Showing posts with label US nuclear deal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US nuclear deal. Show all posts
Thursday, October 30, 2025
Friday, July 4, 2025
Friday, June 27, 2025
Did Iran really retaliate on Israel?
Netanyahu resigns, Tel Aviv completely destroyed? Thousands of Israeli victims of Iran's devastating...
For business inquiries, please contact: polemikchannel@gmail.com. Establishing heated discussions or debates held in the mass media in the form of videos and writing. The Polemik channel is used to deny or expose cases from various perspectives. Let's discuss this video in the comments column.
DISCLAIMER: Under Article 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowances are made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comments, news reporting, teaching, scholarships, and research. Fair use is the use permitted by copyright laws that may be violated. This video is for entertainment only. No copyright violations are intended. All rights to clips and music belong to their respective owners. For copyright matters, please contact: polemikchannel@gmail.com.
How this content was made: auto-dubbed audio tracks for some languages were automatically generated. Learn more
Iran's 26th devastating retaliation, Israeli city destroyed, thousands of Israeli citizens in fear
(Narasi) June 26, 2025: The conflict between Iran and Israel is now entering its most brutal phase and the Armistice. Iran's last missile attack. just hours after the previous wave. The latest reports say hundreds of buildings were destroyed and thousands of Israelis are in critical condition. The attack alarm sounded too late, leaving many victims unable to evacuate. What is the target of this 25th attack? What are the current conditions? Could this be the end of Israel's defense dominance? Narasi presents information in the form of a collection of the latest technology and facts behind trending/viral, unique and strange events in the world. This content is content that has original comments and is full of educational value. This compilation video has gone through various research and data processing in the form of photos, videos and news from various sources which are packaged in a countdown and/or random manner. #IranVsIsrael #BallisticMissiles #TelAviv
Labels:
air attack,
Apartheid,
armenian,
Gaza,
genocide,
iran,
Israel,
nuclear threat,
retaliation,
the young turks,
US nuclear deal
Monday, May 12, 2025
Jimmy Dore: Palestine, Bibi, Israel, Trump, JD
- Desi Lydic, The Daily Show; Jimmy Dore's official website: The Jimmy Dore Show, May 2025; Pfc. Sandoval, Sheldon S., Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Friday, July 12, 2024
DARPA, CIA are scary: It's all for WAR
Inside DARPA: the most powerful and secretive military agency in the world | Annie Jacobsen
(The Diary of a CEO Clips) Annie Jacobsen reveals truth about the CIA,
Area 51 (Dreamland, Groom Lake, Nevada), Operation Paperclip...
- Full episode: • Annie Jacobsen: The Pentagon's NUCLEAR...
- Danny Jones Podcast channel: @koncrete
- American Veterans for Peace
- Code Pink: Women for Peace
- Danny Jones Clips, March 14, 2024; The Diary Of A CEO Clips, March 15, 2024; Pfc. Sandoval, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Tuesday, September 6, 2022
5 largest nuclear tests caught on camera
Underworld, March, 29, 2022; Pfc. Sandoval, Sheldon S., Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
For any and all copyright matters, please email directly at UnderworldCopyright@gmail.com. Unless otherwise created by Underworld, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources: pastebin.com.
Monday, April 27, 2020
Did NAZIs have a sense of humor? (video)
Family Guy; German Vince Ebert, 6/18; Seth Auberon, Pfc. Sandoval (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Watch German Science-Comedian Vince Ebert's first English stand-up show, "Sexy Science," comparing German and American sensibilities Get tickets and tour dates at vince-ebert.com or facebook.com/vince.ebert.
How did North Americans ever catch up to Nazi German scientific advancements -- could it have been Project Paperclip? That's when the American Nazis helped German-born Nazis escape prosecution to come live in the USA and help build the CIA, NAZA NASA, Gestapo Secret Service, chemical and other secret weapons programs, nuclear bombs and missiles... Go figure.
German humor meets American mentality
![]() |
| Bravo, I guess all Germans can be funny. |
Labels:
American culture,
Aryan invaders,
cartoon,
CIA,
comedy,
family guy,
German born,
Germany,
hitler,
NASA,
NAZIs,
paperclip,
racism,
science comedian,
secret weapons,
sexism,
sexy,
US nuclear deal,
WASP-18b
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
"Netanyahu does NOT speak for me"! (World)
Sheldon S., Ashley Wells. CC Liu, Wisdom Quarterly; Aaron Schachter (PRI's The World)
"If you put five Jews in a room," the old joke goes, "you get six opinions." So it's no shock that Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress has strongly divided opinions among Jews living in the United States.
More than 50 Democratic members of Congress, including six Jews, skipped Netanyahu's speech on Tuesday. Lowenthal says he wrestled with the decision and decided to attend, but he's angry that the speech has pitted Democrat against Republican, Jew against Jew.
"The support for Israel, historically, has been a bipartisan effort," he says. "I think that two weeks before the Israeli elections...it's an inappropriate time to both influence the United States Congress, and for the United States Congress to be involved in an election in Israel. I think that's totally inappropriate."
Many liberal American Jews agree with Lowenthal. "We published an ad in the New York Times that was signed by 2650 people. It says, 'No, Mr. Netanyahu, you do not represent American Jews,'" says Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor of Tikkun Magazine, a progressive Jewish quarterly.
![]() |
| Demonstrator holds sign during rally near Israeli Consulate in NY to protest Israeli PM Netanyahu's speech in front of U.S. Congress (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/pri.org). |
![]() |
| Mitt, you tell that Obama... - I'll tell him, Bibi! |
"There is a division," says Alan Lowenthal, a Democratic congressman from California. "I think that it's unfortunate that all of us who were one time on the same page were forced to make choices."
![]() |
| U.S./Israel has bases all around Iran. |
"The support for Israel, historically, has been a bipartisan effort," he says. "I think that two weeks before the Israeli elections...it's an inappropriate time to both influence the United States Congress, and for the United States Congress to be involved in an election in Israel. I think that's totally inappropriate."
![]() |
| US: build nuclear, burn oil |
Lerner is not a fan of Netanyahu in the best of times, and hasn't been for decades. But he says his criticism has mostly been about Netanyahu's policies, not his behavior. This time, though, he says Netanyahu has gone too far. More
News from The World
(PRI.org with backing from BBC.com)
News from The World
(PRI.org with backing from BBC.com)
| Latin American baseball greats-to-be. |
- How JFK made NASA his secret weapon in the fight for civil rights in America (March 03, 2015) NASA's black engineers, mathematicians, and technicians didn't just help America win the space race, they also played a key role in reshaping the American South.
- China can't get enough of "House of Cards" and that scares Washington
- Let the conspiracy theories begin: Who killed Boris Nemtsov? (March 2, 2015)
- The war against Ebola isn't over, but American troops can still come home
- Think our voting system is colorblind? Think again (The Takeaway, Feb. 28, 2015)
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
US, UK plans for Iran; Israel is loose cannon
(RT) Nov. 3, 2011 British officials are reportedly working on a plan to assist US forces in a pre-emptive attack on Iranian military facilities. It follows claims Washington DC is moving towards a policy of invasion and intervention on the pretext of fear that Tehran might some day develop a nuclear weapons program -- something Iran has always denied. Political analyst Chris Bambery believes instead that it is the prospect of economic ruin that is motivating the old elite into action.
The UN nuclear watchdog published a report in Nov. 2011 suggesting Iran has built a nuclear testing facility and will show satellite images to prove it. (The same kind of doctored photos was enough to get into a war on Iraq that continues to this day even amidst cut-and-run talk of withdrawal when facts show a permanent US privatized-war presence). These allegations also come amid reports of possible military action against the country's nuclear facilities. The Israeli president said, when it comes to Iran, "the international community is closer to finding a military solution than a diplomatic one." RT talks to Patrick Henningsen, editor of the Infowars.com foreseeing actions against Iran which could inflame the whole geopolitical Middle East.
Iran stands firm on its nuclear power program in the face of new economic sanctions, explains the country's president. Tehran denied it was developing atomic weapons, as "suggested" in the latest report by a the IAEA, an international nuclear watchdog organization. Israel speaks of potential military action against Iran -- raising fears the IAEA's findings are being twisted to concoct a pretext to attack. John Glaser, an assistant editor at AntiWar.com, says the US is constantly pushing Iran to create a nuclear bomb. By scaring and provoking it, the US gives itself an excuse to illegally invade, occupy, and exploit its resources. More
The UN nuclear watchdog published a report in Nov. 2011 suggesting Iran has built a nuclear testing facility and will show satellite images to prove it. (The same kind of doctored photos was enough to get into a war on Iraq that continues to this day even amidst cut-and-run talk of withdrawal when facts show a permanent US privatized-war presence). These allegations also come amid reports of possible military action against the country's nuclear facilities. The Israeli president said, when it comes to Iran, "the international community is closer to finding a military solution than a diplomatic one." RT talks to Patrick Henningsen, editor of the Infowars.com foreseeing actions against Iran which could inflame the whole geopolitical Middle East.
Iran stands firm on its nuclear power program in the face of new economic sanctions, explains the country's president. Tehran denied it was developing atomic weapons, as "suggested" in the latest report by a the IAEA, an international nuclear watchdog organization. Israel speaks of potential military action against Iran -- raising fears the IAEA's findings are being twisted to concoct a pretext to attack. John Glaser, an assistant editor at AntiWar.com, says the US is constantly pushing Iran to create a nuclear bomb. By scaring and provoking it, the US gives itself an excuse to illegally invade, occupy, and exploit its resources. More
Monday, November 14, 2011
Beating the Drum for War on IRAN (cartoon)
Wisdom Quarterly, RT.com, Jason Bermas
The abuses do not begin and end with cracking down on Occupy Movement free speech. The goal is far greater -- even more war and Perkins-style economic assassinations. Apathy means the war machine goes forward. The goal of occupiers is to call attention to the corporate greed and military madness behind our US policy of endless war as Orwell described in Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Nov. 14, 2011 - Is the latest IAEA report a case for a war with Iran? Why does the US get to read it first? Is there enough evidence to conclude that Iran's nuclear program goes far beyond peaceful purposes? And why is no-one questioning the credibility of the IAEA?
("Invisible Empire") The military-industrial complex
The abuses do not begin and end with cracking down on Occupy Movement free speech. The goal is far greater -- even more war and Perkins-style economic assassinations. Apathy means the war machine goes forward. The goal of occupiers is to call attention to the corporate greed and military madness behind our US policy of endless war as Orwell described in Nineteen Eighty-Four.Nov. 14, 2011 - Is the latest IAEA report a case for a war with Iran? Why does the US get to read it first? Is there enough evidence to conclude that Iran's nuclear program goes far beyond peaceful purposes? And why is no-one questioning the credibility of the IAEA?
("Invisible Empire") The military-industrial complex
Labels:
1984,
Ahmadinejad,
atom,
cartoon,
family guy,
Indo Iran,
iran,
pretext,
radiation sickness,
secret weapons,
U.S. war in Iraq,
US nuclear deal
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Freed Korean journalists back home
After Bill Clinton intervenes, Laura Ling and Euna Lee return to the U.S. after their ordeal in North Korea. Details of their detention
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Indian administration survives Nuclear confidence vote
By Matthew Rosenberg (AP) 7/22/08
NEW DELHI — India's government survived a bruising political battle to win a confidence vote Tuesday, reviving a landmark nuclear energy deal with the United States that is at the center of an emerging partnership between the world's two largest democracies.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Congress party fought hard to secure victory, and appeared to cut back room deals when all else failed. An airport was named after one lawmaker's father, another was promised a high-level job and — rival politicians allege — many others received millions of dollars in bribes.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Congress party fought hard to secure victory, and appeared to cut back room deals when all else failed. An airport was named after one lawmaker's father, another was promised a high-level job and — rival politicians allege — many others received millions of dollars in bribes.
The dealmaking dismayed many in India, and the political hostility it fostered was on display during Tuesday's parliamentary debate, which repeatedly degenerated into an angry back-and-forth as opposition lawmakers heckled government supporters.
At one point, legislators from the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party pulled large bundles of cash out of bags they said contained tens of millions of rupees — the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars — alleging Congress and its allies had tried to bribe them to abstain.
The ruckus forced a temporary adjournment of Parliament — but the stunt failed to stave off the opposition's defeat.
The government won with 275 votes for it and 256 against, a wider margin than many observers had predicted. Ten lawmakers abstained.
Afterward, Singh called the victory "convincing," telling reporters outside Parliament that it would "send a message to the world at large that India is prepared to take its place in the committee of nations."
That means pushing ahead with the nuclear deal, on which Singh has staked his premiership.
The deal is seen as the cornerstone of a budding strategic partnership between the United States and India, which was officially neutral during the Cold War but had warm relations with the Soviet Union. But the communist parties that provided Singh's government with its parliamentary majority have denounced it as a ploy to make India Washington's pawn.
The pact would end more than three decades of nuclear isolation for India, opening its civilian reactors to international inspections in exchange for the nuclear fuel and technology it has been denied by its refusal to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and its testing of atomic weapons.
To finalize the deal, India must now strike separate agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency as well as the Nuclear Suppliers Group of countries that export nuclear material. The U.S. Congress will then need to approve the accord.
The White House on Tuesday welcomed the government's victory.
"We think that this idea of a U.S.-India civil nuclear arrangement is a good one for everybody," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters after the vote. "It's good for India because it would help provide them a source for energy that they need."
India imports about 75 percent of its oil, and Singh, the architect of India's 1991 transformation from a socialist-style economy to a capitalist one, has argued the country needs the nuclear deal to power its financial growth and lift hundreds of millions of its 1.1 billion citizens out of poverty.
Closing Tuesday's debate over the confidence motion, Singh said in a speech to lawmakers that the deal would "lead India to become a major power center of the evolving global economy."
But the speech was presented only in written form because shouting opponents kept Singh from speaking.
Even by the standards of India's theatrical and often chaotic political culture, the politicking of the past week and the actual debate were considered ugly.
A former solicitor general, Harish Salve, called the scandal-laden vote "the worst defeat of Indian democracy." He was especially horrified by the spectacle of lawmakers waving bundles of cash on Tuesday, which he termed "ghastly."
India's equally raucous media vacillated between blasting the alleged corruption and reveling in the spectacle of it all. One New Delhi tabloid newspaper, Mail Today, printed a graphic Tuesday illustrating how many suitcases would be needed to carry more than $5 million worth of rupees, the alleged going rate to bribe a lawmaker. The verdict: at least eight — and they'd weigh at least 690 pounds.
Singh was forced to call the confidence vote after the communist political parties withdrew their support this month to protest the deal.
The communists lined up with the right-wing BJP and other smaller regional and caste-based parties in their failed bid to topple the government, which survived by winning the support of one-time political enemies and minor parties.
PHOTO 1: Activists of the youth and women's wing of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) hold torches as they attend a rally opposing the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal in Hyderabad, India, Monday, July 21, 2008. Indian lawmakers gathered Monday to debate a vote of confidence in the government that will likely determine the fate of the landmark deal. (AP Photo/Mahesh Kumar A.)
The ruckus forced a temporary adjournment of Parliament — but the stunt failed to stave off the opposition's defeat.
The government won with 275 votes for it and 256 against, a wider margin than many observers had predicted. Ten lawmakers abstained.
Afterward, Singh called the victory "convincing," telling reporters outside Parliament that it would "send a message to the world at large that India is prepared to take its place in the committee of nations."
That means pushing ahead with the nuclear deal, on which Singh has staked his premiership.
The deal is seen as the cornerstone of a budding strategic partnership between the United States and India, which was officially neutral during the Cold War but had warm relations with the Soviet Union. But the communist parties that provided Singh's government with its parliamentary majority have denounced it as a ploy to make India Washington's pawn.
The pact would end more than three decades of nuclear isolation for India, opening its civilian reactors to international inspections in exchange for the nuclear fuel and technology it has been denied by its refusal to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and its testing of atomic weapons.
To finalize the deal, India must now strike separate agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency as well as the Nuclear Suppliers Group of countries that export nuclear material. The U.S. Congress will then need to approve the accord.
The White House on Tuesday welcomed the government's victory.
"We think that this idea of a U.S.-India civil nuclear arrangement is a good one for everybody," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters after the vote. "It's good for India because it would help provide them a source for energy that they need."
India imports about 75 percent of its oil, and Singh, the architect of India's 1991 transformation from a socialist-style economy to a capitalist one, has argued the country needs the nuclear deal to power its financial growth and lift hundreds of millions of its 1.1 billion citizens out of poverty.
Closing Tuesday's debate over the confidence motion, Singh said in a speech to lawmakers that the deal would "lead India to become a major power center of the evolving global economy."But the speech was presented only in written form because shouting opponents kept Singh from speaking.
Even by the standards of India's theatrical and often chaotic political culture, the politicking of the past week and the actual debate were considered ugly.
A former solicitor general, Harish Salve, called the scandal-laden vote "the worst defeat of Indian democracy." He was especially horrified by the spectacle of lawmakers waving bundles of cash on Tuesday, which he termed "ghastly."
India's equally raucous media vacillated between blasting the alleged corruption and reveling in the spectacle of it all. One New Delhi tabloid newspaper, Mail Today, printed a graphic Tuesday illustrating how many suitcases would be needed to carry more than $5 million worth of rupees, the alleged going rate to bribe a lawmaker. The verdict: at least eight — and they'd weigh at least 690 pounds.
Singh was forced to call the confidence vote after the communist political parties withdrew their support this month to protest the deal.
The communists lined up with the right-wing BJP and other smaller regional and caste-based parties in their failed bid to topple the government, which survived by winning the support of one-time political enemies and minor parties.
PHOTO 1: Activists of the youth and women's wing of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) hold torches as they attend a rally opposing the Indo-US civilian nuclear deal in Hyderabad, India, Monday, July 21, 2008. Indian lawmakers gathered Monday to debate a vote of confidence in the government that will likely determine the fate of the landmark deal. (AP Photo/Mahesh Kumar A.)
PHOTO 2: Insert (AP)
PHOTO 3: AP Photo: Congress party activists celebrate outside their party headquarters after the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance won...
Labels:
BJP,
communists,
confidence vote,
Congress party,
india,
Manmohan Singh,
nuclear,
US nuclear deal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








