Showing posts sorted by relevance for query garudhammas. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query garudhammas. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, August 21, 2009

The Extra Rules for Nuns


Ayya Tataaloka on the eight "Principles to be Respected" by nuns (garudhammas) and the formation of the female Buddhist Order (bhikkhuni-sangha). The additional monastic rules for women are a "definite historical impossibility." Their origin stories in the Vinaya contradict the famous story of the Buddha's stepmother (the first female to be ordained) and how she was reluctantly granted admission. The venerable nun is at a dialogue seminar in 2008 addressing the topic of the nun's disciplinary code.

A Painful Ambiguity - Ajahn Sujato
The Buddha is said to have laid down eight "Principles to be Respected" (garudhammas) as a prerequisite for female ordination...The eight are like a dam that holds back the floods (buddhanet.net).

Saturday, May 11, 2024

Special Rules for Nuns? (Ayya Tathaaloka)

Ayya Tathaaloka and the Buddhist nuns of the Alliance for Bhikkhunis (bhikkhuni.net)



Global Congress on Buddhist Women, Hamburg, Germany

Special rules for females that subordinate Buddhist nuns to monks (garudhammas or "heavy offenses") are not what they first appear to be.

American Theravada Buddhist nun Ayya Tattaaloka reveals what her research, as well as that of other Buddhist scholars, found. There appears to be no gender difference. (How could that be? We are all led to believe women are subordinate to men in the monastery).

Both monks and nuns have sanghadisesa (calling for a meeting and subsequent meeting of the Sangha) disciplinary rules, which are rather heavy.

In the same way, both males and females have "heavy offenses," that is, garudhammas.

2



3



4

  • Ayya Taathaloka (videos); Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly, originally compiled on 9/17/10

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Buddhist monk on Gender Equality (video)

Claralynn N. (United Kingdom); Dhr. Seven, Ashley Wells, Seth Auberon, Amber Larson, Wisdom Quarterly; Abbot Ajahn Brahmavamso (BuddhistSocietyWA, June 27, 2014)

BuddhistSocietyWAPERTH, Western Australia - Ajahn Brahm -- an enlightened Western Buddhist monk from England living in Australia after a decade in Northeast Thailand (Isan) at Wat Pah Nanachat, the International Forest Monastery -- talks about the banning of his United Nations' speech on gender equity, equality of the sexes.

Viewers who support Wisdom Quarterly and women's right to full ordination in Theravada Buddhism as well as supporting Ajahn Brahm's work striving for the equality of females within all Buddhist schools, particularly his more traditional and monastic tradition, are encouraged to consider signing the online petition here.
  • Sangha: nuns, monks, female, male supporters.
    Traditionally, it was thought that women could no longer secured full ordination due to a rule the Buddha laid down when his foster mother ordained. However, evidence found in the background stories (Vibhanga) of the Nuns' Disciplinary Code (Bhikkhuni Vinaya), research by the Theravada nun Ayya Tathaloka, shows that those rules or garudhammas are a historical impossibility. Had the Buddha laid them down with all the fanfare in front of the Shakyan women as is claimed, questions would not have arisen regarding etiquette between male and female monastics and ordination, as those would have been settled issues. But that questions did arise, as recorded in the stories accompanying the formation of each rule, those sexist and patriarchal garudhammas could not have been preexisted. The function of these additional rules seems to be little more than to subordinate female Sangha members to males and was clearly in the interest of monks to have hastily inserted at some point in time.
Let's invite Ajahn Brahm to present his gender equality paper at the 2015 UNDV conference
United Nations Day of Vesak (UNDV): Invite Ajahn Brahm to present his gender equality paper @ the 2015 UNDV conference
3,242 signers so far. Let's reach 10,000 United Nations' Day of Vesak (UNDV)
 
Supporting Buddhist women at the U.N.
Nuns are necessary for a complete Sangha
We, the undersigned, are astounded and deeply disappointed by the banning of Ajahn Brahm's paper on gender equality at the 2014 United Nations' Day of Vesak (UNDV) conference in Vietnam.
 
The paper was clearly aligned with the UN’s Millennium Development Goal 3 (Promote Gender Equality and Empower Women), which the UNDV is committed to uphold through its connection with the UN. Moreover, Ajahn Brahm's paper had already been approved for presentation when it was suddenly banned 36 hours before its scheduled presentation.
 
We value free and open dialogue. We therefore ask that the UNDV, in accordance with Millennium Development Goal 3, promotes dialogue about the participation of women in contemporary Theravada Buddhism by inviting Ajahn Brahm to publicly present his gender equality paper at the next UNDV conference in 2015.
(To view signers, go to petition2014.org. This petition will remain open until October 1st, 2014. The petition can be read in Chinese (petition2014.org/2001325991.html), Thai and Vietnamese (petition2014.org/3616363436253634365236073618-vi7879t.html), and Sinhalese (petition2014.org/35233538345835243517.html).

Saturday, May 31, 2025

Parrots: Avoid fools, associate with wise

I had to get out of that situation. I'd rather fly alone than keep company with a fool.
25 funniest comics about parrots, illustrated by keeper of the birds herself (boredcomics.com)
Stay far away from fools, and instead associate with the wise
Avoiding fools and
Associating with the wise,
Giving respect to the deserving,
This is [among] life's highest blessings.

Sattigumba and Pupphaka
Asevanā ca bālānaṃ, paṇḍitānañca sevanā;
Pūjā ca pūjaneyyānaṃ
etaṃ maṅgalamuttamaṃ.

Maṅgala Sutra
That's a good bird! - Thank you, sir.
These lines verses from the "Blessings Sutra" uttered by the Buddha who was asked, “What is life's highest blessing?” He spoke of 38 blessings. However, this first verse is perhaps the most important. We are smart to distinguish the fools from the wise.

The Commentary to this verse explains: Fools commit unskillful karma (demeritorious deeds of body, speech, and mind).

The wise create skillful karma (meritorious deeds of body, speech, and mind). The wise develop virtue (sila, morality, ethical conduct).

Lay Buddhists keep Five Precepts, Eight Precepts on fasting (lunar observance) days, and Ten Precepts on retreat or during intensive practice). Monastics vow to adhere to 227 Precepts, including eight more for females who follow the garudhammas.

When a wise person hears about or recollects the Five Precepts, or a wise monastic hears about or calls to mind the 227 Precepts, that person becomes happy.

When one hears of the unskillful karma created by breaking precepts, one becomes happy because of not having broken those precepts and knowing that bad karmic results (resultants and fruits or vipaka and phala) will be avoided.

When one hears of skillful karma due to virtue, one becomes happy, knowing that welcome results will come. This is true for "wise" people, according to the Bālapaṇḍita Sutra (MN 129).

I'm not a fool. I'm drunk -- and loving it. 🤢🤮
Fools (bāla) are described in the same discourse:

Suppose a fool is sitting in a council hall, street, or crossroads, where people are discussing what is proper and suitable. And suppose that fool is someone who kills living creatures, steals, engages in sexual misconduct, lies (deceives), and uses intoxicants that occasion negligence.  That fool thinks:

"‘These people are discussing what is proper and fitting; those things are found in me, and I am seen in them!’

"This is the first kind of suffering and sadness a fool experiences in the present life.

"Those who fail to uphold the Five Precepts [which are useful for all humans of whatever religion or philosophy] for lay practitioners or 227 for monastics become fearful when they hear these precepts and the negative results from breaking them. They are called fools."

Actually, the ones who become afraid have some hints of wisdom, for they know they should change [so as to avoid future suffering].

I'm starting to think you might be a bad influence on me. - Shut the front door, Birdbrain.
.
It is the ones without fear who do not become afraid at all when hearing these things who are absolute fools. They are the most dangerous because they hold wrong views and act on them. They are dangerous because they believe the unskillful actions they do are actually skillful, and they spread these wrong views with others.

The Commentary to the Maṅgala Sutra, "The Discourse on Blessings," says that this is like a house on fire, burning: It easily spreads to neighboring houses.

Spiritual development starts with being morally wise. After morality is developed, one is capable of developing stillness of mind (samatha, samadhi).

Those who have developed stillness (samadhi, unification, concentration, coherence) have completed the second part of “being wise.”

The third part is to develop insight knowledge or vipassana. One must have the ability to focus, be calm, and remain still to develop insight knowledge. And one must have virtue (morality) to develop focus (non-distractedness).

That is why it is said that virtue, stillness, and wisdom (sīla, samādhi, and paññā), in this order and not in any other order, is the path to enlightenment.

The highest level of insight is the glimpsing or realization of nirvana (Pali nibbāna). And the highest level of attaining nirvana (while still alive) is full enlightenment or arahant knowledge.
  • While a person yet lives, this is called enlightenment with remainder because one is still experiencing the results of previous karma, while no longer accruing any new karma. All intentional actions at this point are called kriyas or "simple (functional) actions." They do not bear fruit. When one enters final nirvana or parinibbana, this is enlightenment without remainder.
An arhat (arahant) is someone in whom passion (greed and clinging), aversion (hatred and fear), and delusion (ignorance and wrong views) are completely destroyed without remainder. These are the noble ones who have laid down the burden, who have made an end of suffering and rebirth here and now.

Where do I ordain?
Wanting to practice a direct path to enlightenment free of all worldly distractions, many people ask where to ordain. To find a proper abbey, look for spiritually wise monastics. While this is difficult to discern by merely looking, morally wise monastics are easier to detect.

One cannot be spiritually wise without being morally wise. Therefore, start at a place where both the monastic rules (vinaya) and meditation are regarded as important.

Rotten apple

[In the West, one bad apple rots the entire barrel.] In addition to a burning house spreading fire to another, the Maṅgala Sutra Commentary speaks of rotten fish spreading rot to nearby objects.

One who ties up putrid fish
with blades of kusa grass
makes the kusa grass smell foul:
so it is in the following fools
(It 68, 9-12, Ja IV 435, 28-29, JaVI 236 4-5).

Maṅgala Sutra Commentary: In contrast, the commentary explains that if one were to wrap tagara jasmine flowers with leaves, those leaves would become wonderfully fragrant.

One who ties up tagara
with leaves [fallen from a tree]
makes the leaves sweetly fragrant:
So it is in following the wise
(It 68, 13-16, Ja IV 436, 1-2, Ja VI 236, 6-7).

Maṅgala Sutra Commentary: This is literally used to explain that whatever is near to us can easily “rub off” on us. Perhaps the best example of this is our language or accent.

Not long ago, if someone were from New York City or Long Island, one could easily tell by the way that person talked.

My father is from the Bronx, and everyone who hears him speak knows it. This is becoming a thing of the past because of TV and internet videos that are homogenizing us.

Think about it. Television and internet media affect us in deeply rooted and subconscious ways. They affect the way we speak without us realizing it. If they can affect the way we sound to others, why would they not impact our attitudes, beliefs, and morals without us realizing it?

As internet algorithms choose more and more polarizing and extreme material to present to us, those things will become a part of us. They become the new normal. They already have.

We are encouraged to associate or live with the wise, with those who are higher than us in terms of morality and wisdom. This is very important because it will be easy for this to rub off on us, such as the fragrance of flowers.

The twin parrots Buddhist birth story

The Sattigumba Jātaka is listed in the Commentaries quoted above to explain this point.

It is the tale of two parrots born as twins. A storm comes, and they are separated shortly after birth.

One bird is raised by a gang of thieves, the other by hermit wandering ascetics. The king comes across both parrots at different times. The first encounter is the bad parrot who speaks of stealing and killing, while the other speaks of sharing and kindness. The king is moved by the difference between the two.

This story may seem hard to believe, but we can find examples of parrots on YouTube that point this out. Believe it or not, many parrots are in need of shelter. Enter “parrot + a location” into a search engine and see the many organizations looking for new nests for their avian orphans. 
  • The video above is about a rescued bird who lived with bad people and witnessed a terrible crime.
This parrot witnessed the murder of its owner. It became a key witness at the trial in the human world. Likewise, there are numerous channels with loving parrots who obviously had loving owners, such as this one:

Hey, give me a kiss. - Sure, 'bout time you asked. Hey, WTH? Why you you little love-blocker!

Hello? What the H do you want? - Les, is that U?
This post by Bhante, now edited by Wisdom Quarterly, is dedicated to Bhante’s cousin, Les Brodie, who died. He had a well-trained talking bird and told me about what a joy it was to have it. It had its own bike, and the bird would often pick up the house phone with its claw on the first ring and imitate his voice, “Hello? Uh huh...ummm...yes...uh huh…”

Apparently, sometimes his friends would have whole conversations with the bird without Les knowing it. He was a very special bird, and his person was not so bad either.

If we are parents, our children are our parrots. They are watching and listening whether we like it or not, and they will mimic and model themselves after us.

Moreover, WE are all talking birds, parroting whomever we follow and associate with. Those with whom we associate rub off on us like wrapping around stinky fish or fragrant flowers. So it is wise to be wise in choosing our associates.

Avoiding fools and
Associating with the wise,
Giving respect to those worthy of it,
This is life’s highest blessing.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Gay Marriage, Pandakas, and Kinnars

Wisdom Quarterly (ANALYSIS)
Philadelphia woman flies the gay-pride rainbow flag at a Washington, D.C., march for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender rights in 2000. Created in San Francisco in 1978, the flag grew in popularity after the murder of Harvey Milk (time.com).

How we as Americans will handle the ancient experience of having a third or mixed gender in society will show the world. But we have much to learn. There is nothing new about it. While there are many stories of how odd self expression is ostracized, stories of their acceptance and integration are buried.

On this ancient land, the indigenous people had a tradition called the berdache. Males who felt like women trapped in a female body (or presumably vice versa) were adopted into the female role and married off to a male. That male was not regarded as gay or a berdache for marrying a man because that biological male was now socially accepted as a female in the tribe.

Much to our Puritanical consternation as Westerners and some deep gender bias, which may be biologically-rooted or completely socially-constructed, this offends us. Gender-bending is unsettling enough if we ourselves are not bisexual, pansexual, omnisexual, or questioning. But role reversal and flipping categories contrary to our birth-nature can be shocking.



In Buddhism as in Western science, gender may be fluid but biological sex is fixed. Long before the language of DNA and XX/XY chromosomes, Buddhist psychology understood that derived materiality had a sex/gender component. There is an element that determines one's biological sex at conception.

Apparently, due to karma, many things can cross wires after that. In gestation, before birth, hormones may not trigger sex stereotypical features, impulses, or reflexes. Men in India who displayed aberrant tendencies (cross-dressing, non-normative role displays, transsexuality) were labelled pandakas ("perverts," "eunuchs," "odd fellows"). We misunderstand this to mean our definition of "homosexual." But neither then nor now does this characterization fit.

It's not about homosexual, bisexual, or pansexual desires. It's about not feeling right. Rather than accepting our karmic inheritance -- which may seem very unfair (and who regards results of past actions as "fair" in subsequent lives?) -- we struggle against it. It often makes us miserable and society, being discomfited, can be very antagonistic.

The solution is not that everyone be bisexual. It is enough that people be accepting. No one needs to be gay, but it seems we do need to be fair and kind to one another. Is reserving marriage for some and not others "fair" or "kind"?

Gays (however we wish to define it, from LGBTQ to "freaks and weirdos") have been gay no matter what society has done to them. And the aberrant behavior, drug addiction, and acting out seem to be more a reaction to poor and unfair treatment forcing secrecy than anything inherent in gender-malleable expressions.

Molestation is post-conception. It can confuse many things -- sexuality, gender roles, rage, codependency, PTSD, and so on. Molestation and nonsexual childhood trauma is the great secret of our Puritanical culture from Europe to England to America. There is a taboo to ever talk about it or its lasting aftereffects. If it expresses itself as gender-aberrant behavior, it is squashed and secreted away as indicative of the unspeakable (molestation).

Although it seems that there is much more sexual molestation going on now than in the past (within families, not by strangers), it must not have been uncommon in the past. It often leads to promiscuity, shutting down, suicide, and flamboyant parades and displays.

Kinnar (pandakas) protesting for civil rights, Islamabad (wikipedia.org)

Pandakas in India
What does Buddhism have to teach us? The Buddha was not against gays. While they were not allowed to become monastics, which entails celibacy, there was no reason in the world they could not become Buddhists or members of the real Sangha. (The "real"community is the Noble Sangha, those who have entered upon the stages of enlightenment even as lay followers).

Murderers (Angulimala), vain and sexually promiscuous individuals (various ancient noble nuns come to mind, such as one of the Buddha's chief disciples, Ven. Uppalavanna), lepers (Suppabuddha), slaves and outcasts, prostitutes (Ambapali) -- the Path is open to all, and everyone is capable of attaining something unless so serious a karma absolutely frustrates their attainment. But even so, anyone is able to make a great deal of merit by practicing.

What Buddhist Psychology (Abhidharma or "Higher Teachings") has to say about the determination of biological sex -- or sexual dimorphism as a quality of the material particles that make up the body -- is fascinating but probably boring. It is explained as a characteristic of "derived materiality."

An examination of it needs more expert guidance than studying biology. It is on par with particle physics. The only living expert we are aware of, and with whom we have discussed these issues, is Ven. Pa Auk Sayadaw. But he is far more interested in leading meditators to see it directly for themselves than to speak of it in abstract or hypothetical terms. So if one seeks him out, be prepared to practice virtue, sit, attain absorption, and be ready to practice insight-meditation -- in that order.

His teaching students -- Sayalay (Ayya) Susila (Malaysia), Ven. Dhammadipa (Czechoslovakia), Tina Rasmussen and Stephen Snyder (California), Shaila Catherine (California) -- might respond to inquiries regarding. But they, too, are certain to prefer speaking to sincere spiritual seekers rather than theoreticians and speculators.

There were pandakas ("pansexuals," "perverts") in the past. There are pandakas today. The sexism that existed before the Buddha and reasserted itself in the male-dominated Sangha (who subordinated Buddhist nuns after the Buddha's passing but early enough to have made it seem as if the Buddha was on board and actually started that subordination by setting up extra rules, garudhammas, for bhikkhunis).

This gives Buddhism a black eye it does not deserve. Originally, the Dharma was not sexist. It was radically progressive in India. But the backdrop of oppression was not overcome. Males and females were segregated, and this segregation intensified in the Buddha's two Monastic Orders (male and female). Pandakas were not allowed because the goal of monasticism is to overcome sensual craving. And the promiscuity pandakas are infamous for meant people would not believe they could contain their impulses even to a normative human degree, which is hard enough.

Not only pandakas, many groups are not allowed to become fully ordained monastics in Buddhism. For example, certain diseases prevent one, even harmless and non-transmissible ones like vitiligo. So Michael Jackson would not have been able to become a fully ordained Buddhist monk -- even if his other aberrant behaviors (with drugs, with children, with flamboyant displays) would not have prevented him.

Wisdom Quarterly was talking to someone in India -- thanks to US corporations making so much use of customer care call centers. The operator had never heard the word "pandaka" and had no idea there was an annual Pandaka Parade in India. That is, until a description of this word was given. Then, perfectly familiar with that, yelled out, "Oh, you mean kinnar!"

Kinnar, as in kinnaras (garudas), the mysterious avian-hybrids of Indian mythology incorporated into Buddhist cosmology. Griffins, angels, serpent-hating-eagles, beautiful bird headed people capable of flight (in massive garuda aircraft).

The kinnar are of India and South Asia (hijra) are the kathoey of Buddhist Thailand.

Flighty "Fairies"
Wisdom Quarterly edit of Kinnar
In the culture of South Asia, hijras (in Islam a word related to flight and migration, Hindi: हिजड़ा, chakka in Kannada, khusra in Punjabi, kojja in Telugu are physiological males who have feminine gender identity, women's clothing, and adopt other feminine gender roles.

Hijras have a long recorded history in the Indian subcontinent, which was formerly Buddhist and now has a massive Muslim population (of over 100 million) from the Mughal Empire period onwards. This history features a number of well-known roles within subcontinental cultures, part gender-liminal, part spiritual, and part survival.

In South Asia, many hijras live in well-defined, organized, all-hijra communities, led by a guru or chief.[1][2] These communities have sustained themselves over generations by "adopting" young boys who are rejected by or who flee their family of origin (due to molestation, abuse, or rejection).[3] Many work as prostitutes for survival.[4]

The word hijra is Urdu, derived from the Arabic root hjr, has the sense of flying away, migrating, or "leaving one's tribe"[5]. It has been borrowed into Hindi, the dominant language of India.

The Indian usage has traditionally been translated into English as "eunuch" or "hermaphrodite," where "the irregularity of the male genitalia is central to the definition."[6] However, in general hijras are born with typically male physiology, only a few having been born with male intersex variations.[7]

Historically, ceremonial initiation into the hijra community is rumored to have involved removal of a boy's penis, testicles, and scrotum, without anesthetic, at or around puberty. However, according to the Mumbai (Bombay) health organization The Humsafar Trust, only eight percent of hijra visiting their clinic are nirwaan (castrated).

Since the late 20th century, some hijra activists and Western non-government organizations (NGOs) have been lobbying for official recognition of the hijra as a kind of "third sex" or "third gender," which is neither man nor woman.[8]

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Nuns feel sexism in Thailand (audio)

Patrick Winn (GlobalPost, PRI, 7-5-16); Ashley Wells, Dhr. Seven, CC Liu (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
The Buddha said the Dharma would not be established until there were both female and male monastics as well as female and male lay practitioners. He ordained his mother as the first nun (without additional rules, the American nun Ayya Tathaloka's scholarship has discovered) and many females. In his day there were many enlightened nuns and females (arhats), such as his two chief disciples, Khema and Uppalavanna. But a nun's order was not established in Thailand when Buddhism arrived.
"As a millennial, mixed-race Asian American Buddhist, I often feel like a party of one. When I am feeling lonely or unique, I imagine that I can see myself as if I am looking from a telephoto lens on the moon: I can see the insignificance of my challenges, that being a follower of Buddha's wisdom doesn't mean I am separated into a neat little category..." - Gabrielle Nomura Gainor (Tsuki Nomura-Henley/lionsroar.com)
.
Thailand’s top female monk” [nun] hacked the system to bring women [back] into the fold
Across Women's Lives
Ven. Dhammananda (right) with Thai supporters (ThaiBhikkhunis.org/PRI)
.
Ven. Dhammananda, a 72-year-old Thai woman, is forbidden [by the self-imposed rules of the Buddhist Monastic Disciplinary Code or Vinaya incumbent on all monastics and austere Asian decorum] from hugging her sons.

She’s never been able to chase her giggling grandchildren around the room. Both acts are forbidden by the strict Buddhist precepts that [fully ordained nuns and] monks must follow.


 
Ven. Dhammananda is a self-described “rare species.” She’s a monastic [an abbess]. She’s also a mom. And in the eyes of her homeland’s Buddhist establishment, she’s a feminist insurgent.
  • The Basket of the Discipline (Vinaya Pitaka) is the first division of the Three Collections (Tipitaka), the other two being the discourses (sutras) and the Higher Doctrince (Abhidharma). It is the textual framework upon which the monastic community (Sangha) is built. It includes not only the monastic guidelines but their origin stories, that is, the reason they were laid down in ancient times in the first place.
  • Bhikkhu Pāṭimokkha: The Monastics' Code of Discipline [the "way to liberation" for intensive practitioners who ordain, wishing for themselves the most direct route to enlightenment and nirvana]
  • The Monastics' Rules: A Guide for Laypeople For the monk and nun the Vinaya helps to guide actions and speech....They were set down by the Buddha...
  • The Buddhist Monastic Code
Each day, she and her female disciples wear the same clothing: flowing saffron robes the shade of ripe mangoes. Their heads are shorn clean shaven down to stubble [just like the monks]. Their possessions are limited to flip flops [the Five Requisites, robes, toiletries, and all they, which is provided by donors and family as well as by savings and other sources] and little else.
 
In other words, their day-to-day lives are largely indistinguishable from that of any upstanding Buddhist monk in their native Thailand [which is about 95% Theravada Buddhist, the second most Buddhist country of all].
 
Ven. Tathaloka (left) with Theravada Buddhist nuns of Aloka Vihara (Alliance for Bhikkhunis)
.
Ven. Tathaloka in  California forest (BN)
But because they are women, Ven. Dhammananda and her [female community at the Thai nunnery or convent Songdhammakalyani Vihara] of 15 female monastics are shunned by the state-backed Buddhist hierarchy [old school patriarchy]. This powerful all-male order, known as the “Bhikkhu Sangha,” regards them as imposters.
 
“That’s their problem,” Ven. Dhammananda says. She’s the abbess (yes, that’s a female “abbot”) of a temple 60 kilometers west of Bangkok.
 
“That’s their own ignorance, which they’ll have to overcome,” she adds.
 
There are roughly 300,000 monks in Thailand [and countless temporarily-ordained “novices,” white-clad trainees or probationers called anagarikas, and other ten precept holders], home to one of the highest concentrations of Buddhists on the planet. Yet only 100 are women. They’re scattered among small temples (nunneries or viharas, monastic residences) that the traditional [male] Order views as insolent.
 
Lion's Roar & Buddhafest Online Film Fest
Before Ven. Dhammananda, there were none at all. [Some would counter argue that there have always been many maechi, "ten precept holding women" who live as monastics and some who take on additional disciplines, wear robes, and so are nearly indistinguishable from monks; there are even fully ordained nuns, though they may not be in the Thai Theravada school.]

Prohibited from ordination in Thailand, she hacked the system in 2001 by flying to Sri Lanka, which started ordaining women in the mid-1990s [thanks to the efforts of the great female German meditator, Ayya Khema, who organized efforts to revive the Theravada Bhikkhuni Sangha].
 
She then returned home as Thailand’s first [fully-ordained Thai Buddhist] female monastic in modern times -- at least in the old-school Theravada strain of Buddhism that dominates Thailand and much of Southeast Asia.
 
In Ven. Dhammananda’s view, the near absence of women in the Sangha (Monastic Order) has left Buddhism as wobbly as a three-legged chair. The school is lopsided, she says, because it lacks feminine insight.
 
Past experience as a mother, she says, is particularly valuable to Buddhist spiritual life. “That experience makes you whole,” she says. “You tend to understand people’s problems on a different level than men do.”
 
Female monastics
The Buddha's wife became enlightened nun
The argument against allowing women into the Monastic Order is shaky, she says. Roughly 2,600 years ago, the Buddha explicitly stated that women can achieve enlightenment. He even ordained his own foster mom [who married his father and raised him from the time he was 7 days old, along with ordaining his wife, his sister, his son, and many of his female and male relatives from the extended Shakya Clan].
 
“Enlightenment is the quality of mind that goes beyond. There is no gender there,” Ven. Dhammananda says. “When you talk about the supreme spiritual goal in Buddhism [nirvana, the end of all rebirth and suffering], it’s genderless.”

Thailand’s Monastic Order, however, rests its case against female monastics on a technicality. The Sangha insists that female monastics can only be brought into the fold by other women [according to ordination procedures of the Bhikkhuni Sangha set down by the Buddha as interpreted and remembered by the monks, who asserted themselves as representing the Sangha, a subsidiary of which was the Bhikkhuni Sangha or separate Nuns' Order. But, of course, their order is the Monks' Order, and the two combined make up the Monastic Order. The men do not have supremacy, but for millennia some in the Sangha have asserted they do, with many dutiful women agreeing and going along.]
  
But because the Sangha in Thailand [never had a Bhikkhuni Sangha established and therefore] has never officially sanctioned a female monastic, there are no women available to open the door to newcomers. The original lineage of female monastics dating back to the Buddha’s time faded out centuries ago [and so did their line of succession, their Vinaya and origin stories for the rules, one of which shows that the Eight Additional Rules or Garudhammas could not have been laid down by the Buddha, according to California Theravada nun, Ayya Tathaloka (bhikkhunis.net)].
 
Thailand’s official male Buddhist order “feels women are a big threat. Especially women in [monastic] robes,” says Sulak Sivaraksa, one of Thailand’s best-known Buddhist scholars.
 
“But since [the female monastics] are wonderful people, more and more people recognize them,” Sulak says. “I told the Thai [female monastics]...to keep clear of scandal. Do good work. And soon the male monks will not only recognize you. They will come and worship you. They will be led by you.”

Like any Buddhist monastic, female monastics such as Ven. Dhammananda are sworn to a dry [free, sober] life [of few worldly concerns] that forsakes romance, luxury, and excess of any kind.

Holding hands? Devouring an entire carton of Häagen-Dazs in one sitting? Pop music or even gossiping? All are [actually allowed and engaged in but are said to be] forbidden [in accord with the spirit of the Monastic Code and the guidelines or lesser rules on etiquette and living together harmoniously with few wants and not disturbing other practitioners or inconveniencing supporters].

More than 300 monastic rules (called precepts or vows, which are for fully ordained practitioners only) dictate their conduct to ensure they do not grow attached to sensual pleasures [become angry, annoyed, or discouraged, succumb to wrong views or delusions, bring disrepute to the Buddha's monastic disciples, shorten the duration the Dharma continues on earth, disturb fellow practitioners/meditators, unduly inconvenience lay and royal supporters, turn the monastic community from a "great field of merit in the world" into something else, etc.]

Nor can they work [but many do -- as teachers, authors, scholars, public speakers, and so on, though they should give up personal gain and support the vihara though, again, many do keep some or all of their earnings through a steward if they wish and are allowed by their abbot]. They acquire food and other requisites by an ancient system of generosity toward spiritual practitioners who leave the homebound life to seek enlightenment.

This can mean walking on "alms round" like the Buddha did in ancient India so that lay people can donate support, or by purchasing it in markets from donated funds, or by people bringing food to the temple and to the nunnery. Sometimes this involves walking on pindabata [the third of the 13 "sane ascetic practices" recommended by the Buddha to overcome bad habits] through urban streets and collecting donated food called alms -- of every variety eaten by lay Buddhists themselves -- from everyday people who support the mission of the Buddha's most dedicated disciples.
 
 
Here are Ven. Dhammananda’s thoughts on rebellion, moms in the Monastic Order, and the decadent treats she misses from her life before entering the temple to get away from it all and dedicate herself to the path to enlightenment in this very life. Her comments have been edited for brevity and clarity.

Do you think of yourself as a rebel?
I never thought of myself as a rebel. Even though I might be one.
My intention is not to provoke. My intention is to insist that we return to the right path.

Would you call yourself a feminist?
Yes. Not that I ever studied feminism. But my understanding of feminism is you should bring out your potentiality to the fullest. Anything obstructing your path, you should work against it. That’s my feminist attitude.

When your sons come to visit, are you allowed to hug them?
No. That is a very hard part. Particularly for my oldest son. He really misses that. He once said to the [other female monastics], “You don’t know how much I miss my mother.”
 
He’s kind of making an offering to the Buddha by giving up his own mother to do this job. But he still misses the hugs.

Are there special rules for men speaking to female monastics?
As long as there is a third person around, and as long as we are not sharing the same seat, [men and female monks] can be close. But I must have a sister [fellow female monk] here as a witness.

You have very young grandkids. What are the rules regarding grandchildren? Can you pick them up and play with them?
The youngest is a boy and, yes, I have held him. I don’t think of him as a man, so I’m not touching a man. He’s a 2-year-old boy. A child! But I don’t go around hugging him [nor traditionally do any people in Asia].

As I understand it, monks aren't even allowed to tickle?
Oh, yes! You aren’t supposed to tickle a monk, because people will roll into a great laughter. That’s part of the rules.

So no tickling your grandchildren?
No, that rule is about tickling monks. Not about tickling laypeople. But, no, I don’t tickle them.

How do regular people treat female monastics out in public?
There are two groups. Some couldn’t care less. Others are more suspicious. But for those who are interested, we educate them. It’s much easier now compared to 16 years ago when I was the only female monastic walking in this land.

Tell me about your first day collecting alms.
I was invited to Rayong (a Thai coastal province) for a seminar. And I went out with the male monastics. People in the marketplace, when they realized the last one walking in the back was actually female, they were so interested!
 
One household ran inside and grabbed a big box of drinks and offered it to my [alms] bowl. I was happy.

To go back to the Buddha’s time, it’s said that if you make an offering to monastics, that’s well and good. But if you make offerings to both monks and nuns [the whole Monastic Order or Sangha]? It’s even better. This is in the texts.

The ordination process for female monastics involves embarrassing questions, even sexual questions. Does that create more resistance to ordaining women?
For men, they ask, “Are you a man? [Are you human?] Do you have such and such illness?” For women, they will ask about our private parts. “Do you menstruate all the time?” Or whether you have all of your sex organs.

[The same is asked of men because "eunuchs" (a common but misleading translation of the word pandakas, which might better be translated as perverts or deviants) are not permitted to ordain by tradition, though many are as rules are interpreted differently in different monasteries and schools.]
 
But if I am willing to answer this, they should give us ordination. I think Thai women, young and old, are willing to go through this interrogation.

What do you miss about regular life?
I miss high tea. This here [gestures toward a large 11:00 am lunch spread donated by the local village] is our last meal of the day [but not the first meal, and snacks including tea are permitted, particularly at high tea time, roughly 4:00 pm]. So no [formal British] high tea [unless you want to or are ill or invited, as circumstances warrant]. I actually used to enjoy it more than dinner. Especially if it came with blueberry cheesecake.

Can't you just eat cheesecake in the morning?
It doesn’t feel the same way in the morning! You just have to give it up.

Some people who've been through challenges in life end up being pretty funny. Do you have a sense of humor?
I have a great sense of humor! The monastic life is quite dry. You need to laugh once in awhile.
 
You shouldn’t be making jokes all the time like a joker [prankster, comedian, egomaniac, wisecracker]. But if you can show people another way to look at things, even by making them laugh, that’s okay.

People see monks and wonder: Does it really make you happy to give up everything like that?
Yes. Because we give up the bad things, not everything. It is letting go of that which is unwholesome [and therefore unconducive to calm, insight, and enlightenment].

But you have to let go of pizza. And high tea, as you mentioned. Or your boyfriend or girlfriend. It seems hard.
[Monastics eat pizza and do many other things just as before.] At certain points, it may be so. But then you look ahead in time, outside this context, and realize the goal is much greater than your boyfriend or your girlfriend. And much greater than pizza.

What sorts of backgrounds do the female monastics here have?
All different backgrounds. This one studied journalism. The next one over was a seamstress. Some were just ordinary factory workers. Two of them have Master’s degrees.

If there were a vote, do you think Thai society would allow women to be fully ordained?
Full female ordination is our heritage given by the Buddha. So one should not be ordained expecting people to accept it. You should ordain because you want to do it and to keep our heritage alive.

As a monastic you have to subdue your anger. But doesn't it make you irritated that people think you shouldn't be a monastic?
I cannot put the ignorance of all the people in the whole world on my shoulders. More