Showing posts with label Philip Kapleau. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philip Kapleau. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Why Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene

Married couple, Rabbi J embracing wife Mary Magdalene (based on the Kiss /Gustav Klimt/Etsy
Did Jesus prefer to kiss little boys like Judas and other young "Apostles" as Dr. Hillman says?

The Gospel of Philip Explained (and why Rabbi Jesus kisses [his wife] Mary Magdalene)
(ReligionForBreakfast) Dec. 5, 2025: Was [Rabbi] Jesus secretly kissing Mary Magdalene [and married to her, too, as most Jews would agree]? This video dives into the Gospel of Philip, its infamous “kiss” passage, Valentinian theology, and how baptism, anointing [khristos], and the “bridal chamber” were meant to turn Christians into [awakened] Christs ["Anointed Ones," not blind followers groveling for salvation].
(Goldie Ghamari) Tulku-seeking Tibetan lamas or Zoroastrian Magi?

How Bibi defends Christians in the Middle East and Jesus' own land of Palestine

With RFB link, get 50% off of Nebula. It’s just $30/year, or $2,5/month, at go.nebula.tv/religionforbreak... Get lifetime memberships: go.nebula.tv/lifetime?ref=rel...

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

KOAN: Will Schrodinger kill the cat?

What's the physics behind the Schrodinger's Cat thought experiment (zmescience.com)

KOAN: Nansen Kills the Cat
Roshi Philip Kapleau | Zen Bow | Winter 2018, Vol. XL, No. 4, rzc.org
Shōkei (Andreas Praefcke/Wiki)
Here is a vintage koan ("public case") commentary by the Rochester Zen Center’s founder, the late American Roshi Philip Kapleau. Mumonkan, Number 14. [It presages countless college discussions about Schrodinger's cat below.]

The Case
Once the monks of the Western and Eastern Halls were arguing about a cat. Nansen, holding up the cat, said: “You monks! If you can say a word of Zen, I will spare the cat. Otherwise, I will kill it!”

No one could answer, so Nansen cut the cat in two. That evening, when Joshu returned, Nansen told him of the incident. Joshu thereupon took off his sandal, put it on his head, and walked off.

Nansen said, “If you had been there, the cat would have been saved!”

The Commentary
Just say, what is the real meaning of Joshu’s putting his sandal on his head? If you can give a turning word on this point, you will see that Nansen’s action was not in vain. But if not, beware!

The Verse
Had Joshu only been there,
he would have taken charge.
He would have snatched away the sword,
and Nansen would have begged for his life.

Roshi Kapleau: The two protagonists of this koan, Nansen (748-835) and Joshu, are two of the great masters in Zen. Nansen (Chinese Nanchuan) was the teacher of Joshu (Chinese Zhaozhou). Nansen in turn was a disciple of the great Baso (Chinese Mazu). More: rzc.org

Experiment: Schrödinger Kills a Cat?

In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment (just as koans are like more shocking than historical reporting) concerning quantum superposition.

The experiment shows it's not true.
In this thought experiment, a hypothetical cat (and not the precious companion of Wisdom Quarterly's companion fish, Captain Shiny Sides, no relation to Hecklefish Moriarty of The Why Files) in a closed box may be considered to be simultaneously both alive and dead until it is observed, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. The thought experiment, viewed this way, is described as a paradox.

It is not alive but not quite dead?
It was devised by physicist Dr. Erwin Schrödinger in 1935 [1] in a discussion with Albert Einstein [2] to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems (inconsistencies and contradictions) of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.

In Schrödinger's original formulation, a cat, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box.

If an internal radiation monitor, such as a Geiger counter, detects radioactivity (a single atom decaying), the flask is shattered, releasing the poison, which kills the cat.

But if no decaying atom triggers the monitor, the cat remains alive.

The Copenhagen interpretation implies that the cat is therefore simultaneously both alive and dead.

Yet, when one finally looks in the box, one sees that the cat is either alive or dead, not both alive and dead.

This poses the question of when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality resolves into one possibility or the other. More


Most people don't get Schrodinger's Cat (including you?)
(Looking Glass Universe) Nov. 7, 2024: A 4-week live course will run from Jan. 6-31. More info here: looking-glass-universe.teacha... This is the third video of a series on quantum mechanics. The rest of the playlist is here: Quantum mechanics course
  • Looking Glass Universe, Nov. 7, 2024; Roshi Kapleau, Rochester Zen Center (rzc.org); Brian Cox via Explainify; Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, CC Liu, Sheldon S. (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Friday, September 30, 2022

The Buddha holds up a flower (Zen)

Roshi Bodhin Kjolhede | Zen Bow | Spring 2019, Vol. XLI, No. 1 via Rochester Zen Center (RZC.org); Seth Auberon, CC Liu, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Philip Kapleau Roshi (hvzc.org)
ROSHI PHILIP KAPLEAU HAS SAID that when he was at Hosshin-ji, the monastery where he spent his first three years of training in Japan, at the end of each sesshin Harada Roshi would publicly recognize, in the zendo, the participants who had achieved kensho that week. It was done as a brief ritual, but imagine what it put people through: Besides inviting feelings of envy on the part of the “losers,” the ritual might well have been hard on the “winners,” too; in Japan, you never want to stand out from the group. So why did Harada Roshi do this?

Two reasons come to mind. First, by publicly presenting those who had just seen into their nature, he hoped to boost others’ faith that they, too, could break through. Second, now that those who had glimpsed their True Self were “outed,” they would feel a greater responsibility to live up to that Self in their daily lives. However well these strategies may have worked at Hosshin-ji, for an American Sangha I would expect them to do more harm than good. They would too likely reinforce the delusion that there is something to be “attained” in Zen. On the contrary, if awakening gives us anything, it’s the realization that from the very beginning all beings are endowed with the same originally enlightened nature....

THE BUDDHA HOLDS UP A FLOWER
Koan commentary
Art in the Rochester Zen Center (rzc.org)
How can we convey the teaching beyond words and letters…in words? Once, when the World-Honored One (the Buddha) in ancient times was upon Vulture's Peak (named such because of the shape of the rocks), he held up a flower before the assembly of monastics.

At this all were silent. Venerable Great Kashyapa (Maha Kassapa) alone broke into a smile. The World-Honored One said, “I have the all-pervading Eye of the True Dharma, the Secret Heart of Incomparable Nirvana, the True Aspect of Formless Form. It does not rely on letters and is transmitted outside the sutras. I now hand it on to Maha Kashyapa.”

The Commentary
You don't get it like I do (Demystifying Reality).
Golden-faced Kudon is certainly outrageous. He turns the noble into the lowly and sells dog flesh advertised as sheep’s head — though with some genius. However, supposing that at the time all the monastics had smiled, how would the “All-including Eye of the True Dharma” have been handed on?

Or again, if Kashyapa had not smiled, how could he have been entrusted with it? If you say that the True Dharma can be handed on, the golden-faced old man with his loud voice deceived the simple villagers. If you say it can’t be transmitted, why did the Buddha say he had handed it on to Kashyapa?

The Verse
Holding up a flower
The snake shows its tail.
Kashyapa smiles,
And people and devas are confounded.

THIS CASE IS BASED ON A FAMOUS STORY. Some have called it a fable and said it never really happened, but it doesn’t matter in terms of its value as a koan (a public case). Whether it has historical veracity or not is not important; it’s a rich koan.

About Maha Kashyapa: “Kashyapa” is the short form of Mahakashyapa. The prefix “Maha” means “great” or “large,” and here it is an honorific. With this incident of him on Vulture's Peak smiling in response to the Buddha holding up a flower, he became the first patriarch of Zen.

For the scant biographical information available on Mahakashyapa, let’s turn to The Transmission of Light (Denkoroku in Japanese), a collection of koans compiled by the Japanese Zen Master Keizan, the Dharma Heir of Dogen.

This text purports to be Zen’s ancestral line, presented in stories — enlightenment accounts — of each of the 52 or so earliest masters. It says that Kashyapa was born in an Indian Brahmin family, and his name in Sanskrit means "drinker of light."

When he was born, supposedly a golden light filled the room and went into his mouth; hence the name. We’re also told that his complexion was golden. As a monk he was renowned for his ascetic self-discipline and moral strictness, and these qualities enabled him to assume the leadership of the Sangha after the passing of the Buddha.

It was Kashyapa who convened the First Buddhist Council in order to counteract tendencies toward a less strict lifestyle within the Sangha. He had differences of opinion with Ananda, the Buddha’s attendant, but in the end authorized Ananda as his Dharma Heir in Zen’s ancestral line.


IN THE CHINESE TEMPLES and in [the Rochester Zen Center] Buddha Hall in Rochester, the figure of Mahakashyapa stands on the Buddha’s right and Ananda on the Buddha’s left. Iconographically, Mahakashyapa is often identified by his cracked and wrinkled face, meant to show his age and his asceticism.

When Kashyapa met the Buddha, the latter said, “Welcome, mendicant” [Ehi bhikkhu or "Come, monastic"] — so by that time, apparently, Kashyapa was already wearing the patchwork robe of a monk. [The saying makes someone a monk ordained by the Buddha, so one would not need to be wearing a robe yet.]

The Denkoroku says that “Kashyapa had practiced austerities and never wasted any time.” Remember that the Buddha himself began his journey to enlightenment by first spending six years practicing severe austerities, but then gave them up when he realized they would not lead to enlightenment.

The Buddha then warned that self-punishment [penance, severe asceticism] was not the way, but Kashyapa stuck to his ways, drawing the disapproval of others in the Sangha:

“Only seeing the ugly emaciation of his body and the wretchedness of his clothing, everyone doubted Kashyapa.” Still, we’re told, “every time the Buddha was going to give a talk in someplace or other, he shared his seat with Kashyapa, who thenceforth was the senior member of the community.” More

Monday, February 18, 2013

A Few Words on Zen's Sex Scandals

Wisdom Quarterly; James Myoun Ford (Boundless Way Zen), Monkey Mind (Patheos.com, Feb. 17, 2013), "A Few Words on Zen’s Sex Scandals and What Might Follow"

I’ve commented here and there on the larger sex scandals touching on our Zen communities here in the West. I’ve been praised and I’ve been castigated for these comments. I liked praise better. I can claim for good or ill the distinction of being the first of the Western Zen teachers to write an open letter to the Zen Studies Society board calling for the dismissal of the Reverend Eido Shimano. My letter was quickly followed by a cascade of other letters sent to their board, showing, I believe, if it hadn’t been me, that first letter would have been sent by another, perhaps within days. So not lots of credit to be earned there. I also joined in signing a letter calling upon the Reverend Genpo Merzel to withdraw from teaching, at least for a while in order to pursue serious counseling for his repeated misconduct with students. I gather he chose to follow that counsel for about a week. Since then I have chosen not to write anything about the Reverend Joshu Sasaki... More
(Stephen Slottow) Philip Kapleau used to make the point that Zen teachers are not gurus: They are not magical, they don’t have absolute authority, and they don’t (or shouldn’t) presume to dictate what students should do in every aspect of their lives; they are guides, human beings who have gone sufficiently far in their training to instruct others and have some teaching authorizations to do so -- but [are] still, in some sense, students themselves....And the student doesn’t abdicate responsibility. Aitken made the same points repeatedly. I agree that written guidelines are terribly important; they act as a touchstone and need to be constructed with care. Also there has been too much fixation on sexual incidents to the exclusion of other questionable dealings by some teachers that involve finance and authority outside the sexual realm. 

Oh, the temptation of unenlightened "holy" men after satori (an epiphany)!
 
(Mushim Patricia Ikeda) [Zen's] potential is not a guarantee, however, and in my opinion it has been reduced by a number of different elements, up to now, in the U.S. Among those elements are...lack of cultural safeties that may be present in the Asian societies that Zen (Chan/Son/Thien) have traveled to the U.S. from, absence of cultural safeties that need to be instituted in U.S. cultures as Zen takes root, lack of understanding or acknowledging among teachers of projection/transference/countertransference, wishful and magical thinking, lack of standardized professional codes of ethics for U.S. Zen teachers, insufficient emphasis on the precepts or lack of holding teachers accountable to a “normal” (person on the street) understanding of the precepts, and last but not least, the tenet of Zen which proclaims that it is “a special transmission outside the scriptures.” MORE COMMENTS

Friday, July 24, 2009

Buddhism in Mexico


The World’s Lorne Matalon visits a touring display of ancient Tibetan relics in Mexico City and tells us how Buddhism is gaining popularity in mostly-Catholic Mexico.

Buddhism in Ancient Mexico

Book Reviewer Brian Bruya (Gaia.com)

"If there is a lake, the swans would go there." So said the 16th Karmapa when asked why he visited America in 1976. Of course, the Karmapa wasn't the first swan to go to the lake. In a BOOK of immense scope, Rick Fields surveys the history of Buddhism in America.

From the quasi-legendary Fu-sang in the 6th Century, to Asian immigrant communities, to the latest trends in American Buddhism, Fields goes in depth. Writing as a storyteller as much as a historian, he takes us back to the earliest European contacts with Buddhism.

Most notably, he covers Sir William Jones, who was about to go to America on the recommendation of Ben Franklin when at the last minute he fortunately chose to visit India instead. His work would influence the American Transcendentalists and eventually the great Theosophist and first American convert to Buddhism, Henry Steel Olcott.

A sympathetic writer, Fields is also meticulously inclusive. Besides the obvious transmitters, like Zen pioneers D.T. Suzuki and Roshi Philip Kapleau, Fields traces the forgotten influences of Paul Carus, Ernest Fenollosa, and Dharmapala. One memorable story is of the ex-Navy submarine mechanic Heng Ju, who walked (three steps then a kowtow) from San Francisco all the way to Seattle for a berry pie. Fields has countless stories that make How the Swans Came to the Lake a priceless contribution not only to Buddhism in America but to Buddhism itself. Source