Showing posts with label beatings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label beatings. Show all posts
Monday, April 13, 2026
Monday, November 24, 2025
Jake Paul to be beaten by heavyweight boxer
 |
| Netflix: Live bloodbath on Dec. 19th |
The fight -- which will be streamed live on Netflix -- is scheduled for eight 3-minute rounds, and the fighters will wear 10-ounce gloves, the standard for heavyweight fights.
It's an about-face for Jake Paul, 27, who was originally slated to take on WBA lightweight champion Gervonta "Tank" Davis in an exhibition fight on Nov. 14, 2025. However, the bout was canceled after Davis was named in a civil lawsuit filed by an ex-girlfriend accusing the boxer of [testosterone poisoning,] aggravated battery, false imprisonment, kidnapping, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Taking a dive for the money?
 |
| Breaking news: Fake Jake to get Real in the ring! |
Paul has campaigned primarily as a cruiserweight with a 200-pound weight limit, although he weighed 227.25 pounds for his heavyweight exhibition fight with Mike Tyson in 2024.
 |
| Anthony Joshua is so good he has a wax figure in London |
 |
| Call me a con-man to my face! - We said 'artist' |
Paul (12-1, 7 KOs) is still a novice in the sport with no notable amateur experience and only 70 total rounds boxed as a pro since 2020. He'll take a massive step up from MMA fighters and journeyman boxers to face Joshua (28-4, 25 KOs), one of the hardest-hitting and most decorated heavyweights in the world with over 160 rounds boxed in his 12 years as a professional. More
- VIDEO: Anthony Joshua vs. Jake Paul FULL press conference and face off
- EDITOR'S PICKS
- Joshua vs. Paul stakes rise -- 'no exhibitions!' James Regan
- What we know about Anthony Joshua vs. Jake Paul
- James Dielhenn Hearn: Joshua-Fury planned, Paul fight not agreed PA
Tuesday, October 21, 2025
Shocking book on Epstein, Trump, Maxwell
 |
| Sex trafficked child Virginia Roberts worked at Trump's Mar a Lago. |
 |
| Silenced for speaking out |
- (Tara Palmeri) Nobody's Girl by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) bombshell book is shaking the Epstein/Maxwell World
 |
| Jeffrey "Convicted Sex Trafficker and Don Trump's best friend" Epstein alive and well 2025 |
 |
| That's clearly not Jeffrey Epstein. That's just a man who looks exactly like him on his island. |
 |
| Trump to commute Diddy's sentence and pardon Ghislane Maxwell. Mel Gibson better be careful |
 |
| Ghislane who? I'm not familiar with, oh, you mean Maxwell, asking for a pardon? I'dunno. |
 |
| I was just an innocent girl working at Trump's Mar a Lago as a child. No one cared about me. |
 |
| I was a child, hired by Trump, taken by Epstein, and forced into sex trafficking by Maxwell. |
Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice
 |
| I named names; they killed me. |
This unforgettable memoir is by the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre, the molested and trafficked girl who became the woman who dared to take on [Mossad/CIA assets] Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Israel Prime Minister Ehud Barak raped me
She reports she was raped, beaten, bloodied by child molester Israeli PM Ehud Barak
 |
| Prince Andrew swears that's not his left hand. |
 |
| We went through so many girls together. So? |
She left behind this memoir written in the years preceding her mysterious death and stated unequivocally that she wanted it published.
 |
| Partners-in-crime: We molest and blackmail. |
Here, she offers an unsparing and definitive account of her time being sex trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell, who raped, abused, and sold her and other children to numerous prominent men [such as Pres. Trump].
 |
| I love Agent Ghislane, and I will protect her. |
 |
| Maxwells: Jewish Israeli spies |
The pages of Nobody’s Girl preserve her voice—and her legacy—forever.
Nobody’s Girl is an astonishing affirmation of her unshakable will—first, to claw her way out of victimhood then to shine light on wrongdoing and fight for a safer, fairer world.
Equal parts intimate and fierce, it is a remarkable narrative of fortitude in the face of sexual depravity in our patriarchy and the despair it brings. More
*Epstein trafficked children to Jewish Israeli officials
%20wiki.jpg)
 |
| Accused pedo Israeli PM Barak |
 |
| I love killing for our Israel's IDF (Benny Gantz) |
 |
| We Zionist Jewish men love kids. |
Both Zionist-Jewish American attorney Alan Dershowitz and Israeli PM Ehud Barak denied the validity of her claims [39]. [She would have been just a child when, I mean if, we molested her! Who's going to believe a child?] More
Sunday, October 5, 2025
Girl fights get violent w/ Dakota Ditch'
No joke, she knocks 'em out harder than men: Dakota Ditcheva
(VoteSport) Despite her pretty looks, Dakota Ditcheva, 27, displays an unprecedented knockout rate in the cage. The spotlight belongs to the long-legged PFL champion, who studied Muay Thai in Buddhist Thailand, might soon outshine any MMA (mixed martial arts) star. 11,805,895 views.
- Dakota Ditcheva, Vote Sport, 12/26/24; Pfc. Sandoval, CC Liu, Seth Auberon, Sheldon S. (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Israel tortured Greta, forced her to kiss...
Israel tortures Westerner? Human rights abuses? It wouldn't be the first time
Freedom flotilla journalist challenges Israel's Gaza siege
 |
| How dare Greta embarrass the warmongers! |
The Grayzone: Find more reporting at thegrayzone.com. Support original journalism at Patreon: grayzone. #TheGrayzone. (The Grayzone) Freedom flotilla attorney-journalist challenges Israel's Gaza siege and talks about it with Max Blumenthal
World erupts in outrage and anger at Israel's US-backed war crimes
Dragged by the hair, beaten, forced to take picture with Israeli flag: glee of Zionist IDF torturers
 |
| So IDF may torture me, but I remain full of metta |
Wednesday, May 14, 2025
Diddy done it, says Cassie Ventura (trial)
Diddy trial: Cassie Ventura said 'Freak Offs' make her feel 'disgusting' | Banfield
 |
| That guy's not even my type! Justin Bieber is! |
Diddy paid me for gay sex with him and Cassie then I shot Trump at hotel
 |
| Yeah, Boi, that happened to me, too! - Justin B. |
ABOUT: Ashleigh Banfield is the definitive authority on the nation’s biggest true crime stories. A veteran award-winning journalist, Ashleigh brings a sharp focus to the crime stories gripping America, distilling facts and analyzing context in a way which captures viewers’ interests and imaginations. No one knows the prosecution and the defendants’ cases better than BANFIELD, all the while keeping the victim at the heart of every story we tell – just another reason NewsNation is truly News for All Americans. Weeknights at 10p/9C. #Banfield
ABOUT: NewsNation is a source for fact-based, unbiased news for all Americans [but mainly the conservative and Republican ones]. More from NewsNation: newsnationnow.com. Get app: https://trib.al/TBXgYpp. Find on cable: https://trib.al/YDOpGyG. How to watch on TV or streaming: https://trib.al/Vu0Ikij.
- Caitlyn Becker, Banfield, NewsNation, May 14, 2025; Pfc. Sandoval, Sheldon S., Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Tuesday, March 4, 2025
Gladiator School at LA Juvenile Hall
 |
| 10 Things I Hate About Private Prisons | American Civil Liberties Union of Texas |
Surveillance video shows guards arranged ‘gladiator fights’ between minor inmates
Children as young as 12 abused by officers, who laugh and encourage them to hurt each other for their entertainment during 69 violent fights involving 143 child-convicts who are then told not to report it or seek medical attention for their injuries. Ironically, los pardrinos is Spanish for "the godparents," which male and female officers seem to have taken to mean Mafia members. \
KTLA's Sandra Mitchell reports live on Mar. 3, 2025. Details: ktla.com/news/local-news/30-l...
- Pfc. Sandoval, Ashley Wells, Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Tuesday, July 30, 2024
Disgusting police activity: beating, murder
Renewed call for police reform after violent [implicitly biased] cop shoots woman who called 911 in the face in her home
 |
| Killer Kussin' Kop: "I'll f*cking shoot you right in your f*cking face." *BAM!* |
.
ABOUT: "CBS Saturday Morning" co-hosts Jeff Glor, Michelle Miller, and Dana Jacobson deliver two hours of original reporting and breaking news, as well as profiles of leading figures in culture and the arts. Watch "CBS Saturday Morning" at 7:00 am ET on CBS and 8:00 am ET on the CBS News app.
- KCAL News July 29, 2024; CBS News, July 27, 2024; Pfc. Sandoval, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Wednesday, March 13, 2024
Enraged Buddhism: getting angry (Q&A)
Dhr. Seven, Mr. Like, Ananda (Dharma Budd Meditation), Pfc. Sandoval, Wisdom Quarterly
 |
| Sign language: "F.U., I'm walkin here, I'm walkin here!" - You call yourself a "monk," sir? |
 |
| Who wants a holy water blessing? I'll beat the bad karma out of ya! Leave, demons, leave them! |
 |
| I nodded off in Zen, better beat me, too, Guru! |
- Q: Like, do Buddhist monks have emotions, like, do they get angry?
- WQ: What do you mean?
- Q: Like, do they get angry?
- WQ: What, like, humans?
- Q: Yeah, like, or like regular non-monks.
- WQ: People? Are you asking if monks are people?
- Q: No, I'm asking, do they, like, have emotions?
- WQ: What do you mean?
- Q: Like, do they get angry?
- WQ: But isn't anger an emotion?
- Q: Yeah, like, exactly, right?
- WQ: So you mean you're asking if monks are humans, who have emotions, and one of those emotions is anger, so do Buddhist monks, who being human and therefore not beyond emotions, one of which is anger, will they experience that emotion?
- Q: Exactly.
- WQ: No.
- Q: No???!!! But, like, you just said they're human with normal emotions like any other humans.
- WQ: Yeah, sure, they have human emotions, and anger is a human emotion, but they don't have anger.
- Q: Like, how, how could they not have anger?
- WQ: Exactly, right? I mean, they must, if they're human. They're human, right?
- Q: Yeah, like, aren't they?
- WQ: They look human but I don't think they could have anger.
- Q: Like, how not?
- WQ: Exactly. You're right. I mean, but they're monks. I always see them so well behaved, well, not always.
- Q: Aha, like, so you have seen them angry?
- WQ: What the human ones?
- Q: Yeah, like, aren't they all human?
- WQ: I thought so, but then someone asked me if they get angry, so now I'm not so sure.
- Q: Like, wouldn't they, if they're all human?
- WQ: Yeah, I'm just yanking your chain. I've seen some angry. I've seen some so self-possessed as to be unflappable and they won't show it. Almost all of them are very well behaved. It's very odd to see one who isn't disciplined enough to behave. Except in Thailand, the temporary ordination novices look just like monks. People wouldn't know that's not a monk and so might think it is. But they're usually very well behaved, too, because they're just temporary and will soon revert to household life.
- Q: So, like, they get angry?
WQ: I guess that depends on what we mean by "get angry" because for you and me, if we get angry, everybody's going to know it. We're going to yell, cry, sulk, act out with exasperation, sarcasm, or less than 100% loving kindness. There's Engaged Buddhism, which is good, following the social justice work of Thich Nhat Hanh and MLK Jr. during the secret U.S. War on Buddhist Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. And there's Enraged Buddhism, where some monks think it's okay to hurt people who hurt you -- rather than turning the other cheek, amping up the sympathy and special counter-emotions called The Four Supreme Abidings, which are positive emotions that counter our common base behavior of anger, callousness, envy/jealously, and favoritism.
Rev. Dr. MLK, Jr. and Thay/Thich Nhat Hanh - Q: Like, what could counter those?
- WQ: Anger is countered with loving-kindness (boundless-friendliness), callousness with compassion, envy with joy in the joy of others (mudita), and bias with equanimity or seeing everyone as the same in receiving these positive emotions and intentions from us, not more because we like them or less because we don't (which is called upekkha or "looking on at all with a sense of balance and ease, a fairness and impartiality).
- Q: Like, can anyone really do that?
- WQ: Yeah, anyone can. Imagine if we had been practicing that since childhood. Do you think we'd have any good mental karma stored up?
- Q: Like, yeah.
- WQ: And we might even say nice things, pleasant things, friendly and inoffensive things, for good verbal karma?
- Q: Yeah, like, of course.
- WQ: Then might we even think good things about people and the living beings we meet for the generating of good mental karma?
- Q: Yeah, sure, like, if we're saying nice things and doing nice things, we're probably thinking nice things.
- WQ: ALL of us?
- Q: Well, like , anyone who practices.
- WQ: So you're saying the ones who practice?
- Q: Like...well, yeah!
- WQ: But isn't it enough to be human?
- Q: No, humans, like have emotions, like anger, and like if they don't practice, they're going to think, say, and do harmful and offensive things sometimes.
- WQ: Like get angry?
- Q: Like, yeah.
- WQ: But isn't it enough to become a Buddhist monk?
- Q: I don't know, like, don't you have to practice?
- WQ: Yeah.
Q: So, like, I don't think it would be enough to be human or be a monk...but I think, like, it would be enough to practice.
Practice for self-control, not to control others. - WQ: But wouldn't I still get angry?
- Q: Like, well, you might, but then it wouldn't get out of hand, or you could reel it in really fast if you slipped and it did.
- WQ: That sounds human, and doable, even for us non-monks. What was your question?
- Q: Like, do monks get angry?
- WQ: Human ones?
- Q: *Laughing* Yeah, human ones, like, that's the only kind, right?
- WQ: Right.
- Q: So, like, yeah, right?
- WQ: Naw, I don't think so. I mean they may act like it, but on the inside, after all that practice, it probably doesn't come up that much.
- Q: But they're still human, so like it'll probably come up a little?
- WQ: Well, yeah, I guess, a little, but with so much practice, they can probably reign it in really quickly or notice it arise and avert an outburst. That's probably why they can behave so well so much of the time.
- Q: Hey, like, I might want to be a monk.
- WQ: If you do, will you get angry?
- Q: Like, I don't know. I hope not. That's why I might want to try it, like, at least a temporary monk that you said.
- WQ: Yeah, good idea, then you can practice so much that even if you disrobe and return to the household life, you'll probably be a lot nicer.
- Q: Yeah, like, right?
- WQ: And if you practice so well that anger hardly comes up, your meditation will grow so great you may have a breakthrough so that it never comes up again.
- Q: Is that possible?
- WQ: Oh, yes. Fully enlightened beings, arhats, don't get angry, though they may have the habit, the residual, the custom of being annoyed, or the symptoms of aversion. But on the inside, it doesn't overtake them anymore. It can't. They can, however, act like it does. The Buddha says some things sometimes in some sutras that sure sound like he's upset or annoyed or finds some people wearisome and vexing, like his brother-in-law Devadatta or the monks of Kosambi who used to like to argue and debate rather than practicing and realizing. The Buddha would distinguish them from great examples of monks such as Ven. Kimbila, his fellow monks (Anuruddha and Nandiya), Ananda, and his ten principal disciples. Two Buddhist nuns, Ven. Khema and Ven. Uppalavanna, were always restrained and able to abide in the Four Supreme Abodes, even if they got sick or were attacked.
- Q: Like, attacked-attacked?
WQ: One time this guy was praising how not-angry and wise Ven. Sariputta was, the male monastic declared foremost in wisdom, to this other guy who didn't believe him. So the other guy rolled his eyes and told his friend that the reason he didn't get angry was because his friend never saw Ven. Sariputta meet with a bad (anger-inspiring) situation. So to help his friend, he said he'd show him Ven. Sariputta's anger. The friend was surprised. Ven. Sariputta was a good monk, always practicing, a great disciple, a chief disciple, and a special assistant to the Buddha, teaching other monks and bringing them to the first stage of enlightenment before passing them on to the other chief male monastic, Ven. Maha Moggallana, who would continue to teach them and bring them to full enlightenment. (One has to think the same set up was happening with the female monastics, first taught by Ven. Khema, a great disciple, a chief disciple, the female disciple declared foremost in wisdom by the Buddha, then passed on to Ven. Uppalavanna, who brought nuns to full enlightenment just as Ven. Maha Moggallana did for monks). This is almost certainly why the Buddha had four chief monastic disciples helping him train and enlighten tens of thousands of people he met and countless devas most could not see but some could).
There is no "punishment" for karma, just nature. - Q: Like, what happened to that monk, like, did he get angry?
- WQ: Oh, the friend stood in the bushes by the path where Ven. Sariputta passed every morning on his way for alms. We he passed, the man stepped out behind him and punched him in the back of the head as hard as he could then was amazed when he heard Ven. Sariputta look up -- without turning around to see who hit him -- and exclaim, "I wonder what that was" as he continued on his way. The man, startled, started to burn up with remorse, in disbelief that this monk really didn't get angry or want to know who or what hit him or why, and didn't want retaliation, revenge, or even to criticize or condemn. He begged the monk's forgiveness, and Ven. Sariputta freely gave it. But the humans who saw him do it were not going to let it go. They moved in to apprehend him to drag him off to the king to request a death sentence for such a [blank] who would hit an innocent monk who wasn't hurting anyone. The man said he felt bad, and had apologized, and his apology had been accepted, and that he didn't want to be reported to the king and punished, certainly not beheaded. It was just an experiment. But the people were furious and were not going to let this matter go, they were not going to drop it, and they were forcibly going to drag him before the king that very day and see to it that the king imposed the higher punishment of death as the mob grabbed him. Ven. Sariputta had to intervene on the man's behalf to save him from the mob, allaying their anger and telling them everything was all right and that the man who hit him was fine with no need for anyone to do anything. The man was astonished. The monk he just punched as hard as he could was doing everything he could to calm the mob that would surely have him destroyed, because no doubt the king would sentence him to death over the mob's testimony.
- Q: Wow, like, did that really happen?
- WQ: It is written so I assume so. The question is, Do you think enlightened Ven. Sariputta got angry?
- Q: Not, like, if he didn't look back. Anybody would have immediately swerved around to look back and see what was happening just to save their lives. Do you think he did?
- WQ: I don't think so, even though he was human and had human emotions. Now he had superhuman positive responses to override human habits of reacting because the Buddha had taught him and the others The Parable of the Saw, a short sutra on how to respond if someone is hurting you.
- Q: How, like, run?
- WQ: That's a good idea. But, you know, if you run and get away from the immediate danger, you won't have outrun the feeling, the emotions, the anger over what happened to you, how unfair it was, how the person got away with it...
- Q: Yeah, like, there's that. What about that?
WQ: The Parable of the Saw starts with a question. If someone hurt you, would you get upset -- angry, vengeful, want to strike back, want to force them to stop or not be able to do the same thing to someone else? It might cause you a lot of grief thinking like that, "He hurt me, he wronged me!" With thoughts like that, you're going to be upset and feel a lot of aversion for a long time. That's why it's a good remedy to bring The Parable of the Saw to mind again and again. Forgive (practice khanti, forbearance, tolerance) over and over, every time the feeling comes up. It's not nearly enough to forgive once and think that it's all gone. There's lots of residual, and new feelings of nonforgiveness are bound to arise many, many times. Unless we forgive and forgive again, our reaction to that one act will ruin is over and over again.
Let's cut this one from limb to limb. - Q: Like, what's the parable?
- WQ: Imagine someone comes up to you, grabs you, and starts cutting you limb from limb with a two-handled saw. If you were, toward that person doing it, to vent or give rise to thoughts of anger or revenge, you would not be following the Buddha's teaching on metta, "boundless friendliness." Even toward that person doing that at that time, you should cultivate thoughts of loving-kindness/
- Q: Like, will that save you?!
- WQ: It depends what we mean by "save."
- Q: C'mon, man, quit yanking me. Like, will you live doing that?
- WQ: You might not. I guess you were right. You should run. But if they catch you, stay friendly and kind. Cultivate sympathy, love, agape, concern, and interest in their welfare. Then, in that sense, what harm can they do you? They can't ruin you. Even though they take this body, cause this pain, commit this great injustice, you will not be disturbed if you have been following the Buddha's advice.
- Q: Like, but that takes practice.
- WQ: Practice.
- Q: Like, but how much practice?
- WQ: I don't know, but we should wait until it happens, right? When someone grabs you, holds you down, pulls out the saw, punches you in the back of the head by surprise, THAT'S when you should start practicing for the day someone might insult you.
- Q: Huh? Like, are you serious?
- WQ: No. It won't work then. What's the chance that never having practiced patience, forbearance, tolerance, boundless friendliness, and forgiveness you're going to be able to start when you're being accosted, assaulted, or threatened?
- Q: Like, not much.
WQ: Not much is right. None at all probably. So the time to practice is NOW. There's only now. There's ALWAYS only now. There is no other time. The past doesn't exist. The future doesn't exist. Look at your watch. What time is it? NOW. That's the only time it ever is. And if it ever happens those axe-, I mean saw-murderers come for you, you're ready. Now, it's not likely they will ever come. BUT, what do you think, if we practiced that way, that even for the sake of being sawed into pieces, we wouldn't allow ourselves to get angry or vent or give rise even to thoughts of revenge, what would happen if someone verbally assaulted us, insulted us, said something offensive? Could we bear it?
What, I get to choose between the two of you? - Q: Hah, like, compared to being cut up, what are mere words?
- WQ: Right. Maybe the Buddha was onto something with this crazy teaching in this parable.
- Q: I think, like, he meant it.
- WQ: Yes, of course, but what's more likely to happen, that someone punches us or holds us down and saws us to pieces?
- Q: Like punches us.
- WQ: Not like punches us. Actually punches us. Even that's not likely to happen. But you know what is? Insults, verbal and mental. Someone's staring at us, giving us a hard look, the Evil Eye, smirking, puffing his chest...think you could handle that?
- Q: Of course, like, he didn't even do anything. He didn't even say anything. He's just thinking or using sign language or telepathy. Who cares about that?
- WQ: Well, you know, that's how it happens most of the time. And sometimes words get used. "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words?" Thoughts? It'll be easy not to get mad IF?
- Q: If, like, it just stays at thoughts?
- WQ: No, even if it escalates to full on weaponized violence IF we practice.
- Q: Oh yeah, like, I forgot. If we practice.
- WQ: When's that?
- Q: Like, later on?
- WQ: When?
- Q: Like in a little while?
WQ: Oh, I was thinking now because "later on" and "in a little while" do not exist right now. They might exist or come into existence at some time. We only have control of ourselves right NOW. And if we do it now, we're likely to have control of ourselves at other times. Yeah?
When I practice, anger doesn't arise to begin with. - Q: Like, yeah. No, not like, for sure. Yeah.
- WQ: I like that. There's a short booklet about it called Positive Response: How to Meet Evil with Good by Acharya Buddharakkhita.
 |
| The miracle is not his bad choice but that he remains calm. He neither clings nor identifies, likes nor dislikes. It's only feeling, pain, body, like Bahiya of the Barkcloth. In jhana, one is safe. If enlightened, one is free of all suffering. Was Aaron Bushnell? |
 |
| He doesn't get angry? We'll see. |
SELF-IMMOLATION: Though Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc made a decision to protest the imperial US War on Vietnam, and it was a bad choice, yet he remained calm and unperturbed during this act of ritual suicide. Why? The US is the greatest purveyor of war in the world, as MLK told us. HOW? Because he does not identify with the pain, nor cling to this body nor to any feelings, pleasant or unpleasant, nor to any idea of "self," he can endure without complaint. He seems deep in meditative absorption (jhana), guaranteeing a good rebirth outcome if he is not yet liberated, in which case he is already free of all rebirth and suffering.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
