Showing posts with label aeon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aeon. Show all posts

Thursday, April 30, 2026

What's special about human life? (Blind Turtle)


SUTRA: The hole in the ring
Who would ever become a Buddhist monastic?
"Meditators, suppose that this great earth were completely covered with water and a person were to toss a ring with a single hole onto the surface.
 
"A wind from the east would send it west, a wind from the west would send it east, a wind from the north would send it south, and a wind from the south would send it north.
 
"Moreover, suppose there were a blind turtle that surfaced only once every 100 years.

"Now, what do you think? How likely is it that that blind turtle, coming to the surface only once every 100 years, would ever stick its head through that ring?"
 
"It would be very improbable, venerable sir! It would only be by chance that a blind turtle, coming to the surface only once every 100 years, would stick its head through that ring [being tossed around by wind]."

"Likewise, meditators, it is very improbable, mere chance that [at any given time] one obtains a human rebirth.

"Likewise, it is very improbable, mere chance that a Tathagata [a fully enlightened teaching buddha], worthy and rightly self-awakened, ever arises in the world.

"Likewise, it is very improbable, mere chance that a Doctrine and Discipline [Dhamma-Vinaya] expounded by a Tathagata appears in the world.

"But now this human rebirth has been obtained. A Tathagata, worthy and rightly self-awakened, has arisen in the world. A Doctrine and Discipline expounded by a Tathagata has appeared in the world.
 
"Therefore, take as [an extraordinarily rare and] sacred duty to contemplating [these four enlightening/liberating truths]:
  1. 'This is [the meaning of] suffering...
  2. This is the origin of suffering...
  3. This is the end of suffering.'
  4. Undertake the duty of contemplating: 'This is the path-of-practice that leads to the end of suffering.'"
In retrospect, the historical Buddha might have said:
  1. This is pleasure (sukha)...
  2. This the origin of pleasure...
  3. This is the end of pleasure (dukkha)...
  4. This is the path-of-practice that leads to more and more pleasure [until one reaches the ultimate and unsurpassable bliss of nirvana.]
  • Why didn't he? It must have occurred to him. One very likely reason is that this is not the path of hedonism (pleasure-seeking as the ultimate good). Making an end of 
1. What is "suffering" and could we talk about pleasure instead?
.
What is dukkha (disappointment, distress, unsatisfactoriness)? There is no need for confusion about dukkha or displeasure with translating it as "suffering." It is the nature of Pali and Sanskrit that a term has a RANGE of meaning, from agitation to agony.

All of these are dukkha, which could be rendered "off-kilter," like the wheel of an ox-cart that is off center and making for a bumpy and unpleasant ride. The Buddha defines exactly what he means by the word: "Not getting what one wants, getting what one doesn't want, being separated from or losing what one loves, being joined with what one detests." In short, the Five Aggregates clung to as self (the khandha or skandha) are disappointing, painful, unable to ever fulfill, and are thus unsatisfactory and suffering.

(Wiki) According to Monier Monier-Williams, the actual roots of the Pali term dukkha appear to be Sanskrit दुस्- (dus-, "bad") + स्था (sthā, "to stand") [9, Note 2]. Irregular changes in the development of Sanskrit into the various Prakrits [ancient hybrid languages] led to a shift from dus-sthā to duḥkha to dukkha.

Western Theravada Buddhist monk Analayo
Western scholar-monk Ven. Analayo concurs, stating that dukkha as derived from duḥ-sthā, "standing badly," conveys nuances of "uneasiness" or of being "uncomfortable" [16].

Silk Road philologist Christopher I. Beckwith elaborates on this derivation [17]. According to him: "...although the sense of duḥkha in Normative Buddhism is traditionally given as 'suffering,' that and similar interpretations are highly unlikely for Early Buddhism.

"Significantly, Monier-Williams himself doubts the usual explanation of duḥkha and presents an alternative one immediately after it, namely: duḥ-stha "'standing badly,' unsteady, disquieted (literally and figuratively); uneasy," and so on.

"This form is also attested, and makes much better sense as the opposite of the Rig Veda sense of sukha, which Monier-Williams gives in full [11, Note 3].

Translation
The literal meaning of duḥkha, as used in a general sense, is "suffering" or "painful" [Note 4]. Its exact translation depends on the context [Note 5].

Contemporary translators of Buddhist texts use a variety of English words to convey the [many] aspects of dukh.

Early Western translators of Buddhist texts (before the 1970s) typically translated the Pali term dukkha as "suffering." Later translators have emphasized that "suffering" is a too [harsh and too] limited translation for the term duḥkha and have preferred to either leave the term untranslated [15] or to clarify that translation with terms such as
  • anxiety,
  • distress,
  • frustration,
  • unease,
  • unsatisfactoriness,
  • not [getting] having what one wants,
  • having what one does not want, and so on [19, 20, 21, Note 6].
In the sequence "[re]birth is dukkha," it may be translated as "painful" [22].

The opposite of pleasure
But I want what I want when I want it!!!
When related to vedana ("sensation" or "feeling") dukkha ("unpleasant," "painful") is the opposite of sukha ("pleasure," "pleasant"), yet all feelings are dukkha [unsatisfactory, disappointing] in that they are impermanent, conditioned [impersonal] phenomena, which are unsatisfactory, incapable of providing lasting satisfaction or actual enduring fulfillment.

The term "unsatisfactoriness" then is often used to emphasize the unsatisfactoriness of "life under the influence of afflictions and polluted karma" [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, a], but it would equally well -- though much less obviously -- apply to sukha.

All pleasure ultimately fails to fulfill, satisfy, make us happy exactly because the nature of ALL conditioned (dependently originated or co-arisen) phenomena is beset by what the Buddha described as three universal characteristics or the Three Marks of All Conditioned Existence (ti-lakkhana) and transient states.

Early Buddhism
Dukkha is one of the three marks of existence -- namely anicca ("impermanent"), dukkha ("unsatisfactory"), anatta ("impersonal," "not-self," "empty," devoid of an enduring essence) [Note 7].

Various Pali canon sutras (discourses) sum up how cognitive processes result in an aversion to unpleasant things and experiences (dukkha), forming a corrupted process together with the complementary process of craving and clinging to pleasure (sukha).

What does dukkha mean?
This is expressed as saṃsāra, an ongoing process of [re-]death and rebirth [Note 8], but also more pointedly and non-metaphysically in the process-formula of the Five Aggregates clung to as self (skandhas):
  1. [Re-] birth is dukkha (disappointing),
  2. aging is dukkha,
  3. deteriorating is dukkha,
  4. illness is dukkha,
  5. death is dukkha;
  6. sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair are dukkha;
  7. association with what we don't like is dukkha;
  8. separation from the liked is duḥkha;
  9. not getting what is wanted is dukkha.
  10. In summary, the Five Aggregates clung to as self (khandhas) are dukkha. More

Saturday, April 25, 2026

Gnostic: Demiurge's prison of 'reality'

  • Gnosticism seems to be the Western version of the Vedic/Hindu concept of God (the One or the Supreme) at "divine play" (lila), coming under the illusion (maya) of separation. But all is one. Who is this Demiurge, this false God that created this simulation/illusory reality (duality) around us and the cycle of endless rebirth (samsara)?

Monday, March 31, 2025

Wisdom Quarterly converts to Gnosticism


OM, knowledge is king and compassion queen.
Big announcement: Beginning tomorrow, Wisdom Quarterly: American Buddhist Journal will switch to Gnosticism, having been convinced by Prof. Pagels and other Gnostic Bible scholar like Prof. Bart D. Ehrman, Dr. Ammon Hillman, The Gnostic Informant, and Danny Jones... Of Gnosticism, Dr. Hillman explains, these teachings are timeless, but that is not to say eternal. They are aionic, outside of time, just as can be said of the historical Buddha's Dhamma, recorded in the Tipitaka, the Timeless Teaching, which the Vedas (and Brahminical Mahayana Buddhism) call the Sanatan Dharma, "the Eternal Truth."

Watch the full documentary movie FREE right now at christspiracy.com
What is the history and point of April Fool's Day? - Who's the God? I'M the God, Lord Craig!

Monday, September 2, 2024

Gnostic: God, Yahweh, Demiurge's 3D jail

Leonardo DaVinci was really drawing a brain he saw in secret autopsies? Reason touches Man?
Get out of here, Wisdom Seekers! This garden is a place for dummies who obey! Get lost!

Yahweh (YHWH, Jehovah) and the Three-Dimensional Prison: The DARK Gnostic Connection
(Esoteric Guardian) What if the reality we know is nothing more than a carefully constructed illusion, a three-dimensional (3D) prison designed by unseen, powerful forces?

This video goes deep into ancient Gnostic teachings, revealing how the divine and the dark might be intertwined in a cosmic plot that has remained hidden for centuries.

Timestamps
  • 00:00 - Introduction
  • 01:22 - The Gnostic Worldview
  • 03:20 - Yahweh as the Demiurge
  • 05:31 - The Three-Dimensional Prison
  • 07:40 - Escaping from the Demiurge's dominion
  • 10:07 - Dark conspiracy theories
  • 16:41 - Escaping the Demiurge's dominion in the modern world
  • 18:58 - Conclusion 
I've been eagerly awaiting your arrival.
Are seekers ready to challenge everything we thought we understood about the universe and explore a truth that could shatter this past perception of reality?
Researched, written, edited, and produced by the @esotericguardian team. Music produced by @esotericguardian (copyright control). The team is truly grateful to have viewers here with us. Their support means a lot to us and helps us continue creating valuable content. If anyone enjoys these videos, we would greatly appreciate it if activation of the notification bell, subscribing, liking, and sharing the content. To subscribe @EsotericGuardian. Thanks very much. 🙏

Codex Gigas, the Devil's Bible, medieval demons, demon summoning, esoteric knowledge, occult history, medieval manuscripts, dark rituals, ancient magic, esoteric traditions, occult secrets, demonic illustrations, mystical texts, ancient wisdom, biblical texts, legendary pact with the devil, mystical practices, ritual magic, dark history, occult studies, ancient manuscripts, medieval occultism, spiritual mysteries, hidden knowledge, esoteric practices, supernatural rituals, Gnosticism, demonology, occult, Archons, Aeons, cabal, Illuminati, one world government, government power, banks, corporations, global control, NASA, manipulation, wars, financial crises, David Icke, reptilian, shapeshifters, disguise
  • Esoteric Guardian, Aug. 30, 2024; Sheldon S., Pat Macpherson, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Friday, July 12, 2024

9th avatar of Vishnu, Jesus or Buddha?

What the cartoonist (Dan Piraro) doesn't realize is that the Buddha did set down such a rule.

Great teachers of world's religions (Where's Mo?)
Christianity (particularly imperialist universalist Catholicism and hegemonical American Protestant Evangelism) is closer to Hinduism than Buddhism is, for all of their apparent similarities. The historical Buddha did not teach what Jesus or Krishna (avatars of a God like Vishnu), Brahma or Shiva taught.

All of these, we are told promoted devotional practices as the best that could be done by most humans during the Dark Age or Kali Yuga. Hinduism, to be more popular and tolerant, accepts other religions enough to swallow them and call them part of its own Eternal Teaching or Sanatan Dharma.

Hindu holy man, sadhu, sannyasin, ganja smoker
If Brahmin priests could not rid themselves of pesky wandering ascetic or shramanic traditions like Buddhism and Jainism, it simply dealt with them by incorporating them into its own structure and pantheon just as it did the ancient Vedas ("Knowledge Books") of proto-India and the Indus Valley Civilization, extending Hinduism (which was systematized and established by Adi Shankara a few centuries ago by coordinating and getting major points of agreement for many and diverse "religions" around the Indus River, thus resulting in the name of one conglomerate religion of Indus-ism where previously people did not live with the modern idea of being in a "religion" or doing anything more than practicing spiritual things as part and parcel of daily life).
Tribal Jewish God in a polytheistic world
The British imposed the idea that one must name "spiritual" practices and/or superstitions and beliefs a "religion" and that those practicing in accordance or adhering to such beliefs must be "members" of that religion. The ancients in India, proto-India, Egypt, and elsewhere simply did not have this belief but simply went along when told by the dominant and oppressive colonizing culture. One has to imagine that pre-Christian pagans in Europe did not think they had a "religion" but were just living their cultural life and holding popular beliefs about how the world (with its spirits and mysteries) works.

Amitabha Cosmic Buddha
While Early Buddhism, just like Jainism, rejected the Vedas and gods as ultimate sources of wisdom or liberation, later (Mahayana) Buddhism was co-opted by the Brahmin priests and turned into a kind of Hinduism by other names. While there are certainly many devotional practices in modern Theravada Buddhism, a back-to-basics movement to preserve the historical Buddha's Teachings, many Mahayana traditions and practices went overboard to devote themselves to anyone but the historical Buddha.

Kwan Yin (female Avalokiteshvara)
That Buddha is respected but then quickly disregarded, forgotten, or shunned for "better" Mahayana Buddhist figures like the Cosmic Buddhas Amitabha (and His promise of praying to Him to be reborn in His heavenly Western Paradise, the Pure Land, where one can make efforts to reach enlightenment and liberation without bothering to do anything toward that here other than praying and devoting oneself to Him here and now) and Vairocana, or the ever-popular Virgin Mary figure Kwan Yin (Guanyin, Kwannon, Chenrézik, or Avalokiteshvara, the Goddess of Compassion, who like many other Mahayana figures is actually a bodhisattva, a person striving for Buddhahood, not a buddha at all) and Kṣitigarbha, who saves beings from the hells, which they fall into on account of their own deeds and views.

Pals Jesus, Budai, and Krishna with a cow
This devotional bent of Mahayana Buddhism has gotten so severe that who "the Buddha" is is often blurred, with most of the world mistaking him for the Mahayana figure Budai/Putai/Hotei the "Fat Happy Bodhisattva," the obese guy revered in Chinese restaurants around the world. Moreover, a distinction at one point had to be made between what Western elucidator of Buddhism Alan Watts points out in the Japanese Buddhist terms jiriki versus tariki -- enlightenment by one's own efforts or by outside help.
  • Jiriki (自力, "one's own strength" [1]) is the Japanese Buddhist term for "self-power," the ability to achieve enlightenment and liberation (in other words, to reach bodhi and nirvana) through one's own efforts, whereas tariki (他力, "other power," "outside help") is the belief that it cannot be done on one's own. These two terms in Japanese Buddhist schools classify how one becomes spiritually awakened [2]. The first is commonly practiced in Zen Buddhism, whereas the much more popular Pure Land Buddhism refers to the power of Amitābha Buddha to "save" beings who merely have faith, believe, and worship an outside force like the mythological Amitabha [3].
Does Christianity teach Christians and Catholics that they can save themselves, awaken themselves, enlighten themselves, or even get into heaven (which is viewed as final salvation) by their own efforts? Certainly not. Most modern Christian schools teach that it is ONLY by "grace" (God's underserved gift or His whimsical feeling like it) and never by "works" (one's own efforts) that anyone can be saved.

All three religions (Buddhism, Christianity, and Hinduism) believe in karma (the power of deeds to bring about a result, but Christians insist everything is either God's will or not and nothing we can do can change that, other than perhaps groveling, begging, bargaining, self-abnegation, and absolute devotion and throwing ourselves on His mercy can save us.

For Christians killing isn't so bad compared to not loving the God enough because that God can erase that karmic debt and sin, wipe it away in an instant of devotion, obedience, adherence, and voluntary slavery, whereas not killing in the first, who cares? That's not a big deal to most Christians or apologists. Of course, Hinduism now talks about karma a lot, but it is said that the Buddha was the first sage to go around telling ordinary people about the importance of their deeds.

Up until then it was more or less a secret among Brahmin priests and preservers of the Vedas, who were not keen on telling anyone other than Brahmins. The Buddha, who was regarded as a Karmavadin (Teacher of the efficacy of actions) not as a Buddhist (which came later with the Western idea that things have to be a "religion"), went around telling everyone, emphasizing karma to everyone as a principle, a fixed law, an orderliness to the universe we live in, be it a simulation or a real place.

One has to eventually put forward the endeavor and effort to awaken oneself; it simply cannot be "given" or gained by devotion. It does not belong to anyone to give, not even "God," who Himself, Herself, Itself is not enlightened nor liberated but rapt in this samsara.


So while it is beautiful that we can all be Hindus now, all go back to a time when there was just one universal religion everyone had to follow, a worldwide belief system with an all-attractive cult figure like Krishna, Christ, Thor, Zeus, Sophia, Aphrodite, Brahma, Mithras, Ahura Mazda, Allah (or His Prophet), the Great Spaghetti Monster, Odin, or countless other astrotheological figures, Buddhism does not need the Buddha to be an "incarnation of Vishnu."
  • The great thing is, of course, that "Hinduism" is not really a religion even now when it is treated like one because it has always meant a collection of disparate views, practices, belief, and preferred central gods (one choice in picking any incarnation of an essential Brahman, or "reality behind all illusion") presenting itself as an avatar or aspect of the One True God(hood). The yogis have their way, as do the Shaivites and Vaishnavites, agnostics, atheists, Kali worshippers, devotees of the Goddess Saraswati, Ma Durga, Radha (Krishna's partner), Krishna, or 100,000 others.
In fact, it is insulting as it shows a severe lack of understanding by Brahmins and Hindus that such things could even happen. A buddha is an arhat (fully enlightened being), who therefore by that supreme enlightenment is never again reborn, does not incarnate, does not reappear or rearise. Of course, there will be other buddhas, like Mahayana Buddhism's second favorite buddha of all time, the Buddha-to-come, the Future Buddha, Maitreya.

But that being will not be the last one (Siddhartha Gautama Buddha) coming again. It will be a new one, just as there have been ones in the ancient past and in the distant future. It is never the same being returning to teach beings how to make an end of all suffering and all rebirth after realizing the too-subtle unique teachings of Dependent Origination and anatta (the impersonal nature of all existence) or egolessness.

The Lord's Prayer (Medieval English)
  • Text by Dhr. Seven, Ashley Wells, Pat Macpherson, Wisdom Quarterly

The Gnostic Creation Story (Eric Dubay)


The Gnostic Creation Story
Who Rewrote the Bible?
(Eric Dubay) May 1, 2024: Before the establishment of the Roman Orthodox Church, dating back to the first century A.D., the Gnostics were a sect of Christians with a very different set of beliefs from what the new blossoming religion of Christianity would soon become.

The Gnostics insisted they were in fact the original Christians and that the Roman Church leaders were imposters co-opting and changing their mythology.

Many original founders like Marcion [the creator of the first Bible] and Tatian were actually devout Gnostics who would later leave the Orthodoxy, claiming the church was “setting up the fraud of historic Christianity.”
Gnosticism continued to flourish alongside the Roman Church until it was declared heresy and outlawed by Emperor Constantine in 325 A.D.

Once the Orthodox Bible became canonized, all extra-biblical Gnostic gospels (the Apocrypha) were considered heretical and either hidden or destroyed on threat of death.

By the turn of the next century, any remaining Gnostics still openly practicing were hunted down as heretics...
  • What's so special about Marcion? Marcion concluded that many of the teachings of [good, kind, merciful] Jesus were incompatible with the actions of [genocidal, jealous, angry] Yahweh (YWVH, Jehovah). He concluded this by studying the Hebrew Bible [a simplistic version of the story told in a crude language with only 8,000 original words, which was derived from the much more sophisticated Ancient Greek and its half million words, according to classicist Dr. D.A.C. Hillman], along with received writings circulating in the nascent Church. Yahweh is characterized as the belligerent god of the Hebrew Bible. Marcion responded by developing a di-theistic system of belief around the year 144 [Note 2]. This notion of two gods — a Higher Transcendent One [a kind of Brahman] and a Lower World-Creator and Ruler [a kind of Maha Brahma] — allowed Marcion to reconcile perceived contradictions between harsh Christian Covenant theology and the nicer gospel proclaimed by the New Testament.
Connect with and help support Eric Dubay:

Sunday, October 23, 2022

OOPARTS: out of place artifacts, impossible


Impossible ruins no one can explain
(Mystery History II) Oct. 14, 2022. What are ooparts? Here is video footage of some of them, impossible ruins that cannot exist (with the false history of the planet we've been told) that yet do exist.
Join channel to access perks. Support Mystery History via the following avenues: Become a member for exclusive content by making an ongoing donation to help mission via patreon.com/MysteryHistory. (Every donation received is reinvested into the channel and used to continually bring improved productions). Other avenues no matter how small the donation are: PayPal, pre-order a first print of first book, please also attach postal address to donation and send to: mysteryhistory@mail.com Go Fund Me. Or donate anonymously using a cryptocurrency transfer to one of our wallets:
  • Bitcoin: 1MW6SZ3qoqZt8S3dudem533ovfuf3gw2Nq
  • Ethereum: 0x21c23688670A25210DfF86dFAcc25B33296cB52D
  • Monero (most confidential): 47sw8yRwYwVPCGN34SfSNWJSG6uKy4RB5N1bKAiVkzvZ4r6FFckSUZVgT5sR6ZUGVpJLTTC2PbU5mY83F86KXeA3BpumfZ9
  • Thanks for all the help and all contributions no matter how small, as they help the channel grow and flourish. Follow and join in discussions on Facebook. There is a private group for fan posts, a place for the community to connect with tens of thousands of followers growing rapidly. There’s plenty yet to be unraveled, so stay tuned!
  • Main narration by Don Moffit: donmoffit.com

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

How science / Buddhism study consciousness


To say what "consciousness" is, science explores where it isn't
Who needs a brain, eh Gazoo?
In 2014, a month-long bout of dizziness and vomiting brought a 24-year-old woman in China to the hospital. She was no stranger to these symptoms: She’d never been able to walk steadily and suffered from dizziness nearly her whole life. These were serious, debilitating symptoms.

Yet, they might have seemed almost mild once CT ("cat scan") and MRI scans presented a diagnosis: The woman was missing the majority of her brain. Most of the parts of her brain were present:
  • cerebral cortex, the largest, outermost part of the brain responsible for most of our thinking and cognition,
  • subcortex and the midbrain, with their myriad functions involving movement, memory, and body regulation,
  • brainstem, essential for controlling breathing, sleep, and communicating with the rest of the body.
Dr. Joel Frohlich, Ph.D., UCLA post doc
But none of these areas hold the majority of the brain’s currency, neurons, the cells that fire impulses to transmit information or relay motor commands.

This distinction goes to the cerebellum, a structure situated behind the brainstem and below the cerebral cortex. Latin for "little brain," the highly compact cerebellum occupies only 10 per cent of the brain’s volume yet contains somewhere between 50 and 80 per cent of the brain’s neurons.
.
Neurons are the "currency" of the brain (wiki).
It was in this sense that the hospitalized Chinese woman was missing the majority of her brain.

Incredibly, she had been born without a cerebellum, but she had made it through nearly two and a half decades of life without even knowing it was missing.

The crude instruments of science chasing blood
Compare that with strokes and lesions of the cerebral cortex, whose neuron-count is a fraction of the cerebellum’s. These patients can lose the ability to recognize colors or faces and to comprehend language -- or they might develop what’s known as a "disorder of consciousness," a condition resulting in loss of responsiveness or any conscious awareness at all.

Understanding consciousness might be the greatest scientific challenge of our time [the hard problem of consciousness].
.
How can physical stuff like electrical impulses explain mental stuff like dreams or the sense of self? Why does a network of neurons in the brain feel like an experience when a network of computers or a network of people does not? More
  • Dr. Joel Frohlich is a postdoctoral researcher studying consciousness in the laboratory of Prof. Martin Monti at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Department of Psychology. He is also a content producer at "Knowing Neurons," an Aeon.co partner.
Does Buddhism have a better way to study consciousness?
Dhr. Seven, Sayalay Aloka, Wisdom Quarterly, May 20, 2020
The "mind door" is in the heart not head.
The massive collection (pitaka) of Buddhist literature known as the Abhidharma ("Higher Doctrine" or the "teaching in ultimate terms," which means all things explained not in the conventional language of the discourses or sutras but in ultimate technical terms) explains consciousness in excruciating detail.

One does not embark upon an intellectual study of it if one hopes to really directly understand consciousness.

Many scholar-monks waste their time commenting and splitting hairs. But practitioners come to know-and-see these things.

The Buddha (Gandhara)
That is the purpose of Buddhism, to directly see mind-and-body (nama-rupa, defined as the Five Aggregates clung to as "self"), by Buddhist physics and psychology, to let go and awaken to reality.

This is done through a process (path) of mental purification first, to strengthen the medium through which this understanding will arise.

Scientists should take a cue from this and abstain from alcohol and obtunding drugs, junk foods, toxins, distractions, sleep deprivation, rushing and hurrying, and ego inflation before doing their science of experimental design, research execution, and honest reporting of results. The process purifies:
It is not empirical and objective to prove what is true to everyone else, but personal and subjective to prove what is true to oneself.

Man, this is cool, all scientifical like Spock!
Meditators realizing enlightenment (awakening) know-and-see four things and are thereby liberated by wisdom. It becomes possible to let go and make a complete end of suffering.

Scientists, on the other hand, are likely to be karmically destroyed by their discoveries and inventions, the knowledge they develop that then gets out of their control and abused, or the technology and weapons that are then developed based on their basic research.

Ah, this is much better. The Buddha was right!
Where does psychology ("the study of mind") go? To help increase sales, control people, get them addicted to gambling and other things, develop dangerous pharmaceuticals, public relations, and so on. Where does enlightenment ("personal realization") go? To complete peace, to the marriage of wisdom and compassion, to the end of all suffering. It's good that we have both science and Buddhist practice in the world.

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Cal Neanderthals: How old's history? (video)



How old are stone skulls people find?
A Vedic "Day of Brahma" is an "aeon" or kalpa (hundreds of millions of years), which vary in length, some being of indeterminate duration. The Buddha defined a "great aeon" (maha-kalpa) as consisting of four ordinary aeons.

The duration is so staggering that he gave a simile of a flawless mountain of granite a mile long, a mile high, a mile wide. On it each century a small bird comes to whet its beak while holding a piece of fine Kasi cloth. Well, that mound of granite would be ground down to nothing and still one kalpa will not yet have elapsed.

  
Ancient discoveries are hidden from public
Ancient Secret DiscoveriesForbidden archaeology about human origins refers to texts and tangible artifacts and discoveries that do not fit into conventional timelines and theories of mainstream academic and scientific communities.

Neanderthals built mysterious underground circles around 175,000 years ago inside a cave in France. They arranged pieces of stalagmites in rings, as well as in separate piles that they used to light fires upon.

Mes Aynak, Buddhist Afghanistan
This showed a high level of intelligence, he noted, as the beings had to collaborate to pull off the accomplishment, given that the stalagmites were quite heavy.

The standard idea is that the Neanderthals came into existence about 300,000 to 400,000 years ago, and modern humans (Homo sapien sapiens) like us came much later.

But there is plenty of evidence to show that anatomically modern humans were present in Europe at the same as Neanderthals and even before. For example, a couple years ago, archaeologists found footprints resembling modern humans in a layer of rock in Happisburgh, England dating back to around 900,000 years.