Showing posts with label supermundane paths. Show all posts
Showing posts with label supermundane paths. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Whose is this Buddhism?

Ajahn Khamdee via Ven. Sujato; Dhr. Seven, Ellie Askew, Crystal Q. (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

[Who is the] Owner of Practice?
Thank you for the Dharma.
There are three sorts of Dharma: the Dharma of theory, the Dharma of practice, and the Dharma of attainment.

The Dharma of theory refers to the teachings of the Buddha: the discourses (sutras), the (monastic) discipline, and the higher teachings (Abhidharma), all "84,000" sections of the Pali language canon. This sort of Dharma is everyone's common property.

As for practice and attainment, they're the individual property of those who do them.

The Dharma as the teachings: sutras/discourses.
For example, [one of the Buddha's four chief disciples, two of them nuns, two of them monks like] Ven. Moggallana's practice was his own practice. His attainment of the paths and fruitions leading to nirvana was his own attainment.

The same holds true for [the other chief male disciple] Ven. Sariputra and each of the noble disciples, all the way down to all of us practicing here [and now].

The practice and attainments of each person are that person's very own. It's like our own land and fields. They belong to us individually; they are not common property.

[Therefore, it is wise to take our common property and make it our own, take the Dharma (teaching) and make it our own. For our practice of it and attainment through it will be our own. Only then will we really benefit from what the Buddha made known.]

Sunday, February 10, 2019

The problem with beauty (sutra)

Samuel Beal (trans.) Dhammapada Verses and Their Origin Stories, "33. Advantageous Service" (SuttaCentral.net) edited by Dhr. Seven, Sayalay, Wisdom Quarterly
Beauty? It's only skin deep. But that's pretty deep when you're beautiful (D.M.I.).
.
What's the big deal? So what if I'm pretty?
Formerly the Buddha, along with his followers, having gone to the kingdom of Kosambī, took up residence in the monastic compound (vihara) called Mi-yin ("lovely sound"). There he preached the Dharma for the sake of [unseen] "shining ones" (devas) and humans.

At that time the king of the country was Udayana (Yau-tien), whose queen was of remarkably pure character. Having heard that the Buddha had come to his kingdom, the king and the queen, with her attendants, went to visit him. Having paid him the usual  respectful salutations, they sat down and the Buddha, for their sake, began to teach to show the impermanence, disappointment, and vanity of things, from which all our misery comes.

Then he illustrated how heavenly rebirths were the reward of merit (virtue) and hellish ones the result of demerit (unwholesome actions). In consequence of this discourse (sutra) both the king and queen came to accept the Five Precepts of a lay-disciple then returned to the palace.

Now at this time there was a certain Brahmin [caste man] named Kih-sing ("lucky star"), who had a daughter incomparable for beauty, just 16 years old. On her account the Brahmin, for 90 days, exposed a heap of 1,000 gold masurans and challenged anyone to find a single fault in her so that whoever could do so would get the gold. No one was able to, so desiring to find someone fit for her to marry, the Brahmin again challenged anyone to bring a man equal to his daughter in grace. To him he would give his daughter as a wife.

Now, having heard that the family of the shaman Gautama, known as the Shakyians [Scythians], were remarkable for their beauty and therefore fit to possess his daughter, he came to the place where the Buddha was staying. Taking his daughter with him, after the usual salutations, he said:

"My daughter is extremely beautiful, unequalled in womanly grace. You also, Gautama, are remarkable for your beauty. You may, therefore, have my daughter and make her your companion (wife).”

The Buddha's beauty
The beauty of a buddha is incomparable.
The Buddha replied: “Your daughter's beauty, sir, is according to your own estimation, whereas my beauty is according to that of the buddhas. My beauty and a woman's beauty are wholly different. Your daughter's loveliness, sir, is like that of the picture on the jar (vessel), in the middle of which there is only filth and excrement. How can that be considered as 'beauty' that belongs only to the eyes, the ears, the nose, the mouth, the body? It is this 'beauty' of external (outside) form that causes disappointment, overturns families, destroys kinship, sacrifices relationships, kills children. All of these come from this [love of] womanly beauty. But I am a shaman. I stand by myself and would rather endure any calamity than comply with your request. Sir, you may go. I decline your offer.”

Reaction
Shhh, what the old king doesn't know won't...
At this the Brahmin, who was very irate, departed. Then, coming into the presence of the king, he expanded on his daughter's beauty and offered her to the king. The king, very pleased at the 16-year-old's appearance, accepted her and made her his second queen.

He weighed her down with presents and jewelry. Nevertheless, his mind began to fill with jealous thoughts on account of the young beauty, and discontentment and dislike grew for his first queen.

This at last persuaded him to send for her on a certain occasion to indulge her fancy (knowing that she would not come). When the king sent for her, the first queen declined to appear on the grounds that she was engaged in some spiritual exercise (fasting) and so for several occasions.

The king, enraged by that, sent a man with a rope to drag her into his presence. When she was brought in, he took his bow and arrow and shot her through the body. But the arrow he discharged returned again towards the king and did her no harm. And so it happened again and again.

At this the king, filled with astonishment (awe and fear), said to her: “By what magic power have you been able to bring this about?”

She replied: “I have but taken guidance (sarana) in the Three Gems and the whole day have been engaged in spiritual observances (fasts), and on this account the World-Honored One [the Buddha] has protected me.”

At this the king exclaimed, “Wonderful!” Dismissing the beautiful, young second queen, he sent her back to her parents and re-established the first queen in undisputed authority. Then, with the queen's attendants, he went to see the Buddha and, after due salutations, he explained to him what had happened, at which the Buddha (after a short sutra) repeated these lines:
“If heaven were to rain down the seven precious items, yet the covetous person would not be satisfied. That person's pleasure would be little but the sorrow much. The wise person, possessed of virtue, although possessing the pleasures of heaven, would wisely let them go and not covet them. One who finds happiness in removing thoughts of lustful enjoyment, this person is the [real] disciple of the Buddha.”
Then the Buddha explained to the king the inevitable result of an unwholesome life: it would redound 10,000 times more miserably on the guilty person, while the reward of spiritual exertions and self-improvement [unselfishness] would certainly be the enjoyment of heaven.

Having spoken, the king and queen and their attendants realized perfect release (enlightenment) and became partakers of the Paths.

Monday, August 7, 2017

Five Contemplations (sutra)

Seth Auberon, Dhr. Seven, CC Liu (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly; based on original translation by Ven. Thanissaro (trans.) Upajjhatthana Sutra: Subjects for Contemplation (AN 5.57)

"There are five things [remembrances] one should reflect on frequently, whether one is a woman or a man, a layperson or ordained. What are the five?
  1. 'I am subject to aging, have not gone beyond (transcended) aging.' This is the first contemplation one should reflect on frequently, whether one is a woman or a man, layperson or ordained.
  2. 'I am subject to illness, have not gone beyond illness.' ...
  3. 'I am subject to death, have not gone beyond death.' ...
  4. 'I will grow different, separate from all that is dear and appealing to me.' ...
  5. 'I am the owner of my karma (actions), heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator [judge]. Whatever I do, for good or harm, to that will I fall heir.' ...
"These are the five contemplations one should reflect on frequently, whether one is a woman or a man, layperson or ordained.

1.
"Now, based on what line of reasoning should one frequently reflect... 'I am subject to aging, have not gone beyond aging'?

"There are beings who are intoxicated with youth. Because of intoxication with youth, they conduct themselves in an unprofitable (harmful, unskillful, unwholesome) way by body... speech... and mind. But when they frequently reflect, such intoxication with youth will either be entirely abandoned or begin to weaken...
 
2.
"Now, based on what line of reasoning should one frequently reflect... 'I am subject to illness, have not gone beyond illness'?

"There are beings who are intoxicated with health. Because of that intoxication, they conduct themselves in an unprofitable way by body... speech... and mind. But when they frequently reflect, such intoxication will either be entirely abandoned or begin to weaken...
 
3.
"Now, based on what line of reasoning should one frequently reflect... 'I am subject to death, have not gone beyond death'?

"There are beings who are intoxicated with life. Because of that intoxication, they conduct themselves in an unprofitable way by body... speech... and mind. But when they frequently reflect, such intoxication will either be entirely abandoned or begin to weaken...
 
4.
"Now, based on what line of reasoning should one frequently reflect... 'I will grow different, separate from all that is dear and appealing to me'?

"There are beings who feel desire and passion for things they find dear and appealing. Because of that passion, they conduct themselves in an unprofitable way by body... speech... and mind. But when they frequently reflect, that desire and passion for the things they find dear and appealing will either be entirely abandoned or begin to weaken...
 
5.
"Now, based on what line of reasoning should one frequently reflect... 'I am the owner of my (karma) actions, heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator.

"Whatever I do, for good or harm, to that will I fall heir'? There are beings who conduct themselves in an unprofitable way by body... speech... and mind. But when they frequently reflect, that conduct of body, speech, and mind will either be entirely abandoned or begin to weaken...
 
Further contemplation
1. "Now, a disciple of the noble ones considers this: 'I am not the only one subject to aging, who has not transcended (gone beyond) aging. To the extent that there are beings -- past and future, passing away and rearising (being reborn) -- all living beings are subject to aging, have not gone beyond aging.'

Path arises
2. "When one frequently reflects on this, the [factors of the] path arise. One sticks with the path, develops it, cultivates it. As one sticks with the path, develops it, and cultivates it, the fetters are abandoned, the obsessions destroyed.
 
"Further, a disciple of the noble ones considers this:
  • 3. 'I am not the only one subject to illness, who has not gone beyond illness.'...
  • 4. 'I am not the only one subject to death, who has not gone beyond death.'...
  • 5. 'I am not the only one who will grow different, separate from all that is dear and appealing to me.'...
"A disciple of the noble ones considers this: 'I am not the only one who is owner of my (karma) actions, heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator; who -- whatever I do, for good or harm, to that will I fall heir.

"To the extent that there are living beings -- past and future, passing away and rearising -- all beings are the owner of their (karma) actions, heir to their actions, born of their actions, related through their actions, and have their actions as their arbitrator. Whatever they do, for good or harm, to that will they fall heir.'

"When one frequently reflects on this, the [factors of the] path arise. One sticks with the path, develops it, cultivates it. As one sticks with the path, develops it, and cultivates it, the fetters are abandoned, the obsessions destroyed."

The Buddha
"Subject to birth, subject to aging, subject to death, uninstructed-ordinary people are repelled by those who suffer from that to which they are also subject.
"And if I were to be repelled by beings subject to these things, it would not be fitting for me, living as they do. As I maintained this attitude -- knowing the Dharma -- I overcame all intoxication with health, youth, and life as one who sees renunciation (letting go, detachment, non-clinging) as rest.

For me, energy arose, nirvana was clearly glimpsed. There is now no way I could delight in sensual pleasures. Having fulfilled the high life, I will not return [to the low, base].

Sunday, July 2, 2017

Sex and the Noble Eightfold PATH factors

Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Ashley Wells, Crystal Quintero (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly: Wiki edit
This is the Middle Way, the Path the Buddha, Sage of the Shakya Clan, showed.
THE NOBLE EIGHTFOLD PATH
This is the direct way to the end of all suffering once and for all:
  
What is the Path?
1. RIGHT VIEW (sammā-diṭṭhi) "right understanding" or "right comprehension," the grasping that our karma (actions) have consequences, that death is not the end, that our beliefs also have consequences after death (in the next and in many future lives), and that the Buddha followed and taught a successful path out of this world and out of the other world (blissful and miserable planes).

The Mahācattārīsaka Sutra (Pāli canon), describes the first seven practices as requisites of right samadhi, starting with right view. But actually all of the limbs are co-factors developed more or less simultaneously; they are mutually-supportive and culminate in the goal. They begin with right view:

"Of those, [mundane] right view is the forerunner...And what is the right view with defilements, meritorious, resulting in gains? 'There is [a result of] what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed [givto pren up]. There are fruits, and results of skillful and unskillful actions. There is this world and the other world[s]. There is mother and father [who are different for an individual in terms of the significance of karma, skillful and unskillful, towards them]. There are spontaneously reborn beings [without mother and father]; there are wandering-ascetics and Brahmins [temple priests] who , faring rightly and practicing rightly, proclaim this world and the other[s] after having directly known and realized them for themselves.' This is the right view with defilements, meritorious, resulting in gains..." 

2. RIGHT INTENTION (sammā sankappa) "right thought" or "right aspiration," the resolve to renounce the worldly life [let go internally though not necessarily externally] and dedicate oneself to a spiritual pursuit. "What is right intention? Being resolved on renunciation, on freedom from ill will, on harmlessness" (MN III.248).
Like right view, this factor has two levels. At the mundane level, the thought or intention includes non-harming (ahimsa) and refraining from ill will (avyabadha) toward any being, as this accrues karma and leads to a miserable rebirth. At the supramundane level, the factor of right intention includes a resolve to see things as they truly are, namely, as ultimately impermanent, suffering (disappointing), and impersonal (without self).... 

Even seen still not believed.
3. RIGHT SPEECH (sammā-vācā) in most Buddhist texts is presented as four things that a wise person would abstain from, such as is stated in the Pali canon thus:
"What is right speech? Abstaining from perjury, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, and from useless chatter: This is called 'right speech.' "
Instead of the usual "abstaining and refraining from wrong speech" terminology, a few discourses such as the Samaññaphala Sutra and Kevata Sutra in "The Collection of Lengthy Discourses" (Digha Nikaya) explain this virtue in an active sense, after stating it in the form of an abstention. For example, the Fruits of Recluseship Discourse (Samaññaphala Sutra) states that a part of a Buddhist monastic's virtue is that "one abstains from false speech [referring to perjury or bearing false witness].

One speaks the truth, holds to the truth, is firm, reliable, no deceiver of the world." Similarly, the virtue of abstaining from divisive speech is explained as delighting in creating concord. The virtue of abstaining from abusive speech is explained in this sutra as including affectionate and polite speech that is pleasing to most people. The virtue of abstaining from useless chatter is explained as speaking what is connected with the Dharma's goal of liberation.

In the "Fearless Young King Discourse" (Abhayarajakumara Sutra), the Buddha explains the virtue of right speech in different scenarios, based on its truth-value, utility-value, and emotional content. The Buddha or Wayfarer (Tathagata), states in the "Fearless Discourse" (Abhaya Sutra), never speaks anything that is unfactual or factual, untrue or true, disagreeable or agreeable, if it is unbeneficial and unconnected to the goals.miscond

Further, adds this discourse, the Buddha speaks the factual and the true, but -- in the event that it is disagreeable and unendearing -- only if it is beneficial to goals, but with a sense of proper timeliness.

Additionally, adds the Abhaya Sutra, the Buddha only speaks with a sense of proper timeliness even when what he speaks is the factual, the true, the agreeable, the endearing, and what is beneficial to goals.
 
The Buddha explains right speech in the Pali canon, according to Ganeri, as never speaking something that is not beneficial but only speaking what is true and beneficial, "when the circumstances are right, whether they are welcome or not."

4. RIGHT ACTION or KARMA (sammā-kammanta) is, like right speech, expressed as abstaining but in terms of bodily action. In the Pali canon, this path factor is stated as:
"What is right action? Abstaining from taking the lives of living beings, abstaining from taking what is not given, abstaining from taking sexual liberties. This is called right action."
First human depictions of the Buddha from Mes Aynak, Afghanistan
.
The injunction to preserve life (not killing) is a precept in Buddhist texts that applies to ALL living beings, explains Christopher Gowans, not just human beings. Bhikkhu Bodhi agrees, clarifying that the more accurate rendering of the Pali canon is an injunction on "taking the life of any sentient being," which includes human beings, animals, birds, insects, but excludes plants because they are not considered sentient beings [even if they are associated with devas that may inhabit them].

Furthermore, adds Ven. Bodhi, this precept refers to intentional deprivation of life, as well as any form of intentional harming or torturing of any sentient being. This moral or virtue in early Buddhist texts, both in the context of harming or killing of animals and human beings, is similar to the nonharming (ahimsa) precept found in texts of other dharmas, particularly Jainism and Hinduism, and it has been a subject of significant debate by various Buddhist traditions.
 
The injunction against stealing in the Pali canon is an abstention from intentionally taking what is not voluntarily offered by the person to whom that property belongs. This includes, explains Ven.  Bodhi, taking by stealth, by force, by fraud, or by deceit. Both the intention and the act matters, as this precept is grounded on the impact on one's karma.

Sex versus Sexual Misconduct


Wait, are we allowed to talk about sex?
The injunction against taking sexual liberties (sexual misconduct or kamesu micchacara) in the Noble Eightfold Path, explains Tilmann Vetter, refers to "not performing sexual acts [with the ten forbidden persons who are off limits]." This virtue is more generically explained in the Cunda Kammaraputta Sutra, which teaches that one must abstain from all sensual misconduct, including getting sexually involved with anyone who is under the protection of:
  1. mother
  2. father
  3. guardians
  4. siblings
  5. one's community
  6. spouse (a married person)
  7. betrothal or promise (garlanded) to another
  8. fiancee
  9. a convict [determined to be off limits by law]
  10. or by dharma [duty, social obligations, notions of right and wrong in society].
What do you think? - I don't know.
For Buddhist monastics [novices, Eight- and Ten-Precept trainees, and those intensively meditating on retreat], abstaining from sexual misconduct means complete celibacy, explains Christopher Gowans, while for ordinary lay Buddhists this means avoiding adultery [which is phrased as sexual contact with someone who is married as well as infidelity toward one's spouse] as well as other forms of sensual misconduct.
 
We're lay-Buddhists, right? - Yeah, lay, baby.
Later Buddhist texts, explains Ven. Bodhi, state that the injunction against sexual conduct for lay Buddhists includes any sexual involvement with someone married, a girl or woman protected by her parents or relatives, or someone prohibited by dharma conventions (such as relatives, nuns and others). 

5. RIGHT LIVELIHOOD (sammā-ājīva) is nonharming with regard to supporting oneself, a precept mentioned in many early Buddhist texts, such as the Mahācattārīsaka Sutra in "The Middle-Length Discourses" (Majjhima Nikaya) as follows:
"What is right livelihood? Right livelihood, I say, is of two sorts. There is right livelihood with defilements, meritorious, resulting in gains. There is right livelihood that is noble, free of defilements, transcendent, a factor of the Path.
"What is the right livelihood with defilements, meritorious, resulting in gains? There is the case where a follower of the noble ones [enlightened persons from stream-enterers to arhats] abandons 'wrong' livelihood and maintains life by right livelihood. This is the right livelihood with defilements, meritorious, resulting in gains.
"What is the right livelihood that is noble, free of defilements, transcendent, a factor of the Path? The abstaining, abandoning, abstinence, and avoidance of wrong livelihood in one developing the noble path whose mind is noble, whose mind is without defilements, who is fully possessed of the noble Path."...
The early canonical texts state right livelihood as avoiding and abstaining from wrong livelihood, but this shorthand formulation appeared to early English and European translators as tautological (completely obvious and redundant). This virtue is further explained in Buddhist texts, explains Vetter, as "living from [alms gathering], but not accepting everything and not possessing more than is strictly necessary."

For lay Buddhists, explains Harvey, this precept means that one 's livelihood avoid causing suffering to any sentient beings by cheating them or harming or killing them in any way.
 
The "Numerical Discourses" (Anguttara Nikaya III.208), explains Harvey, asserts that right livelihood means not trading in weapons, living beings [slavery, prostitution, human trafficking], meat [slaughtering or raising for slaughter], alcoholic drinks, or poisons.

The same text (AN V.177) asserts that this applies to lay Buddhists. This has meant, explains Harvey, that raising and trading cattle livestock for slaughter is a breach of the "right livelihood" precept in the Buddhist tradition, and Buddhist countries steer clear of the mass slaughter houses [abattoirs] found in Western countries.

We can all meditate like monastics -- with knowledge, practice, and persistence.
.
6. RIGHT EFFORT (sammā-vāyāma) is presented as consisting of four parts in the Pali canon, such as the "Exposition on Truth Discourse" (Sacca-vibhanga Sutra) as follows:
"What is right effort? Here the monastic [meditator] arouses will, puts forth effort, generates energy, exerts mind, and strives to prevent the arising of unskillful and unwholesome mental states that have not yet arisen.
"One arouses will...and strives to eliminate unskillful and unwholesome mental states that have already arisen. One arouses will...and strives to generate wholesome mental states that have not yet arisen.
"One arouses will, puts forth effort, generates energy, exerts mind, and strives to maintain wholesome mental states that have arisen, to keep them free of delusion, to develop, increase, cultivate, and perfect them. This is called 'right' effort."
Unwholesome (akusala) states are described in Buddhist texts as relating to thoughts, emotions, intentions, particularly the Five Hindrances (panca nivarana)
  1. sensual craving
  2. ill will of any kind
  3. restlessness
  4. drowsiness-sluggishness
  5. skeptical doubts about the path.
Only persistence pays off on the Path.
Of these, Buddhist tradition considers thoughts of sensual craving and ill will (attraction and aversion, greed and hatred) as needing more right effort.

Sensual craving to be eliminated by right effort includes anything related to pleasing and attractive sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and touch. Ill will (hate) to be eliminated by right effort includes all forms of aversion including hatred, anger, resentment towards anything or anyone. 

7. RIGHT MINDFULNESS (sammā-sati) in the "Exposition of Truth" (Sacca-vibhanga Sutra) is explained as follows:
"What is right mindfulness? Here the meditator remains contemplating [being mindful of rather than thinking about] the body in the body, resolute, aware, and mindful, having set aside worldly desire and dejection; one remains contemplating feelings in feelings; one remains contemplating mental states in mental states (dhammas, dharmas, phenomena related to the Five Aggregates of Clinging]; one remains contemplating mental objects [enumerated in the sutra] in mental objects, resolute, aware, and mindful, having set aside worldly desire and dejection. This is called 'right' mindfulness."
This factor in the Noble Eightfold Path helps the meditator/monastic to guard the mind/heart rather than (as was common before meditation) endlessly craving and clinging to any transitory state or thing, by complete and constant awareness of phenomena (dhammas, khandha, skandhas) as ultimately
  1. impermanent,
  2. disappointing, and
  3. impersonal (not-self).
The most detailed discussion of the right mindfulness in the Pali canon is in the "Setting Up of the Four Foundations of Mindfulness Discourse" (Satipatthana Sutra), where the emphasis is to consider the four subjects of contemplation -- body, feelings (pleasant, painful, and neutral sensations), mind, and phenomena -- as just that and nothing more rather than reflexively ascribing to them any substantiality or "eternal self."

According to Theravada Buddhism, these "four contemplations" through the systematic setting up and practice of right mindfulness lead to liberating insight into the Three Marks or Characteristics of Existence: (1) impermanence (anicca), (2) unsatisfactoriness (dukkha), and (3) not-self (anatta). And they cover the Five Aggregates clung to (the skandhas, groups, or heaps we commonly cling to as "self" and a separate "ego," "identity," "soul," "personality," "I," "me"). 

Ah, I finally see! The Buddha was right!
8. RIGHT CONCENTRATION (sammā-samādhi) or "right coherence of mind" or "right meditative absorption" (attention, consciousness, heart, awareness). Samadhi is a practice in Dharmic religions of India [and the preceding Ancient Indus Valley Civilization]. Although often translated as "concentration," as in the limiting of mental attention to one object, it reall refers to the clearness, coherence, and heightened awareness of mind that appears through prersistent and prolonged practice of dhyana (Pali jhana, "absorption").

The term samadhi derives from the root sam-a-dha, which means "to collect all together" or "bring into coherent functioning," so it is often translated as "collectedness" or "unification of mind."

In early Buddhist texts, samadhi is also associated with the term samatha (serenity, tranquility, calm abiding). In the sutras, samadhi is defined as "one-pointedness of mind" (cittass'ekaggatā).

The famous commentator and scholar-monk Buddhagosa defines samadhi as "the centering of consciousness [cittas] and consciousness-concomitants [cetasikas] evenly and rightly on a single object...the state in virtue of which consciousness and its concomitants remain evenly and rightly on a single object, undistracted and unscattered."

Neither the Four Noble Truths nor the Noble Eightfold Path discourse, explains Johannes Bronkhorst, provide details of right samadhi. The explanation is to be found in the canonical texts of Buddhism, [in the many commentaries, the tika, and subcommentaries, particularly the "Higher Teachings"/Abhidharma, in several sutras, such as the following from the "Exposition on Truth Discourse" Saccavibhanga Sutra:
"What is right concentration? [i] Here, the monastic, detached from sensual craving, detached from unwholesome states, enters and remains in the first absorption (jhana, level of coherence/concentration, Sanskrit dhyāna), in which there is applied and sustained attention, together with joy and pleasure born of detachment;
[ii] And through the subsiding of applied and sustained attention, with the gaining of inner stillness and one-pointedness of mind, one enters and remains in the second absorption, which is free of applied and sustained attention, but in which there are [still] joy and pleasure born of concentration;
[iii] And through the subsiding of joy, one remains equanimous, mindful and aware, and one experiences in the body the pleasure of which the noble ones [enlightened persons] say: "equanimous, mindful, and dwelling in pleasure [is the person who attains the state" and thus one enters and remains in the third absorption;
[iv] And through the transcending of pleasure and pain, and through the previous disappearance of gladness and sadness [elation and dejection], one enters and remains in the fourth absorption, which is beyond pleasure and pain, and in which there is pure equanimity and mindfulness. This is called right concentration."
Shakya Land, the Buddha's home, the Middle Country, was present-day Afghanistan.
.
According to Bhikkhu Bodhi, the Noble Eightfold Path factor of right concentration is reaching a one-pointedness of mind and unifying all mental factors [so it it called better translated as "coherence" than the commonly misunderstood and misleading term "concentration"], but it is not the same as "a gourmet sitting down to a meal or a soldier on the battlefield" who also experience one-pointed ["wrong"] concentration.

The difference is that the latter have a one-pointed object in focus with complete awareness directed to that object -- the meal or the target, respectively.

Thank you, Buddha.
In contrast, "right" concentration -- according to Wisdom Quarterly -- refers to the meditative factor on the Buddhist Path, a state of heightened awareness [mental expansion] with a good (wholesome, beneficial) object or subject (such as the breath, a person toward whom one is cultivating loving-kindness/metta, or any of the 40 commonly assigned meditation subjects, and ultimately onto the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (satipatthana) that lead to insight (vipassana), direct realization/knowing, enlightenment (bodhi), and glimpsing/experiencing nirvana (nirodha). More

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Sutra: Five Helpers to Right View

Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly based on translation by Ven. Nyanaponika and Bhikkhu Bodhi (Numerical Discourses of the Buddha, AN V, 25) UPDATED
The Buddha explained: Right view, O meditators, if it is helped by five things, has liberation of mind/heart as its fruit and is rewarded by the fruit of liberation of mind/heart. It has liberation by wisdom as its fruit and is rewarded by the fruit of liberation by wisdom. What are those five things? Here, meditators, right view is helped by:
  1. wide learning (suta-mayā-paññā)
  2. discussion (of what is learned)
EXPLANATION
Knowing-and-seeing (Sharon Cummings)
“Liberation of mind” (ceto-vimutti) means the concentration present at the attainment of the noble paths and fruitions -- that is, at the time of the first three stages of enlightenment.

“Liberation by wisdom” (paññā-vimutti) is the liberating-insight (release) pertaining to the fourth fruition, namely, arhatship.

An arhat may be said to be an accomplished disciple or savaka-buddha ("enlightened hearer"), one who has gained full enlightenment (as distinguished from pacceka-buddhas and sammasambodhi-buddhas).

This fivefold help to right view is compared to the growing of a mango tree in the ancient Commentary (the Anguttara Atthakatha) to this text:
  • Right view is like the mango seed.
  • The other supporting factors are like measures taken to ensure the growth of the tree.
  • And the two liberations are like the fruits.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Sacred Robe Offering: Kathina 2012 (video)

Ven. Karunananda, Ph.D., Ven. Bibekananda, Dharmachari Seven, Wisdom Quarterly
The Buddha under the Bodhi tree, Dharma Vijaya Buddhist Monastery, Crenshaw Bl. (WQ)
The sacred saffron kathina robe, Dharma Vijaya Buddhist Vihara, Los Angeles, California, 2011 (Wisdom Quarterly).
   
The offering (dana) of the sacred robe is an annual event, traditionally held in October. It marks the end of the three-month Rains Retreat or Vas. During this time Buddhist nuns and monks retire to their hermitages to engage in intensive meditation, study, teaching, and other practices for rapid spiritual advancement.

Buddhist History
One one occasion, in ancient India, monks took up residence practicing sane-austerities for the rainy season. At the end of their seclusion, they set out to visit the Buddha, who was residing in distant Savatthi.

Their travel was arduous. At times, they had to endure inclement weather. At the end of their long journey, one of the monks was soaking wet as he approached.

Seeing him, the Buddha requested monastics to accept additional robes for their hardship. One robe in particular, the special kathina robe, was to go to a monastic who had successfully completed the rigors of the Rains Retreat. (At this time those in robes are not allowed to travel or venture from the nunnery/monastery for overnight trips; instead they stay in one place and meditate in a loosely cloistered setting).
  
Thereafter Buddhist devotees have provided hermitages with a specially made robe, which is awarded to the one who has most successfully completed the Rains Retreat.

This robe is revered as the most important for a monastic to receive AND the most meritorious for a devotee to give.

Whereas the monastic who receives the robe gains five mundane benefits, the donor of the robe accrues a tremendous amount of merit (anisangsa, punya). The Pali word for the robe is kathina, Bengali kathin.
  
It means hard [to come by], firm, steadfast -- indicating the greatness of the merit, which is difficult to obtain and is a firm and reliable source of spiritual as well as material benefit unshakable in the face of minor bad karma.

Traditionally, devoted Buddhists undertake to strictly observe moral and ethical precepts during the period of the retreat culminating in the sacred ceremony. However, even the simple act of participating (attending in approval of this gift) they are able to share in the remarkable merit of this special gift-giving.
  • California Bodhi Vihara will celebrate the Sacred Robe Offering Ceremony today, Nov. 3, 2012 in Long Beach. Moreover, various Theravada temples throughout Los Angeles and the country are holding this ceremony as they end their Rains Retreat observance. (Contact local temples for dates).
Why?
Buddha, Lahore Museum (tribune.com.pk)
What would make the offering of this robe so meritorious? If the monastics were to practice sincerely, practice diligently and mindfully in accordance with the Dharma, some would be sure to gain mundane and supramundane attainments, such as the Eight Meditative Absorptions (jhanas) and the Eight Path-and-Fruition consciousnesses. These latter attainments are the penetrating insights that lead to enlightenment by stages from stream-entry to full realization. Giving to someone who has attained any of these is extremely meritorious, each more rare and powerful than the previous one. There is great merit in giving to anyone who emerges from the first absorption. But the merit of giving to one who has gain full enlightenment is uncountable, off the scale, so precious as to be considered beyond reckoning.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

The Five Hindrances (definition)

The Five Hindrances (nivarana) are obstacles to the mind. They blind our mental vision. In the presence of them, we cannot reach Neighborhood-Concentra-tion (upacara-samadhi), Full- Concentration (appana-sama-dhi), or clearly discern the truth.
.
They are:
  1. Sensuous Desire (kamacchanda)
  2. Ill-will (vyapada)
  3. Sloth and Torpor (thina-middha)
  4. Restlessness and Scruples (uddhacca-kukkucca)
  5. Sceptical Doubt (vicikiccha)
In the beautiful similes in A.V. 193,

  • Sensuous Desire is like water mixed with manifold colors;
  • Ill-will with boiling water;
  • Torpor with water covered by mosses;
  • Restlessness with agitated water whipped by wind;
  • Sceptical Doubt with turbid and muddy water.

Just as in such water one cannot perceive one's own reflection, so in the presence of these Five mental Hindrances, one cannot clearly discern one's own benefit, nor that of others, nor of both.

Regarding the temporary suspension of the Five Hindrances on entering the first absorption [jhana], the stereotype sutra text (e.g., A. IX. 40) runs as follows:

"One has cast away Sensuous Desire; one dwells with a heart free from sensuous desire; from desire one cleanses one's heart.

"One has cast away Ill-will; one dwells with a heart free from ill-will, cherishing love and compassion toward all living beings, one cleanses one's heart from ill-will.

"One has cast away Sloth and Torpor; one dwells free from sloth and torpor; loving the light, with watchful mind, with clear consciousness, one cleanses one's mind from sloth and torpor.
"One has cast away Restlessness and Scruples; dwelling with mind undisturbed, with heart full of peace, one cleanses one's mind from restlessness and scruples.

"One has cast away Sceptical Doubt; dwelling free from doubt, full of confidence in the good, one cleanses one's heart from doubt.

"One has put aside these Five Hindrances and come to know these paralyzing defilements of the mind. And far from sensual impressions, far from unwholesome things, one enters into the first absorption [jhana], and so on."

The overcoming of these Five Hindrances by the absorptions [jhanas] is, as already pointed out, a merely temporary suspension, called "Overcoming through Repression" (vikkhambhana-pahand).

They disappear forever on entering the Four Supermundane Paths (ariya-puggala): That is,

  • Sceptical Doubt disappears forever upon reaching Stream-entry;
  • Sensuous Desire, Ill-will and Mental Worry on reaching Non-returning;
  • Sloth, Torpor, and Restlessness on reaching full enlightenment (Arahatship).

—For the origination and overcoming of the Five Hindrances, see A. I, 2; VI, 21; S. XLVI, 51. See also The Five Mental Hindrances by Ven. Nyanaponika (BPS, Wheel 26).