Showing posts with label vishnu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vishnu. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

I've had it with God, Krishna and Jesus

(Life of BeerBiceps) How Lord Krishna and Jesus Christ are related: Sindu/Hinduism+Christianity

A Hindu's Crisis of Faith
  • NEW: (Neo Dharmism) I stopped feeling God's presence — Hinduism had an answer I didn't expect
  • Great Lord Krishna of Hinduism
    Hindu Lord Vishnu (the Preserver), Narayana, Hari, the Supreme god of Vaishnavism. [This is a beautiful avatar so much so that the Buddha, the Christ, and the dark Lord Krishna (whose name means "black" Kānha, Sanskrit कान्हा, "The dark-complexioned beloved one" 108 Names of Shri Krishna) are said to be avatars and incarnations or emanations of this god. Of course, in the case of the historical Buddha, this can't be quite right. It is a beautiful sentiment, indeed, but the Buddha is not reborn here or elsewhere, is not a "god," and rises beyond the gods.
  • Radha and Krishna=Jesus and Mary
    As for a historical Jesus, maybe, but surely most Christians (or perhaps they should more rightly be labelled Jesuits or Jesevites) would not like to think that their all-powerful, supreme controller, creator of the entire universe were an avatar of a neighboring faith, in spite of the fact that Jesus practiced Hinduism to some extent or was exposed to it in his 18 years of travel in Tibet and India (Nicolas Notovitch). However, the title avatar may well apply to Lord Krishna, the central object of veneration and faith in popular Hinduism today, sometimes rivaling Lord Shiva and the great Goddesses Lakshmi, Sarawati, Parvati, Kali, Ma Durga, and his consort Radha.]
  • Ishtadeva or Ishtadevata (Sanskrit इष्ट देव(ता), iṣṭa-deva(tā), literally the "cherished divinity" from iṣṭa, "personal, liked, preferred, cherished" and devatā, "deity, divinity, godhead, tutelary deity" or deva, "deity"), is a term used in Hinduism denoting a worshipper's favorite deity [1, 2] or favorite form of the deity if approached from a monotheistic or henotheistic point of view. More
Could a Hindu godman restore faith?
Three religions, one teaching?

Are nuns 2nd-class citizens in Buddhism?
(Natasha Yehenara) Are Buddhist nuns, who are forced to accept the garudhammas or "Eight Additional Rules," second-class citizens?

Ayya Tathaaloka (Alliance for Bhikkhunis)
[They sure have been treated as such by sexist and patriarchal monks trying to enhance and preserve their worldly power as abuse-prone clergyman. But these additional rules are NOT historical, as revealed by the scholarship of Ayya Tathālokā Bhikkhunī of California looking into the Theravada Bhikkhuni Vinaya, were not laid down or approved by the Buddha, and have been shown to be later additions. For instance, on one occasion, the Buddha's mother, the first Buddhist nun in history, comes to the Buddha seeking clarification on some matter or other, which would never have happened IF such additional rules had been laid down by him. The fact that she asks what she does, as documented in a vinaya backstory preserved among the ancient Buddhist texts, proves the Buddha didn't do it. And the fact that monks at later Buddhist councils added such sexist and oppressive stipulations is tantamount to crimes against humanity and the Sangha, maybe even a "defeat" (parajika) offense of a schism between monk and nun communities. Wisdom Quarterly stands firmly on the side of nuns, Natasha, and all future female-embodied persons (because we can all be reborn any gender whether we like it or not) seeking enlightenment and liberation. We have covered this topic many times in the past.]

Saturday, October 4, 2025

Hindu Ramayana in Buddhist Thailand



The Ramayana (Sanskrit रामायणम्, Romanized Rāmāyaṇam [3]), also known as Valmiki Ramayana, as traditionally attributed to Valmiki, is a smriti text (Sanskrit epic) from ancient proto-India (Bharata), one of the two important epics of modern Hinduism known as the Itihasas, the other being the Mahabharata [4], the story of "Great Bharata." The epic narrates the life of the god Rama, the seventh avatar of the [extraterrestrial] Hindu deity Vishnu, who is a prince of Ayodhya in the Kingdom of Kosala. The epic follows his 14-year exile
  • to the forest urged by his father King Dasharatha, on the request of Rama's stepmother Kaikeyi;
  • his travels across the forests on the Indian subcontinent with his wife Sita and brother Lakshmana;
  • the kidnapping of Sita by Ravana, the king of [Sri] Lanka, which resulted in a bloodbath; and
  • Rama's eventual return to Ayodhya along with Sita to be crowned as a king amidst jubilation and celebration. More
  • Angkor Wat: Buddhist/Vedic (Hindu) fusion temple
  • WION; Amber Larson, CC Liu (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, August 4, 2025

Jesus never existed, a literary invention



Five forgotten incarnations of Christ (Osiris, Krishna, [Vishnu], Zarathustra, Sophia)
and our own potential for Cosmic or Christ Consciousness as understood by Gnostics
Cosmic Consciousness
Cosmic Consciousness
A Study in the Evolution of the Human Mind is an attempted scientific study of illuminated individuals. Author Richard Maurice Bucke provides three dozen very consistent examples of "cosmic consciousness." Some of these are the usual suspects, and others are contemporary case-histories which Bucke collected. He proposed that these enlightened figures are evolutionary jumps, the predecessor of a more advanced species. 
(Internet Archive)
Historical figure versus divine fantasy
Church exaggerated me into God
There's another distinction, the small and nearly insignificant historical figure (Jesus the Nazarene of Bethlehem) used as the core of a lot of ancient mythology and astrotheology, which Dr. Reza Aslan calls the fantasy version or "Jesus Christ." It is easy to take a questionable person, like William Shakespeare, and make a superman out of him until one wonders if there ever was a root figure to begin with, one stripped of all the additional mythology grafted onto him.

I'm a professional academic Bible scholar
Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth
 is a historical account of the life of a possible person, Jesus, that analyzes religious perspectives on the figure and the creation of Christianity. Prof. of Religion Aslan, Ph.D., argues that Jesus was a political rebel and eschatological ("end times") Jew, whose proclamation of the "coming kingdom of God" [not the genocidal figure in the Old Testament Bible but rather the Gnostic real God] was a call for regime change, for ending Roman Empire hegemony over Judea and the corrupt and oppressive aristocratic Jewish priesthood. The New York Times bestseller has been optioned by Lionsgate and producer David Heyman with a script co-written by Aslan and screenwriter James Schamus. More

For those who cling, there's this Jesus
When "demons" put fear in a cowardly warrior

Friday, March 7, 2025

Bible scholar: Jesus was vegetarian

What proof is there for this claim? Everyone knows J was a killer, or was he? (jesusveg.com)

Why I know Jesus was vegetarian (vegan)

(James Tabor) In this interview with Derek Lambert, host of ‪the Myth Vision Podcast, [Prof. Tabor] presents arguments, almost never explored (other than by Keith Akers and just a few others), that Jesus and his followers followed a vegetarian (vegan) diet and did not eat any living creature -- not even fish.

WATCH NOW at christspiracy.com

What's Lent got to do with it? We're Protestant
I realize there are a very few passages in the New Testament gospels -- three in total -- that imply otherwise, but they are late and do not stand any test of authenticity.
  • Q: What the difference between a vegetarian and a vegan? A: Neither word comes from the English word vegetable but rather from the Latin vegetus — "whole, sound, fresh, lively." A vegetarian eats no creatures but may eat creature products like dairy, whereas a vegan is purely plant-based, avoiding animal products and byproducts (many of which are hidden ingredients in common foods and products), often also avoiding leather and cruelty to animals of all kinds.
It is generally acknowledged that his cousin John the Baptizer -- as well as his [twin] brother James, who grew up in his household, never ate meat. But Jesus is made an exception by many.

In Eden, things were wonderful.
Jesus was in fact very much a "Back to Eden" figure who always emphasized, within the varieties of Judaism of his day, "from the beginning it has not been so."

Over the years I have noticed that people get very emotionally involved in dietary questions, every bit as much as the proverbial forbidden topics "religion and politics," as around the table discussions.

I hope folks [Christians] will objectively consider the undeniable evidence.
What kind of Bible "scholar" is this?
Do not make of thy body a blood-soaked "cemetery" by eating the corpses of the dead.
.
About Dr. Tabor (jamestabor.com)
ABOUT: Dr. James Daniel Tabor, Ph.D. (jamestabor.com) is the founder and director of the Original Bible Project, a non-profit organization aiming to produce a new and reordered translation of the Bible in English. He is a retired professor of Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where he taught from 1989–2022 and where he was chair of the department from 2004–2014. He previously held positions at Ambassador College (1968–1970, while a student at Pepperdine University), the University of Notre Dame (1979–1985), and the College of William and Mary (1985–1989). More

Sunday, November 24, 2024

Pilgrimage to Himalayan Hindu temple



Is Kedarnath the most mysterious Hindu pilgrimage site?

(Celestial Stories) Nov. 23, 2024: Is Kedarnath the greatest pilgrimage (yatra) destination? No, that would probably be Enlightenment Grove or Boudhanath or the whole Buddhist Circuit in India and Nepal (on the Great Nirvana Express).

But mysteries are wrapped in devotion: Nestled in the majestic Himalayan mountains, Kedarnath is not just a temple — it’s a realm where devotion meets the unexplained.

Revered as one of the holiest shrines dedicated to the Hindu great-god Shiva, "the Destroyer," this ancient temple has stood the test of time, guarding secrets that remain unsolved to this day.

From miraculous survival against nature’s seismic fury to the legends steeped in mythology, Kedarnath is a sacred site shrouded in mystery. Join a journey to uncover its spiritual significance, untold stories, and the divine aura that make Kedarnath a place where faith and enigma are intertwined.

Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/celestialstories 🌟 Welcome to Celestial Stories 🌟 Explore the mysteries of Hinduism, ancient civilizations, and spiritual wisdom. 🕉️✨ Dive into stories of Dwarka, Lord Krishna, and more! 🏙️🙏 🔔 Subscribe for a journey through mythology, archeology, and timeless teachings. 🌌💫

Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. We deeply respect the rights of all content creators and honorable ownership of intellectual property. If you believe your work has been used without proper acknowledgment, please contact us, and we will take appropriate action to address the matter. TAGS: #CelestialStories #Hinduism #AncientIndia #SanatanDharma #Dwarka #SpiritualJourney #Mythology #indianhistory #Kedarnath #LordShiva #Himalayas #SpiritualJourney #SacredPlaces #HinduTemple #IndianTemples #pilgrimagetomecca kedarnath, kedarnath yatra

Friday, July 12, 2024

9th avatar of Vishnu, Jesus or Buddha?

What the cartoonist (Dan Piraro) doesn't realize is that the Buddha did set down such a rule.

Great teachers of world's religions (Where's Mo?)
Christianity (particularly imperialist universalist Catholicism and hegemonical American Protestant Evangelism) is closer to Hinduism than Buddhism is, for all of their apparent similarities. The historical Buddha did not teach what Jesus or Krishna (avatars of a God like Vishnu), Brahma or Shiva taught.

All of these, we are told promoted devotional practices as the best that could be done by most humans during the Dark Age or Kali Yuga. Hinduism, to be more popular and tolerant, accepts other religions enough to swallow them and call them part of its own Eternal Teaching or Sanatan Dharma.

Hindu holy man, sadhu, sannyasin, ganja smoker
If Brahmin priests could not rid themselves of pesky wandering ascetic or shramanic traditions like Buddhism and Jainism, it simply dealt with them by incorporating them into its own structure and pantheon just as it did the ancient Vedas ("Knowledge Books") of proto-India and the Indus Valley Civilization, extending Hinduism (which was systematized and established by Adi Shankara a few centuries ago by coordinating and getting major points of agreement for many and diverse "religions" around the Indus River, thus resulting in the name of one conglomerate religion of Indus-ism where previously people did not live with the modern idea of being in a "religion" or doing anything more than practicing spiritual things as part and parcel of daily life).
Tribal Jewish God in a polytheistic world
The British imposed the idea that one must name "spiritual" practices and/or superstitions and beliefs a "religion" and that those practicing in accordance or adhering to such beliefs must be "members" of that religion. The ancients in India, proto-India, Egypt, and elsewhere simply did not have this belief but simply went along when told by the dominant and oppressive colonizing culture. One has to imagine that pre-Christian pagans in Europe did not think they had a "religion" but were just living their cultural life and holding popular beliefs about how the world (with its spirits and mysteries) works.

Amitabha Cosmic Buddha
While Early Buddhism, just like Jainism, rejected the Vedas and gods as ultimate sources of wisdom or liberation, later (Mahayana) Buddhism was co-opted by the Brahmin priests and turned into a kind of Hinduism by other names. While there are certainly many devotional practices in modern Theravada Buddhism, a back-to-basics movement to preserve the historical Buddha's Teachings, many Mahayana traditions and practices went overboard to devote themselves to anyone but the historical Buddha.

Kwan Yin (female Avalokiteshvara)
That Buddha is respected but then quickly disregarded, forgotten, or shunned for "better" Mahayana Buddhist figures like the Cosmic Buddhas Amitabha (and His promise of praying to Him to be reborn in His heavenly Western Paradise, the Pure Land, where one can make efforts to reach enlightenment and liberation without bothering to do anything toward that here other than praying and devoting oneself to Him here and now) and Vairocana, or the ever-popular Virgin Mary figure Kwan Yin (Guanyin, Kwannon, Chenrézik, or Avalokiteshvara, the Goddess of Compassion, who like many other Mahayana figures is actually a bodhisattva, a person striving for Buddhahood, not a buddha at all) and Kṣitigarbha, who saves beings from the hells, which they fall into on account of their own deeds and views.

Pals Jesus, Budai, and Krishna with a cow
This devotional bent of Mahayana Buddhism has gotten so severe that who "the Buddha" is is often blurred, with most of the world mistaking him for the Mahayana figure Budai/Putai/Hotei the "Fat Happy Bodhisattva," the obese guy revered in Chinese restaurants around the world. Moreover, a distinction at one point had to be made between what Western elucidator of Buddhism Alan Watts points out in the Japanese Buddhist terms jiriki versus tariki -- enlightenment by one's own efforts or by outside help.
  • Jiriki (自力, "one's own strength" [1]) is the Japanese Buddhist term for "self-power," the ability to achieve enlightenment and liberation (in other words, to reach bodhi and nirvana) through one's own efforts, whereas tariki (他力, "other power," "outside help") is the belief that it cannot be done on one's own. These two terms in Japanese Buddhist schools classify how one becomes spiritually awakened [2]. The first is commonly practiced in Zen Buddhism, whereas the much more popular Pure Land Buddhism refers to the power of Amitābha Buddha to "save" beings who merely have faith, believe, and worship an outside force like the mythological Amitabha [3].
Does Christianity teach Christians and Catholics that they can save themselves, awaken themselves, enlighten themselves, or even get into heaven (which is viewed as final salvation) by their own efforts? Certainly not. Most modern Christian schools teach that it is ONLY by "grace" (God's underserved gift or His whimsical feeling like it) and never by "works" (one's own efforts) that anyone can be saved.

All three religions (Buddhism, Christianity, and Hinduism) believe in karma (the power of deeds to bring about a result, but Christians insist everything is either God's will or not and nothing we can do can change that, other than perhaps groveling, begging, bargaining, self-abnegation, and absolute devotion and throwing ourselves on His mercy can save us.

For Christians killing isn't so bad compared to not loving the God enough because that God can erase that karmic debt and sin, wipe it away in an instant of devotion, obedience, adherence, and voluntary slavery, whereas not killing in the first, who cares? That's not a big deal to most Christians or apologists. Of course, Hinduism now talks about karma a lot, but it is said that the Buddha was the first sage to go around telling ordinary people about the importance of their deeds.

Up until then it was more or less a secret among Brahmin priests and preservers of the Vedas, who were not keen on telling anyone other than Brahmins. The Buddha, who was regarded as a Karmavadin (Teacher of the efficacy of actions) not as a Buddhist (which came later with the Western idea that things have to be a "religion"), went around telling everyone, emphasizing karma to everyone as a principle, a fixed law, an orderliness to the universe we live in, be it a simulation or a real place.

One has to eventually put forward the endeavor and effort to awaken oneself; it simply cannot be "given" or gained by devotion. It does not belong to anyone to give, not even "God," who Himself, Herself, Itself is not enlightened nor liberated but rapt in this samsara.


So while it is beautiful that we can all be Hindus now, all go back to a time when there was just one universal religion everyone had to follow, a worldwide belief system with an all-attractive cult figure like Krishna, Christ, Thor, Zeus, Sophia, Aphrodite, Brahma, Mithras, Ahura Mazda, Allah (or His Prophet), the Great Spaghetti Monster, Odin, or countless other astrotheological figures, Buddhism does not need the Buddha to be an "incarnation of Vishnu."
  • The great thing is, of course, that "Hinduism" is not really a religion even now when it is treated like one because it has always meant a collection of disparate views, practices, belief, and preferred central gods (one choice in picking any incarnation of an essential Brahman, or "reality behind all illusion") presenting itself as an avatar or aspect of the One True God(hood). The yogis have their way, as do the Shaivites and Vaishnavites, agnostics, atheists, Kali worshippers, devotees of the Goddess Saraswati, Ma Durga, Radha (Krishna's partner), Krishna, or 100,000 others.
In fact, it is insulting as it shows a severe lack of understanding by Brahmins and Hindus that such things could even happen. A buddha is an arhat (fully enlightened being), who therefore by that supreme enlightenment is never again reborn, does not incarnate, does not reappear or rearise. Of course, there will be other buddhas, like Mahayana Buddhism's second favorite buddha of all time, the Buddha-to-come, the Future Buddha, Maitreya.

But that being will not be the last one (Siddhartha Gautama Buddha) coming again. It will be a new one, just as there have been ones in the ancient past and in the distant future. It is never the same being returning to teach beings how to make an end of all suffering and all rebirth after realizing the too-subtle unique teachings of Dependent Origination and anatta (the impersonal nature of all existence) or egolessness.

The Lord's Prayer (Medieval English)
  • Text by Dhr. Seven, Ashley Wells, Pat Macpherson, Wisdom Quarterly

Sunday, March 24, 2024

Forgiveness in Buddhism: Why should I?

But I can't forgive, Buddha, I just can't! Do you think I should pay Vishen $299 to be able to?
.
Did the Buddha teach forgiveness?

Anger seems good but feels terrible.
My Catholic mother once asked me, "Does Buddha recommended forgiveness the way Jesus Christ [Saint Issa] did?

I was stymied. I couldn't think of that as an emphasis or exact teaching, but I assured her the Dharma, as the Noble Eightfold Path, was suffused with such ideas.

I asked a monk, and he immediately said, "Yes." I said, "What do we call it, what's the word for it?"

Who's that under that tree?
"Khanti," he answered, "is the Pali word, long suffering patience and forbearance," pointing out that it is one of the Ten Perfections (pāramīs).

Those ten are what made the wandering ascetic Siddhartha the Buddha, the "Awakened One."

There's also a popular Buddhist saying in this regard:

"Forbearance is the highest virtue."

Ven. Khantipalo (Laurence Mills) had khanti
When I told my mom there was a specific teaching of forgiveness, she asked, "Oh, where do you suppose Buddha learned that?" implying that Buddhism borrowed the idea from Christianity (or Yazooism).

"Oh, I don't know, Mom, given that the Buddha was born and taught at least 500 years before God ever even thought of begetting Himself as Son." That shut that line of inquiry down. I followed up, "Mom, do you suppose God made the Buddha?"

Truth will out, like sun and moon.
"Well...."

"Didn't He make everything and everyone -- the Devil, evil, Mohammed, rebellious Jews, and atheists? And didn't you once say, 'God don't make no junk'?"

"That's just a saying to make kids feel better about themselves."

"Sure it is, Mom, sure it is."


It is the advice of three of India's Dharmic religions to be like the sandalwood tree, who when felled by the lumberjack's axe does what to that lumberjack and that axe? It sprinkles them with perfume.

I forgive you. - Me, too. - I feel much better.
Either way, the Buddha told us where he got his Teaching, his Dharma, this Doctrine-and-Discipline we follow in his footsteps, where he everything he taught from: He realized it as a natural law, a fixity, an impersonal orderliness of the universe he called karma-vipaka or "action and its results." (We always state "result" as plural because there's no action or deed that has only one result or fruit. The resultants are exponential:

It's mindboggling. Even one tiny good deed (free of greed, hatred/fear, delusion) redounds with many, many results. Sadly, the same can be said about tiny bad deeds (those motivated by greed, aversion, or delusion).


Abhidharma is Buddhist psychology (Zen).
While it sounds unfair, it is explained in the Abhidharma (the "Dharma in Ultimate Terms"). Each intentional action (karma) is preceded by an intention (cetana) that colors it, underlies it, motivates it, and gives us the ability to name it as "good" or "bad," "skillful" or "unskillful," "profitable" or "unprofitable."

One action, one deed, one karma, however small -- even just verbal or mental -- lays down a track in the mind. The tracks are called cittas, the "mind-moments," producing it, the impulsions or javanas, the cittas and cetasikas (or moments and mental concomitants).

Who Ordered This Truckload of Dung? (Ajahn Brahm)
The sh* in our lives, should we complain or fertilize?

Judge not. Karma (our own deeds) will judge.
These each have the power to come to fruition when they find the opportunity (like seeds waiting to sprout and bear fruit), yielding welcome and unwelcome resultants.

This is why the Buddha over and over again made much of "karma," so much so that in his day he was never called a "Buddhist." He was called a Karmavadin, "a teacher of the efficacy of deeds."

What deeds did he commend, advise, and praise? Those actions free of traces of desire, aversion, and delusion (lobha, dosa, moha).

Welcoming the Unwelcome: Wholehearted Living in a
Brokenhearted World
(by Pema Chödrön, as read by Claire Foy)


This is true even for bad people, who will enjoy good or mixed results when those deeds ripen. It is said that even success in crime is due to skillful karma of the past, not present unskillful karma like the crimes being committed. So even if one keeps doing bad, one is wise to do much good as well.

To forgive others is to be good to yourself.
Why? Imagine "bad" is like harsh salt in a container of fresh water. How will we ever get it all out? Even if most settles, there's still much in suspension. It will be hard to remove or swallow. BUT if we add more clean water, it will dilute that saltiness and make it bearable. Just so, a little bad and much good will be sufferable, bearable, maybe even not so unpleasant.

"To do all good (kusala),
to refrain from all bad (akusala),
this is the advice of all buddhas."