Showing posts with label ajahn maha boowa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ajahn maha boowa. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 25, 2019

What it means to love ourselves

Ajahn Maha Boowa, Brahm via Ven. Sujato, Ellie Askew, Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly


The way to find genuine Dharma (Dhamma) is to build up virtue and goodness. Making merit through dāna, sīla, and mettā-bhāvanā is the path of goodness for going beyond dukkha.

Every one of you, remember this! Don’t practice dāna, sīla, and mettā-bhāvanā just a little. We are all valuable people.

Before anything else we are important and precious. This is very important! It’s oneself who is important. This is called loving oneself before others. Loving ourselves comes before anything else.

When we love ourselves what should we do? How should we practice to make the words “love myself” appropriate?

We must take care of ourselves and not damage or destroy ourselves by believing the defilements (kilesas) that constantly deceive the world. Remember this well, all of you.


Ajahn Brahm also has advice on "Self-Love and How to Cultivate It." He is a Western (British now living in Australia) from Ajahn Maha Boowa's Thai Forest Tradition, a Theravada Buddhist school, a direct student of Ajahn Chah.

A strange "Chris-Buddhist-mas"

Ajahn Chah; Ajahn Maha Boowa; Ven. Sujato, Ellie Askew, Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly

Was Jesus ever a Buddhist? Yes.*
It was Christmas (December 24th) in Thailand, and the foreign [Western Buddhist] monks decided to celebrate it. They invited some laypeople as well as the Abbot Ajahn Chah to join them.

The laypeople were upset and skeptical. "Why," they asked, "are Buddhists celebrating Christmas?"

Ajahn Chah gave a talk on religion in which he said, "As far as I understand, Christianity teaches people to do good and to avoid doing harm, just as Buddhism teaches, so what's the problem?"

"However, if people are upset by the idea of celebrating 'Christmas,' that can be easily remedied. We won't call it 'Christmas.' Let's call it ['Chris-Buddhist-mas']. Anything that inspires us to see what is true and do what is good is proper practice. You may call it any name you like."

The Christ and The Buddha
Ajahn Maha Boowa
Siddhartha the Buddha, Jesus the Christ, Saintly Young Men Manga (Geraldford/flickr)
.
Every [world-] religion teaches people to be good. I do not dare put the Christ (Jesus) and the Buddha (Siddhartha) in the boxing ring to see who's champion -- because the religions do not have anything to argue and fight about.

But we people who are variously "Christians" or "Buddhists" like to quarrel and to fight with words. Because of being stubborn, we do not practice the way of either religion.

The teachings of the founders of each tradition give us a "right path" to follow, so we ought to contemplate the virtues of the founders.

It is as if we were walking along a path to a particular destination. At first we'd go along a path that we knew until we reached a point where we no longer knew the way. So we'd ask someone who knows, and they'd tell us the way to go farther.

Siddhartha the Buddha lived to help others and to rise above the lures of the world.
.
As soon as we again reached a point of uncertainty, we'd ask again. We'd continue like this until we reached the goal at the culmination of the path.

The one who points out the path is a benefactor, and we ought to reflect on the gift.

The Buddha saw clearly into Dharma (the true nature of things), because he understood clearly the method by which he had trained himself [to see things as they really are].

Therefore, it was always beneficial when Buddhists turned to him. He was always ready to help the world gain freedom from various dangers with methods that were full of friendliness/loving-kindness (mettã).

To summarize, in both religions, the founders compassionately taught people to be good (virtuous) in the same way. They are different in their degrees of subtlety following the abilities of the founders of each tradition.

*Yes, Jesus was at one time a Buddhist monk, apparently in the Mahayana-Hinduistic-Vajrayana tradition. According to Nicolas Notovitch and many others, Jesus lived in India during the unknown or "lost" years of his life. There in Ladakh, India/Tibet, he was a Buddhist monk, a Hindu yogi, a miracle worker (siddhi), a healer, and teacher who got in trouble and went back to Jerusalem, where he got in even more trouble. And he came back to Kashmir, where we find his tomb now overtaken by a Muslim burial site with a Jewish person, whose feet are symbolized to mark it in a very Buddhist and very non-Jewish way.

Saturday, September 21, 2019

Dharma versus Defilements

Ajahn Maha Boowa via Ven. Sujato, Ellie Askew; BDict; Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly
Everything may seem fine, but it isn't.
Without Dharma, there can be no genuine progress in the world or in Buddhism [the Buddha's path-of-practice]. When there is Dharma, there will be peace and happiness because Dharma is selflessness.
  • [Dharma = "Truth, natural law, what the Buddha taught, regularity on a cosmic scale, true nature of things/existence; that which bears its own nature (as opposed to a conditional thing); the opposite of the defilements."]
With Dharma, we’ll see that all human beings are the same, and we’ll have loving-kindness, compassion, and unselfish concern for the welfare of others.

Without Dharma, we’ll put ourselves above others. Although we’re bad, we’ll be deluded into thinking that we’re good. That’s why Dharma is indispensable.

When a person, a society, or a country has Dharma, there’ll be peace. When there is no Dharma, there’ll be strife. When our hearts are ruled by the defilements (kilesas), it will be engulfed by fire.

The Buddha and all the sages of the present and past never praised the defilements, craving (attachment), and the taints (kilesas, tanha, and asavas) — greed, hatred, and delusion — because they agitate and torment the heart.

Who can be wiser than a buddha, a perfectly-enlightened teacher? All buddhas realize and make known the same essential teaching. They praise the things that are worthy of praise and censure the things that are worthy of censure.

They teach us to let go of the things that should be let go of [if we wish make an end of suffering] and to develop the things that should be developed [if we wish to gain enlightenment] for the sake of establishing peace and happiness within our heart and living a peaceful existence.

If we can let go of some of these things, we’ll be more peaceful and have fewer defilements [manifesting themselves in our lives].

If we can totally let go of everything, we’ll be completely free from the defilements and become a noble [i.e., enlightened] and superior being.

What can afflict the heart if not the defilements that have ignorance (avijja) as their root? Any behavior directed by the defilements can only produce trouble and affliction.

The defilements are troublesome, whereas Dharma is cool, peaceful, and pleasing to the eyes and ears.
What are the "defilements"?
Ven. Nyanatiloka (a.k.a. Anton W. F. Gueth), Buddhist Dictionary: A Manual of Buddhist Terms and Doctrines via the German website palikanon.com, edited by Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly
The defilements or kilesas are mind/heart-defiling, unwholesome qualities. According to The Path of Purification (Vis.M. XXII, 49, 65):
  
"There are ten defilements, so called because they are themselves defiled and because they defile the mental factors associated with them. They are:

(1) greed (lobha
(2) aversion (dosa)
(3) delusion (moha
(4) conceit (māna)
(5) speculative views (ditthi
(6) skeptical doubt (vicikicchā
(7) mental torpor (thīna)
(8) restlessness (uddhacca)
(9) shamelessness (ahirika)
(10) lack of conscience or moral dread (anottappa)." 

For 1-3, see "roots" or mūla; for 6-8, see "hindrances" or nīvarana; for 9 and 10, see ahirika-anottappa. These ten are explained in Dhs. 1229f and enumerated in Vibh. XII. No classification of the defilements is found in the sutras ("discourses"), though the term occurs quite often in them. For the related term, upakkilesa ("impurities"), different lists are given. - (Appendix)

Sunday, July 7, 2019

How to run from suffering (Part 1)

Ajahn Maha Boowa via Ven. Sujato, Ellie Askew, Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly
Suffering is coming, so we must escape. But where is escape? (Horns of a Dilemma)

.
People often say that the way Buddhism teaches constantly about the dukkha or "suffering" of living beings is unpleasant to them.

It makes them so depressed that they get no joy out of listening to the Dharma, the Buddha's Teaching.

They feel as if the disappointments and discontents being talked about were joining forces with the suffering and discontentment already inside them, making them despondent and sad.

And if that weren’t enough, the basic principles of the Buddha’s Teaching -- the Four Ennobling Truths (contemplations leading to the noble state of enlightenment) -- start with pain as their primary theme, since that’s what the dispensation (sasana) teaches about far more than anything else.
  • [The Buddha actually sought to teach only two things, suffering and the end of all suffering, dukkha and nirvana. Those twin teachings, in a nutshell, are the Dharma.]
It’s as if the Buddha were driving away the people who, out of fear of all kinds of suffering, come running to the Dharma for shelter, consolation, and a real solution.

But instead they feel they have to run away from the Dharma, inasmuch as they don’t want to sit and listen to anyone talking about pain, its cause, suffering, or discontent.

Actually, when people say things like this, it shows that they haven’t had enough training in the dispensation of the Buddha to understand its true aims.

The fact that the dispensation teaches about disappointment or suffering is completely in line with the way things are. This is in keeping with the name "Ennobling Truths."

These truths are the dispensation's basic principles. They’re true. Moreover, they lead to personal realization and enlightenment.

The Buddha was a person who truly knew and understood. This is why he was able to point out the wants and deficiencies in living beings -- for the suffering we experience all have deficiencies as their basic cause.

What are these Four Ennobling Truths, in brief? See Part 2

Friday, May 24, 2019

"Buddhism: A Method of Mind Training"

Golden Buddha atop Phra That Khao Noi Temple, Nan, Thailand (K. Phothiwijit/wiki)
.
This is a very basic beginner's outline of the Four Noble Truths.
  
Wat Tham Sua, Kanchanaburi, Thailand
When we hear anything about Buddhism in the daily news, we usually think of it as having a background of huge golden idols and saffron-robed monastics, with a thick atmosphere of incense smoke.

We never feel that there is anything in it for us -- except, maybe, an exotic spectacle.

Is that all there is to Buddhism? Does the news photograph the real Buddhism? Do glossy magazines show the fundamentals or only the externals?

Let's see, then, what Buddhism really is. Buddhism as originally expounded still exists underneath the external trappings and trimmings.

Though generally regarded as a religion, Buddhism is basically a method of cultivating the mind. It is true that, with its monastic tradition and its emphasis on ethics, it possesses many of the superficial characteristics Westerners associate with religion.

However, it is non-theistic. It affirms that the universe is governed by impersonal rules (regularities) and not by a creator-god. It has little use for petitionary prayer, for the Buddha was a great teacher of gods (devas) and humans.

It regards devotion not as a religious obligation but as a means of expressing gratitude and as a means of self-development. So it is not a religion at all from these usual points of view.
 
Faith or confidence?

Sutra to the Kalamas, Charter of Free Inquiry
Buddhism knows "faith" (saddha) only in the sense of confidence in the path pointed out by the Buddha. Buddhists are expected to avoid blind faith, questioning everything.

The Kalama Sutra shows that nothing is true or to be "taken on faith" merely
  • because someone -- even the Buddha -- says it,
  • or because it is written in ancient books,
  • or because it has been handed down by tradition,
  • or because others claim it,
  • or because it agrees with our biases,
  • or because of specious reasoning.
One may decide to take the Buddha-Dharma (the Buddha's eightfold path to enlightenment) as a testable hypothesis, having great confidence in it as one investigates to prove it, to directly see for oneself. One is not expected to accept anything unless it can be verified by direct experience in this very life.

That is not to say that everything can be demonstrated rationally and intellectually. Many things exist beyond the scope of intellect and can be cognized (directly known and seen) only by the development of higher faculties. So Buddhism may seem strictly mystical but, in fact, is experiential.

However one arrives at firm conviction from tentative confidence, the fact remains that there is no need for blind faith or acceptance of anything in Buddhism.

Buddhism is a way of life based on the training of the mind. Its ultimate aim is to show the way to complete liberation from suffering by the attainment of the unconditioned (nirvana), the deathless, a state beyond the range of the normal untrained mind.

Its immediate aim is to strike at the roots of suffering in everyday life. More
  • Things as They Are: Talks on Training the Mind (Ajahn Maha Boowa)
  • *Leonard A. Bullen (1909-1984) was one of the pioneers of the Buddhist movement in Australia. He was the first president of the Buddhist Society of Victoria when it was established in 1953 and one of the first office-bearers of the executive committee of the Buddhist Federation of Australia. He was also a co-editor of the Buddhist journal Metta (BPS).

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Investigating DEATH to overcome it

Ajahn Maha Boowa via Ven. Sujato and Ellie Askew; edited by Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly
(TheJourneyOfPurpose) Death is an illusion; life is a dream; we are the co-creators of our own imagining. "The present moment is the only moment available to us and is the doorway to all moments" - Vietnamese Zen Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh. In addition, we hear from speakers: British Buddhist teacher Alan Watts, Apple Inc's Steve Jobs, actor Jim Carrey, and Nick Vujicic.
Ever imagine dying in slow motion? Taken by the arms, killed by cops while conscious?

.
All around is this killjoy Death. Why?
In your investigation of death, you must investigate so that you can really get to see the truth of it [and wake up from this delusion].

In this whole world of saṁsāra [the "continued wandering on" through life after life, through rebirth and redeath], every person, every male, every female, every animal, they must all die.

Wherever we may be, there is always a cemetery. Even right here where we are sitting there is a cemetery, for there are all sorts of animals and organisms that die all over the place. It is just that we never think about it that way. We don’t think of it as a cemetery.

We just call it an assembly hall or pavilion (sālā). In our bodies there can be found many organisms living inside us, such as germs for instance. They are one form of animal. And inside this body there is nothing that one can call attractive or beautiful.

You must investigate and analyze to see according to the truth of the Buddha, the One Who Woke Up. The defilements (kilesas) -- the defiled mind and heart -- tend to see it as something beautiful. They tend to see it as people, as animals, as ‘I,’ as ‘mine’  [rather than as impersonal phenomena].

We'll live for a long time, but what about others?
And attachment to [wrong] view, our clinging [upādāna] to misunderstanding, is much more tenaciously fixed than a nail driven into a piece of wood. It cannot be easily dislodged.

This is because of the influence of the defilements/kilesas, our misperception of things. We must, therefore, uproot and correct this misperception, which is truly the work of the kilesas.

We can do this with the Teaching, the Dharma, of the Buddha, using:
  • sati = mindfulness
  • paññā = wisdom
  • saddhā = confidence
  • viriya = energy, diligent effort.
We must get to see it clearly. We have to establish our perception so that we really see this body passing away, because death [which is not coming in the future but happening at every moment] is the undeniable truth.

Friday, March 29, 2019

Develop the heart rather than material things

Ajahn Maha Boowa via Ven. Sujato; Ellie Askew, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Beloved Theravada Buddhist nuns of the re-established bhikkhuni order, California (DV).
.
Let go of things...put problems in the past.
In practicing the Dharma, aim at improving the qualities of the heart -- virtue, concentration, and wisdom -- more than at material things.

As for material things, if we have just enough to get by, that’s plenty enough.…

We are born from human beings; we monastics come from people. People have homes; we monastics need places to stay -- enough to provide ordinary shelter -- but they should be just enough to get by.

Don’t make them fancy. Don’t go competing with the world outside. That would simply foster one's own defilements and make one known throughout the world in a way that the defilements would ridicule.

Better to make oneself known instead for one's virtue, concentration, and wisdom, for one's confidence in the Dharma and persistence in the practice. Better to make oneself known for having striven to cure oneself, to extricate oneself, to find release from the defilements and to be free from this entanglement of suffering that is the cycle of rebirth.

Letting go is the easy part. Move on.
This is what it means to genuinely and directly enhance one's stature. Strive in the effort. Make it to the other shore of this churning cycle in this very life -- which is much surer than any other lifetime, any other time or place.

And don’t forget, wherever you go: Don’t get involved in construction work. Everywhere we go these days there’s construction work with monastics involved in it. It’s enough to make one sick.

As soon as they meet each other they ask, "How’s it going with your meeting hall? How’s it going with your school? Finished yet? How much did it cost?"

Whenever they have a project, whatever the project, they go around harassing laypeople, gathering funds, so that laypeople have to spend money and get embroiled, too, without respite.

Let laypeople have enough money so that they can stash some of it away as savings for their own use.

Letting go gives us freedom (Thich Nhat Hanh)
They practically kill themselves just to scrape together a little cash, but instead of being able to use it to provide for their stomachs, for their families, their children, and other essentials, or for making merit at their leisure, they end up having to hand it over to help monastics who harass them by fundraising to the point where they’re left empty-handed.

This is the dispensation (sasana) of harassing the world, which the Buddha never practiced and never taught monastics to practice. So I want you all to understand this: The Buddha never acted this way.

This is the dispensation of material objects, of money, not the dispensation of Dharma following the example of the Buddha.

Saturday, January 26, 2019

The Thai Forest Tradition

Thaiforestwisdom.org; Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Pat Macpherson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Buddhism is estimated to be some 2,600 years old. As it spread, different schools arose. There are now essentially at least three Buddhisms based on different scriptural canons.

There is Theravāda Buddhism based on the Pali language canon, the East Asian tradition (Mahayana) centered on the Chinese canon, and the Tibetan tradition (Vajrayana) centered on the Tibetan canon [Reference: Buddhist Religions, a Historical Introduction, Robinson, Johnson, and Thanissaro (eds.), 5th edition, pg. xxi]. For general background reference material on Buddhism, see:
The oldest complete set of scriptures is the Pali canon. The Thai Forest Tradition arose at the end of the 19th century as a deliberate attempt to focus on the practice of meditation as described in these early sutras. [Some therefore say it is an illegitimate sect, invented by a Thai royal out of thin air, but it has produced many great meditating monks.]
 
It is relatively new and, perhaps, also very old as  well. There are numerous discussions of this tradition online. A great place to start is The Customs of the Noble Ones by Ven. Thanissaro (from Access to Insight). Here are a few more favorites:
An excellent account of an exemplary dhutanga or thudong monk's life was written by Ven. KhantipaloWith Robes and Bowl, Glimpses of the Thudong Bhikkhu Life. It can be read online or downloaded: HTML (via Access to Insight), PDF (via Buddhanet.net's Buddhist eLibrary )

Monday, October 30, 2017

Meditation: The Language of the Heart

Straight from the Heart: Thirteen Talks on the Practice of Meditation by Ven. Ajahn Maha Boowa Ñanasampanno, Ven. Thanissaro; Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Buddhism is about the heart (mind)and the breath (prana or chi) = compassion + wisdom.

Ajahn Mun taught that all hearts (minds) have the same language. No matter what one's language or nationality, the heart has nothing but simple awareness, which is why he said that all hearts have the same language. When a thought arises, we understand it.
But when we put it into words, it has to become this or that language, so that we don't really understand one another. The feelings within the heart, though, are the same for everyone. This is why the Dharma (Pali Dhamma) fits the heart perfectly. The Dharma isn't any particular language. The Dharma is the language of the heart. The Dharma resides with the heart.

Pleasure and pain reside within the heart. The acts that create pleasure and pain are thought up by the heart. The heart is what knows the results that appear as pleasure and pain, and the heart is burdened with the outcome of its own thoughts. This is why the heart and the Dharma fit perfectly. No matter what our language or nationality, we can all understand the Dharma. It is because the heart and the Dharma are a natural pair.

The heart forms the core within the body. It's the core, the substance, the primary essence within the body. It's the basic foundation. The conditions that arise from the mind, such as thought-formations, appear and vanish again and again.

Here I'm referring to the rippling [vrittis] of the mind. When the mind ripples, that's the formation of a thought. Labels, which deal with conjecturing, memorizing, and recognizing, are termed sañña. "Long" thoughts are sañña; short thoughts are sankhara. In other words, when a thought forms — "blip" — that's a sankhara. Sañña refers to labeling and recognizing.

Viññana refers to the act of taking note when anything external comes and makes contact with the senses, as when visible forms make contact with the eye and cognition results. All of these things are constantly arising and vanishing of their own accord, and so the Buddha called them khandhas (heaps, groups, aggregates). Each "heap" or "group" is called a khandha. These Five Heaps of Khandhas are constantly arising and vanishing all the time.

Even arahants (arhats, enlightened beings)have these same conditions — just like ordinary people everywhere — the only difference being that the arahants' khandhas are khandhas pure and simple, without any defilements giving them orders, making them do this or think that. Instead, their khandhas think out of their own free nature, with nothing forcing them to think this or that, unlike the minds of ordinary people in general.

To make a comparison, the khandhas of ordinary people are like prisoners, constantly being ordered about. Their various thoughts, labels, assumptions, and interpretations have something that orders and forces them to appear, making them think, assume, and interpret in this way or that. In other words, they have defilements as their boss, their leader, ordering them to appear.

Arahants, however, do not. When a thought forms, it simply forms. Once it forms, it simply disappears. There's no seed to continue it, no seed to weigh the mind (heart) down, because there's nothing to force it, unlike the khandhas governed by defilements or under the leadership of defilements. This is where the difference lies.

But their basic nature is the same: All the khandhas mentioned are inconstant (aniccam). In other words, instability and changeability are a regular part of their nature, beginning with the rupa khandha [form aggregate], our body, and the vedana khandha [feeling or sensation group], feelings of pleasure, pain, and neutrality. These things appear and vanish, again and again. Sañña, sankhara, and viññana are also always in a state of appearing and vanishing as a normal part of their nature.

But as for actual awareness — which forms the basis of our knowledge of the various things that arise and vanish — that does not vanish. We can say that the mind cannot vanish. We can say that the mind cannot arise. A mind that has been purified thus has no more problems concerning the [re]birth and death of the body and the khandhas; thus, there is no more rebirth here and there, appearing in crude forms such as individuals or as living beings, for those whose minds have been purified.

But those whose minds are not purified, they are the ones who take rebirth and die, setting their sights on cemeteries without end, all because of this undying mind.

This is why the Buddha taught the world, and in particular the world of human beings, who know right from wrong, good from evil, who know how to foster the one and remedy the other, who understand the language of the Dharma he taught.

This is why he taught the human world above and beyond the other worlds. It was so that we could try to remedy the things that are harmful and detrimental, removing them from our thoughts, words, and deeds. It was so we could try to nourish and foster whatever goodness we might already have and give rise to whatever goodness we do not yet have.

He taught us to foster and develop the goodness we already have so as to nourish the heart, giving it refreshment and well-being, giving it a standard of quality, or goodness, so that when it leaves its present body to head for whatever place or level of being, this mind that has been constantly nourished with goodness will be a good mind.

Wherever it fares, it will fare well. Wherever it takes rebirth, it will be reborn well. Wherever it lives, it will live well. It will keep on experiencing well-being and happiness until it gains the capacity, the potential, the accumulation of merit it has developed progressively from the past into the present.

In other words, yesterday is today's past, today is tomorrow's past, all of which are days during which we have fostered and developed goodness step by step — to the point where the mind has firm strength and ability, from the supporting power of this goodness, that enables it to pass over and gain release [from rebirth and suffering].

The forest monastic tradition rediscovered in the 20th century, Isan, Thailand: famous monks

Such a mind has no more rebirth, not even in the most quiet or refined levels of being that contain any latent traces of conventional reality (sammati) — namely, rebirth and death as we currently experience it. Such a mind goes completely beyond all such things. Here the reference is to the minds of buddhas and arahants.

There's a story about Ven. Vangisa that has a bearing on this. Ven. Vangisa, when he was a layperson, was very talented at divining the level of being at which the mind of a dead person was reborn — no matter who the person was. One ould not quite say he was a fortuneteller. Actually, he was more of a master of psychic skills.

When anyone died, he would take that person's skull and knock on it — knock, knock, knock — focus his mind, and then know that this person was reborn here or there, on this plane or that. If the person was reborn in a hell or a heaven, or as a common animal or hungry ghost, he could tell in every case, without hesitation. All he needed was to knock on the skull.

When he heard his friends say that the Buddha was many times more talented than this, he wanted to expand on his knowledge. So he went into the Buddha's presence to ask for further training in this science. When he reached the Buddha, the Buddha gave him the skull of an arahant to knock on.


"All right, see if you can tell where he was reborn."

Ven. Vangisa knocked on the skull and listened.

Silence.

He knocked again and listened.

Silence.

He thought for a moment.

Silence.

He focused his mind.

Silence.

He couldn't see where the owner of the skull was reborn. At his wit's end, he confessed frankly that he didn't know where the arahant was reborn.

At first, Ven. Vangisa had thought himself talented and smart and had planned to challenge the Buddha before asking for further training. But when he reached the Buddha, the Buddha gave him the skull of an arahant to knock on — and right then he was stymied. So now he genuinely wanted further training.

Once he had further training, he'd really be something special. This being the way things stood, he asked to study with the Buddha. So the Buddha taught him the science, taught him the method — in other words, the science of the Dharma. Ven. Vangisa practiced and practiced until finally he attained arahantship. From then on he was no longer interested in knocking on anyone's skull except for his own. Once he had known clearly, that was the end of the matter. This is called "knocking on the right skull."

Once the Buddha had brought up the topic of the mind that does not undergo rebirth — the skull of one whose mind is purified — no matter how many times Ven. Vangisa knocked on it, he could not know where the mind was reborn, even though he had been very talented before. For the place of a pure mind's rebirth [since rebirth does not take place] cannot be found.

The same is true in the case of Ven. Godhika. This story should serve as quite some food for thought. Ven. Godhika went to practice meditation, made progress step by step, then regressed. They say this happened six times. After the seventh time, he took a razor to slash his throat. That's how depressed he was — but then he came to his senses, contemplated the Dharma, and became an arahant at the last minute. That's the story in brief.

When he passed into final nirvana, Mara's hordes searched for his "spirit" (gandhabba, relinking consciousness, continuation). To put it simply, they stirred up a storm but couldn't tell where he had been reborn.

So the Buddha said, "No matter how much you dig or search or investigate to find the spirit of our son, Godhika, who has completely finished his task, you won't be able to find it — even if you turn the world upside down. This is because such a task lies beyond the scope of conventional reality." How could they possibly find it? It's beyond the capacity of people with defilements to know the power of an arahant's mind.

In the realm of conventional speech, there is no one who can trace the path of an arahant's mind. This is because an arahant lies beyond convention, even though such a being's mind is just the same. Think about it: Even our stumbling and crawling mind, when it is continually cleansed without stop, without ceasing, without letting perseverance lag, will gradually become more and more refined until it reaches the limits of refinement.

Then the refinement will disappear — because refinement is a matter of conventional reality — revealing a nature of solid gold, or solid Dhrmma, called a pure mind. We, too, will then have no more problems, just like the arahants, because our mind will have become a superlative mind, just like the minds of those who have already gained release from rebirth and suffering.

All minds of this sort are the same, with no distinction between women and men, which is simply a matter of sex or convention. With the mind, there is no distinction between women and men, and thus both women and men have the same capacity in the area of the Dharma.

Both are capable of attaining the various levels of Dharma all the way to final release. There are no restrictions that can be imposed in this area. All that is needed is that we develop enough ability and potential, and then we can all go beyond the beyond.

For this reason, we should all make an effort to train our hearts/minds. At the very least, we should get the mind to attain stillness and peace with any of the meditation themes that can lull it into a state of calm, giving rise to peace and well being within it.

For example, mindfulness of breathing, which is one of the primary themes in meditation, seems to suit the temperaments of more people than any other theme. But whatever the theme, take it as a governing principle, a guide, a mainstay for the mind, putting it into practice within the mind so as to attain rest and peace.

When the mind begins to settle down, we will begin to see its essential nature and worth. We will begin to see what the heart is and how it is. In other words, when the mind gathers all of its currents into a single point, as simple awareness within itself. This is what is called the "mind" (citta).

The gathering [coherence, coming together in harmony and coordination] of the mind occurs on different levels, corresponding to the mind's ability and to the different stages of its refinement.

Even if the mind is still on a crude level, we can nevertheless know it when it gathers inwardly. When the mind becomes more and more refined, we will know its refinement: "This mind is refined... This mind is radiant... This mind is extremely still... This mind is something extremely amazing," more and more, step by step, this very same mind!

In cleansing and training the mind for the sake of stillness, in investigating, probing, and solving the problems of the mind with discernment (pañña, wisdom, understanding) — which is the way of making the mind progress, of enabling us to reach the truth of the mind, step by step, through the means already mentioned — no matter how crude the mind may be, don't worry about it.

If we get down to making the effort and persevere continually with what diligence and persistence we have, that crudeness will gradually fade away and vanish. Refinement will gradually appear through our own actions or our own striving until we are able to go beyond and gain release by slashing the defilements to bits. This holds true for all of us, men and women alike.

But while we aren't yet able to do so, we nevertheless should not be anxious. All that is asked is that we make the mind principled so that it can be a guide and a mainstay for itself. As for this body, we've been relying on it ever since the day we were reborn. This is something we all know. We've made it live, lie down, urinate, defecate, work, earn a living. We've used it, and it has used us. We order it around, and it orders us around.

For instance, we've made it work, and it has made us suffer with aches here and pains there so that we have to search for medicine to relieve it. It's the one that hurts, and it's the one that searches for medicine. It's the one that provides the means. And so we keep supporting each other back and forth in this way.

It's hard to tell who is in charge, the body or us. We can order it around part of the time, but it orders us around all of the time. Illness, hunger, thirst, sleepiness, these are nothing but a heap of suffering and distress in which the body orders us around from every side. We can order it around only a little bit. So when the time is right for us to give the orders, we should make it meditate.

So get to work. As long as the body is functioning normally, then no matter how much or how heavy the work, get right to it. But if the body isn't functioning normally, if you're ill, you need to be conscious of what it can take. As for the mind, however, keep up the effort within, unflaggingly, because it's your essential duty.

You've depended on the body for a long time. Now that it's wearing down, know that it's wearing down — which parts still work, which parts no longer work. You're the one in charge, and you know it full well, so make whatever compromises you should.

But as for the heart, which isn't ill along with the body, it should step up its efforts within so that it won't lack the benefits it can gain.

Make the mind have standards and be principled — principled in its living, principled in its dying. Wherever it's reborn, make it have good principles and satisfactory standards. What they call "merit" (puñña) will not betray our hopes and expectations.

It will provide us with satisfactory circumstances at all times, in keeping with the fact that we've accumulated the merit — the well being — that all the world wants and of which no one has enough. In other words, what the world wants is well being, whatever the sort, and in particular the well-being of the mind that will arise step by step from having done things, such as meditation, which are noble, virtuous, and good.

This is the well being that forms a core or an important essence within the heart. We can strive, then, while the body is still functioning, for when life comes to an end, nothing more can be done. No matter how little or how much we have accomplished, we must stop at that point. We stop our work, put it aside, and then reap its rewards and consequences — there, in the next life.

Whatever we are capable of doing, we do. If we can go beyond or gain release from suffering and rebirth, that's the end of every problem. There will then be nothing to involve us in any further turmoil.

Here I've been talking about the mind because the mind is the primary issue. That which will make us fare well or ill, meet with pleasure or pain, is nothing but the mind.

As for what they call bad karma, it lies within the mind that has made it. Whether or not we can remember, these seeds — which lie in the heart — cannot be prevented from bearing fruit. This is because they are rooted in the mind. We have to accept our karma. Don't find fault with it. Once it's done, it's done, so how can we find fault with it? The hand writes, and so the hand must erase. We have to accept it like a good sport. This is the way it is with karma until we can gain release — which will be the end of the problem. More

Friday, October 10, 2008

Life of a Western Monk


This is the life story of Ven. Pannavaddho. He was born Peter John Morgan in 1925 to Welsh parents and lived as an electrical engineer. But then he decided to renounce the world to pursue meditation. He lived in England and eventually moved East to study under the renowned Ajahn Maha Boowa in the famed Thai forest tradition.