Showing posts with label laypeople. Show all posts
Showing posts with label laypeople. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

The Buddha or Goenka's Vipassana?

(Buddha's Wisdom) GOENKA: The man who removed Buddhism from Buddhism?

Do it yourself at home the U Ba Khin way
The Goenka Method (of U Ba Khin) provides some practical advice for practicing systematic mindfulness (sati) of the body, one of the four crucial elements in the setting up of the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (Satipatthana), a practice necessary for "insight" (vipassana). Is it the only method? No. Is it the most effective method? Who can say, as it varies from individual to individual. Is it an effective method? Without sufficient stillness, calm, samadhi, absorption (jhana), it seems to Wisdom Quarterly that it is not. The claim is that practicing vipassana can produce its own mild forms of "access concentration" without needed full absorption. This will at best be a very weak and sketchy foundation of sila and samma-samadhi, virtue and "right samadhi." Samadhi is crucial and cannot be skipped over with the ideal of "dry insight" being enough for this decadent age.

Who is this Goenka guy?
Let go. Stop clinging. Be free right now.
S. N. Goenka (Satya Narayana, Satyanārāyaṇa Gōyaṅkā, Burmese ဦးဂိုအင်ကာ) lived from Jan. 30, 1924–Sept. 29, 2013. He was an Indian Burmese businessman and teacher of Buddhist insight (vipassanā) meditation.

Born in neighboring Burma to an Indian family, he learned vipassana from Sayagyi U Ba Khin (Int'l Meditation Centre, Rangoon).

It's never too early or too late to practice.
Goenka-jii (an honorific added out of great respect) retired from business in 1962, during a period of business nationalization by the military junta in Burma, then moved to India in 1969 to start teaching vipassana meditation.

His teachings are secular and therefore stay away from anything that might appear to be rites or rituals and instead emphasize that Buddha's path to liberation, which was non-sectarian, universal, and scientific (rational) in character.

This led to vipassana meditation appealing to people of all religions as well as no religion, theists, nontheists, atheists, and agnostics, from all parts of the world, East and West.
  • Vipassana, in the Burmese Theravada Buddhist tradition, is derived from the Abhidhamma (as taught by the Buddha to the monk he declared "foremost in wisdom" Ven. Śāriputra [27, 28]).
  • Although some Burmese teachers hold that vipassana and Abhidhamma study are inseparable [29], Goenka invited students to consider the theoretical aspects of these Teachings (pariyatti), advising them that the most important aspect of the technique is its practice (paṭipatti), contrasting mere book learning from experiential learning.
  • Students are free to accept the theoretical background or reject any part they find objectionable.
  • Goenka reported the words of the Buddha as follows [30]: "Filled with these compassionate and loving thoughts, [the Buddha] proclaimed: Apārutā tesaṃ amatassa dvārā Ye sotavanto pamuñcantu saddhaṃ "Open are the gates of the deathless state to those with ears [to hear] who renounce their lack of [confidence]," that is to say:
  • "Open are the gates of Nirvana so that people who hear and practice will be able to overcome all doubt," which is one of the Five Mental Hindrances.
Free 10-day course
I thought I'd join a 10-day course, get enlightened, then go get my nails done. Boy, was I wrong.
.
Four Foundations begin with the body breathing
Mr. Goenka became an influential teacher and played an important role in establishing non-commercial vipassana meditation centers globally where vipassana meditation is taught as a free 10-day residential program with no charges for food, lodging, or meditation instruction, with centers funded by voluntary donations from "old" (past and present) meditators.
  • How could it possibly be free? It is non-commercial. The rule is that only "old" students (who have completed at least one course) are allowed to donate. "New" students (who have not yet completed at least one course) are not allowed to donate. Donations are accepted after the completion of a course, which everyone qualifies to donate to at the end of each course, so there's never really a time when centers are open to donations and not accepting them. As soon as they are open to accepting dana (donations, gifts, charity), everyone present who just completed the course can give. Give what? Dāna
Goenka was awarded the Padma Bhushan by the government of India in 2012, an award bestowed for distinguished service of a high order.
Meeting Goenka-jii in person
The kalyana-mitta S.N. Goenka and his wife
(Wisdom Quarterly was fortunate enough to meet S. N. Goenka, 88, and his lovely wife when they were invited to the Dhammakaya Meditation Center in Azusa, Los Angeles, for a lunch in his honor and to receive an award for service to humanity, circa 2012. This was just as the Aztec Calendar was wrapping a cycle and the world was about to end, with few people noticing that a new cycle and new world would immediately be continuing. He seemed very kind, and not nearly as Dracula-like as one might think from hearing his droning, baritone Transylvanian/Indian accent on the standardized tapes played during all free 10-day courses). More

Monday, June 29, 2026

Buddhist Lunar Observance (Uposatha)

(English Buddhist Monk) Second full moon uposatha (Buddhist "sabbath, Pagan-Wiccan "esbat," lunar observance): Best practice for lay Buddhists to develop (cultivate) equanimity
  • Uposatha: HISTORY: The word uposatha ("observance") derives from the Muluposatha Sutta (AN 3.70), in which a laywoman named Visakha (Migāramāta, the "Mother of Migara"), visits the Buddha and says she is observing the uposatha day. The Buddha replies that there are different uposatha days, then proceeds to tell her the best version of the day, which he calls the "Uposatha of the Noble Disciples." More

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Best Buddhist life for laypeople

The Buddha has good news for everyone pursuing a home-life or a left-home life (Ven. Bodhi).


Four-day hybrid retreat with Ven. American Bhikkhu Bodhi
During the Buddha’s time, thousands of people left the household life to take up the lifestyle of monastics (monks and nuns), but the Buddha also had hundreds of thousands of ordinary householder disciples who continued to live and practice at home.

To guide these lay disciples, the Buddha offered a rich body of teachings that would enable them to live the best life — a truly noble life — while fulfilling their household duties.


Over four days, Bhante (Bhikkhu Bodhi) lead a retreat focused on the Buddha’s teachings for laypeople. The retreat was based primarily on the Maha Mangala Sutta, the "Great Blessings Discourse," but Bhante gathered a vast number of discourses (suttas) and other texts that show how a lay disciple can walk the path to liberation while dwelling amid “the dust of the world.”

What about fans of Guanyin? Welcome to BAUS
The retreat included Dhamma talks, discussion periods, and five sessions of meditation each day. It also provided the opportunity for those who haven’t yet “gone for guidance” (sarana) to go for guidance (aka refuge) to the Three Jewels, the first decisive step to formally becoming a practitioner of the Buddha-dharma (the Buddha's Teachings).
The retreat was in hybrid mode, onsite and online. The teachings were given in English only. Those who wished to join in person could visit Chuang Yen Monastery (BAUS or the Buddhist Association of the United States) and attend the retreat live. Those unable to attend in person practiced at home, participating online over Zoom or YouTube.

The monastery was able to accept only 50 onsite practitioners. If applying after the 50 spaces have been filled, there was a waiting list and accepted if prior applicants drop out. If not joining in person, attend from home via Zoom or YouTube. Register to participate onsite only if a firm commitment to stay for the duration of the retreat can be made. If participating only part time, please join through the online channels. There is no charge for the course. Donations for the monastery are always welcome.

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Buddhist Denominations Explained

WARNING: Narrator mispronounces nearly every Buddhist term he uses as if they were phonetic.

The Buddha vs. Budai vs. Cosmic Amitabha
Strange as it may sound, most of the time when most people say "Buddha," they are NOT talking about the historical Buddha Siddhartha Gautama (a.k.a. Shakyamuni), the founder of Buddhism, but rather a cosmic/celestial god called Amitabha or Budai (Putai, Hotei, aka "Fat Happy Buddha," who is not even a buddha but a bodhisattva) or Avalokiteshvara or Guanyin (Kwan Yin, Kwannon, Kannon, Chenrezig) or Prajnaparamita or Bodhidharma or Ksitigarbha or quite often Maitreya (the future buddha) or the Dalai Lama or the Panchen Lama or Padmasambhava or some other Rinpoche.

In the older, more focused Theravada tradition, only the historical person Siddhartha Gautama is THE Buddha, though there have been and will be other buddhas in the past (at least 28 of them) and in the distant future (one of them named Maitreya or Metteyya). All the other figures arise out of the watered-down reform movement that is the "Great Vehicle" (Mahayana) that is a collective term for everything else. And lest anyone should be confused, there are no extant Hinayana ("Lesser Vehicle") schools or sects (like the Sarvastivadins) left, all having been pushed into extinction by the Mahayana movement. Theravada, a back-to-basics movement concerned with what the historical Buddha taught rather than later developments or additions, is not a Hinayana school, but as there are no Hinayana schools left, it gets called one anyway by know-it-alls who are not too concerned with facts or details.

Is Buddhism spoken in every Asian language?

The Buddhist language
It is also crucial to point out that there are at least two Buddhist languages, Pali (Magadhi) and Sanskrit, and the two schools use different ones. This can be confusing because they are so similar. The reason there are two is because Pali was what ordinary people spoke, the lingua franca of the Buddha's day. Sanskrit was exclusively the language of elitist temple priests known as Brahmins, who regarded themselves as the upper crust and a members-only old boys club. Their sacred books, the Vedas, are in this ancient secret language, once spoken only by them, just as Catholic priests (popes, cardinals, bishops, etc.) managed all their official affairs in Latin, leaving Spanish and Italian and other related languages for the commoners. Because ex-Old Vedic Religion Brahmins were dealing with Buddhism, there came to be a Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. There are many languages used by Buddhists, according to their country, but one can easily tell if one is dealing with Theravada Buddhism: Its root texts are all in Pali. Now that many Sanskrit terms (like karma, mantra, avatar, ayurveda, mandala, dharma, sutra) have crossed into English, the lines are blurry. Pali must have had many dialects and regional differences. One of the most important is the Gandhari script, Kharosthi, in which the oldest existing Buddhist texts are written. The Buddha was NOT from India but from Gandhara. How can we be sure? There was no India yet, only different kingdoms, republics, and territories that were later united by Buddhist Emperor Ashoka into a single country (Bharat or Great Bharat). This union may have existed before in antiquity, but it did not exist at the time of the Buddha. He was also not from Nepal, as he is now placed. He was a Saka (Scythian, Shakya, Sakka, Sakai) from Gandhara (Afghanistan/Pakistan area). He did travel to, become enlightened in, and teach in proto-India, and out of laziness or not to be pedantic, we call Magadha and Bihar and places he stayed "India." But it is interesting to always bear in mind that it is because he was a foreigner and an outsider that nativists like Sri Shankara who systematized the diverse spiritual traditions of "Greater India" (the whole Indus Valley Civilization and Mahabharata and neighboring areas) that came to be called by the occupying British interlopers "Hinduism" (Indus-ism, all the different and unrelated things people were and are practicing around the Indus river valley) as a whole. Prior to Sri Shankara, there was on consensus or unifying label for disparate views and daily observances. Prior to British influence, there wasn't even the idea of "religion," as most people here and around the world (like the Egyptians and shamans) did not make a distinction between daily life and customs and "religion" or beliefs; they were the same thing, just life.

Buddhist Denominations Explained | Theravada vs. Mahayana 
(UsefulCharts) There's more than one Buddhism? Yes. There are at least two kinds with big differences. They are called Theravada (Teaching of the Elders, the "elders" being the enlightened monks and nuns who were the immediate disciples of the historical Buddha) and Mahayana (almost a kind of Hinduism, with Brahmins doing a number on the Buddha's teachings to bring them back in line with their Vedas or "Knowledge Books," turning the Buddha from a man who awakened thereby showing we ALL can to him being "Lord Buddha," an avatar or incarnation of Lord Vishnu, one of their major gods). Although everyone gets along, except for newbies who might think they need to take sides when they do not, their aim and practices differ. There is a third kind of Buddhism (Vajrayana, particularly the Tibetan variety, but also Nepalese and Bhutanese, sometimes also called Tantrayana or Mantrayana) and even more (like Japanese Zen/Chinese Chan, Pure Land, Esoteric Buddhism, etc.) except that all of them are lumped under the heading "Mahayana." So the split is 90% Mahayanists vs. 10% Theravadins.

SOURCES
  • Skilton, A. (1994). A Concise History of Buddhism. Cambridge: Windhorst.
  • Strong, J. S. (2015). Buddhisms: An Introduction. London: Oneworld
CREDITS
  • Charts and narration by Matt Baker
  • Animation by Syawish Rehman
  • Audio editing by Ali Shahwaiz
Theme music: "Lord of the Land" by Kevin MacLeod and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0. Available from incompetech.com

PRODUCT
UsefulCharts tagged product is a World Religions Family Tree Poster ($25.00) usefulcharts.com/products/world-religions-family-tree... Click: blinkist.com/usefulcharts to get 40% off Blinkist’s Annual premium and enjoy the collection. Start a 7-day free trial now. Buy the poster version of the chart: usefulcharts.com.
  • Matt Baker, UsefulCharts, 1/12/24; text by Pat Macpherson, Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, September 2, 2024

Ven. Bodhi: Enlightenment for Laypeople

ONLINE: four days, from Friday evening, Aug. 30, through Monday, aftertoon, Sept. 2, 2024
American Theravada scholar-monk Bhikkhu Bodhi from New York is holding a retreat.
.
What did the Buddha teach laypeople?
During the Buddha’s time, tens of thousands of people left the household life to take up the monastic life of wandering ascetics.

The Buddha also had hundreds of thousands of lay disciples who continued to live at home.

To guide these lay disciples, the Buddha offered a rich body of teachings to enable them to live the best life — a truly noble life — while fulfilling their household duties.

Venerable Bodhi, scholar-monk
Over four days, from Friday evening, Aug. 30, through Monday mid-afternoon, Sept. 2, Bhante (Bhikkhu Bodhi, the most prolific English translator of early Buddhist texts in the world) will lead a retreat focused on the Buddha’s teachings for laypeople.

The retreat will be based primarily on the Maha Mangala Sutta ("Great Blessings Discourse"), but Bhante will gather a vast number of [Pali canon] sutras and other texts that show how a lay disciple can walk the path to liberation while dwelling amid “the dust of the world.”
  • Dhamma talks,
  • discussion periods, and
  • five sessions of meditation each day.
It will also provide the opportunity for those who haven’t yet “gone for guidance” (sarana) to go for guidance to the Three Jewels, the first decisive step to formally becoming a follower of the Buddha-Dharma, the Path taught by the Buddha.

This retreat will be in hybrid mode, onsite and online. The teachings will be in English only. Those who wish to join in person can come to BAUS.org (Chuang Yen Monastery, Carmel, NY) and stay from Friday until Monday afternoon.

Attend live, over Zoom, or on YouTube
Those who cannot attend in person can practice at home, participating online over Zoom or YouTube.

The monastery can accept only 50 onsite practitioners. If one applies after the 50 spaces have been filled, one will be put on a waiting list and accepted if prior applicants drop out.

If not joining in person, please join from home via Zoom or YouTube. Register to participate onsite only if making a commitment to stay for all of it until Monday afternoon. If participating only part time, please join through the online channels.
  • The Buddhist Association of the U.S. (BAUS)
  • 美國佛教會
  • 2020 Route 301
  • Carmel, New York 10512
  • contact@baus.org

Monday, January 1, 2024

The Buddha's advice to laypeople (DN 31)

Ven. Sujato (trans.), Siṅgāla Sutta, "The Buddha's Advice to Laypeople" (DN 31) (suttacentral.net) edited by Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Advice to the young householder
Guidance for Lay Practitioners (Buddha Weekly)
Thus have I heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha, in the Bamboo Grove, in the squirrels’ feeding ground. Now at that time the householder’s son Sigālaka rose early and left Rājagaha (Rajgir, India).
  • Sigālaka (“little jackal”) only appears in this discourse.
With his clothes and hair wet, he raised his joined palms to revere the various quarters — east, south, west, north, below, and above.
  • Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 5.5.1 recommends offerings to Agni in the east, Indra or Soma in the south, the All-gods in the west, Mitra and Varuṇa in the north, and Bṛhaspati in the middle. The quarters themselves are divine, since one can travel them and never reach the end (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 4.1.5). In Buddhism, the quarters are said to be inhabited [ruled over] by the respective Four Great Sky Kings as per DN 32.
Then the Buddha put on his robes in the morning and, with bowl and outer cloak, entered Rājagaha for alms. He saw Sigālaka revering the quarters and said to him, “Householder’s son, why are you revering the quarters in this way?”

“Venerable sir, my father on his deathbed said to me: ‘My dear, please revere the quarters.’
  • Sigālaka blindly followed this request without considering the real meaning (as urged by Chāndogya Upaniṣad 1.3.11) because his father was a Buddhist and had wanted his son to follow the Buddha, but Sigalaka had no interest in such matters and was only doing this morning ritual because it was a deathbed request.
Honoring, respecting, and venerating my father’s words, I rose early and left Rājagaha and, with my clothes and hair all wet [as a mark of respect in ancient proto-India], raised my joined palms to revere the various quarters — east, south, west, north, below, and above.”

1. The Six Directions
“Householder’s son, that’s not how the six directions should be revered in the training of the noble [the arya or enlightened, awakened] ones.”
  • It is unusual to find “six” directions. Normally it is the four quarters, then eight (with intermediate directions), then ten (adding above and below). Praśna Upaniṣad 1.6 lists the six, then the intermediate directions.
“But, venerable sir, how should the six directions be revered in the training of the noble ones? Please teach me this.”

“Well then, householder’s son, listen, apply your mind well, and I will speak.”

“Yes, venerable sir,” replied Sigālaka. The Buddha then said:

“Householder’s son, a noble disciple gives up four corrupt deeds, refrains from bad deeds on four grounds, and avoids six drains on wealth. When one has left these 14 bad things behind, one has protected the six directions.
  • The Buddha outlines the contents of the discourse to follow. One is practicing to win in both worlds, to succeed in this world and the next (wherever that may be in any of the 31 Planes of Existence). When one’s body breaks up, after death, one is reborn in a good place, even in one of the many heavenly realms (sagga).
2. Four Corrupt Deeds
What four corrupt deeds has one given up?
  • The Buddha’s teaching or Dharma is structured to reinforce memorization. He gives the number of items (twice), so listeners will notice if any are missing: List the items, restate the numbers, then restate the items once more in verse.
(1) Killing living creatures, (2) stealing, (3) sexual misconduct, and (4) false speech: these are corrupt deeds. These are the four corrupt deeds one has given up.”

That is what the Buddha said. Then the Awakened One, the Teacher, went on to say:

“Taking life, taking what is not given,
speaking falsehoods, and sexually
misconducting oneself:
Wise people praise not these things.”

3. Four Grounds
“On what four grounds does one not do bad deeds (unskillful karma)?
  • First, we learned what the unskillful deeds were, and now we learn why people do them. One engages in misdeeds prejudiced by favoritism, hostility/cowardice, and stupidity (lobha, dosa, moha or liking, aversion/fear, delusion). When a noble disciple is not prejudiced by favoritism, hostility/cowardice, and stupidity, one does not do bad deeds on these four grounds.”
That is what the Buddha said. Then the Awakened One, the Teacher, went on to say:

“If one acts against the Dharma
out of favoritism, hostility/cowardice, or stupidity,
one’s fame shrinks,
like the moon in the waning half of the month.

If one does not act against the Dharma
out of favoritism, hostility/cowardice, and stupidity,
one’s fame swells,
like the moon in the waxing part of the month.”
4. Six Drains on Wealth
“What six drains on wealth does one avoid?
  • “Drains on wealth” is apāyamukha, literally “openings for departure.” This is emphasized here since Sigālaka wants to be a good son and not squander the family fortune for which he is newly responsible.
“Habitually engaging in the following things is a drain on wealth: drinking alcohol; roaming the streets at night; frequenting entertainments; gambling; bad friends; laziness.

5. Six Drawbacks of Drinking
“There are these six drawbacks of habitually drinking alcohol.
  • Now each of the six drains on wealth are expanded and explained.
“Immediate loss of wealth, promotion of quarrels, susceptibility to illness, disrepute, indecent exposure, and weakened wisdom as the sixth. These are the six drawbacks of habitually drinking alcohol.

6. Six Drawbacks of Roaming the Streets at Night
“There are these six drawbacks of roaming the streets at night. One, one’s partners, one’s children, and one’s property are all left unguarded. One is suspected of misdeeds (crimes). Untrue rumors spread about one. One is on the receiving end of many things that entail suffering. These are the six drawbacks of roaming the streets at night.

7. Six Drawbacks of Entertainments
“There are these six drawbacks of frequenting entertainments. One is always thinking, ‘Where is there dancing? Where is there singing? Where is there music? Where are there stories? Where is the applause? Where are drums being played?’ These are the six drawbacks of frequenting entertainments.

8. Six Drawbacks of Gambling
“There are these six drawbacks of habitually gambling. Winning breeds enmity. The loser mourns the loss of money. There is immediate loss of wealth (by losing). A gambler’s word carries no weight in public assemblies. Friends and colleagues treat one with contempt. And no one wants to marry a gambler, thinking, ‘This individual is a gambler — unable to support a partner.’ These are the six drawbacks of habitually gambling.

9. Six Drawbacks of Bad Friends
“There are these six drawbacks of bad friends (keeping bad company). One becomes an associate and companion with those who are addicts, carousers, drunkards, frauds, swindlers, and thugs. These are the six drawbacks of bad friends.

10. Six Drawbacks of Laziness
“There are these six drawbacks of habitual laziness. One does not get work done, thinking, ‘It’s too cold! It’s too hot! It’s too late! It’s too early! I’m too hungry! I’m too full!’ By dwelling on so many excuses for not working, one does not make any more money, and the money one already has runs out. These are the six drawbacks of habitual laziness.”

That is what the Buddha said. Then the Awakened One, the Teacher, went on to say:

“Some are just drinking buddies,
Some call you dear, dear friend,
But a true friend is one
Who stands by you through thick and thin.

Sleeping late, sexual misconduct,
Making enemies, doing harm,
Bad friends, and avarice:
these are six grounds for the ruin of a person.

With bad associates, bad companions,
Bad behavior, and bad resort,
One falls to ruin
In this world and the next.

Dice, women, drink, song, and dance,
Sleeping by day and roaming the streets at night,
Bad friends, and avarice:
these six grounds ruin a person.

One plays dice and drinks liquor,
Consorts with women loved by others.
Associating with the worse rather than the better,
One diminishes like the waning moon.

A drunkard, broke, and destitute,
Thirsty, drinking in bars,
Drowning in debt,
One will quickly lose one’s way.
  • Kāhiti is third person singular future of karoti.
When one is in the habit of sleeping late,
Seeing night as the time to rise,
And always getting drunk,
One cannot maintain the household life.

‘It’s too cold, too hot,
too late,’ one says.
When the young neglect their work like this,
riches pass them by.
  • The subcommentary explains atthā as dhanā (“riches”).
But one who regards heat and cold
as nothing more than a handful of grass —
one does one’s duties well,
and happiness never fails.”

11. Fake Friends
“Householder’s son, recognize these four enemies disguised as friends: the taker, the talker, the flatterer, the spender.

“One can recognize fake friends who are all take on four grounds:
  • One’s possessions end up theirs.
  • Giving little, they expect much.
  • They do their duty out of fear.
  • They associate for their own advantage.
“One can recognize fake friends who are all take on these four grounds.

“One can recognize fake friends who are all talk on four grounds. They’re hospitable in the past (speaking of past favors). They’re hospitable in the future (promising future favors). They’re full of meaningless pleasantries. When something needs doing in the present, they point to their own misfortune and inability to do anything to help. One can recognize fake friends who are all talk on these four grounds.

“One can recognize fake friend who are flatterers on four grounds: They support doing bad and doing good. They praise one to one’s face yet put one down behind one’s back. One can recognize fake friends who are flatterers on these four grounds.

“One can recognize fake friends who are spenders (wastrels) on four grounds: They accompany one when drinking, roaming the streets at night, frequenting entertainments, and gambling. One can recognize fake friends who are spenders on these four grounds.”

That is what the Buddha said. Then the Awakened One, the Teacher, went on to say:

“One friend is all take,
another all talk;
one is just a flatterer,
and one is a friend who wastes.

A wise person understands
these four enemies for what they are
and keeps them at a distance,
as one would avoid a risky road.”

12. Good-Hearted Friends
“Householder’s son, recognize these four good-hearted friends: the helper, the friend in good times and bad, the counselor, and the one who is compassionate.

“One can recognize good-hearted friends who are helpers on four grounds: They guard one when one is negligent. They guard one’s property when one is negligent. They keep one safe in times of danger. When something needs doing, they provide one with twice the resources needed. One can recognize good-hearted friends who are helpers on these four grounds.

“One can recognize good-hearted friends who are the same in good times and bad on four grounds: They share their secrets. They keep one’s secrets. They do not abandon one in times of trouble. They would even give their lives for one’s welfare. One can recognize good-hearted friends who are the same in good times and bad on these four grounds.

“One can recognize good-hearted friends who are counselors on four grounds: They keep one from doing bad. They support one in doing good. They teach one what one does not know. They explain the path to rebirth in heavens (sagga). One can recognize good-hearted friends who are counselors on these four grounds.

“One can recognize good-hearted friends who are compassionate on four grounds: They do not delight in one’s misfortune (downfall). They delight in one’s good fortune (success). They keep others from criticizing one. They encourage one’s praise. One can recognize good-hearted friends who are compassionate on these four grounds.”

The Buddha spoke this matter. Then the Awakened One, the Teacher, went on to say:

“A friend who’s a helper,
one the same in both pleasure and pain,
a friend of good counsel,
and one of compassion

A wise person understands
these four friends for what they are
and carefully looks after them,
like a mother nurses her own child.
The wise and virtuous
shine like a burning flame.

They gather riches like bees
roaming around collecting nectar.
And their riches stack up
like a termite mound rising.

Gathering wealth in this way,
a householder has enough for family.
And one holds on to friends
by dividing wealth in four.

One portion one enjoys now,
two parts one invests,
and the fourth one saves
for times of need.”
  • The investment is spoken of terms of replenishing inventory for continued success as a merchant.
13. Protecting the Six Directions
“And how, householder’s son, does a noble disciple honor the six directions?
  • Having explained the six drains on wealth, the Buddha moves on to the next item in the table of contents.
“These six directions one recognizes: parents as the east, teachers as the south, partner and children as the west, friends and colleagues as the north, servants and workers as beneath, and ascetics and Brahmins as above.
  • Why? The directions are symbolic: Parents are the east because that is where the sun begins as one rises. Teachers are the south (dakkhiṇā) because they are owed an offering (dakkhiṇā). Family (spouse and children) is one’s legacy, so they are the west just as the setting sun. Good friends are the north because they keep one upright and on track on the way up. Servants are below (the earth) because they support one and make life possible. And spiritual teachers are the above (the heavens) because they lead one to transcendence.
“A child supports parents as the eastern quarter in five ways, thinking: ‘I will support those who supported me. I will do my duty (dharma) for them. I will maintain the family lineage (customs, reputation). I will take care of the inheritance. When they have passed away, I will make offerings on their behalf.’

“Parents supported by children in these five ways in turn show compassion to them in five ways: They keep them from doing wrong. They support them in doing good. They train them in a profession (livelihood so they can support themselves independently). They connect them with a suitable partner. They provide an inheritance in due time.

“Parents served by their children in these five ways in turn show compassion to them in these five ways. And that is how the eastern quarter is protected, kept safe and free of peril.

“A student supports teachers as the southern quarter in five ways: by rising for them (as a sign of respect), by serving them, by listening well, by looking after them, and by carefully learning their lessons.

“Teachers supported by students in these five ways in turn show compassion to them in five ways: They make sure they are well educated and well drilled in memorization. They clearly explain all the knowledge of the lesson. They introduce them to their associates and colleagues. They provide for their protection in every place.
  • “Protection in every place” (disāsu parittāṇaṁ) refers to when students have completed their studies and gone off to travel, teachers do what they can do to ensure their safety in other regions.
“Teachers supported by their students in these five ways show compassion to them in these five ways. And that’s how the southern quarter is protected, kept safe and free of peril.

“A spouse supports a spouse as the western quarter in five ways: by honoring, by not looking down on, by being faithful, by giving authority to, and by presenting with adornments.
  • Marriage is, of course, based on mutual care and respect, not on dominance and obedience.
“The other spouse in turn supports a spouse and shows compassion to him in five ways: One is well-organized in work. One manages the domestic help. One is faithful. One preserves the other’s earnings. One is deft and tireless in performing duties. A spouse served by a spouse in these five ways shows compassion in these five ways. And that is how the western quarter is protected, kept safe and free of peril.

“One supports friends and colleagues as the northern quarter in five ways: giving, kindly words, taking care, impartiality, and not using tricky words. Friends and colleagues served in these five ways show compassion in five ways: They guard one when one is negligent. They guard one’s property when one is negligent. They keep one safe in times of danger. They do not abandon one in times of trouble. They honor one’s descendants.

“Friends and colleagues served by one in these five ways show compassion to one in these five ways. And that is how the northern quarter is protected, kept safe and free of peril.

“One supports servants and workers as the lower quarter in five ways: by organizing work according to ability, by paying food and wages, by nursing them when sick, by sharing special treats, and by giving time off work. 

“Servants and workers supported by one in these five ways shows compassion in five ways: They get up first and go to bed last. They do not steal. They do their work well. And they promote a good reputation. Servants and workers supported in these five ways show compassion in these five ways. And that is how the lower quarter is protected, kept safe and free of peril.

“One supports wandering ascetics and Brahmins as the upper quarter in five ways: by loving deeds of body, speech, and mind, by not turning them away at the gate, and by providing them with material needs. Wandering ascetics and Brahmins served in these five ways show compassion in six ways: They keep one from doing wrong. They support one in doing good. They think of one with kindly thoughts. They teach one what one does not know. They clarify what one has already learned. They explain the path to the heavens.

“Wandering ascetics and Brahmins supported in these five ways show compassion in these six ways. And that is how the upper quarter is protected, kept safe and free of peril.”

The Buddha spoke this matter. Then the Awakened One, the Teacher, went on to say:

“Parents are the east,
teachers the south,
spouses and children the west,
friends and colleagues the north,

Servants and workers below,
Ascetics and Brahmins above.
By honoring these quarters
a householder does enough to be a householder.

The wise and the virtuous,
the gentle and the well-spoken,
the humble and the kind:
they are the ones who win glory.

The diligent, not lazy,
those not disturbed by troubles,
those consistent in conduct, the intelligent:
they are the ones who win glory.

The inclusive, the makers of friends,
the generous, those rid of stinginess,
those who lead, train, and influence:
They are the ones who win glory.

Giving and kindly words,
taking care here,
and treating equally in worldly conditions,
as befits one in each case;
these ways of being in the world
are like an axle pin upon which the world turns.

If there were no such ways of being,
neither mother nor father
would be respected and honored
for what they do for their children.

But since these winning ways do exist,
the wise regard them well
and so achieve greatness
and are praised.”

When this was said, Sigālaka the householder’s son said to the Buddha: “Excellent, sir, excellent! It is as if one were righting what had been overturned, or revealing the hidden, or pointing out the path to the lost, or lighting a lamp in the dark so people with clear eyes were able to see what is there! Just so the Buddha has made the Dhamma clear in many ways. I go for guidance to the Buddha, to the Dhamma, and to the [Noble] Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower who has gone for guidance for life.”

Thursday, August 25, 2022

Dharma Door of Nonduality: Vimalakirti

Tricycle: The Buddhist Review, Spring 1993; Dr. Findlay, Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly
.
The Dharma Door of Nonduality: From the Vimalakirti Nirdesha Sutra
Who actually forged the Mahayana sutras?
The Vimalakirti Nirdesha Sutra is unique among the classic texts of Mahayana Buddhism. Vimalakirti, an honorable businessman, husband, father, and citizen of the City of Vaisali, is remarkable in that he contradicts the conventional assumption that only ordained disciples can realize the highest degrees of spiritual attainment [enlightenment].

As an enlightened layperson, Vimalakirti legitimizes an alternative path, one outside the monastic tradition.

In the passage below, Vimalakirti and the disciples of the Buddha debate the nature of non-duality —one of the central themes of the Middle Way (Madyamika) School of Mahayana Buddhism [a kind of Vedantic Hinduism in the guise of Buddhism, some might say].

The bodhisattvas [beings bent on supreme enlightenment], as the disciples are called in the text, respond to his challenge to define the “entrance” into the dharma [teaching, doctrine] of nonduality by espousing various sophistries [philosophical points of view].

Manjushri, the Bodhisattva of Wisdom, interjects, arguing that the disciples’ statements do not illuminate the essential nonduality of enlightenment.

When asked to state his own opinion, Vimalakirti declines to answer and, through his profound silence, upholds the realization of the lay practitioner.

Vimalakirti’s name is used with “Licchavi,” the name of the tribe and city-state where he lived. While the events recorded in the Vimalakirti Nirdesha Sutra are believed to have occurred during the Buddha’s lifetime, in the sixth century R.CE., no accounts were recorded until the second century CE. 
  • [This is the case with many if not all Mahayana "sutras," later works put into the mouth of the historical Buddha and other figures. They are apocryphal at best, forgeries, fictions, or sincere efforts by later disciples to describe or articulate what the Buddha did not.]
All original Sanskrit texts have been lost. This translation, by Columbia University Prof. Robert A. F. Thurman, derives from a Tibetan version dating from the ninth century C.E.

Mr. Vimalakirti is the ideal Mahayana layperson.
THEN, THE LICCHAVI [CITIZEN] VIMALAKlRTI asked those bodhisattvas, “Good sirs, please explain how the bodhisattvas enter the Dharma-door of nonduality!”

The Bodhisattva Dharmavikurvana declared, “Noble sir, ‘production’ and ‘destruction’ are two, but what is not produced and does not occur cannot be destroyed. Thus, the attainment of the tolerance of the birthlessness of things is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Srigandha declared, “‘I’ and ‘mine’ are two. If there is no presumption of a self, there will be no possessiveness. Thus, the absence of the presumption is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Srikuta declared, “‘Defilement’ and ‘purification’ are two. When there is thorough knowledge of defilement, there will be no conceit about purification. The path leading to the complete conquest of all conceit is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Bhadrajyotis declared, “‘Distraction’ and ‘attention’ are two. When there is no distraction, there will be no attention, no mentation, and no mental intensity. Thus, the absence of mental intensity is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Subahu declared, “‘Bodhisattva-spirit’ and ‘disciple-spirit’ are two. When both are seen to resemble an illusory spirit, there is no bodhisattva-spirit, nor any disciple-spirit. Thus, the sameness of natures of spirits is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Animisa declared, “‘Grasping’ and ‘nongrasping’ are two. What is not grasped is not perceived, and what is not perceived is neither presumed nor repudiated. Thus, the inaction and noninvolvement of all things is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Sunetra declared, “‘Uniqueness’ and ‘characterless’ are two. Not to presume or construct something is neither to establish its uniqueness nor to establish its characterlessness. To penetrate the equality of these two is to enter nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Tishya declared, “‘Good’ and ‘evil’ are two. Seeking neither good nor evil, the understanding of nonduality of the significant and the meaningless is the entrance into nonduality....”

The Bodhisattva Simhamati declared, “To say, ‘This is impure’ and ‘This is immaculate’ makes for duality. One who, attaining equanimity, forms no conception of impurity or immaculateness, yet is not utterly without conception, has equanimity without any attainment of equanimity — [on]e enters the absence of conceptual knots. Thus, [on]e enters into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Suddhadhimukti declared, “To say, ‘This is happiness’ and ‘That is misery’ is dualism. One who is free of all calculations, through the extreme purity of gnosis — [one's] mind is aloof, like empty space; and thus [one] enters into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Narayana declared, “To say, ‘This is mundane’ and ‘That is transcendental’ is dualism. This world has the nature of voidness, so there is neither transcendence nor involvement, neither progress nor standstill. Thus, neither to transcend nor to be involved, neither to go nor to stop — this is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Dantamati declared, “‘Life’ and ‘liberation’ are dualistic. Having seen the nature of life, one neither belongs to it nor is one utterly liberated from it. Such understanding is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Pratyakshadarshana declared, ‘Destructible’ and ‘indestructible’ are dualistic. What is destroyed is ultimately destroyed. What is ultimately destroyed does not become destroyed; hence, it is called ‘indestructible.’ What is indestructible is instantaneous, and what is instantaneous is indestructible. The experience of such is called ‘the entrance into the principle of non-duality.'”

The Bodhisattva Parigudha declared, “‘Self’ and ‘selflessness’ are dualistic. Since the existence of self cannot be perceived, what is there to be made ‘selfless’? Thus, the nondualism of the vision of their nature is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Vidyuddeva declared, “‘Knowledge’ and ‘ignorance’ are dualistic. The natures of ignorance and knowledge are the same, for ignorance is undefined, incalculable, and beyond the sphere of thought. The realization of this is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Priyadarshana declared, “Matter itself is void. Voidness does not result from the destruction of matter, but the nature of matter is itself voidness. Therefore, to speak of voidness on the one hand, and of matter, or of sensation, or of intellect, or of motivation, or of consciousness on the other — is entirely dualistic. Consciousness itself is voidness. Voidness does not result from the destruction of consciousness, but the nature of consciousness is itself voidness....”

The Bodhisattva Pramati declared, “‘Eye’ and ‘form’ are dualistic. To understand the eye correctly, and not to have attachment, aversion, or confusion with regard to form — that is called ‘peace.’ Similarly, ‘ear’ and ‘sound,’ ‘nose’ and ‘smell,’ ‘tongue’ and ‘taste,’ ‘body’ and ‘touch,’ and ‘mind’ and ‘phenomena’ — all are dualistic. But to know the mind, and to be neither attached, averse, nor confused with regard to phenomena — that is called ‘peace.’ To live in such peace is to enter into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Aksayamati declared, “The dedication of generosity for the sake of attaining omniscience is dualistic. The nature of generosity is itself omniscience, and the nature of omniscience itself is total dedication. Likewise, it is dualistic to dedicate morality, tolerance, effort, meditation, and wisdom for the sake of omniscience. Omniscience is the nature of wisdom, and total dedication is the nature of omniscience. Thus, the entrance into this principle of uniqueness is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Gambhiramati declared, “It is dualistic to say that voidness is one thing, signlessness is another, and wishlessness still another. What is void has no sign. What has no sign has no wish. Where there is no wish there is no process of thought, mind, or consciousness. To see the doors of all liberations in the door of one liberation is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Santendriya declared, “It is dualistic to say ‘Buddha,’ ‘Dharma,’ and ‘Sangha.’ The Dharma is itself the nature of the Buddha, the Sangha is itself the nature of the Dharma, and all of them are uncompounded. The uncompounded is infinite space, and the processes of all things are equivalent to infinite space. Adjustment to this is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Apratihatanetra declared, “It is dualistic to refer to the ‘aggregates’ and the ‘cessation of aggregates.’ Aggregates themselves are cessation. Why? The egoistic views of aggregates, being unproduced themselves, do not exist ultimately. Hence such views do not really conceptualize ‘These are aggregates’ or ‘These aggregates cease.’ Ultimately, they have no such discriminative construction and no such conceptualizations. Therefore, such views have themselves the nature of cessation. Nonoccurrence and nondestruction are the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Suvinita declared, “Physical, verbal, and mental vows do not exist dualistically. Why? These things have the nature of inactivity. The nature of inactivity of the body is the same as the nature of inactivity of speech, whose nature of inactivity is the same as the nature of the inactivity of the mind. It is necessary to know and to understand this fact of the ultimate inactivity of all things, for this knowledge is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Punyakshetra declared, “It is dualistic to consider actions meritorious, sinful [unskillful], or neutral. The non-undertaking of meritorious, sinful, and neutral actions is not dualistic. The intrinsic nature of all such actions is voidness, wherein ultimately there is neither merit, nor sin, nor neutrality, nor action itself. The nonaccomplishment of such actions is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Padmavyuha declared, “Dualism is produced from obsession with self, but true understanding of self does not result in dualism. Who thus abides in non-duality is without ideation, and that absence of ideation is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Shrigarbha declared, “Duality is constituted by perceptual manifestation. Nonduality is objectlessness. Therefore, nongrasping and nonrejection is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Candrottara declared, “‘Darkness’ and ‘light’ are dualistic, but the absence of both darkness and light is nonduality. Why? At the time of absorption in cessation, there is neither darkness nor light, and likewise with the natures of all things. The entrance into this equanimity is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Ratnamudrahasta declared, “It is dualistic to detest the world and to rejoice in liberation, and neither detesting the world nor rejoicing in liberation is non duality. Why? Liberation can be found where there is bondage, but where there is ultimately no bondage where is there need for liberation? The mendicant who is neither bound nor liberated does not experience any like or any dislike and thus he enters nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Manikutaraja declared, “It is dualistic to speak of good paths and bad paths. One who is on the path is not concerned with good or bad paths. Living in such unconcern, he entertains no concepts of ‘path’ or ‘nonpath.’ Understanding the nature of concepts, his mind does not engage in duality. Such is the entrance into nonduality.”

The Bodhisattva Satyarata declared, “It is dualistic to speak of ‘true’ and ‘false.’ When one sees truly, one does not ever see any truth, so how could one see falsehood? Why? One does not see with the physical eye, one sees with the eye of wisdom. And with the wisdom-eye one sees only insofar as there is neither sight nor nonsight. There, where there is neither sight nor nonsight, is the entrance into nonduality.”

WHEN THE BODHISATTVAS had given their explanations, they all addressed the Crown Prince Manjushri: “Manjushri, what is the bodhisattva’s entrance into nonduality?”

Manjushri replied, “Good sirs, you have all spoken well. Nevertheless, all your explanations are themselves dualistic. To know no one teaching, to express nothing, to say nothing, to explain nothing, to announce nothing, to indicate nothing, and to designate nothing — that is the entrance into nonduality.”

Then, the Crown Prince Manjushri said to the Licchavi Vimalakirti, “We have all given our own teachings, noble sir. Now, may you elucidate the teaching of the entrance into the principle of nonduality!”

Thereupon, the Licchavi Vimalakirti kept his silence, saying nothing at all.

The crown prince Manjushri applauded the Licchavi Vimalakirti: “Excellent! Excellent, noble sir! This is indeed the entrance into the nonduality of the bodhisattvas. Here there is no use for syllables, sounds, and ideas.”

When these teachings had been declared, five thousand bodhisattvas entered the door of the Dharma of non-duality and attained tolerance of the birthlessness of things. More

Excerpted from The Holy Teaching of Vimalakirti, translated by Robert A. F. Thurman. Reprinted with permission from The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Tricycle [claims to be] the leading independent journal of Buddhism in the West, where it continues to be the most inclusive and widely read vehicle for the dissemination of Buddhist views and values. By remaining unaffiliated with any particular teacher, sect, or lineage, Tricycle provides a public forum for exploring Buddhism and its dialogue with the broader culture.