If only there were a way to erase racism: Eracism Foundation(eRACE Racism) Join eRACE to show the world that we run together against discrimination, prejudice, and racism. We run for real change and that starts one sister (and one mister) at a time, with everyone reaching across the race lines. Running is our vehicle, and connection is our superpower. Invite friends (open to men and women) to team up for this important virtual event. More: eraceracismbgr.com
Most American racism is not overt like young white males famously display behind the safety of computer monitors, trolling others from their middle class bedrooms. It's implicit, which means it is often hidden to us. We don't realize what we're doing. It's like when satiricalSacha Baron Cohen (as Borat and as Bruno) interviewed white frat boys in their Winnebago and on the beach in Florida for Spring Break.
DEFINITION: An implicit bias stereotype is the pre-reflective attribution of particular qualities by an individual to a member of some social out group [1]. "Those people are all like that." This color skin equals that set of behaviors.
It is an unconscious bias that stems from a natural human tendency to divide the social world into groups [2].
Implicit stereotypes are shaped by experience and based on learned associations between particular qualities and social categories, including race and gender [3], leading to racism and sexism or gender role stereotypes of how people are "supposed" to be.
Perceptions and behaviors can be influenced by the implicit stereotypes we hold, even if we are unaware we are holding such stereotypes [4].
Implicit bias is an aspect of implicit social cognition, the social phenomenon that our perceptions, attitudes, and stereotypes can operate prior to conscious intention or endorsement [5]. We may have taken it on from our family of origin or circle of friends, associates, and media figures.
It's real. The existence of implicit bias is supported by scientific articles in psychological literature [6]. The term implicit stereotype was first defined by psychologists Mahzarin Banaji and Anthony Greenwald in 1995 [7].
Implicit stereotypes (unconscious associations held by individuals) can influence behavior even when they contradict our consciously endorsed beliefs. This effect is particularly observable in real-world contexts such as judgments of fame and hiring processes [7, 8]. More
The Buddha's FIRE SERMON: the speech that converted 1,000 wanderers
What is the "all" that is burning?
(Buddha's Wisdom) š WE’RE BURNING RIGHT NOW — THE BUDDHA’S FIRE SERMON There’s a constant inner heat -- craving, hatred, confusion -- that drives our decisions and drains our peace.
In this guided breakdown of the Buddha’s Fire Sermon (Adittapariyaya Sutta), see exactly what’s burning, why “ALL is burning” became one of Buddhism’s most powerful teachings, and a 5-step method to stop being consumed by it, today.
DISCOVER
How the Buddha converted 1,000 fire-worshippers with a single 20-minute speech
The three psychological fires burning in our chest right now (and why they always find new fuel and never stop)
The hidden follow-up teaching that challenges even clinging to the pursuit of “enlightenment”
The 5-step method that extinguished suffering for 1,000 people simultaneously
What the Buddha taught AFTER the Fire Sermon that made even enlightened beings question everything
Master Buddhist meditation and mindfulness with the Buddha's original Fire Sermon teaching
02:50 1,000 meditators, same burn — The Kassapa Setup (near Bodh Gaya)
04:11 All is burning — the Buddha’s Fire Sermon (SN 35.28)
07:27 Silence: 1,000 awaken — What liberation felt like
09:20 How to stop burning — the 5-Step Practice
11:01 Beyond the Fire
Subscribe for daily Buddhist wisdom, meditation guides, and ancient teachings for modern spiritual awakening and meditation practices. Join community: Instagram: buddhaswizdom. Facebook: buddhaswizdom. Support the channel: buymeacoffee.com/buddhaswisdom
(Beth Upton) What is the importance of balancing our effort when we meditate. These videos are only made possible by generous donations (bethupton.com/support). Consider supporting this work on Patreon: bethupton. About my work: bethupton.com
Contentment and relaxing?
Upton's teacher Ven. Revata
When I sat a long retreat with Beth Upton (formerly Sayalay Anutara, a very successful student of Ven Revata, a direct disciple of Pa Auk Sayadaw, my teacher), she told me the same thing Ven. Revata told her: "I want you to practice contentment (santosha)."
"But, but," I argued, "if I were 'content,' why would I k*ck a*ss? I'm here to out-sit everyone and get still there faster."
She shook her head. She might have laughed if it weren't so pathetic and common among us Yankees. She's British, so I thought maybe she didn't understand the American will to muscle and speed through everything. Oh, she understood it and dealt with it with many students. I thought she must not believe how much I wanted to succeed. I tried telling her.
"All the more reason for you to slow down, relax, take it easy, enjoy it."
"'Enjoy' watching the breath?!"
"That's right, it should be enjoyable."
"I don't remember anyone ever saying that. I'm here to be an ascetic, to skip meals, get into hard yoga poses and hold them, to sit until my bum is numb or aching, until I can't sit anymore."
"Then take some time off."
We were talking at cross purposes, because everything I said to win her approval was causing her to look sad. "There's piti (joy, bliss, keen enthusiasm), you know?"
No, I didn't know. "Not for me there isn't. This is all about suffering and overcoming suffering."
She smiled and shook her head. She's quite intuitive but doesn't tell you that at first. "Maybe that's the problem. Take this retreat to treat yourself extra nice, remembering that your goal is CONTENTMENT. And when you're content, I think you'll see that this is much easier [effortless] than you've been making it or trying to make it."
Oh, she was so right. We Americans, we just won't listen. A lazy student should probably be told to shape up. But a rigid student, an over-eager one has to be calmed down, way down. Persistence is much, much more valuable (profitable) than valiant effort. More than 99% of people who read about how the wandering ascetic Siddhartha became the Buddha will misunderstand what he did to succeed.
Ask yourself, American. What did he do that finally did the trick? It's right in the story, the allegory of his life. Prince is born rich in a kingdom, living in three seasonal-capital palaces, shielded from all hardships by loving (doting, overly concerned and sheltering) father who wants and needs his son to grow up and take over the family business -- ruling this Kapilvastu.
The prince is raised very delicately, receiving all the pleasures one could want, sees the signs at 29, realizes there is suffering in the world (aging, sickness, death, not getting what we want when we want it, getting what we don't want, and never being able to find satisfaction or fulfillment in anything) for everyone including him. He, too, will grow old, get sick, and pass away. This so shocks him that he renounces the throne, leaves the lap of luxury just on the night of having been told the beautiful spouse he married years earlier just had their first child, whom he is sure to love and be held in bondage (rahula) by on account of his love. This whole family bonds thing is going to ruin his quest for truth, enlightenment, and liberation. He will not, as king, be able to save his people from their real problem in life -- suffering (dukkha, disappointment, ill, all that not-getting-what-we-want coupled with getting-what-we-don't want). So he takes the decision to let go and leave it all behind. He sets off for the East. (He was not in India when this happened, and no one else was either as there was no "India" yet, and he almost certainly wasn't in Nepal either, but try telling anyone that. He was in Gandhara, what today is the northwestern frontier of the future Empire of India under Ashoka). He finds a yoga teacher, trains, learns meditation as this teacher believes it to work, reaches the pinnacle, and asks, "Is that all there is?"
The teacher, so impressed with his progress, offers him co-teaching status, but Siddhartha is a seeker and not interested in that. He needs to find why we suffer, and nothing this teacher (Yogi Alara Kalama) has taught him has led him to that. So he takes off again. He meets another reputable yogi (Yogi Uddaka Ramaputta), who takes him under his wing, teaches him, and he reaches the pinnacle, and asks, "Is that all there is?" He gets the same offer, feels the same dissatisfaction, and leaves. This time he sets off on his own to practice what all great wandering ascetics have practiced: penances and austerities (tapas) to subjugate the "evil" body and liberate the "pure" mind/heart/consciousness/spirit stuck in the prison of the flesh. Five others see how hard he's been working and think to themselves, "If anyone's going to make it, it's this guy." So they follow him deep into the woods -- forest groves and lonely wildernesses to fast, meditate, and practice according to their own intuition or as they have learned to do.
The less he succeeds, the more Siddhartha doubles down. He's been fasting and that hasn't worked, so he fasts even more. He's been mortifying the body and that hasn't worked, so he punishes and mortifies it even more. The others are impressed, until he goes too far, falls on his face, exhausted, and near dies. He gathers himself, goes off alone, finds a better tree. And it is there that two women (Sujata and her servant) feed him. He takes food directly from their hands, and the other guys are disgusted and turn away. "He's given up." They restore him to health, he bathes in the river, and eventually he realizes this whole roughing it and blaming the body just isn't the way. He sets off again, finds a better tree, and starts to reflect, "If this hasn't worked, what have I been doing wrong and what would be more spiritually profitable and bring me to my goal of awakening and finding a solution to the problem of suffering?" It isn't his suffering he's worried about. He's lived so well that he hasn't experienced much suffering. It is the suffering of all his relations and subjects back in his kingdom that he's worried about, so he has to succeed.
Suddenly, he spontaneously remembers something that happened to him when he as 7-years-old. He was left in the shade of a tree during the annual Ploughing Festival as his caretakers went off to join the party. Alone for once, he sat cross legged and fell into a very profound meditative absorption (jhana). It was pleasant, absorbing, and so deep that legend has it, as he sat, a miracle occurred. Even though the sun moved through the sky as usual, the shade stayed still protecting him. He may have levitated a bit as well. (And let's say these two things didn't happen, it almost certainly felt that way, that time lost all meaning, he started in the shade and emerged still in the shade feeling that a lot of time must've elapsed, and he felt so light and elated that it was as if here were floating). So powerful was this memory, that Siddhartha wondered if this weren't the way to awakening. A strong intuitive sense came upon him that it indeed was.
And then he takes to wondering why he hasn't allowed himself this pleasant way. After all, he studied and quickly mastered these stages of absorption under his two yogi teachers (in addition to having practiced them a great deal in many past lives). He realizes that this way is full of pleasure (piti, joy), and he's been fearing pleasure. Having had so much of it in the first part of his life, he knows that didn't do him any good for realizing the ultimate truth about life, the universe, and everything. But why be afraid of supersensual pleasure, he reasons, given that it's not wrapped up in the body or tied to lust or anything to do with the world and worldliness? That's true, he realizes, and starts practicing them.
He gets up, goes to the river, places his alms bowl in the river, testing his intuitive sense that he's on the verge of success. If the bowl goes against the stream (opposite the flow of the current) that will be a sign and good omen of impending success. It goes against the stream. Buoyed by this auspicious sign, he goes and finds a better tree, takes a seat under it, and makes a strong determination that he will not get up until he succeeds in his quest even if "his blood runs dry and his body shrivels up." It is success or bust, supreme enlightenment (maha bodhi) or nothing! And with that strong determination, sure enough, he sits, lets go, goes deep, emerges purified by this profound stillness and is able to see things as they really are, taking up the successive stages of mindfulness (satipatthana), considering the question, "Why is there this present suffering?"
He realizes in successive stages (paticca-samuppada) that on account of this, that came to be, and on account of that, this other thing, and so on through the 12 causal links, tracing back this present suffering to past ignorance that led to karma that led to karmic results that led to so many rebirths that led to this present rebirth, being here now, suffering. And that if it weren't for that unbroken chain of causes-and-conditions this present state would not be arising. That's the answer! Take the lynchpin out of this revolving wheel that leads again and again to suffering!
There is an amazing breakthrough waiting
With this purification and realization, he gains the superknowledges and psychic powers (abhinnas and siddhis), and breaks through to understanding. He recalls his many past lives with their general outline and details, sees how karma has been shaping this all along, sees how this has been happening to all other beings who have for the most part been in the dark about it, and realizes he has answered his question. "Light arose, knowledge arose," and he comes upon the great realization that all states are conditioned and caused, and share three universal characteristics.
They are impermanent, unsatisfactory, and impersonal. And with that, through the night, he comes to the dawn, and is now the "Awakened One," the Buddha, replete in knowledge and conduct, full of insight and understanding. He remains around that tree that helped him to this realization for seven weeks, sometimes staring at it in admiration and wonders if it would make any sense to try to tell others what he has realized. He decides that it would not because this world, being so enamored of sensual pursuits, has no time for setting that hedonism aside and purifying their hearts/minds to see what Truth he saw and thereby be liberated by that direct knowing-and-seeing because, you know, the Truth sets one free.
Now, we all know that story, more or less. It's an ancient tale, the "Hero's Journey" as Joseph Campbell called it and Hermann Hesse alluded to in Siddhartha(1922). One could go into far more detail, but that's not the point. The question is, how did he do it? What is the KEY turning point in the story that led to his success, American reader?
One need not go back and look through the story. One already knows (or at least imagines that) one knows the answer. Why? It's because of the way we're wired or the way storytellers have been telling it down through the centuries that more than 99% of people will point to the magic line, "He made the strong determination that he wouldn't get up from this seat, even if his blood dried and body shriveled..." But that's completely wrong.
"Well, it can't be completely wrong," people will say, "because it's in the story." But it is completely wrong because he didn't need to say or do that. But he did need to realize and do something else that comes a little earlier in the story. What is it?
He needed to relax, be content, let go, enjoy the ride, stop over-efforting, and remember that the way was through the absorptions (jhanas, another word for which is the "meditations"). Since nearly every American will necessarily try to muscle it, the only people who make quick progress are the ones who don't, the ones who don't know enough to make the mistake of thinking that they know. They practice with beginner's mind, set no goal up for themselves to reach, and allow themselves to just sit rather than scheming and striving, struggling and suffering.
Ah, happiness leads to absorption.
They take the way of the Tao, as spoken of so much outside of Taoism in Zen. They follow the Buddha's actual advice that this is a "gradual training" that leads to the goal of enlightenment (bodhi) and liberation (nirvana). Craving and grasping at a "goal," as we do with worldly things, just doesn't work in this context. It is counter-productive.
So Upton gave me great advice in promoting contentment. I often forget that in practice as I start to tighten and strain and become exhausted by effort and despair. But there's no telling those Americans to take this up with a light touch, with a playful attitude, with confidence that the historical Buddha well understood what he was talking about and talked about it from direct experience.
Manjushri (Sanskrit š«šššš¼š°ššš», Romanized MaƱjuÅrÄ«) is a bodhisattva who represents transcendental wisdom (prajƱÄ) of the "Cosmic Buddhas" [like Vairocana] in MahÄyÄna Buddhism.
The name "MaƱjuÅrÄ«" is a combination of Sanskrit word maƱju and the honorific -ÅhrÄ«. It can therefore be literally translated as "Beautiful One with Glory" or "Beautiful One with Auspiciousness."
MaƱjuÅrÄ« is also known by the fuller name of MaƱjuÅrÄ«-kumÄra-bhÅ«ta (ą¤®ą¤्ą¤ुą¤¶्ą¤°ीą¤ुą¤®ाą¤°ą¤ूą¤¤) [1], literally "MaƱjuÅrÄ«, Still a Youth" or, less literally, "Youthful Prince MaƱjuÅrÄ«." Another name of MaƱjuÅrÄ« is MaƱjughÅį¹£a.
In MahÄyÄna Buddhism
Scholars have identified MaƱjuÅrÄ« as the oldest and most significant bodhisattva in MahÄyÄna Buddhist literature [2]. Notable traits of MaƱjuÅhrÄ« include: More
AnattÄ: "not-self," "non-self," "non-ego," "egolessness," "selflessness," "soullessness," the fact that ultimately all is "impersonal" is the last and most difficult of the three fetters or wrong views to cut.
It is one of the Universal Characteristics of All Existence (ti-lakkhana). The anattÄ doctrine taught by the historical Buddha is that neither within the bodily and mental phenomena of existence (the Five Aggregates clung to as self: form, feelings, perceptions, formations, and consciousness), nor outside of them, can there be found anything that in the ultimate sense can ever be regarded as a self or independently-existing real ego-entity, soul, self, or any other abiding essence, substance, or atman.
This is the central doctrine of Buddhism, without the understanding of which any real knowledge of Buddhism is altogether impossible.
It is the only really specific Buddhist doctrine, with which the entire structure of the Buddhist Teaching (Dharma, Dhamma) stands or falls.
All the remaining Buddhist doctrines might, more or less, be found in other philosophical systems or religions, but the anattÄ-doctrine is only clearly and unreservedly taught by the Buddha (or buddhas before him), wherefore the Buddha is known as the anattÄ-vÄdi, or "Teacher of Egolessness."
Whoever has not penetrated this impersonal characteristic of all existence and does not comprehend that in reality there exists only this continually self-consuming process of arising and passing bodily and mental phenomena, that there is no separate ego-entity within or without this process, that person will not be able to understand Buddhism, that is, the teaching of the Four Ennobling (Enlightening) Truths (sacca) in the correct light.
One will think that it is one's ego or personality that experiences suffering, one's person that performs good and harmful karma and will be reborn according to those actions, one's personality that will enter into nirvana, one's personality that practices the Ennobling Eightfold Path. More
(Psyfluence) This video delves into The Apocalypse of the Mind: The Age of Idiocracy and Idolatry, a deep analysis of how contemporary [American] society is caught in an unprecedented intellectual and spiritual crisis.
We reflect on the decline of critical thinking, the glorification of [idiocy and] superficiality, and the worship of false idols—from celebrities to empty ideologies.
This content invites us to question our dominant culture, its values, and how this reality impacts our inner and collective freedom. Through current examples and philosophical reflections, we are invited to awaken and seek an authentic path amid the noise and confusion of the modern age.
Are we ready to challenge our own beliefs and open our minds? Some are. Everyone else can return to consuming corn and cattle, body parts and synthetic plastic contamination.
The allegory of the cave is presented by the Greek philosopher Plato in his work Republic (514a–520a, Book VII) to compare "the effect of education (ĻĪ±Ī¹Ī“ĪµĪÆĪ±) and the lack of it on our nature."
It is written as a dialogue between Plato's brother Glaucon and his mentor Socrates. It is narrated by Socrates. The allegory is presented after the analogy of the Sun (508b–509c) and the analogy of the divided line (509d–511e).
In the allegory, Plato describes people who have spent their whole lives chained by their necks and ankles in front of an inner wall [a screen] with a view of the empty outer wall of the cave.
They observe the shadows [images] projected onto the outer wall by objects carried behind the inner wall by people who are invisible to the chained "prisoners" and who walk along the inner wall with a fire behind them, creating the shadows on the outer wall in front of the shackled prisoners.
The "sign bearers" pronounce the names of the objects, the sounds of which are reflected near the shadows and are understood by the prisoners as if they were coming from the shadows themselves.
The only reality for the prisoners of the cave are those shadows and sounds, which are of course only inaccurate representations of the real world. The shadows represent distorted and blurred copies of reality we perceive through our senses, while the objects under the Sun represent the true forms of objects that we can only perceive through reason [or directly through refined intuition].
Three higher levels exist: (1) natural science; (2) deductive mathematics, geometry, and logic; and (3) the theory of forms.
Socrates explains how a "philosopher" is like a prisoner now freed from the cave who comes to understand that the shadows on the wall are not the direct source of the images seen.
A philosopher aims to understand and perceive the higher levels of reality. However, the other inmates of the cave do not even want to escape their chains or leave their prison, for they know no better life [1].
Socrates remarks that this allegory can be paired with previous writings, namely the analogy of the Sun and the analogy of the divided line. More
After Skool; Jim Carrey, George Harrison (T&H Inspiration and Motivation); Philosopher Mel Brooks; CC Liu, Pfc. Sandoval, Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Death (marana) is death because it is immediately followed by rebirth; there is no space in between, as the Bardo is misunderstood to be, because it will not be another human rebirth next
At the instant of death, in that submoment, what was a human life is lost, the impersonal process of consciousness relinks and rearises according to karma in a new form. It is neither a new existence nor the same as the one before, and this is confusing. Identity clings. But just as it was impersonal before, it is impersonal still, and the process (patisandhi in samsara) rolls on. Samsara is the "continued wandering on" and its detailed process the Buddha made known in the Abhidhamma, how cittas (mind moments) and impuslions (javanas) produce their results (vipaka and phala), and a "being" (which is really always a becoming) is unaware and just carried on...
Nagarjuna: NÄgÄrjuna (from Sanskrit NÄga + Arjuna, Chinese LĆ³ngshĆ¹ é¾ęع, Tibetan Klu sgrub); circa 150 – c. 250 CE) was a philosopher and MahÄyÄna Buddhist monk from South India. He is considered the founder of the Madhyamaka (Middle Way) school [2, 3]. He is widely considered to be the most important Buddhist philosopher after the Buddha himself [4, 3]. Indeed, at least in Tibetan Buddhism, he is called the "second Buddha" [5]. He was a well-known defender of the new MahÄyÄna movement. His treatises (ÅÄstras) are the foundational texts of a school of Buddhist philosophy known as the teaching of emptiness (ÅÅ«nyatÄ-vÄda) or Middle Way School of Madhyamaka...
All materials on this site are submitted by editors and readers. All images, unless otherwise noted, were taken from the Internet and are assumed to be in the public domain.
In the event that there is still a problem, issue, or error with copyrighted material, the break of the copyright is unintentional and noncommercial, and the material will be removed immediately upon presented proof.
Contact us by submitting a comment marked "private."
Do not follow this journal if you are under vinaya or parental restrictions. Secure protection by Sucuri.
Wisdom Quarterly: American Buddhist Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at creativecommons.org/about/licenses.
._The_photographer_for_this_shot_is_not_listed_or_known,_and_it_is_likely_that_this_photo_was_taken_at_a_Klan_cross_burning_in_earlyJanuary_(8223346951).jpg){kind=link}
_-_Allegory_of_Fortune_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
