Showing posts with label mara the tempter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mara the tempter. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Lent: Will Devil tempt us? (Alan Watts)

Impatient? Rush to Minute 2:37 to hear Christian approach and the Devil's opposition to being good

What is the Zen way to liberation? Kindergarten
Imagine beginning the Rains Retreat (Buddhist Lent known as Vas) with the idea of being good. Mara will come right at you like an angel of light (Mara Devaputra, Cupid, Eros, Kamadeva) and undermine your efforts, won't he? That's his modus operandi, as Alan Watts explains. But Taoism, and therefore Zen Buddhism, has a solution: Don't let him know what you're doing. One must act without intention, without premeditation, without the goal or outcome in mind so as to not let him know what we're up to on our path to be good. Otherwise, he'll just come along and ruin our efforts like taking candy from an old person or trying to give veggies to a baby: They'll fight you.
What does Alan Watts know?
By understanding both cultures, he's a bridge.
Not 40 days, but for more than 40 years, Alan Watts has earned a reputation as one of the foremost Western interpreters of Eastern philosophy.

Beginning at age 16, when he wrote essay for the journal of the Buddhist Lodge in London, Watts developed an audience of millions who were enriched by the wisdom of the East through his books, recordings, radio shows, public television programs, and public lectures.

In all, Watts wrote more than 25 books and recorded hundreds of lectures, all building toward a personal philosophy that he shares in complete candor and joy with readers and listeners throughout the world.

Insight can do what the ego cannot do by doing. - Philosophy or sophistry? Does Watts go too far?

Sixties icon? He was at it since before the 1950s.
His overall body of work has presented a model of individuality and self-expression matched by few philosophers, modern or ancient.

KPFK 90.7 FM Los Angeles continues to air Watts on Sunday mornings (8:00 am) and during Something's Happening midnights on Thursdays overnight to Friday.

The three main sources for Alan Watts are the Pacifica Radio Archives, (800) 735-0230, pacificaradioarchives.org, the Electronic University (415) 460-0825, alanwatts.org, and Wisdom Quarterly.

Friday, March 30, 2018

Pope changes his mind: There is a HELL

Slayer, "Hell Awaits"; Nat'l Public Radio (Two Way, npr.org); Editors, Wisdom Quarterly
Beloved Latino Pope Francis of Argentina celebrates the Chrism Mass at St. Peter's Basilica on Holy Thursday in Vatican City (Alessandra Benedetti/Corbis/Getty Images)

Devil and Church together again?
Things got a little heated at the Vatican this week when an Italian journalist reported that Pope Francis denied the existence of hell.
 
Apparently, the fiery 93-year-old avowed atheist reporter, Eugenio Scalfari of La Repubblica, set the social media world aflame after writing in Italian that when asked about the fate of "bad souls," the pontiff responded, "Hell does not exist."
  • [NOTE: He would not be the first pope to deny the existence of hell for "we-want-to-be-more-popular Roman Catholicism: the previous pope, not the Nazi Pope Benedict, but the good and beloved Pope John Paul II said the same thing, redefining "hell" as the more palatable just any kind of "separation from hell" but not all the fire and brimstone stuff. The reason for the reassessment seems to be a bid to gain many, many millions more adherents no matter what the tenets of the religion actually are. Ask a old school Catholic, and s/he will say, "Of course there's a hell!" and be dumbfounded to read the infallible pope's writing on the subject as there now not being one. And nice guy Pope Francis, former longtime henchman for bad Pope Benedict, was now admitting the same thing. Whether or not there's a hell, Catholicism certainly believes there is. Catholics, on the other hand, probably mostly don't believe but certainly fear it, and it will take generations to clear the fear from their consciousness, yet another reason why there are so many "recovering Catholics." Catholicism is the make believe religion of colonial-hegemonic empire, Emperor Constantine's way of trying to rule an empire by cherry picking Christian teachings and tossing out all of the inconvenient stuff. The wannabe "universal" religion, like the Protestant Christianity that came after it, originated as a Roman psy-op, as was widely reported a few years back. Catholicism and Christianity are the great appropriators of many other religions, taking all of the their beliefs from Mithraism, Zorastrianism, Judaism, Hinduism/Mahayana Buddhism, and the many paganisms of the now Christian world. (See, e.g., the work of Archaya S).]
Tell them there's no hell, Papa. - But our guy says there is. - Change this book! - O.K.
.
Co-Pope Benedict, former Nazi Youth
The pope continued, according to Scalfari, saying (emphasis added), "The disappearance of sinful souls exists."

The statements spurred Catholics and other believers to grab their virtual pitchforks to express their fury, which the Vatican has since tried to cool.

The Vatican adamantly rejected Scalfari's characterization of the conversation, which it insisted was not an official interview but rather a "private meeting." 

On Friday -- Good Friday -- the Vatican issued a statement saying:
"What is reported by the author in today's article is the fruit of his reconstruction, in which the precise words uttered by the Pope are not cited. No quotations in the aforementioned article, then, should be considered as a faithful transcription of the words of the Holy Father." More
"Christianity" created for social control

(Therearenosunglasses) Was Jesus Christ an anti-Jewish Roman [Flavian Family] PsyOp?

Jesus is American and Republican.
Biblical scholars at the “Covert Messiah” Conference at Conway Hall in London on October 19th presented a controversial discovery to the British public: “[Jesus Christ] may be the only fictional character in literature whose entire life story can be traced to other sources.”

American Biblical scholar Joseph Atwill appeared with them to present a controversial new discovery:

I will be your new God. Forget the others.
Ancient confessions recently uncovered now prove that the New Testament was written by first-century Roman aristocrats and that they fabricated the entire story of Jesus Christ. His presentation was part of the one-day symposium entitled “Covert Messiah” at Conway Hall in Holborn. More

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Valentine's Day: Cupid is the devil Mara (sutra)

John D. Ireland (accesstoinsight.org), Padhana Sutra: "The Great Struggle" (Sn 3.2); PRI; Cozmo El; Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Crystal Quintero (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Dharma Meditation Initiative - Pasa Dharma - Punx - Disclosure Project - MARC UCLA


 
Cupid (Kama-deva) is a "devil"
The Buddha remembered: "When, near the Nerañjara river, I exerted myself in meditation for attaining to security from bondage (yogakkhema, a name for nirvana), there came speaking words of compassion Namuci*:
  • *"He who does not let go [his hold over beings easily]" is a name for Mara, the Tempter, the Killer, the Evil One, the Dark One.
"'You are emaciated and ill-looking, near to death! A thousand parts of you belong to death, and only a fraction of you is alive. Live, good sir! It is better to live! Living you may perform many meritorious deeds (good karma).

Relics of St. Valentine of Terni at the basilica of Saint Mary in Cosmedin.
.

What's better than being bad?
"From practicing celibacy and tending the sacrificial fire much merit is made. But what is obtained from striving [in meditation]? It is difficult to enter the path of exertion, it is difficult to do, difficult to maintain.'"
 
Mara spoke these words while standing in the presence of the Buddha, the "Awakened One." To Mara speaking in this way, the Buddha replied:
 
"You who are a friend of the negligent, O Evil One. For what reason have you come here? Those who still have use for merit [because they are not yet enlightened and liberated], Mara may consider worthwhile addressing.

"I have confidence and energy and wisdom. Being thus bent on striving, why do you ask me to live? This wind will wither the currents of the rivers; why should not my exertion dry up even the blood? When the blood dries up, the bile and phlegm wither.

"Lust" (Raquel Welch) in 1967's Bedazzled
"On the wasting away of the flesh, my mind becomes more and more serene. And my mindfulness, wisdom, and concentration are established more firmly.

"In me, who abides enduring such an extreme experience, the mind does not long for sensual pleasures. Behold the purity of a being!"

Who/what in the hell is Cupid?

Hey, STFU. I'm the Greek god Eros anew
CUPID comes from its verb cupere (Latin "to desire"). Three derived nouns have been passed down into English with minimal modification: Cupiditas meant "yearning" and "desire," which English borrowed as "cupidity," which originally in the 15th century was synonymous with "LUST." (Another meaning of "cupidity," now archaic, is "greed").

Latin cupido started out as a near-synonym of cupiditas, but it came to stand for the specific personification of carnal desire, the counterpart of Greek Eros (the erotic "god"); this is the source of our familiar and rather domesticated (Roman god) Cupid. A strengthened form of cupere (concupiscere, meaning "to desire ardently) yielded the noun concupiscentia in the Late Latin of the Christian church.

I'm not impressed. Get it out of my face!
English concupiscence, which means "sexual desire," comes from this form. Cupidity's origin and etymology is therefore from the Latin cupiditat-, cupiditas — more at covet, which led to Middle English cupidite and Anglo-French cupidité. (Derived from Merriam-Webster.com).
  • A Buddhist View of Romantic Love: Nothing Higher to Live For If ROMANTIC LOVE is the highest thing to live for, this is a hopeless universe because...Cupid's arrows not only thrill us but make us bleed. "Man Kills Estranged Lover Then Self"! "Wife Stabs Husband in Domestic Quarrel"! "Love Triangle Leads to Shooting"! -- scream the headlines...
  • The Buddha's Encounters with Mara the Tempter In the typical style of this Indian Cupid, the first weapons used are the five flower-arrows. When they fail Måra thinks: “He is not worthy of my flower-shaft, nor my arrow 'gladdener,' nor the sending of my daughter Rati (to tempt him); he deserves alarms, rebukes, and blows from these gathered armies of demons.
Mara's Armies
Lord Shiva Turns Cupid/Kama-Deva to Ashes (Madan Bhasma/metmuseum.org)
  1. "Sensual desire is your first army
  2. the second is called discontent
  3. the third is hunger-and-thirst
  4. the fourth craving
  5. the fifth sluggishness-and-laziness
  6. the sixth fear
  7. the seventh indecision
  8. and the eighth stubbornness and disparagement of others: gain, fame, honor, unmerited prestige (wrongly acquired), praise of oneself, and despising others.
"These, Namuci, are your armies, the striking forces of the Dark One.*
  • Kanha, the "Dark One" (Sanskrit, Krishna), is another name for Mara. He is India's version of Cupid (Kamadeva) and personifies sensual passions. He carries a lute (vina), mentioned at the close, with which he captivates beings by his playing. His other equipment includes a bow, arrows, a noose, and a hook.
"A lazy, cowardly person cannot overcome them. But by conquering them one gains bliss. I wear muñja-grass*!
  • *Indian warriors used to wear a tuft of a certain variety of grass called muñja on their head or headgear, to indicate that they were prepared to die in battle and determined not to retreat.
Representations of the Buddha Gautama
"Shame on life here in this world! It is better for me to die in battle than to live defeated.

"Some wandering ascetics and Brahmins are not seen (exerting themselves) here, so immersed are they (in sensual worldliness). They are unaware of the path those of perfect conduct walk.

"Seeing the surrounding army ready and Mara mounted (on his elephant), I am going out to fight so that he may not move me from my position.

Under the Buddha's bodhi tree, India
"This army of yours, which the world together with the devas is unable to subdue, that I will destroy with wisdom, [shatter] like an unbaked clay-bowl with a stone.

"Having mastered the mind and firmly established mindfulness, I shall wander from country to country guiding many disciples.

"And these disciples will be diligent and energetic in practicing this teaching, the teaching of one free of sensual craving. And they will reach where, having reached, one no more grieves."
 
Who's as beautiful as Barbie? Valeri-Devi
Mara responded: "For seven years I followed the Blessed One step by step but did not find an opportunity to defeat that mindful Awakened One.

"A crow flew around a stone the [whitish] color of fat thinking: 'Can we find here something tender? May it be something to eat?'
 
"Not finding anything edible the crow left that place. As with the crow and the stone, we leave Gotama [the Buddha], having approached and become disheartened."
  • *Māra Devaputra is the deva of the highest world in the Sensual Sphere (Kama Loka), who considers himself the God of this sphere (which includes the human plane that is in no way limited to earth) tries to prevent the Buddha from finding the escape that is liberation from the otherwise endless cycle of rebirth during his struggle for enlightenment.

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

Mara's Army fights the Buddha

I may have lost the Buddha with an offer to rule the world, but you'll sign here.
Mara is Eros, Cupid, Tempter...
Māra's Army is described as being tenfold (listed below).

Each division of the army is described in very late accounts (especially in Sinhalese books from Sri Lanka) with a great wealth of [embellished] detail.
 
The Buddha faced each division was with one perfection (pāramī) and was put to flight.

F all y'all! He got away, but you won't.
Māra's last weapon was the cakkāvudha (a cloth-like "world-destroying weapon"). But when he hurls it at the Buddha, it hovers over him like a canopy of flowers.

Undaunted, Māra challenged the Buddha to show that he had the right to sit on the seat he was sitting on [an elevated stone covered with grass beneath the banyan tree].

Māra's followers (an army of yakkhas or ogres) all shouted their declarations that the seat was rightly Māra's to sit on. The Buddha, having no other witness, placed his hand on the Earth (in what has become a famous mudra or hand pose).

Shapeshifting ogres (yakkhas, rakshasas) of Mara's Army advance; Buddha touches Earth.
.
Earth-witnessing mudra, Tibet
He asked the Earth (Bhumi Devi, the goddess Mother Earth) to bear witness and give testimony on his behalf. The Earth shook and roared in reply.

Māra and his followers were shocked and fled in utter terror. The woodland devas (fairies, dryads, sylphs, nature spirits) and others gathered around the Buddha to celebrate his victory over Mara. The sun set on the defeat of Māra.

Look, the cloth just hovers over him! Run!
This, in brief, is the account of the Buddha's conquest over Māra, greatly elaborated in later chronicles and illustrated in countless Buddhist shrines and temples with a wealth of riotous color and fanciful imagery that gifted artists could imagine.
 
That this account of the Buddha's struggle with Māra is literally true, mainly the simple believe even today.

The more popular psychological interpretation (held by most Buddhists) is well expressed by the British translator Rhys Davids (in his article on the Buddha in the Encyclopedia Brittanica). By the attack of Māra's Army is meant that all of the Buddha's
"old temptations came back upon him with renewed force. For years he had looked at all earthly good through the medium of a philosophy which had taught him that it, without exception, carried within itself the seeds of bitterness and was altogether worthless and impermanent; but now, to his wavering faith, the sweet delights of home and love, the charms of wealth and power, began to show themselves in a different light and glow again with attractive colours. He doubted and agonized in his doubt, but as the sun set, the religious side of his nature had won the victory and seems to have come out even purified from the struggle."
I am a yakkha (ogre) in Mara's Army.
There is no need to ask, as does Thomas, with apparently great suspicion (Thomas, op. cit., 230), whether we can assume that the elaborators and embellishers of the Māra story were recording "a subjective experience under the form of an objective reality."

Did they know or think that this was the real psychological experience the Buddha went through?

The living traditions of Buddhist countries supply the adequate answer, without the aid of rationalists. The epic nature of the subject has given ample scope for the elaboration so dear to the hearts of the Pāli language rhapsodists.
 
The similar story among Jains, as recorded in their commentarial works -- for example, in the Uttarādhyayana Sūtra [ZDMG. Vol. 49 (1915), 321ff] -- does not bear close parallelism to the Buddhist account, but only a faint resemblance.
 
There is no doubt that the Māra legend had its origin in the Padhāna Sutra. There Māra is represented as visiting the ascetic Siddhartha on the banks of the river Nerañjarā, where he is practicing severe austerities.

Mara tries to tempt him to abandon his striving, his quest to find the end of all suffering, and devote himself instead to just doing good works for others.
  • Padhana Sutra: The Great Struggle "When, near the river Nerañjara, I exerted myself in meditation for attaining to security from bondage [nirvana], there came Namuci speaking words of compassion: 'You are emaciated and ill-looking, near to death! A thousand parts of you belong to death and only a fraction of you is alive. Live, good sir! It is better to live [and do good works instead].
  • When I shapeshift into a man
    Padhana Sutra: Exertion To me — resolute in exertion near the river Nerañjara, making a great effort, going into jhana [meditative absorption] to attain rest from the yoke/flood -- Namuci came, speaking words of compassion: "You are ashen, thin. Death is in your presence. Death has 1,000 parts of you. Only one part is your life. Live, good sir! Better to live. Alive, you can do acts [of charity, good deeds of all kinds, merit, nice karma]...
Mara's Tenfold Army
Siddhartha refers to Māra's Army as being tenfold. Those divisions are:
  1. the first consists of the Lusts;
  2. the second is Aversion;
  3. the third Hunger and Thirst;
  4. the fourth Craving;
  5. the fifth Sloth and Indolence;
  6. the sixth Cowardice;
  7. the seventh Doubt;
  8. the eighth Hypocrisy and Foolishness;
  9. Gains, Fame, Honor, and Glory falsely obtained form the ninth;
  10. the tenth is the Lauding Oneself and Condemning Others.
"Seeing this army on all sides," said the Buddha, "I go forth to meet Māra with his equipage (savāhanam). He shall not make me yield ground. That army of yours, which the world of fairies (devas, shining ones) and humans conquers not, even that, with my wisdom, will I smite, as an unbaked earthen bowl with a stone."

Here we have practically all of the elements found in the later elaborated versions.
 
The second part of the Padhāna Sutra (SN. vs. 446f.; cf. S.i.122) is obviously concerned with later events in the life of the Buddha, and this the Commentary (SNA.ii.391) definitely tells us.

I sink and fade away now, but I'll be back.
After Māra had retired discomfited, he followed the Buddha for seven years, watching for the slightest transgression on his part. But his quest was in vain. And "like a crow attacking a rock," Mara left the Buddha's side frustrated and  in disgust.

"The lute of Māra, who was so overcome with grief, slipped from his arm. Then, in dejection, the ogre (yakkha) disappeared then and there."

This lute, according to the Commentary (SNA.ii.394), was picked up by Sakka King of the [lesser] Devas and given to Pañcasikha.

Three Beautiful Daughters

Lana Del Rey is a Jezebel and a vixen. Nice.
The Samyutta Nikāya [S.i.124f.; also in Lal. 490 (378); cp. A.v.46; see also DhA.iii.195f ] also contains a sutra (the Dhītaro Sutra) in which three daughters of Māra are represented as tempting the Buddha after his great enlightenment.

Their names are given as Tanhā (Craving), Arati (Passion), and Ragā (Lust). They are apparently personifications of three of the ten forces in Māra's Army, as enumerated in the Padhāna Sutra.

They assume numerous forms of varying age and charm, full of blandishment, but their attempt is all in vain. And they are finally obliged to admit defeat. More

What did the daughters say?
Open your eyes, Sid. Look at these hotties.
The three daughters of Māra [who in the "Acts of the Buddha" or Buddhacarita (xiii.) are named Ratī, Prītī, and Trsnā and in the Lal. (353) are Ratī, Aratī, and Trsnā) see their father, Mara, disconsolate after his repeated attempts to foil Siddhartha's quest for enlightenment.

They offer to tempt the Buddha with soft force, their feminine wiles. This was in the fifth week after the great enlightenment and took place under a banyan tree called the ajapala nigrodha.

Pssst. Hey, boy. I offer you my daughter.
With Māra's approval, they go to the Buddha in various shapeshifting forms and lovely guises as he is sitting at the foot of the tree. They dance and sing before him.

In the end the Buddha tells them that he has gone beyond temptation of sense pleasures. So they go back to their father (S.i.124-7; J.i.78-80, 469; DhA.i.201f., iii.196,199; SN.v.835).

In the Samyutta account, they are said to have asked the Buddha questions about himself and his teachings. Aratī's question was how a man who had already crossed the five floods [oghas?] could cross the sixth. For explanation see KS.i.158, n.3.

Monday, February 5, 2018

Man offers his daughter to the Buddha (sutra)

Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly based on original translation by Ven. Thanissaro, Magandiya Sutra (Sn 4.9); G. P. Malalasekera, Dictionary of Pali Proper Names

If you want "inner peace," Ivanka, then...
[In the Magandiya Sutra a man named Magandiya offers in marriage his extremely desirable daughter to the Buddha, who was a young and handsome ascetic. But he shows no interest. The man is shocked, so the Buddha declines his generous offer.]

The Buddha was very beautiful Central Asian.
Māgandiya is a Brahmin from the Kuru country with a very beautiful daughter named Māgandiyā. Many high status men sought her hand in marriage, but the Brahmin did not consider them worthy. One day the Buddha became aware that both Māgandiya and his wife were ready to become enlightened, so he paid their village a visit.

Māgandiya saw him and, noting the auspicious marks on his body, told him of his alluring daughter and begged him to wait until she could be brought.

Look at me, so beautiful! - No thanks.
The Buddha said nothing, and Māgandiya ran home and returned with his wife and daughter arrayed in all their splendors. On arriving, they found that the Buddha had gone, but his footprint was visible.

Māgandiya's wife, who was skilled in such matters, said that the owner of such a footprint was free from all passion (i.e., enlightened and liberated).

But Māgandiya paid no attention and, going on a little way, found the Buddha and offered him his daughter. The Buddha thereupon told them of his past life, his renunciation (letting go) of the world, his conquest of Māra the Tempter, and the unsuccessful attempts of Māra's three very beautiful daughters to lure him back to worldly cares.

Compared to them Māgandiya was, he said, a corpse filled with 32 impurities, an impure (asubha) vessel painted without that he would not even want to touch with his foot. At the end of the discourse, Māgandiya and his wife become enlightened to the third stage or anāgāmins (DhA.iii.193ff.; SNA.ii.542f.)

Compare this sutra to Dvy.515ff., where the name is given as Mākandika and he is called a parivrājaka. The daughter's name is given as Anūpamā, and the wife is Sākalī.
 
It is said that as a result they put their daughter into the charge of her uncle, Culla ["Minor"] Māgandiya, retired from the world, and became fully enlightened arhats (DhA.i.202).
THE CONVERSATION
Hey, you! Want my daughter? I have three.
[The Buddha:] On seeing [the alluring dancing daughters of Mara] -- Discontent, Craving, and Passion (Tanhā, Arati, and Ragā) -- there was not so much as the inkling of sexual desire.

So what would I want with this woman [your daughter], who is full of urine and excrement, both of which I would avoid touching even with my foot if I came across them on a road as I was walking.
 
Look at my beautiful daughters, Prince!
[Magandiya:] If you do not want this gem of a girl, who is coveted by many kings, then what sort of view, precept, practice, life, attainment of [further] becoming [rebirth] do you argue [propose, promote, advocate]?

[The Buddha:] The thought "I argue for this" does not occur to one when considering what is clung to among doctrines (dharmas). Looking to let go of views I saw and found inner peace.
 
I don't mind giving Daddy whatever he needs.
[Magandiya:] Sage, you speak without clinging to any preconceived judgments. This "inner peace," what does it mean? How is it proclaimed by an enlightened person?

[The Buddha:] One does not speak of purity in connection with view, learning, knowledge, precept, or practice. Nor is it found by a person through lack of view, learning, knowledge, precept, or practice.
  • [NOTE 1: The Pali language version of the first sentence puts the words for "view, learning, knowledge, precept, and practice" in the instrumental case, which stands for the relationship "by means of" or "because of." But it also has an idiomatic meaning, "in terms of." (To keep the translation neutral on this point, I have translated it using the idiom, "in connection with," which can carry both possibilities.) The second sentence puts the words for lack of view and so on in the ablative case, which carries the meaning "because of" or "from." If we assume that the instrumental case in the first sentence is meant in the sense of "by means of," then we are dealing -- as Magandiya asserts -- with plain nonsense: The first sentence would say that a person cannot achieve purity by means of views and so on, while the second sentence would be saying that one cannot achieve purity by means of no view and so on. The fact that the two sentences place the relevant terms in different grammatical cases, however, suggests that they are talking about two different kinds of relationships. If we take the instrumental in the first sentence in the sense of "in terms of," then the stanza not only makes sense but also fits in with teachings of the rest of the Pali language sutras: A person cannot be said to be "pure" simply because one holds to a particular view, body of learning, and so on. Purity is not defined in those terms. The second sentence goes on to say that a person does not arrive at purity from a lack of view and so on. Putting the two sentences together with the third, the message is this: One uses right views, learning, knowledge, precepts, and practices as a PATH, a means of arriving at purity. Once one arrives one lets go of the path (does not cling to what was so helpful), for the purity of inner peace, in its ultimate sense, is something transcending the means by which it was reached. In the stanza immediately following this one, it is obvious that Magandiya has not caught on to this distinction. For further illustrations of the role of Right View in taking one beyond all views, see AN 10.93, AN 10.96, and MN 24. (The analogy of the relay stage coaches in MN 24 actually seems more tailored to the issues raised by the Buddha's remarks in this discourse than it does to the question it addresses in that sutra). Ven. Thanissaro also references sections III/H and III/H/i of his book on the 37 Requisites of Enlightenment, The Wings to Awakening.]
Letting go of these, at peace, no longer grasping, independent [of all teachers and teachings to know what is path and not-path to complete freedom], one would not long for becoming [further rebirth].

[Magandiya:] If one does not speak of purity in connection with view, learning, knowledge, precept, or practice and yet it is not found by a person through lack of view, learning, knowledge, precept, or practice, it seems to me that this teaching is confused, for some assume a purity in terms of -- by means of -- a view.

[The Buddha:] Asking questions dependent on views, you are confused by what you have grasped [and clung to]. So you do not glimpse even the slightest notion [of what I am saying]. That is why you think it is confused.

Whoever reckons [construes, thinks in terms of] "equal," "superior," or "inferior," by that such a person would dispute, whereas to one unaffected by these three, "equal" and "superior," do not occur.

Of what would the Brahmin say "true" or "false," disputing with whom: he in whom "equal," "unequal" are not.

Having abandoned the home-bound life, living free from society, the sage in villages creates no clinging relationships. Free of sensual passions, free from yearning, one would not engage with people in quarrelsome debates.
  • [2: For explanation of this stanza, attributed to Ven. Maha Kaccana, see SN 22.3.]
Those things aloof from which one should go about in the world, the great one would not take them up and argue for them. As the lotus flower is unstained by the water or mud [it grows up in], so the sage, a proponent of peace, free of greed [lust, craving, clinging], is unstained by sensual craving and the world.

An attainer-of-wisdom is not measured or made proud by views or what is thought, for one is not fashioned from them.
  • [3: "Measured...made proud" are two meanings of the Pali word manameti.]
One would not be led by action.
  • [4: "Action" here can mean either karma in its general sense. That is to say, the attainer-of-wisdom has gone beyond creating karma [because fully enlightened beings no longer make karma that bears a karmic result; instead their actions are called kriya ("simple actions") no longer ripening in the future, all of which they are liberated from]. Or in a more restricted sense, it is "ritual action." According to Nd.I, it refers to the factor of "formation" or "fabrication" (sankhara) in the analysis of Dependent Origination. (See SN 12.2).]
Learning does not reach a conclusion in any entrenchments. For one dispassionate toward perception there are no ties. For one released by wisdom [enlightened, liberated], there are no more delusions.

Those who grasp at [and cling to] perceptions and views go about butting their heads in the world.
Blood moon blue moon 2018