Showing posts with label types of buddhahood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label types of buddhahood. Show all posts

Thursday, April 10, 2025

Bhikkhu Bodhi, what is enlightenment?


Bodhi ("enlightenment"), what does it actually mean? with scholar-monk Bhikkhu Bodhi
Isn't the homelife harder than the left-home life?
(Daniel Aitken) Watch the full episode at dharmachats.com. In this Dharma Chat, renowned American Theravada Buddhist scholar-monk and translator of the Pali canon Bhikkhu Bodhi (one of Wisdom Quarterly's root-teachers through his scholarship, BPS.lk editorship, and one-on-one communications, the New Jersey born/California-trained Jewish-Buddhist Dr. Jeffrey Block, Ph.D., Claremont, who still teaches us and leads us in meditation every Wednesday evening live from Chaung Yen Monastery in Carmel to our base in Los Angeles) sheds light on the meaning of his own monastic Buddhist name, "Bodhi." Join him as he unveils the multifaceted nature of the word bodhi (awakening to the ultimate truth and thereby realizing complete liberation as nirvana).
Bhikkhu Bodhi, if the Buddha means "the Enlightened One," what does buddha mean?

Expectations impede attainment of enlightenment
Enlightened (bodhi-fied persons) are not called buddhas because that term is reserved for two very rare and special types of awakened individuals, the private (nonteaching self-awakened) and public (supremely self-awakened teaching) buddhas. Other "noble ones" are noble disciples (enlightened students), whose experience of enlightenment is the same as the buddhas with the difference that buddhas have other additional knowledges and powers like the dasa-balas or "Ten Powers of a Tathagata") which distinguish a supreme (samma-sam-bodhi) teacher from his successful students who have awakened to the same ultimate truths by pursuing the path he has pointed out. It may sound like a technical difference between these three kinds of individuals, "Enlightened Ones," as it were but it is key to comprehending how extraordinarily rare a supreme-enlightened-teaching buddha is, how rare and extraordinary pacceka-buddhas (nonteaching buddhas with the same knowledge but not the capacity to teach), and how relatively less rare (but still extraordinarily rare) disciple-arahants ("enlightened beings") are.

What does "Buddha" mean? An article by Bhikkhu Bodhi may change some minds
(Doug's Dharma) Let's take a look at a recent article by American scholar-monk and Pali canon translator Bhikkhu Bodhi on the meaning of Buddha and his related realization.

Some contemporary scholars have argued that bodhi ("enlightenment") should be translated as "awakening" and the historical Buddha should therefore be understood to mean "the Awakened One."

Bhikkhu Bodhi prefers a different option, and we'll see why.
  • 00:00 Intro to the dispute
  • 05:17 1. English definitions of the terms
  • 07:48 2. Looking at Pāli language usage
  • 08:56 3. Early metaphors and similes
  • 14:08 A hidden irony or contradiction [by analogy bodhi is spoken of as enlightenment or awakening, whereas 
NOTE: A recent article by Western Buddhist monk Bhikkhu Anālayo calls Bhikkhu Bodhi's translation of this term into question. Doug Smith has done a follow up video discussing that response here:
✅ Articles mentioned
✅ Book mentioned
  • Carl Sagan, The Demon Haunted World, Science as a Candle in the Darkamzn.to/3yGFLgy
☸️ FREE MINI-COURSE at the Online Dharma Institute: onlinedharma.org.
🧡 Find this material useful? Check out Doug's Dharma's Patreon and get fun benefits like exclusive videos, audio-only versions, and extensive show notes: dougsseculardharma
🧡 Donations? paypal.me/dougsdharma
Facebook: onlinedharmainstitute. Twitter: dougsdharma
✅ Video mentioned: Gauging Progress on the Buddhist Path: The Traditional Four Stages — [of Enlightenment].
✅ Suttas (Pali canon sutras) mentioned: suttacentral.net/mn4/en/bodhi (Appears at 4.34) suttacentral.net/an3.53/en/bodhi
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (BAUS.org/en); Daniel Aitken, Jan. 26, 2024; Doug Smith (Doug's Dharma), Aug. 9, 2021; Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Friday, August 10, 2018

The Way to Buddhahood (NY study group)

BAUS.org/en; CC Liu, Dhr. Seven (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Textbook: The Way to Buddhahood (Ven. Yin Shun)
Mahayana Buddhism prides itself on being the biggest and "best" kind of Buddhism because it advocates universal saviors and self-sacrifice over and above the historical Buddha's teachings followed by the Theravada school.

This is not a north/south distinction because all of the "Hinayana" schools went extinct displaced by Mahayana-Hinduism. Theravada is a resurgent school that aims to practice what the historical Buddha taught rather than the "countless buddhas" like the "gods" of the Brahmins.

Admittedly, not many Mahayana Buddhists actually take up the effort to become buddhas ("supremely enlightened teachers of liberation") in the future, but all of them [blindly] take the vow to do so.

Here's a chance to live up to it. This study group, using the textbook The Way to Buddhahood by Ven. Yin Shun (available for $18.00 in the library) is a good first step.

This is a self-study group. Notes and questions are kept on a digital document and answered by the instructor Ven. Ekayana. FREE. More

Monday, November 13, 2017

"Escape to Reality"

Ananda Pereira (BPS.lk), rewritten by Dhr. Seven, Ananda, Amber Larson, Wisdom Quarterly

Buddhahood (samma-sam-bodhi or supremely fulfilled enlightenment) is a process of self-improvement that goes far beyond the level sufficient for personal liberation. It comes with the ability to effectively teach the Dharma enlightenment rediscovers.

This kind of buddha -- like the historical Buddha, Shakyamuni, Siddhartha Gautama the Scythian/Sakyian prince from Central Asia -- wishes to guide others as well. But one can only do so by teaching them how to help themselves. There is no "salvation by proxy." No one can save another, although one can certainly help so much that it seems that this is what has happened.

Kick ass, Buddha! Hell yeah, Ireland!
This may sound like a hard or callous teaching, but it is the marriage of wisdom and compassion, a reasonable one, and it fits into the pattern of life as we know it. Would it be better to drown trying to swim for others?

One cannot eat for another or learn meditating for another or keep healthy for another -- no matter how much we love them, how selfless we are, or how wise we may consider ourselves. Our wisdom shines in effectively encouraging others. In a sense, we can't do it ourselves, yet no one can do it for us. So what to do? Let us do it with help, with advice, with some guidance, with our own effort and determination tempered by those who have already succeeded in reaching complete freedom.

Oh, I get it now. I thought I could hire someone.
Nor can one “atone” for the wickedness and folly of another. Each must pay one's own debts and shape one's own destiny. Even supreme teaching buddhas (as contrasted with nonteaching buddhas and personal buddhas, pacceka-buddhas, and disciple-arhats) can only show the way.

No one saves us but ourselves
No one can and no one may
We ourselves must tread the Path;
Buddhas only point the way.


A buddha, also called a Tathāgata (a Wayfarer, Well-Gone One, Welcome One), is a teacher in the truest and highest sense of the word. One cannot place a limit to the value of such a teacher. Life after life, through countless aeons (kalpas), beings live in darkness. They cling to this false beliefs (wrong views) and to that. They live, die, and live again, life after life on and on, now in states of pleasure, now in states of pain. But they do not know how to win freedom from it all, how to get off the tiresome merry-go-round of samsara.

I get it, I get it now. It's as simple as this.
Then, like the dawning of a glorious day, a buddha appears. He teaches the Way of Freedom. Some leap to this Teaching and profit by it immediately. They are the ready ones, like the great arhats of the Buddha’s day. For them, a single stanza, a phrase, a word [some say even an intimation like picking up a flower and looking at it, as in a famous albeit apocryphal Mahayana sutra] may be sufficient.

Others take longer to learn. Still others do not learn at all. They are as unprepared for the Buddha-Dharma as a kindergarten child is unprepared for the Theory of Relativity.

Who are those ready ones who profit immediately by the appearance of a buddha? According to the Buddha himself, they are those who are meditative. Already, on their own, perhaps in many past lives, they have trained themselves to be calm and think clearly. They have developed their minds and hearts with wisdom and compassion.

To them, the “effort” of following the Buddha’s Teaching is a glad one. They do not yearn after the so-called prizes of life, the wealth, the fame, the power, the worldly reputation that others find so alluring. They see much greater worth in such things as peace of mind, joyful contentment, and true freedom. They take easily to the Way and are delivered from the bonds of Māra (Rebirth and Death), the bonds of desire, ill-will, and ignorance. They win freedom.

Greatness
Higher than lordship over all earth,
Higher than residing in heavens supreme,
Higher than imperial power over all the worlds,
Is the Fruit of Entrance into the Dharma Stream.
The Dhammapada

We ordinary worldlings see greatness in worldly success. To us a reigning sovereign [like Trump or star entertainer] is great, a multi-millionaire is great, a famous actor, designer, doctor, business owner, lawyer, or photographer is great. We measure greatness by the yardstick of worldly influence or fame.
 
To the historical Buddha, greatness was something entirely different. He saw beings dying and being reborn according to their karma (the storehouse of their "actions" -- thoughts, words, and deeds).
 
He knew that an emperor can be reborn as a termite. He saw that, in this world of ceaseless change, there is only insecurity in worldly power, and there is no stability in worldly fame.

Death comes to the powerful and the famous just as surely as it comes to the meek and unknown. And with death there is a loss or shedding of worldly power, wealth, and fame. Again and again it happens.
 
Seen against the background of unceasing change, there is only the unreal in worldly greatness. Even ordinary worldlings can see things as they truly are, in this way, if we take the Buddha’s Teaching to heart and use our discerning intelligence. But few of us do so.

That is why the Buddha said, “Blind is this world. Few are they who truly see.” If, seeing things as they truly are, we refuse to grant that greatness is an attribute of worldly power, fame, or success, must we conclude, that there is no such thing as greatness?
 
The Buddha’s answer was to point to the stream-winner (sotāpanna), the being who has attained the first stage of enlightenment or "sainthood," as this term (arhat) is understood in Buddhism.

“There” said the Buddha, “is one who is greater than any reigning sovereign (chakravartin, world ruler), than any celestial being (deva), be he even a Brahmā (divinity).”
 
And, be it remembered, there are three higher stages of enlightenment/sainthood, culminating in the attainment of Final Emancipation as an arhat.
 
Why is this? A stream-winner o(or stream enterer) may well be a poor person, unknown, and unhonored. By worldly standards one may be a person of no account at all. In what lies this greatness?
 
Greatness lies in the security of having taken a step upward from which there can be no falling back. Never again will he have the “ego” delusion. Never again will one have doubts as to the true road. Never again will one believe in mere rites and ceremonies. Never again will one break a single one of the five cardinal precepts of virtue (sila).

Never again will one be reborn in a plane lower than the human plane (which includes countless planets like this). One can be reborn, at most, only seven times more before one attains nirvana. [This is by the impersonal cosmic order of things, not by anyone's decree.]

The arhat is like one who, having traversed a terrible desert or barren wilderness, sees ahead the end of the journey: The sand still burns the feet, the sun still blazes down on the head, one is tired and thirsty, but there, within sight, lie the shady trees, the cool ponds of crystal-clear water.

Seeing the goal within sight, one presses on gladly, knowing that soon one will reach the journey’s end. Not for anything in the world would such a person change places with one who is still lost and wandering, hopelessly lost in the desert with no guide to point the way out.

That other person may be a wealthy worldling, richly-dressed, with a large following. But such a person is to be pitied. For that person is a long, long way off from the “journey’s end.”

Power and Freedom

Time and time again in the beginningless succession of past lives which is our existence in saṃsāra, we worldlings have sought power for its own sake [or for its false sense of safety and many possible privileges]. There is something terribly fascinating about the idea of power.

We wish to be “big.” We wish to do “big” things [like conquering, vanquishing, giving, or helping]. We wish to exercise control over our environment. Hardly any of us wishes, or attempts, to exercise control over ourselves.
 
If a wise person were asked, “What would you do if you were offered dictatorship over all the earth?” that person would answer, “Refuse it, of course.” For the wise do not seek power, nor are they impressed by it. And yet how many of us are wise?

We seek power, imagining that it is the key to happiness. We strive for power, and if we happen to get it, we generally abuse it. The wise seek dominance only over themselves, realizing that therein lies the key to freedom. “Fruit of Entrance into the Dharma Stream” is the first stage of awakening, as taught by the Buddha. It is the threshold of freedom. The stream-winner is beyond the reach of worldly ambition.
 
One has done away, once and for all, with the desire for worldly trappings. Politicians, every one of whom is at heart a power seeker, sometimes talk of “freedom” as though it were a commodity that could be bought with votes or won in the bloody gambit of a war. But there is no such thing as mass-deliverance into freedom, and there never will be, whatever politicians tell us.

Humanity in the mass is fit only for what it already has, and just at present that looks like the brink of hell. Humanity in the mass may, and very likely will, plunge over the brink and suffer the consequences, for a while. It has happened before and can happen again, for that is the endless story of human foolishness that follows fools for leaders.
 
But, for the individual, there is always the opportunity to seek freedom. That was the glorious truth taught by the Buddha, and it still holds good. Freedom is not the fruit of worldly power. It is the fruit of virtue and collectedness (mental coherence sometimes labelled concentration or focus), leading to insight (liberating wisdom).
 
On this road to deliverance, power too comes as a byproduct, a strange new power such as worldlings never dream of. But that is not the goal. It is merely a sign of progress made, an encouragement to further effort.
 
Freedom is the one and only goal. The Buddha had such power in incalculable measure, and so too did many of the arhats, the enlightened ones. They used it wisely and kindly, to help others, never to exercise dominance over them. More

Monday, July 4, 2011

Thoughts of Liberation (on the 4th of July)

Wisdom Quarterly, text Meditation: First Steps to Control of the Senses (P.M. Rao)
(lisisoft.com)

When the Bodhisat failed to attain the goal -- freedom of the heart, liberation of mind -- by means of the formless concentration attainments and the extreme austerities and penances, he said to himself:

“I recall how, when my father the Sakyan was at work, I sat in the cool shade of a rose-apple tree and, aloof from the pleasures of the senses, aloof from unwholesome states of mind, I entered upon and reached the first absorption, which has applied and sustained attention, is born of aloofness, and has rapture and happiness. Could this, I wonder, be the way to wisdom?”

And there came to him the consciousness that follows truth: “Yes, this is the way to wisdom!” (MN 36)

After developing the four absorptions one after the other [and using it as a foundation for insight-meditation, tracing the links of Dependent Origination to discover the cause and solution to suffering] the highest wisdom was attained. He saw nirvana.

(nekorpa.org)

He accomplished the noble quest by following the method of serenity-and-insight (jhana-vipassana) as the way to nirvana.

But the only descriptions we find of the absorptions in the Discourse Collection come in a set of recurring formulas similar to the one given above concerning the first absorption. To follow the path to freedom today, we have to turn to the oral tradition for the actual practice. Experienced meditation teachers are not easy to find.

The formula for the first absorption has certain interesting and intriguing expressions. Chief among them are the phrases “aloof from pleasures of the senses” and “aloof from unwholesome states of mind.”

What does “aloofness” signify? In our work-a-day world surrounded by pleasing sense objects, we can imagine aloofness to consist of turning eyes away from a beautiful object or turning a deaf ear to a catchy tune. But how does one remain aloof amid the flood of thoughts when sitting in mentally secluded in meditation?

Far from the distractions of the world's sense objects, there are internal attachments and constant clinging we will not lay aside even long enough to become free.

We know of various things to do when unwholesome thoughts arise. As described in the Vitakkasanthana Sutra (Wheel No. 21, The Removal of Distracting Thoughts) it is possible to suppress, ignore, or replace them with wholesome thoughts. Or we might ponder over their unpleasant consequences, or try to remove the causes that give rise to them.

But to be aloof from them? A deeper study of the discourses shows that the word “aloofness” refers to a powerful psychological method of overcoming unwholesome tendencies.

The Buddha evolved a general approach for mastering some of the problems that arise on the path to nirvana. The attainment of aloofness in the first absorption is an example of this approach. The absorptions suppress mental defilements. That temporary purity of mind/heart enables insight-meditation to succeed.

Tibet's Potala Palace, overtaken and gutted by China, Lhasa, Tibet (Matteo Pistono)

This method can be understood by studying its application to the related subject of controlling the senses. But before any method can succeed, we must purify our attitude towards the world in general and sense-control in particular. How?

We must abandon all dogmas that hinder spiritual progress. Suppose one believes that there is a "destiny" that shapes all of our ends and at the same time recognizes the need to struggle to control the senses (a common combination of views). Further, suppose one encounters a particularly attractive object of desire.

It might be the path of least resistance to surrender to desire saying, “I was destined to do it.” Again one may have a theory that the attainment of an absorbed state is a sign of spiritual perfection. In this case, one would naturally put more emphasis on the methods leading to absorption. Then control of the senses would seem natural and good for this attainment.

But one may go to the other extreme: One may think that leading a good life and control of the senses are ends in themselves. The right attitude in these matters is to consider every attainment as a step to a higher one. The goal is nothing short of nirvana. Source

On 4th of July, Earth is Farthest from Sun
Joe Rao (space.com)
The weather forecast for this year's Fourth of July holiday in the United States calls for high temperatures across much of the country's central and southern states, with some places expected to surpass 100 degrees for the American holiday. So it may come as a surprise that despite this heat, the planet is actually about as far away from the sun as it ever gets. More

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Mahayana versus Theravada

Dr. W. Rahula (Gems of Buddhist Wisdom, additional editing by WQ)

.
What is the difference between Mahayana [the Buddhist school prevalent in China, Korea, Japan, Tibet, and Vietnam] and Theravada [the Buddhist school prevalent in Sri Lanka, Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos]? To put things in perspective, let us turn to the history of Buddhism and trace the emergence and development of Mahayana and Theravada.

History
The Buddha was born in the 6th Century B.C. From the attainment of enlightenment at the age of 35 until his final nirvana at the age of 80, he spent his life teaching. He was energetic: for 45 years he taught day and night, sleeping for about two hours a day.

The Buddha spoke to all kinds of people: kings, farmers, beggars, brahmins, wanderers, and ordinary everyday people. His discourses were tailored to the experience, understanding, and mental capacity of his audience. What he taught was called Buddha-Vacana, that is, “the word of the Buddha.” There was nothing called Theravada or Mahayana at that time.

After establishing the Order of monks and nuns, the Buddha set down disciplinary and procedural rules called the Vinaya to the guide the Order. The remainder of his Teaching was called the Dharma, which included discourses, sermons, and sayings to monastics and lay people.

The First Council
Three months after the Buddha’s final nirvana, his immediate disciples convened a council in Rajagaha, India. Maha Kassapa, the most respected and elderly monk, presided over that council. Two very important Great Disciples (mahatheras) who specialized in the two distinct areas of the Teaching (the Dharma and the Vinaya) were present. The first was Ananda, the Buddha’s closest companion and disciple over the preceding 25 years. Endowed with a remarkable memory (even in an age of remarkable memories), Ananda was able to recite all the discourses the Buddha had uttered. [When sutras begin “Thus have I heard,” Ananda is that “I” and he made this statement in front of the First Council of enlightened elders]. The other monastic was Upali, who had committed all of the Discipline to memory.

Only these two sections, Discourses and Discipline, were recited at the First Council. Although there were no differences of opinion on the Dharma (no mention was yet made of the Abhidharma, “Higher Teaching,” the metaphysical and psychological explanations), there was some discussion about the Rules.

Before the Buddha’s was to pass into nirvana, he told Ananda that if the Order wished to amend or modify some “minor” rules after his passing, they could do so. But on that occasion Ananda, overpowered by grief on hearing of the Buddha’s impending passing, it did not occur to him to ask what the “minor” rules were.

As the members of the First Council were unable to agree as to what constituted those minor rules, Maha Kassapa finally ruled that no disciplinary rule laid down by the Buddha should be changed and that no new ones should be introduced. No intrinsic reason was given. Maha Kassapa did say one thing, however: “If we changed the rules, people would say that Ven. Gautama’s disciples changed them even before his funeral pyre had gone out.”

At the First Council, the Dharma was divided into various sections, and each section was assigned to an Elder (a Thera) and his pupils to commit to memory. The Dharma (or “Teaching,” the Vada) was then passed on from teacher to pupil orally.
.
The Dharma was recited daily by groups of monastics who often cross checked each other to ensure that no omissions or additions were made. Historians agree that an oral tradition is more reliable than a report written by one person from memory several years later.

The Second Council
One-hundred years later, a Second Council was held to discuss some Rules. There was no need to change the Rules three months after the final passing of the Buddha because little to no political, economic, or social changes took place during that short interval. But a century later, some monastics saw the need to change certain minor rules. The orthodox Order said that nothing should be changed, while others insisted on modifying some Rules.
.
Finally, a group of monks left the Second Council and formed the Mahasanghika, the “Great Community.” Even though it was called the Mahasanghika, it was not known as “Mahayana.” During the Second Council, only matters pertaining to the Rules were discussed, and no controversy whatsoever about the Teaching is reported.

The Third Council
In the 3rd Century B.C.E., during the reign of Emperor Asoka, the Third Council was held to discuss the differences of opinion among the monks of [18] different sects that had arisen. By the Third Council the differences were not confined to the Rules but were also connected with the Teaching. At the end of the Third Council, the president of the council, Moggaliputta Tissa, compiled a book he called Kathavatthu refuting the heretical, false views and theories held by some sects.
.
The Teaching approved and accepted by the Third Council was known as Theravada -- the “Teaching of the Elders” or what the Buddha’s original-hearers (those Theras) had rehearsed and passed down through the students dedicated to memorizing, reciting, and cross checking the various sections of the Dharma. The Abhidharma collection -- the Higher Teaching, that is, the philosophical commentaries and metaphysical treatises as distinct from the bare discourses -- was also included at the Third Council.

After the Third Council, Asoka’s son, Venerable Mahinda, brought the Three Collections (Tripitaka: Teaching, Rules, and Abhidharma) to Sri Lanka, along with the commentaries and explanations which were recited at the Third Council. The texts brought to Sri Lanka were preserved to the present day without losing a single page. The texts were written in the Pali language, which was based on the Magadhi dialect spoken by the Buddha. There was still nothing known as “Mahayana.”

The Coming of Mahayana
Between the 1st Century B.C.E. to the 1st Century A.D., the two terms Mahayana (the “Great Vehicle”) and Hinayana (the “Inferior Vehicle”) appeared in the Saddharma Pundarika Sutra, the “Discourse of the Lotus of the Good Law.”

About the 2nd Century A.D., Mahayana became clearly defined. Nagarjuna developed the Mahayana philosophy of Sunyata (Emptiness or nonexistence) and proved that everything is Void [devoid of personality or identity] in a small text called the Madhyamika Karika.
.
About the 4th Century, Asanga and Vasubandhu wrote many additional works on Mahayana.

After the 1st Century AD., the Mahayanists took a definite stand and only then were the opposing terms Mahayana and Hinayana introduced and propagated, the latter as a foil or strawman for the former. [Mahayana teachings were a criticism of those now defunct Indian sects (not of Theravada) particularly the Sarvastivada School, which taught the theory that all exists].

Therefore, one must not confuse Hinayana with “Theravada,” the Teaching of the Elders, because the terms are not synonymous. Theravada Buddhism had gone to Sri Lanka during the 3rd Century B.C.E. when there was no Mahayana at all. Hinayana schools [among the 18 sects that had] developed in India [200 years after the Buddha’s passing] and had an existence independent from the form of Buddhism existing in Sri Lanka.

Today there is no “Hinayana” sect or school in existence anywhere in the world.

Therefore, in 1950 the World Fellowship of Buddhists inaugurated in Colombo, Sri Lanka unanimously decided that the term “Hinayana” should be dropped when referring to Buddhism existing today in Sri Lanka, Thailand, Burma, Cambodia, Laos, etc. [sometimes referred to as “Southern Buddhism”].

This is the brief history of Theravada, Mahayana, and Hinayana.

Mahayana and Theravada
Now, then, what can be said of the difference between Mahayana and Theravada?

I have studied Mahayana for many years, and the more I study it the more I find there is hardly any difference between Theravada and Mahayana with regard to the fundamental Teaching.

  • Both accept Sakyamuni Buddha as the teacher.
  • The Four Noble Truths are exactly the same in both schools.
  • The Eightfold Path (to enlightenment) is exactly the same in both schools.
  • The teaching of Dependent Origination is the same in both schools.
  • Both reject the idea of a supreme being who creats and governs this world.
  • Both accept the teachings of Impermance, Unsatisfactoriness (Dukkha), Impersonality (Anatta) as well as Morality, Concentration, and Wisdom without any difference.

These are the most important teachings of the Buddha, and they are all accepted by both schools without question.

Differences
There are also, however, some points of difference, or at least of emphasis. An obvious one is the “Bodhisattva ideal.” Many people say that Mahayana is for a Bodhisattvahood that will lead to Buddhahood, while Theravada is for Arahantship (immediate enlightenment as taught by the Buddha). I must point out that the Buddha was an arahant (an enlightened one). A Nonteaching (Prateka or Pacceka) Buddha is also an arahant.

A disciple can also be an arahant. Mahayana texts never use the term “Arahant-yana,” the Arahant Vehicle. Instead, Mahayanists use three terms: Bodhisattva-yana, Prateka-Buddha-yana, and Sravaka-yana (the Bodhisattva-vehicle, the Nonteaching-Buddha vehicle, and the Disciple-vehicle). In the Theravada tradition these three are called Bodhis.

Some people mistakenly imagine that Theravada Buddhism is “selfish” because it teaches (what the historical Buddha taught) that people should diligently work towards their own salvation without helping others. But how could a selfish person ever gain enlightenment? (It would be impossible because selfishness precludes the compassion and wisdom necessary for realizing the truth that leads to enlightenment and the liberation of nirvana). Both schools accept the three Yanas or Bodhis and consider Bodhisattvahood the ideal, the highest.

The difference is Mahayana Buddhism has created many mystical Bodhisattvas, while Theravada Buddhism considers a “bodhisattva” a person among us who devotes his or her entire life to the attainment of perfection, ultimately attaining buddhahood [enlightenment] for the benefit, welfare, and happiness of the world.

Types of Buddhahood

There are three types of Buddha:

  • Samma Sambuddha (a supremely enlightened one), who gains full enlightenment [by perfecting ten qualities and gaining the magical ability to teach] by one’s own effort alone
  • Pacceka Buddha who is fully, independently enlightened but has not developed the Ten Perfections to a lesser degree than the Samma Sambuddha [and therefore is not skilled in showing others the way to enlightenment], and the
  • Savaka Buddha who is an arahant-disciple of a perfectly enlightened Buddha.

The nirvana of the three types is exactly the same. The only difference is that the Samma Sambuddha has many more qualities (paramitas, paramis, or perfections) and capacities which are useful in teaching than the other two types.

Emptiness
Some people think that the Voidness (Sunyata) discussed by Nagarjuna is purely a Mahayana teaching. However, it is based on the Buddha’s teaching of Impersonality (anatta) or no-self and Dependent Origination, both found in the original Theravada, Pali language texts.

On one occasion Ananda asked the Buddha, “People say the word Void. What is Void (Sunya)?” The Buddha replied, “Ananda, there is no self, nor anything belonging to a self in the world. Therefore, the world is empty.”

This idea was used by Nagarjuna, who wrote the small remarkable book, Madhyamika Karika.

Apart from the idea of Voidness, the concept of the “store-consciousness” in Mahayana Buddhism also has its seed in Theravada texts. The Mahayanists have simply developed it into a deep psychology and philosophy.

PHOTOS: Map showing distribution of the two Buddhist schools (Feng Shui Times); the Buddha sending out the first Buddhist missionaries (who were arahant-savakas or "enlightened disciples"); modern day Theravada monks on almsround in Sri Lanka; ornate and elaborate golden Bodhisattva (Nepal); Theravada Sangha (Order) living as simply as the Buddha originally set out (Kare Lie); Mahayana-Vajrayana Sangha in front of many Buddhas and Bodhisattvas on an altar (thubtenchodron.com); anthropomorphic depiction of a Bodhisattva of "perfect wisdom."