Showing posts with label ripening. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ripening. Show all posts

Thursday, April 4, 2024

Hells? Messengers of the Gods (AN 3.36)


SUTRA: Messengers of the Gods
“There are, meditators, these three ‘messengers’ of the gods (devas). What are the three?

“Firstly, someone does unskillful things by way of body, speech, and mind. When that person’s body breaks up, after death, one is reborn in a place of loss, an unfortunate place, the underworld, even in hell(s).

The King of the Dead Yama is kind and just
“Then the wardens of hell take one by the arms and present one to the King of the Dead Yama, saying: ‘Your Majesty, this person did not pay due respect to mother and father, wandering ascetics and temple priests (Brahmins), nor honor the elders in the family. May Your Majesty judge this person!’

“Then King Yama questions, presses, and grills that person about the first messenger of the gods: ‘Sir, did you not see the first messenger of the gods who appeared among human beings?’

“The person answers, ‘I saw nothing, sir.’

A typical old person, balding and falling apart
“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, did you not see among human beings an elderly woman or man — 80, 90, or 100 years old — bent double, crooked, leaning on a staff, trembling to walk, ailing, past one’s prime, with teeth broken, hair grey, scanty or bald, skin wrinkled, and limbs blotchy?’

“The person answers, ‘I did see that, sir.’

I love you, Baby. Stay healthy, and wear a coat.
“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, did it not occur to you — being sensible and mature — “I, too, am liable to grow old. I am not exempt from old age. I should better do good by way of body, speech, and mind”?’

“The person answers, ‘I couldn’t, sir. I was negligent.’

“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, because you were negligent, you didn’t do what is skillful by way of body, speech, or mind. Indeed, they’ll definitely torment you to fit your negligence. That unskillful deed wasn’t done by your mother, father, brother, or sister.
This is Death turning samsara.
  • [NOTE: What deeds (karma) are skillful, wholesome, and profitable, and what intentional actions are unskillful, unwholesome, and unprofitable? Why? By natural course of results, some deeds produce pleasant, wished for, welcome results, whereas by the same natural course of results, not anyone's punishment or education, some deeds produce unpleasant, unwished for, unwelcome results. This is a natural fixity of the universe and not a meting out of rewards and punishments, as it is often presented for the sake of simplicity, clarity, and believability by many of the world's spiritual teachings. If something produces a bad result and that is not clear because it does not happen immediately or even necessarily in this life, the Buddha has pointed it out so that people and devas may guard against it if they heed the Buddha's enlightened advice. If an plant, for example, were poisonous such that anyone who ate of it, it would bring about their illness, they would not eat of it. However, if another plant seemed to produce no such result, and was inviting and experienced as pleasant, but later produced illness, people would eat of it, eat a lot of it, blissfully unaware of the danger, and one who knows might warn them. Who would listen? People would argue against such a person, laugh at such a person, stick in the mud, killjoy, goody two-shoes, judge, critic, buttinsky, and neither listen nor cause others to listen but instead urging them to eat and enjoy and not worry, having for themselves tested the plant and found it to be pleasant and without harm. Then, later, when the harm set in, long after its consumption, people would become confused: "Some say it's fine, some that it's dangerous, I don't know who to believe or what to do? I like it, so I'll do it. I don't see any harm in it, and until I do, I'll do what I want." People have that choice. In this discourse, the Buddha warns against actions that seem harmless to one who does them even though they harm others as one would not wish to be harmed. And they see no danger in this so long as the result does not ripen and come to fruition. Are Buddhist hells real? There is no need for faith or belief. One may develop meditative absorption and look for them under the ground in a designated area, and one will see for oneself. Unless one sees, how likely is anyone to believe? This traditional method of investigation is taught in detail by Pa Auk Sayadaw and his accomplished students able to enter the jhanas at will. A similar instruction is also given to perceive vimasnas or heavenly mansions above the tree tops. However it may sound to us, it is not a matter of belief or skepticism; it is a matter of looking for oneself so that one needs no teacher or teaching to tell one what is real and what is merely metaphorical. We hope it's a metaphor, a simile, or hyperbole. That is a comforting thought. But we have known people who have known-and-seen for themselves, revealing that it is completely possible to know for sure while one is yet alive and do something about it. Consider the case of the Dickensian Ebenezer S.]
“It wasn’t done by friends and colleagues, by relatives and kin, by the deities (devas), nor by wandering ascetics and temple priests. That unskillful deed was done by you alone, and you alone will experience the results.’

“Then King Yama grills that person about the second messenger of the gods: ‘Sir, did you not see the second messenger of the gods who appeared among human beings?’

“The person answers, ‘I saw nothing, sir.’

A typical sickly hag, festering
Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, did you not see among human beings a woman or man, sick, suffering, gravely ill, collapsing in one’s own urine or feces, being picked up by some and put down by others?’

“The person answers, ‘I did see that, sir.’

“Then King Yama answers, ‘Sir, did it not occur to you — being sensible and mature — “I, too, am liable to become sick. I’m not exempt from sickness. I’d better do what is skillful by way of body, speech, and mind”?’

“The person answers, ‘I couldn’t, sir. I was negligent.’

“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, because you were negligent, you didn’t do what is skillful by way of body, speech, and mind. Well, they’ll definitely torment you to fit your negligence. That unskillful deed wasn’t done by your mother, father, brother, or sister.

“It wasn’t done by friends and colleagues, by relatives and kin, by the deities, nor by wandering ascetics and temple priests. That unskillful deed was done by you alone, and you alone will experience the results.’

“Then King Yama grills that person about the third messenger of the gods: ‘Sir, did you not see the third messenger of the gods who appeared among human beings?’

“The person answers, ‘I saw nothing, sir.’

“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, did you not see among human beings a woman or man, dead for one, two, or three days, bloated, livid, and festering?’

“The person answers, ‘I did see that, sir.’

“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, did it not occur to you — being sensible and mature — “I, too, am liable to die. I’m not exempt from death. I’d better do what is skillful by way of body, speech, and mind”?’

“The person answers, ‘I couldn’t, sir. I was negligent.’

“Then King Yama asks, ‘Sir, because you were negligent, you didn’t do what is skillful by way of body, speech, and mind. Well, they’ll definitely torment you to fit your negligence. That unskillful deed wasn’t done by your mother, father, brother, or sister.

“It wasn’t done by friends and colleagues, by relatives and kin, by the deities, or by wandering ascetics and temple priests. That unskillful deed was done by you alone, and you alone will experience the results.’

“Then, after grilling that person about the third messenger of the gods, King Yama falls silent. Then the wardens of hell torment one with the five-fold crucifixion.

“They drive red-hot stakes through the hands and feet, and another in the middle of the chest. And there that person suffers painful, sharp, severe, acute feelings — but that person does not die until that unskillful deed is eliminated.

“Then the wardens of hell throw that person down and hack that person with axes. …

What torments await in purgatory?
“They hang that person upside down and hack that person with hatchets. …

“They harness that person to a chariot and drive that person back and forth across burning ground, blazing and glowing. …

“They make that person climb up and down a huge mountain of burning coals, blazing and glowing. …

“Then the wardens of hell turn that person upside down and throw that person in a red-hot copper pot, burning, blazing, and glowing. There one is seared in boiling scum and one is swept up and down and round and round. And there that person suffers painful, sharp, severe, acute feelings — but that person doesn’t die until that unskillful deed is eliminated.

“Then the wardens of hell toss that person into the Great Hell (Avici, the "Waveless").

“Now, about that Great Hell:

‘Four are its corners, four its doors,
Squarely divided in equal parts.
Surrounded by an iron wall,
of iron is its roof.

The ground, too, is made of iron,
it burns with fierce fire.
The heat constantly radiates
a hundred leagues around.’

“Once upon a time, the King of the Dead Yama thought, ‘Those who do such unskillful deeds in the world receive these many different torments. Oh, I hope I might be reborn as a human being and that a Realized One — a Perfected One, a fully Awakened One, a Buddha — arises in the world! Oh, that I may pay homage to that Buddha! Then the Buddha can teach me Dhamma so that I may understand the timeless Teaching.’

“Now, I do not say this because I have heard it from some other wandering ascetic or Brahmin. I only say it because I have known, seen, and realized it for myself.

Those people who are negligent,
when warned by the gods’ (devas’) messengers:
a long time they sorrow,
when they go to that wretched place.

But those skillful and peaceful people,
when warned by the gods’ messengers,
never neglect

Seeing the peril in grasping,
the origin of birth and death,
the unattached are freed
with the ending of rebirth and death.

Happy, they’ve come to a safe place,
extinguished [all suffering] in this very life.
They’ve gone beyond all threats and perils
and risen above all suffering whatsoever.”
  • Bhikkhu Sujato (trans.), SuttaCentral.net,  Devadūta Sutta (AN 3.36), Tikanipāta, Paṭhamapaṇṇāsaka, Devadūtavagga,—"Numbered Discourses" 3.36, 4. "Messengers of the Gods [Devas]" edited by Dhr. Seven; submitted by Eli W., Wisdom Quarterly

Sunday, October 2, 2022

Alan Watts: Karma, "Why Not Now?" (video)


This is Alan Watts on television (KQED), filmed in the San Francisco Bay Area back in the 1970s. In it he explains "the true meaning of karma" from the documentary Alan Watts: Why Not Now?
Why Not Now? (Alan Watts trailer)

(T&H - Inspiration & Motivation) This is an inspirational and profound speech from the late British Buddhist philosopher Alan Watts, a self-described "spiritual entertainer." The original audio was sourced from: “Alan Watts: 'Eco Zen' from Philosophies of Asia” produced and edited by T&H Inspiration. It is a documentary film on the life and works of Alan Watts, a two DVD set: alanwatts.org/news.php.

The great philosopher Alan Watts
Each film comes with The Essential Alan Watts, a bonus disc of video materials that did not fit into the film, and "The Animated Alan Watts." The 23-minute DVD includes extracts from the 1972 series "The Fine Art of Goofing Off" as well as a couple of animations produced by South Park creators and animators. The reel has been met with joyous laughter and standing ovations at film showings and is not to be missed.

Why Not Now follows the life of one of the most inspiring philosophers of our time, Alan Watts, as told though none other than Alan Watts himself from the wealth of material and lectures that were left behind after his passing.
Why Not Now was created by his son Mark Watts, who has given T&H (Tragedy and Hope) exclusive rights to create the trailer for the documentary. Visit the official site: alanwatts.org. Follow the Alan Watts Organization: Speech courtesy of alanwatts.org, instagram.com/alanwattsorg, facebook.com/AlanWattsAuthor..., youtube.com/c/AlanWattsOrg. Speech licensed from mindsetdrm.com


T&H Inspiration is on a mission to share inspiring wisdom. The goal is to have listeners pause, think, and reflect. Many videos revolve around the extraordinary teachings of Alan Watts that T&H produces with permission from the Alan Watts Electronic University. T&H also films and releases original interviews with iconic people who have experienced successes while also persevering through life's highs and lows. T&H looks forward to sharing more of these perspectives and insights. Its hope with these videos is to push thinking. As Alan Watts said, “No one is more dangerously insane than one who is sane all the time: he is like a steel bridge without flexibility, and the order of his life is rigid and brittle.” – Alan Watts.

Thursday, September 22, 2022

Is everything due to past karma (action)?

Sabbamidaṁkammatotikathā — Shwe Zan Aung, C.A.F. Rhys Davids (Kv 17.3: SuttaCentral.net), Points of Controversy, 17.3 Of Everything as Due to Karma; Eds., Wisdom Quarterly

Karma (intention): a funny definition
Controverted point: That all this [that we are presently living and experiencing] is from [due to past] karma.

Theravādin: (PTS cs 17.3.1) Do you then include karma itself as due to karma [present actions are due to past actions rather than to present intention and choice]? And do you imply that all this is simply the result [vipaka and phala, resultant and fruit] of bygone causes? [If so] you are committed here to what you must deny.

(PTS cs 17.3.2) Again, you imply, by your proposition, that all this is not so much from [presently intended] karma as from the result of still earlier karma. If you deny, you deny your first proposition. If you assent, you imply that one may commit murder through not karma [a present intention], but the result of [previous] karma.

You assent? Then murder, though a result [phala], is itself productive of karmic result? You assent? Then the result of karma [vipaka] is productive of result? You deny? Then it is barren of result, and murder must a fortiori be barren of karmic result….

(PTS cs 17.3.3) This argument applies equally to other immoral [unskillful] acts — to theft, to wicked speech — lying, abuse, slander, and idle talk — to burglary, raiding, looting, highway robbery, adultery, destroying houses in village or town.

Karma, Rebirth, & Samsara (bps.lk)
It applies equally to moral acts: to giving gifts [letting go, sharing, donating, helping others] — e.g., giving the four necessaries to the religious [four requisites to monastics, food, clothing, shelter, and medicine].

If any of these is done as the result of karma, and themselves produce karmic result, then you are on the horns of this dilemma: that either result-of-karma can itself produce effects, which is heterodox [a heresy], or any good or bad deed has no karmic result, which is heterodox [heretical]….

Rājagirika, Siddhatthika: (PTS cs 17.3.4) But was it not said by the Exalted One [the historical Buddha]:

“'Tis karma makes the world go round,
Karma rolls on the lives of humans.
All beings are to karma bound
As lynchpin is to chariot-wheel.”

“By karma praise and fame are won.
By karma, too, birth, death, and bonds.
Who that this karma's diverse modes discerns
Can say, “There is no karma in this world”?

Hence surely all this is due to karma?

The Buddha's past BAD karma (sutra)

Pubbakammapilotikabuddhaapadāna—Jonathan S. Walters (trans.), Therāpadāna, "The Legends of the Theras [Elder Monastics]," edited by Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Wisdom Quarterly

387. {390.} The Rags of Previous Karma
(Walt 3341) Near the lake named Anotatta,
on the lovely level rock ground,
where sparkled gems of different sorts
and varied perfumes filled the woods, (Verse 1)

(Walt 3342) surrounded by the Assembly
of monastics, the Best of the World,
while seated there, did then explain
the former deeds he had done: (Verse 2)

(Walt 3343) Hear from me, O meditators, the karma
which formerly I did [intentionally],
and how those karma rags’ effects
ripen in the Buddha himself. (Verse 3)

(Walt 3344) Among my other, former rebirths
I was a jerk named Munāli.
I told lies about Sarabhu,
an innocent Silent Buddha. (Verse 4)

(Walt 3345) As a result of that karma [deed],
a long time I circled through hell.
I experienced suffering
for numerous thousands of years. (Verse 5)

(Walt 3346) As its final karmic effect,
here in my final existence,
I received some nasty slander
connected with Sundarīkā. (Verse 6)

(Walt 3347) I was Nanda, a follower
of the Buddha Sabbābhibhu.
My rebirth was in hell
for long after I slandered him. (Verse 7)

(Walt 3348) My long rebirth in hell
continued for 10,000 years.
When I again got human rebirth,
I also got lots of slander. (Verse 8)

(Walt 3349) Through what remained of that karma,
Lady Ciñca did slander me
in front of a group of people
without any grounding in fact. (Verse 9)

(Walt 3350) I was an erudite Brahmin,
attended on, given reverence.
In a large wood, I was teaching
mantras to many young men. (Verse 10)

(Walt 3351) To that place had come Sage Gīma,
who possessed vast superpowers.
After having seen him coming,
I slandered that blameless person. (Verse 11)

(Walt 3352) I said this to my students then:
“This sage delights in sense pleasures!”
The young men there took that to heart
when I made that declaration. (Verse 12)

(Walt 3353) Then all the young men, my students,
going for alms from clan to clan,
repeated to a lot of folks,
“This sage delights in sense pleasures!” (Verse 13)

(Walt 3354) As a result of that karma,
these many monastics now with me
all received some nasty slander
connected with Sundarīkā. (Verse 14)

(Walt 3355) One time eying wealth I murdered
brothers by a second mother.
I put them on a mountain road
and crushed them in an avalanche. (Verse 15)

(Walt 3356) As a result of that karma,
Devadatta threw a boulder
and a splinter off that boulder
then crushed the big toe on my foot. (Verse 16)

(Walt 3357) One time I was a little boy,
playing by the great thoroughfare.
Having seen a Silent Buddha,
I threw a clod of dirt at him. (Verse 17)

(Walt 3358) As a result of that karma,
here in my final existence,
Devadatta hired some killers
for the sake of murdering me. (Verse 18)

(Walt 3359) Once, while I was on my tusker,
I saw a supreme Silent Sage,
wandering about for alms food —
with that elephant I attacked him. (Verse 19)

(Walt 3360) As a result of that karma,
the elephant Nāḷāgiri,
agitated, cruel, ran at me
in the fine town at Vulture’s Peak. (Verse 20)

(Walt 3361) I was the King Patthiva;
I killed a man with a dagger.
As a result of that karma,
I roasted in hell a long time. (Verse 21)

(Walt 3362) Through what remained of that karma,
the skin on my foot got all cracked
and caused me a lot of trouble —
karma surely does not just vanish! (Verse 22)

(Walt 3363) I once lived as a fisher-boy,
in a village of fishermen.
Having seen the fish getting killed,
pleasurable thoughts filled my mind. (Verse 23)

(Walt 3364) As a result of that [mental] karma,
I suffered a headache one time;
all of the Ścythians (Shākyans) were murdered,
when Viḍuḍabha murdered them. (Verse 24)

(Walt 3365) I reviled the holy words and
followers of the Buddha Phussa,
“Chomp and eat inferior grain,
you all, and don’t eat any rice.” (Verse 25)

(Walt 3366) As a result of that karma,
I had to eat grain for three months
when, invited by a Brahmin,
I lived in various kingdoms. (Verse 26)

(Walt 3367) In the midst of a wrestling match,
a wrestler’s son, [I broke a back in a] fight;
as a result of that karma,
one time I suffered a backache. (Verse 27)

(Walt 3368) I was a practicing doctor
and purged the son of a rich man;
as a result of that karma,
I contracted dysentery. (Verse 28)

(Walt 3369) One time I, Jotipāla, said
to [the Buddha] Kassapa, the Well-Gone One,
“Whence then this baldy’s Waking Up,
Awakening so hard to reach?” (Verse 29)

(Walt 3370) As a result of that karma,
I practiced great austerities
in Uruvela, six long years,
and then achieved Awakening. (Verse 30)

(Walt 3371-72) “Along that path I did not reach
supreme Awakening,” I thought,
“along which path then should I search,
hindered by previous karma?
Exhausting skillful and unskillful karma
and avoiding every torment
free of grief, troubles, and outflows,*
I shall realize nirvana.” (Verse 31-32)

(Walt 3373) Thus did he explain, the Victor,
Endowed with All Superpowers,
in front of the Assembly of monastics,
at the great Lake Anotatta. (Verse 33)

Thus, indeed the Blessed One spoke this short discourse on Dharma, revealing his own previous unskillful conduct [as the Bodhisatta, "a being bent on supreme-enlightenment" but not yet a buddha], the Buddha-apadāna named “The Rags of Previous Karma.”

The Buddha-apadāna named “The Rags of Previous Karma” is finished.

The Summary:

Avaṇṭa and Labuja, too,
Udumbara and Pilakkhu,
Phāru, Valli, and Kadali,
Panasa, Koṭivīsaka
and the Rags of Former Karma,
the legend of the Sage so Great:
verses numbering 91
are counted by those who are wise.

THE AVAṆṬAPHALA CHAPTER, THE THIRTY-NINTH

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Vipaka: results of KARMA (sutra)

Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson (trans.) based on Ven. Thanissaro (AN 8.40), Wisdom Quarterly
Letting go is not easy. Have faith in karma.
"Meditators, the taking of life -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening (fruiting) from the taking of life is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to a shorter lifespan.
"Think about how sh*tty this is for me."
"Taking what is not given -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening from stealing is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to the loss of one's wealth.

Video of victims lecturing child molester
"Sexual misconduct -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.
  • [What is "sexual misconduct"? According to the texts, it is at its most basic having sex with any of the ten forbidden persons: someone too young to consent, under the protection of relatives or caretakers or community, already engaged, betrothed, promised, married, forbidden by law.]
"The slightest of all the results ripening from sexual misconduct is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to rivalry and revenge. 
  • [NOTE: "False speech" (the fourth precept) refers to four verbal acts: perjury, divisive tale-bearing, harsh speech, and frivolous chit chat.]
Ahhh, I didn't know I would live after death!
"Perjury [bearing false witness] -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening from perjury is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to being falsely accused.
 
In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts (Dr. Gabor Mate)
"Divisive tale-bearing -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening from divisive tale-bearing is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to the breaking of one's friendships.
 
"Harsh speech -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening from harsh speech is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to unappealing sounds.
 
"Frivolous chit chat -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening from frivolous chattering is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to words that are not worth taking to heart.

I don't know if I believe in rebirth. If only there were some way to know in this life! (MI)

 
"The taking of intoxicants [that occasion heedlessness] -- when pursued, indulged in, and developed -- is something that leads to rebirth in the hells, [or depending on one's other karma] leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to rebirth in the realm of hungry ghosts.

"The slightest of all the results ripening from taking intoxicants is that, if one is reborn as a human being, it leads to mental derangement."

Friday, December 30, 2011

Kindness boomerangs (video)

LifeVestInside.com; Wisdom Quarterly; Ayshfi blog


()

Watch a depiction of karma as the camera tracks an act of kindness as it passes from one individual to another and manages to boomerang back to the person who set it in motion. Of course, a single deed (karma) done with the intention to benefit or harm a living being has many mental resultants (vipaka) and physical consequences (phala, fruit) when it finally comes to fruition. Acts grow exponentially before their results ripen into our circumstances in this and lives to come. Support lifevestinside.com.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Karma and its Fruit


By Nyanaponika Thera

I.
Most writings on the doctrine of karma emphasize the strict lawfulness governing karmic action, ensuring a close correspondence between our deeds and their fruits. While this emphasis is perfectly in place, there is another side to the working of karma — a side rarely noted, but highly important. This is the modifiability of karma, the fact that the lawfulness which governs karma does not operate with mechanical rigidity but allows for a considerably wide range of modifications in the ripening of the fruit.
If karmic action were always to bear fruits of invariably the same magnitude, and if modification or annulment of karma-result were excluded, liberation from the Samsaric cycle of suffering would be impossible; for an inexhaustible past would ever throw up new obstructive results of unwholesome karma.

Like any physical event, the mental process constituting a karmic action never exists in isolation but in a field, and thus its efficacy in producing a result depends not only on its own potential, but also upon the variable factors of its field, which can modify it in numerous ways. We see, for example, that a particular karma, either good or bad, may sometimes have its result strengthened by supportive karma, weakened by counteractive karma, or even annulled by destructive karma. The occurrence of the result can also be delayed if the conjunction of outer circumstances required for its ripening is not complete; and that delay may again give a chance for counteractive or destructive karma to operate.

II.
It is, however, not only these extraneous conditions which can cause modification. The ripening also reflects the karma's "internal field" or internal conditions — that is, the total qualitative structure of the mind from which the action issues. To one rich in moral or spiritual qualities, a single offense may not entail the weighty results that the same offence will have for one who is poor in such protective virtues. Also, analogously to human law, a first offender's punishment will be milder than that of a re-convicted criminal.

Of this type of modified reaction the Buddha speaks in the continuation of the discourse quoted above:

"Now take the case when a minor bad deed has been committed by a certain person and it takes that person to hell. But if the same minor offense is committed by another person, its result might be experienced during this lifetime and not even the least (residue of a reaction) will appear (in the future), to say nothing of a major (reaction).

"Now what is the kind of person whom a minor offense takes to hell? It is one who has not cultivated (restraint of) the body, not cultivated virtue and thought, nor developed any wisdom; one is narrow-minded, of low character and even for trifling things suffers. It is such a person whom even a minor offense may take to hell.



"And what is the person by whom the result of the same small offense will be experienced in one's lifetime, without the least (future residue)? One who has cultivated (restraint of) the body, who has cultivated virtue and thought and who has developed wisdom; one is not limited by (vices), is a great character and lives unbounded (by evil). It is such a person who experiences the result of the same small offense during this lifetime, without the least future residue.

"Now suppose one throws a lump of salt into a small cup of water. What do you think: would that small quantity of water become salty and undrinkable by that lump of salt?" — "It would, Lord." — "And why so?" — "The water in the cup is so little that a lump of salt can make it salty and undrinkable." — "But, monastics, suppose that lump of salt is thrown into the Ganges river. Would it make the Ganges salty and undrinkable?" — "Certainly not, Lord." — "And why not?" — "Lord, great is the mass of water in the Ganges. It will not become salty and undrinkable by a lump of salt."

It is an individual's accumulation of good or bad karma and also one's dominating character traits, good or bad, which affect the karmic result. They determine the greater or lesser weight of the result and may even spell the difference between it occurring at all.

III.
But even this does not exhaust the existing possibilities of modifications in the weight of karmic reaction. A glance into the life histories of people we know may well show us a person of good and blameless character, living in secure circumstances; yet a single mistake, perhaps even a minor one, suffices to ruin one's entire life — one's reputation, career, and happiness — and it may also lead to a serious deterioration of one's character. This seemingly disproportionate crisis might have been due to a chain-reaction of aggravating circumstances beyond one's control, to be ascribed to a powerful counteractive karma of one's past. But the chain of bad results may have been precipitated by the person's own action — decisively triggered by one's initial mistake and reinforced by subsequent carelessness, indecision or wrong decisions, which, of course, are unskillful karma in themselves. This is a case when even a predominantly good character cannot prevent the ripening of bad karma or soften the full force of the results. The good qualities and deeds of that person will certainly not remain ineffective; but their future outcome might well be weakened by any presently arisen negative character changes or actions, which might form a bad counteractive karma.

Consider too the converse situation: A person deserving to be called a thoroughly bad character, may, on a rare occasion, act on an impulse of generosity and kindness. This action may turn out to have unexpectedly wide and favorable repercussions on one's life. It might bring about a decisive improvement in one's external circumstances, soften one's character, and even initiate a thorough "change of heart."
.
.
How complex, indeed, are situations in human life, even when they appear deceptively simple! This is so because the situations and their outcome mirror the still greater complexity of the mind, their inexhaustible source. The Buddha himself has said: "The mind's complexity surpasses even the countless varieties of the animal kingdom." (SN 22.100) For any single individual, the mind is a stream of ever-changing mental processes driven by the currents and cross-currents of karma accumulated in countless past existences. But this complexity, already great, is increased still very much more by the fact that each individual life-stream is interwoven with many other individual life-streams through the interaction of their respective karmas. So intricate is the net of karmic conditioning that the Buddha declared karma-result to be one of the four "unthinkables" (acinteyya) and warned against creating it as a subject of speculation. But though the detailed workings of karma escape our intellection, the practically important message is clear: the fact that karmic results are modifiable frees us from the bane of determinism and its ethical corollary, fatalism, and keeps the road to liberation constantly open before us.

IV.
The potential "openness" of a given situation, however, also has a negative side, the element of risk and danger a wrong response to the situation might open a downward path. It is our own response which removes the ambiguity of the situation, for better or worse. This reveals the karma doctrine of the Buddha as a teaching of moral and spiritual responsibility for oneself and others. It is truly a "human teaching" because it corresponds to and reflects a human's wide range of choices, a range much wider than that of an animal. Any individual's moral choice may be severely limited by the varying load of greed, hatred and delusion and their results which one carries around; yet every time one stops to make a decision or a choice, one has the opportunity to rise above all the menacing complexities and pressures of one's unfathomable karmic past. Indeed, in one short moment one can transcend eons of karmic bondage. It is through right mindfulness that one can firmly grasp that fleeting moment, and it is mindfulness again that enables one to use it for making wise choices.
Originally published in The Vision of the Dhamma (Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society, 1994).
Copyright © 1994 Nyanaponika Thera