Showing posts with label ontological. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ontological. Show all posts

Monday, August 25, 2025

Jesus' true identity deciphered by Spinoza


I realized it in ancient India/Tibet
(Spinoza Forever) Spinoza proved Jesus was not the [sole] "son of God" [deva-putra or "one born among the devas," angelic being or ruler like Sakka King of the Gods in a celestial heaven].

The Church has manipulated the truth and made of Jesus (Yeshua, Joshua, Issa, Y'shua) an idol, calling him the "Son of Zeus" from the time of Emperor ("Saint") Constantine and the Council of Nicaea.

Ego death shall be our resurrection/Second Coming, the arrival of divine awareness, mystical insight, cosmic consciousness (samadhi) in a syncretic Vedism, devotional Hinduism (Zoroastrianism, Yazidism, Samaritanism, Abraham-ism) and Mahayana sense.
The "lost" years are actually hidden years

This is what Hinduism has been saying for centuries

Resurrection of Christ within You
The Self-Realization Fellowship, as explained by Paramahansa Yogananda in the book The Second Coming of Christ, understood this as will many fans of the Yoga Sutras and the Krist (our innate Christic Nature) or Krishna Consciousness.

How did Baruch Spinoza figure it out? How did he prove it with logical rigor?

Monday, January 27, 2025

Bhikkhu Bodhi, what is NIRVANA?


Bhikkhu Bodhi's surprising and profound description of nirvana (nibbana)
(Daniel Aitken) In this profound Dharma Chat, renowned American Theravada Buddhist monk, scholar, and translator Bhikkhu Bodhi sheds light on the ultimate goal of the Buddhist path: nirvana (nibbana). Join him as he navigates the intricacies of this elusive concept in three ways, unveiling its multifaceted nature and dispelling common foolish misconceptions about this reality. Watch the full episode at dharmachats.com.

Nirvana (the Unformed)

Arhats in nirvana are not in nothingness
The beautiful thing about this short answer is that it is what Bhikkhu Bodhi was saying decades ago in his landmark series As It Is, ten taped lectures. The "Nibbana" lecture (Number 6) goes into detail to show that nirvana is NOT nothingness as so many people have concluded. It is not "emptiness." It is not negative, though described by excluding what it is not, which makes it sound like exactly that. Anyone wishing to intellectually grasp nirvana, because direct realization of it (which is the best way of understanding it) is a little way off, will enjoy this talk:

Nirvana (the Deathless)
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi, Daniel Aitken, Dec. 28, 2023; Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Simulation? Peter meets Trump (Family Guy)


Maya and the Simulation Theory
(OntologicalOdyssey) [This whole video, from the script to the voice, seems like AI, and one can only hope there is a human creator behind it.] Explore the intriguing parallels between Simulation Theory and the ancient Hindu concept of Maya ("Illusion"). Discover how both philosophies challenge our understanding of reality, suggesting that what we perceive may be a deceptive illusion or a constructed facade. Delve into the profound implications for consciousness, existence, and the search for ultimate truth in this thought-provoking exploration.


The Simulation Hypothesis is pseudoscience
(Sabine Hossenfelder) Is it possible that you, I, and everything we experience is a computer simulation? Why do people like Elon Musk and Neil DeGrasse Tyson think this is possible? In this video Lady Einstein (Sabine) explains how Nick Bostrom's argument for the simulation hypothesis goes and what the problems with it are. The reference she mentions at around 6:00 minutes is "Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation" (Silas R. Beane, Zohreh Davoudi, Martin J. Savage EPJ A, 50, 148, 2014, link.springer.com/article/10....). #science #physics #philosophy
  • 0:00 Intro
  • 0:25 What is the Simulation Hypothesis?
  • 3:52 Can we simulate consciousness?
  • 4:38 Can a computer replace the laws of nature?
  • 6:18 Can we avoid calculating details?
  • 8:14 Conclusion
  • 8:52 Sponsor message: Signup for FREE trial to The Great Courses Plus here: http://ow.ly/6ymM30rvhBa
  • Seth MacFarlane (Family Guy); OntologicalOdyssey, July 6, 2024; Sabine Hossenfelder, Feb. 13, 2021; Seth Auberon, Sheldon S. (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, February 25, 2019

ZEN: What is a paradox? (video)

Brilliant (Vsauce2, 4/18); Philip J. Bossert, "Paradox and Enlightenment in Zen Dialogue..." Journal of Chinese Philosophy (buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw); Bob Gavagan; Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

What if they were to make a Zen movie? (imdb)
Dr. Chung-ying Cheng discussed the seemingly paradoxical use of language in Zen dialogues and suggested a means for understanding this paradoxical quality.

The "principle of ontic non-commitment" and the method of "ontological reduction" he described as an approach to resolving the paradoxical qualities of Zen language appear to be quite similar to the phenomenological technique of epoche and the method of phenomenological reduction the German philosopher Edmund Husserl developed early in this century to deal with certain paradoxes of subjectivity and objectivity.

A discussion of this issue of language and paradox might provide a fruitful point of comparative philosophical dialogue between Zen Buddhism and phenomenological philosophy.

Hence, using Dr. Cheng's article as a basis, there are various similarities.... After mentioning how these methods are used to treat seemingly paradoxical situations, the notions of enlightenment in Zen Buddhism and transcendental phenomenology deserve remark.

Dr. Cheng points out that the paradoxes of Zen dialogue are due to an attempt to understand an utterance in terms of its surface semantic structure and the common-sensical ontological structure that normally provides the referential framework it.

However, instead of the semantic structure of an utterance ("Listen to the dog") referring to some past or present ontological event (the experience or concept of a barking dog), the Zen koan ("Listen to the sound of one hand clapping") appears to refer to an ontological absurdity (neither the concept nor the experience of a clapping sound can be meaningfully associated as originating from a single hand).

10 Brain-Splitting Paradoxes


The semantic structure of the utterance does not seem to "point to" anything and is thus an apparently meaningless use of language.

This means that the language of the Zen paradoxes contradicts the background reference presuppositions of surface-level terms in ordinary usage and by doing so points to the singular absence of reference or that of reference framework for the language of the paradoxes.

But the insight that the Zen dialogue seeks to offer is not at the common sense level of ordinary linguistic usage.

And it is precisely the first step toward enlightenment to realize that the paradox is valid only as long as one remains at the common sense level of understanding.

The Zen koan uses language not to refer but as a tool or a dialectical process for revealing a very deep ontological structure by means of or in virtue of the incongruity of the surface semantic structure of the paradoxes in reference to a standard framework of reference.

To get at this deep ontological structure, the surface level of understanding must be sundered, and it is precisely the paradoxicality of the language of the koan that accomplishes this.

But this is only the negative side of the paradox, that is, its destruction of the common-sensical understanding of the world.

If the listener does not retreat from the apparent absurdity of the paradoxical statement but instead grapples with it, the positive side of the paradox may have the constructive effect of producing in the person an insight into this deeper level of understanding.

A paradox is something that is "contrary to common belief," that is, something that does not have a place in the ontology of everyday life.

The destruction of this "common ontology" as a basis for understanding leaves one open for understanding at a different level.

The insight into this deeper level of understanding is a result of a shift in attitude toward the language of the utterance, a shift that separates the semantic structure from its ordinary ontological framework of reference. This shift resolves the paradox.

It does not solve it or dissolve it by explaining away the incongruity involved but resolves it by clarifying the paradoxicality of the paradox. At the level of common sense understanding and ordinary linguistic usage, the paradox still remains. The individual who has mastered the koan, however, now understands... More

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Questioning reality: life as simulation (video)

Strange Mysteries (video); Seth Auberon, Pat Macpherson, Wisdom Quarterly


3 Reasons We Are Living in a Simulation
Strange Mysteries, Jan. 20, 2017
Despite simulation theory existing for thousands of years in various forms, one of the most compelling comments on the subject came just a few years ago in 2003 from philosopher Nick Bostrom. Every day and night we conjure up vivid dreams, mental images, and crystal clear memories we're certain we once experienced. There are many things about the universe we haven't yet explained, but some scientists are starting to believe that simulation theory works like a catch-all for things we haven't figured out.


(Jan. 19, 2017) The claim that we know more about outer space than we do the ocean is a pile of horse poop. We've explored lots of the ocean. We've met many of its creatures. Heck, I've even drank some of it, but I've never drunk outer space.

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Dr. Moody: Everyone will believe in rebirth

Everyone's "island" is different. So be an island (dipa) unto yourself! (SN 22:43)
 
Near death experience (NDE) researcher Dr. Moody, M.D. has been studying and documenting the reality of rebirth, post mortem consciousness, and the existence of other dimensions. On Jan. 17-18, 2014 he is conducting a seminar and claimed on Coast to Coast that he will reveal a bombshell breakthrough in the scientific study of future and past lives. 

Neverland, Nonsense, Afterlife, Living Wisely
The story of Peter Pan has long been described as a metaphor for childhood and immortality.

Dr. Moody's new and groundbreaking work Nonsense (following Life After Life) shows that Peter Pan's story may also be a metaphor for understanding how nonsense can be a key to creating new language and thinking regarding the afterlife.

Understanding the afterlife offers us wisdom for living now. J.M. Barrie, author of Peter Pan, shared that Neverlands are found in the minds of children. Although they always seem to be more or less an island resembling one another, they are not the same from one child to the next.

For example, John Darling “had a lagoon with flamingos flying over it,” while his little brother Michael “had a flamingo with lagoons flying over it.”  Like Dr. Moody describes in his research on Near Death Experiences... More
  
The Power of Nonsense
Beauty and the bullet, Mona mad for the MIC?
"Nonsense wakes up the brain cells," according to Dr. Seuss. Science has brought humanity a long way during the last 400 years. We have cured [or at least developed profitable "treatments" for] innumerable diseases, mastered human flight, split the atom, and sent humans to the moon. So why do so many of our deepest mysteries remain beyond the reach of reason?

I have discovered a hidden collective cognitive flaw that impairs our ability to think cogently about some very fundamental problems of science, philosophy, and religion.

I am a psychiatrist and professor of philosophy and logic. During my almost 50-year career, I have examined a glitch that is practically built into the way we think. When Aristotle codified logic [for the Western world, having borrowed so much from India] 2,300 years ago, he left a gap, an area of incompleteness that compromises our ability to think rationally about important questions that do not fit easily into the literal frame of... More 

Neverland 
So how does one get to Neverland? Walt Disney popularized the directions to Neverland by giving the nonsensical directions, “Second star to right, straight on til morning.”  In the novel, however, Barrie said the directions were “second to right, straight on til morning.”

This is a great metaphor both for both entering the dream world and dying. One second to the right is the difference between being awake (alive) and being on our way in flight in dreams (death) until we wake up in the morning (make our passage to the new afterlife realm).
  
THE SEMINAR
Prof. Moody is a medical doctor and author
The program will guide participants through a process that awakens an important but forgotten power of the mind. The purpose is to enhance critical, analytical, and creative thinking in a rapid, observable way with three main objectives:
  1. Increase critical thinking skills. Democracy depends on citizens' ability to think and debate logically. So this program teaches participants how to think more logically with entertaining exercises that enhance critical thinking skills.
  2. Open new possibilities for advances in numerous fields including science, psychology, and advertising. There are direct applications in many fields, widening the scope of the mind in a way that is useful in any profession.
  3. To enable us to study mystical states of consciousness including near-death experiences in an entirely new way. A study is in progress using the information in this program to understand the language of dying patients in more depth, which will help improve our care of the terminally ill. More

Monday, October 4, 2010

Nirvana: The Story of the Turtle and the Fish



How to describe nirvana when nothing compares?
Bhikkhu Bodhi As It Is (edited by Wisdom Quarterly)
The following story illustrates the error of regarding nirvana as "nothingness" when it is described by saying what it is not.

There was once a turtle who lived in a lake with a group of fish. One day the turtle went for a walk on dry land. He was away from the lake for a few weeks. When he returned he saw the fish.

They greeted him and asked: "Hello! How are you, Mr. Turtle? We haven't seen you for weeks. Where have you been?"

The turtle answered, "I was up on dry land, spending time on dry land."

The fish looked puzzled and said, "Up on dry land? What are you talking about? What is this dry land?"


The turtle paused as he tried to think of a way to explain something that had no parallels to their ordinary underwater world.

The fish tried to help by prompting the turtle, "Is it wet?"

The turtle answered, "No, it's not wet."

The fish continued, "Is it cool and refreshing?"

"No, it's not cool and refreshing."

"Does it have waves and ripples?"

"No, it doesn't have waves and ripples."

Worried, they finally asked, "Well, can you swim in it?"

"No you can't swim in it," the turtle had to admit.

Naturally, the fish reasoned: "It's not wet, not cool, not wavy, and you can’t swim in it? Well then this 'dry land' of yours must be complete nothingness, either a fairytale or annihilation."

"That may be, that may be" the turtle smiled as he left for another walk on dry land.

THE MANTRA
Wisdom Quarterly
Ineffable nirvana gets poetic treatment -- at least the attainment of it does -- in a Sanskrit mantra epitomizing the Heart Sutra: Gate, gate, paragate, parasamgate, bodhi, swaha!

Gone, gone,
Gone beyond,
Gone altogether beyond,
O, what an awakening,
So it is!

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Brain versus Mind

Dharmachari Seven

(LiveScience.com) (n-s-d.com)

According to the Buddhist theory of mind (in Abhidharma or Buddhist Psychological terms), there are eight factors that together comprise a human being. The first four are collectively known as body -- although most frequently referred to in the aggregate as form (rupa). These are the Four Great Elements or mahabhuta (dhatu).
  • Earth (the quality of hardness)
  • Fire (heat)
  • Water (cohesion)
  • Wind (motion)
At a subatomic level, the Abhidharma speaks of particles (kalapas) or units that together build up to form the various qualities of matter. All materiality is characterized by degrees of these qualities.

The second four are collectively known as mind -- although most frequently referred to in the aggregate as "name" (nama). These are spelled out and together are regarded as "mind."
  • Feeling (sensation)
  • Perception (six sense-organ and object contact)
  • Mental formations (e.g., will or volition, etc.)
  • Consciousness (reflective awareness)
At a finer magnification, the Abhidharma speaks of mind-moments (cittas) or discrete units of mentality that together build up to form the various processes of awareness.

Brain vs. Mind
Body (brain) and mind (mentality) are interdependent, and for the most part do not occur separately. This may not be obvious because the Abhidharma analyzes them as if they were separable.
.
The purpose of the analysis is to demonstrate their conditioned (compo-nent, dependent) nature. It may also not be obvious because form or body need not be gross, as it is in the Sensual Sphere (Rupa-loka). It can be fine material (subtle and luminous as with beings existing in higher realms that are not perceptible with the eye but rather with the mind's eye). There are even four Immaterial Planes (Arupa-loka), which are mind-only. These may correspond to a material basis in some form, somewhere, but not as it is generally spoken of.

The Buddha depicted among angelic devas in the Fine Material world.

The brain is not the mind and may not even be the "seat of consciousness." In fact, rightly speaking, the entire body is conscious. And it is difficult to demarcate where the brain ends and body begins. The Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems (which could also reasonably be called the "brain") enervate every region of the body and can literally be seen in the shape of the human body (Bodyworlds). They actually look like this:

(bryanedwards.coml)


One might even go so far as to argue that the brain cannot operate, and therefore normal human consciousness (or the epiphenomenal mind) cannot function, in the absence of blood -- that is, without nutriment (glucose) and oxygen. Glucose is not considered the brain, and neither are the lungs. Yet without them, there is no brain function. This is only to say that it is an artificial distinction being drawn:

The body is interconnected and interdependent, and it supports ordinary mentality. Mentality, in turn, governs the body. Anyone can practice telekinesis, or mentally moving something physical. Just blink or raise your arm. We are fascinated how someone might remotely move objects and forget the miraculous everyday movement of proximate objects.

(connellychiro)

At a finer resolution, the nervous system looks like this (Figure 2.5). However, Western science is not doing much to spread the news that there are many "neurons" in the heart and intestinal tract (giving a whole new literal meaning to the express "gut feeling" and intuition).

(sinoemedica)

In ancient times, in almost every culture, the heart was regarded as the "seat of consciousness," not the brain. Certainly, it is the heart early in utero that begins to beat before the quadrants or components of what will come to be the brain are formed. Yet, "mind" (sensation + perception + formations + consciousness) is already present. In the absence of the subconscious-stream (see bhavanga-sota), and without the force of karma to sustain one in this form, human life is not possible. Therefore, the physical basis is not enough, but neither is the nonphysical. They are both important and interdependent. They co-arise and co-exist.
.
It is important to note that on death, consciousness seems to be independent of the brain (and body). The "spirit" (gandhaba) departs. However, that is only the way it seems. Immediately upon death, by force of karma, there is a spontaneously-arisen (opapātika) "body" that supports consciousness. This may be the rebirth or a transitional form. It is also possible in meditation to attain and literally see the Four Immaterial Planes now while embodied as a human. Siddhartha Gautama did so before becoming a buddha (fully-enlightened) under the Indian yogis Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputra.

(mogokmonle)

The system is ongoing and functions as a closed loop. The flowchart diagramming this process is encapsulated in the fundamental Buddhist teaching of Dependent Origination (Paticca-samuppada). "When this is, that comes to be. With the ceasing of that, this ceases" is a brief way of explaining an otherwise complicated set of codependent factors.


Eidetic representation of Dependent Origination's complexity (vimokkha)

No originating or prime cause is stipulated, only the necessary and sufficient conditions for sustaining the process. In the past, on account of ignorance, there was karma (the performance of deeds with the tendency to ripen in a result). On account of karma, there is rebirth. And on account of this, the "entire mass of suffering" comes to be. Because one factor is dependent on the others, it is possible to bring ignorance and suffering to complete extinction.

Since that was the Buddha's goal -- nirvana or "the end of suffering" -- rather than psychology or physics for their own sake, no ultimate ontological resolution is to be found in the Dharma. However, enlightenment is possible. And with enlightenment, the pursuit of all these questions is possible. One may see and know for oneself and come to understand that such questions are not the ultimate and do not pertain to full liberation from ignorance and the end of suffering. If they did, the Buddha explained, he would have taught them. Instead, from all that he knew, he limited himself to teaching only two thing, suffering (dukkha) and the end of suffering (nirvana).



More Depth