into a view of annihilation.
Here Dogen Zenji warns particularly against a view of permanence. A view of permanence is considering there to be a single, permanent, guiding self. It is considering there to be a fixed, unchanging "soul." It is thinking that the "self" actually exists.
Unenlightened people have the karmic illness of considering whatever they attach themselves to as having a self [an identity, a persisting or unchanging entity riding or guiding the phenomenal process]]. If they make a group, they consider the group to have a self [a persisting reality or identity independent of its parts].
If they attach themselves to a nation, they consider the nation to have a self. One would hardly think that there was a self in the planet, but if the world were to become completely unified and there were such a thing as a world-state, perhaps they would come to believe in a world-self.
"The Buddha Way is no-self." The one who thoroughly realized that all things are without self [are impersonal or devoid of self] was Shakyamuni Buddha.
"The myriad teachings return to the one" is also fine. But if Buddhism compromises with religions that have a false belief in the "self" or "soul" or "atman," it is no longer Buddhism at all.
But then if religions other than Buddhism return to no-self, the bases of those religions will disappear, and those religions will be changed into something completely different.
However, since there can only be one truth, I think that when the wisdom of human beings advances, one way or another they'll become one.
In recent times the ones who, comparatively speaking, are least inclined toward a false belief in the "soul" or "self" are the scientists, particularly physicists and psychologists. But I'm quite afraid that if they make one false step, they will fall into a view of nihilism.
By no means do scientists think that body and mind exist separately. But they are liable to regard the body as important and neglect the mind. Western [allopathic] medicine up until now has been treating people from that standpoint.
In contrast, it seems that the Eastern medical tradition has emphasized the mind since long ago. The expression, "Illness originates in the spirit (ki or chi)" is a common one. Even the word for sickness (byoki) means illness (byo) of the spirit (ki)." [Ki can also be taken to mean the energetic body, mood or mentality influencing the body.] But even Western medicine has lately come to regard the mind as quite important.
Of course, it is confused thinking to consider mind and body as existing separately. But attaching greater or lesser importance to the mind or the body is also confused thinking. So if one thinks that a fixed body or mind exists for even one minute, this is also confused thinking. [All is in flux, moving, shifting, processing, not "being" but becoming.]
When one thinks about everything with this kind of confused thinking as the basis, one makes the mistake of thinking that only the body changes, arises, and passes away. One mentally depicts something like a spirit or a self that is eternally abiding and unchanging. This is the way ordinary people think.
From there, the theory of the undying soul emerges. On the one hand, in fact Buddhism stresses that there is no [creator] God [responsible for all things] and no soul. On the other hand, people think that Buddhism is something that believes in an unchanging soul.



















