(Buddha's Wisdom) Inception's hidden Buddhism: The real prison was never the "dream" (maya).
Inceptionis an American science fiction action film written and directed by Christopher Nolan, who also produced it with his wife Emma Thomas.
The film stars Leonardo DiCaprio as a professional thief who steals information by infiltrating the subconscious of targets.
To whom are we still hopelessly attached?
He is offered a chance to have his criminal history erased as payment for the implantation of another person's idea into a target's subconscious.
The ensemble cast includes Ellen Page [now living as Elliot Page], Ken Watanabe, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Marion Cotillard, Tom Hardy, Cillian Murphy, Tom Berenger, Dileep Rao, and Michael Caine. More
Buddhism in The Matrix goes deeper than most of us think (other than Wachowski Brothers). The Wachowskis built this film on Buddhist philosophy—but Neo (Keanu Reeves, who played the Buddha in Little Buddha) goes on a journey that reveals something most viewers miss: Taking the red pill isn'tenlightenment, it's just the beginning. This video explores what The Matrix gets RIGHT about Buddhism, what Neo gets WRONG about awakening, and why the ending is actually the most Buddhist part of the entire trilogy. More (See The Matrix Trilogy)
HOW do we get out of this prison?
We are trapped in a prison of our own making. Realizing it does NOT free us. Letting go does. But how can we let go? We can't. It isn't an act of willpower. It's by seeing things as they are. Okay, okay, that makes sense! How are they? This is not a belief-system to believe. We must go in and see kalapas and cittas, particles and mind-moments, which means we must first cultivate samadhi (stillness, absorption) to purify and intensify the instrument of seeing (the mind). Then when we really know-and-see what is there, letting go happens by itself free of effort. The mind/heart lets go when it sees all things are marked by Three Universal Characteristics.
The allegory of the cave is presented by the Greek philosopher Plato in his work Republic (514a–520a, Book VII) to compare "the effect of education (παιδεία) and the lack of it on our nature."
It is written as a dialogue between Plato's brother Glaucon and his mentor Socrates. It is narrated by Socrates. The allegory is presented after the analogy of the Sun (508b–509c) and the analogy of the divided line (509d–511e).
In the allegory, Plato describes people who have spent their whole lives chained by their necks and ankles in front of an inner wall [a screen] with a view of the empty outer wall of the cave.
They observe the shadows [images] projected onto the outer wall by objects carried behind the inner wall by people who are invisible to the chained "prisoners" and who walk along the inner wall with a fire behind them, creating the shadows on the outer wall in front of the shackled prisoners.
The "sign bearers" pronounce the names of the objects, the sounds of which are reflected near the shadows and are understood by the prisoners as if they were coming from the shadows themselves.
The only reality for the prisoners of the cave are those shadows and sounds, which are of course only inaccurate representations of the real world. The shadows represent distorted and blurred copies of reality we perceive through our senses, while the objects under the Sun represent the true forms of objects that we can only perceive through reason [or directly through refined intuition].
Three higher levels exist: (1) natural science; (2) deductive mathematics, geometry, and logic; and (3) the theory of forms.
Socrates explains how a "philosopher" is like a prisoner now freed from the cave who comes to understand that the shadows on the wall are not the direct source of the images seen.
A philosopher aims to understand and perceive the higher levels of reality. However, the other inmates of the cave do not even want to escape their chains or leave their prison, for they know no better life [1].
Socrates remarks that this allegory can be paired with previous writings, namely the analogy of the Sun and the analogy of the divided line. More
After Skool; Jim Carrey, George Harrison (T&H Inspiration and Motivation); Philosopher Mel Brooks; CC Liu, Pfc. Sandoval, Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Friends, Peace Class meets on Wednesdays, but tonight we take a deep dive. On Tuesday (May 26, 2026) the Deep Dive Poetry reading series returns to Manly P. Hall's Library of World Religions at the Philosophical Research Society (PRS), with the next poetry presentation taking place in September. The last Peace Class was about Loving Boundaries, found below.
WHAT HAPPENED?
More than 40 people showed up, so many that we ran out of chairs. But there's a gallery to the side, and a few folding chairs later, Mandy Kahn got up to read. A new poem about being a "Kahn" (German Jewish Cohen) delighted readers. But the one about Mara (Death) really caught our attention:
I Do Not Fear Death, Yet Go On Living
I do not fear death, yet go on living.
I know choirs wait for me to finish,
waiting to paint this clear air with their singing,
Mandy’s youthful, but one is reminded of Jen Moxley and her contemplations: When people lie awake with their thoughts, their mind often turns to how life has changed and what may come. Spinning in the dark hours, thoughts swirl with fears, hopes, and reflections. People change as they pass through time. So, too, does the world they live in, their friends and their environment and the society they live in. The Midnight Work, Jennifer Moxley’s eighth book of poetry, contemplates these changes as she enters and experiences midlife. UMaine.edu/news/2026.
Then self-described “moribund" Callie Siskel stepped up to the podium, asking, Does loss define us, or do we define loss?
Tracing the duality of grief as it reverberates through a family, she wrestles with questions of identity and inheritance in precise, lucid language. Her book of poetry, Two Minds, indulges and therefore exposes the vanity of turning private pain into art and the pursuit of self-revelation.
Drawing on ekphrasis, ars poetica, and prose poetry, Siskel expands the elegy and elegiac genre as she oscillates between childhood and adulthood, art and mythology, as well as the natural and domestic world. At once cerebral and emotional, Amazon describes Two Minds as “an essential meditation on the ways that loss cleaves and doubles our perceptive power.” Her poem about Jean says it all, reflecting on her own appearance as she sees it through the eyes of a great portraitist who repeatedly painted his wife. Who would ever guess she was once Time'sperson of the year? She explains in her other "Narcissus" (The Paris Review):
Time’s Person of the Year was “You.” I was a sophomore in college. I held the mirror up to my friend. Outside a fraternity, I stood in a circle of women telling each other how pretty they were. On the walk back to my room, I passed a monument: water running over granite. The man I loved wanted me in his bed, so I could tell him he was exceptional. There is a difference between Echo and the spring: one repeats, one colludes. More
"The Concept of Immediacy"
I fell asleep with an idea, but when I woke up, I’d lost it,
as when, approaching the rabbit on the trail,
it took off into the brush.
I followed, clearing the warblers,
fixing their gaze.
Ruining something felt like a reason to proceed.
Looking out at the view—
dense swaths of pine, the bay, all three bridges
half-submerged—
I waited for a sign to go back, the mind saying enough
Paralleling how celebrated artists create and are consumed, this book of poetry maps a zone of contact between artistic creation and the dangers of identification. A neo-baroque, lyrical treatise on encountering the Other, the poems in Strange Signatures reverse the colonial gaze and transform it into scenes of conflicted recognition.
At the origin of the Other is a queer Bluebeard, an emblem of imperialist violence and savage injustice. Resisting the patriarchy and its colonizing powers are Bluebeard's feminist phantom brides, a "bride brotherhood," the guerrilla-muses of solidarity and revolution. In poems that open the secret chambers of individual and collective histories, Bluebeard's survivors continue a phantom afterlife by way of dislocated avatars: modernist artists, estranged Latin American poets, pop stars, a taxidermized parrot and a Peruvian mummy.
This book is an international, cinematic montage of the phantasmatic and the all-too-real, locating social transformation in memory, crime and the allegorical biographies of celebrated artists and poets. More
Who could write a whole poem about a commonplace mirror? Sylvia Plath did.
.
Then two veteran poets and friends came to the podium, the well-known Gail Wronsky and David St. John. While her readings were the highlight of a very uplifting night, he did more explaining and prefacing, bringing us into the interior life of a poet. Then he went to a touching early piece, "From a Bridge."
We are here to learn to choose peace. Choosing peace looks like choosing to honor the Earth and her holy forests and waters. It is choosing to honor others with love, kindness, gentleness, and choosing to honor ourselves with self-love, self-kindness, self-gentleness.
As an aspect of this project of learning to choose peace, all will eventually learn how to share mettaor universal love-without-end while still maintaining boundaries that honor self.
Only the lower mind thinks that one must choose between honoring others and honoring oneself.
Only the lower mind thinks, “Should I take an action that benefits me or one that benefits others?”
From the perspective of the higher mind, the Peace Mind, one can see that there is always an action (karma) available that both honors the self and all others.
When we are operating from the Peace Mind, we see with the Peace Mind's faculties. The Peace Mind is the place of infinite options, infinite opportunities.
Only someone outside of the Peace Mind could believe that a choice between self and others could be required.
Often, the options that honor both self and others will look like kindness with loving boundaries, or unconditional love with loving boundaries.
The gate that guards my garden of loving
Now, these boundaries are not limits on the amount of love expressed; one can express love-without-end, love-without-condition, and still engage loving boundaries.
These are boundaries that protect the individual even as s/he shares love-without-end, universal, limitless love. What does it look like? Imagine a cottage surrounded by a tall garden wall with a locked gate.
Can I be safe in my garden AND share it?
To visualize love-without-end being expressed while maintaining loving boundaries, imagine being the inhabitant of that cottage. You send love-without-end over the wall, into the town, all the while still maintaining a protective wall. The inhabitant keeps her/his ground safe.
All day, every day, we can flow our love over the wall. It can flow from us without ceasing, and it can be a love without judgment, a love that surrounds and supports everyone equally, a love that enriches and heals and purifies all who are touched by it.
Our love can heal others, support others, care for others, and can still keep this boundary in place.
Because we are a part of others, it never honors others when we dishonor ourselves or give of ourselves in a way that does not serve us as we serve them. Over-giving harms others, even as it harms us.
Regardless of how others react to our boundaries in the moment, know that our lack-of-boundaries never serves others in the long run. Why? It hinders our ability to be of service to them and to everyone, and to ourselves in the future.
Service to self and service to others are aspects of the same thing. One's highest action always serves both self and others simultaneously.
Participating in service to others that does not honor self is simply a phase that many will pass through before choosing forms of service that also honor self.
Serving others feels so good to us, so right to us, that sometimes we experience “service rapture.” That selfless “service rapture” can be a kind of high. We can love the joy of serving so much that we over-give and burn out. This is simply a lesson to be learned.
When we give from grace, from strength, from fullness, we refill even as we give, and burnout is not reached. We give, fill, give, fill, give, in a harmonic flow—and when we do, we can feel when it is time to rest, and we can feel when it is time to act, and we naturally do what is called for, knowing that serving self by resting is also an aspect of serving others.
What was I doing way up there?
This flow state of service is always eventually learned by every evolving being.
Honoring self and honoring others is one. We are one. We are one in separate bodies. When we realize this, we begin to serve all parts of self—the self that appears to be us as well as the self that appears to be others—in harmonic flow.
When we learn this flow, when this flow becomes natural to us, we are of highest service.
Different situations and different relationships require different forms of loving boundaries from us.
The easiest way to see what kind of boundaries are required in any situation is to gaze at it from the place of our Peace Mind. From here, it is clear how to both honor ourselves with boundaries and to send love-without-end over our garden walls.
Even in a private magic garden, I love everyone
We will know that we have learned these lessons as a society when kindness is expressed in our penal system.
Now we live in a society that maintains a penal system that attempts to “scare people straight”—to use punishment, fear, cruelty, and harshness to build fear into an individual in an attempt to reform that penitent.
This system is based on the belief that fear could ever inspire inmates in such a system to choose more loving actions. It will not. It cannot.
Fear-based reform tactics build fear, hatred, resentment, anger, and frustration in an inmate, and those things flow back toward all of us in the collective, where such things affect everyone to our detriment.
One cannot build fear in another and not also build fear into the collective. We are all part of the collective consciousness.
But a separated mind believes, “As I punish this person, I make myself safe from punishment.” That can never be true. We are too connected for that to be possible.
That which we put into others we put into ourselves and into all whom we love and hope to protect.
When we understand this, it becomes natural for us to treat all people, even those who have acted in ways that are less than loving, with love. But we learn to do this while maintaining loving boundaries.
This is what we will learn to express in our penal system.
When we have learned this completely, when we have treated all inmates with love, while maintaining needed physical boundaries, we will have evolved to a place wherein no penal system is needed.
On the way to the experience of no penal system being required, we must first learn how to share love and maintain boundaries. That is the next lesson for us to learn.
Yes, high, thick walls may be required to create general safety. But cruelty and torture behind those walls is never required. We can have those walls, and we can send love over them. We are never safe from our own cruelty.
When there is a place within our town or our state or our country or our world where people are treated with cruelty, aspects of that cruelty affect us and those we love most.
Once we understand this, we can begin to look at the penal system as a place of opportunity. Our opportunity is to consider this question: "How can I express my love-without-end here while still maintaining needed boundaries?"
True transformation is inspired by the Peace Mind witnessing acts of peace.
If our goal is to see fewer unloving acts taking place in our society, we can only reach that goal by modeling acts of peace: acts of loving-kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity.
If our penal systems become places in which acts of true peace can be observed, they will become places of true and permanent transformation.
Transformation must be chosen by the individual; it cannot be enforced. After witnessing acts of peace, some will choose transformation.
Our job, then, is to give people the opportunity to witness acts of peace.
We can give people these opportunities, and we can treat them with respect, honoring and love, and we can still create needed boundaries that protect others, and ourselves.
Fear-based “reform” tactics do not only affect those who find themselves on the receiving end of them. They also build guilt, shame, regret, and resentment in their practitioners because these practitioners will always, on some level, recognize that actions of cruelty towards others are not their highest actions.
Love-based tactics heal. They heal those who carry them out, and they heal those who are on the receiving end of them.
They heal the relationship between practitioner and recipient in the moment, and they begin to heal the resentment, anger, and sadness that centuries of cruelty-based reform tactics have built up in our collective consciousness.
One act of love-based interaction in this format heals many levels of trauma left over from old cruelty-based strategies. As they heal old trauma, these love-based tactics create new possibilities of peace-on-earth for all beings.
Our penal systems are wonderful places to practice kindness-without-end with loving boundaries. Our lives are also wonderful places to practice this.
Where is life giving us the opportunity to both share unconditional love and to honor—and enforce—the space, the protection, and the boundaries that we require?
Special thx to Seven for helping me express this!
Once we can create loving boundaries in our own lives, we can safely flow more love-without-end into our world.
In brief, the better our boundaries, the more fully we can be an instrument of pure and ever-flowing metta and grace.
Robert Monroe of the monroeinstitute.org described invisible emotional energy and called it "loosh." This world of ours has been converted into a Loosh Farm by the Archons, and their symptoms brings us back in a cyclical fashion described by the Dharmic religions as samsara, the Wheel of Life and Death that binds us to suffering, constantly seeking pleasure now here then there, coming to death again and again. But rebirth is a process impelled by our craving, aversion, and ignorance (aka "greed, hatred, and delusion," lobha, dosa, and moha).
Alex Jones: Everything we didn't know about his sh*tty past
(Hysteria) Nov. 23, 2025: In our 29th episode of This F*cking Guy, Erin Ryan and Alyssa Mastromonaco dive deep into the past of moronic conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
From the conspiracy theory Bible (a novel) that inspired Infowars, to spreading 9/11 false flag propaganda that grew his following, to having vein-popping tantrums that would terrify most cardiologists, to owing the Sandy Hook families $1.4 billion U.S. dollars, this may be our most hysterical man-baby-guy yet.
Head to squarespace.com/HYSTERIA to save 10% off first purchase of a website or domain using code HYSTERIA.
31:52 - Relationship with Trump, COVID, Stop the Steal, Jeffrey Epstein
39:31 - Sandy Hook conspiracy and defamation case
51:39 - Outro/matrix ratings
ABOUT: Political commentator and comedy writer Erin Ryan and former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Alyssa Mastromonaco are joined by a bicoastal squad of funny, opinionated women to talk through everything from reproductive rights to romcoms. They break down the political news of the week, plus the topics, trends, and cultural stories that affect women’s lives.
New episodes drop every Thursday. Get in touch: hysteria@crooked.com. Photos courtesy of AP Photo Archive Crooked Media believes that we need a better conversation about politics, culture, and the world around us—one that doesn’t just focus on what’s broken, but what we can do to fix it. We are a media network that showcases stories, voices, and opportunities for activism that inform, entertain, and inspire action because it’s up to all of us to do our part to build a better world. That’s it. End of mission. Learn more about us at crooked.com.
(MorgueOfficial) Premiered Sept. 20, 2025: I’m going to prove that the deity Christians call God is actually the Devil. How? Let's look at PROOF in the Bible itself -- not the cherrypicked verses they spoon feed us on Sunday mornings. I mean the raw, uncut, crazy parts they hope we never open to. And guess what? I’m not the first person to notice. The Gnostics knew it. Some of the first Christians read these very same verses and said, "Yeah, this ‘God’ is totally evil."
(BIBLE STORY) Sept. 30, 2024: What if everything we thought we knew about God and the Bible is wrong?
This video dives deeply into the ancient Nag Hammadi texts and diverse Gnostic beliefs that the creator of our world isn’t the loving God we’ve been taught to worship but rather the Demiurge—a false jealous god (Yaldabaoth?) who seeks to control and keep us in ignorance.
With hidden wisdom and forgotten scriptures, we explore how the Gnostics saw the material world as a prison and the serpent in Eden as a liberator offering forbidden knowledge.
Discover the radical ideas that challenge mainstream religion, revealing that true salvation may rest in breaking free from that Demiurge's control.
From wiseSophia’s role as the guide to enlightenment to the real meaning behind Jesus’ teachings, this video questions everything. Ready to explore the truth that’s been buried for centuries? Hit play and behold!
All materials on this site are submitted by editors and readers. All images, unless otherwise noted, were taken from the Internet and are assumed to be in the public domain.
In the event that there is still a problem, issue, or error with copyrighted material, the break of the copyright is unintentional and noncommercial, and the material will be removed immediately upon presented proof.
Contact us by submitting a comment marked "private."
Do not follow this journal if you are under vinaya or parental restrictions. Secure protection by Sucuri.
Wisdom Quarterly: American Buddhist Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at creativecommons.org/about/licenses.
_theatrical_poster.jpg)
_-_Allegory_of_Fortune_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg){kind=link}
