(Near-Death Experiences) White American Southern man and farmer dies, which becomes a profound near-death experience for him as he meets the spirit Jesus, which reveals shocking truths about Black people. He never thought he hated them, nor did he notice his implicit biases, only "preferring to stick with his own kind."
Buddhism is nontheistic, not atheistic, and Buddhists are free to believe, follow, worship, or depend on a god (Maha Brahma, the Great Supremo), gods (brahmas, devas), or whatever conception they have of the "divine" (divinity)
(Holy Koolaid) Six Seven resurrection stories with much better evidence than Christians have for their savior figure the Guru/Rabbi Jesus Christ (Yeshua the Nazarene and likely Essene).
COUNTLESS OTHERS: Enoch, Nelson Mandela (whose reappearance led to the coining of the term "Mandela Effect" for a very real phenomenon the powers that be want us not to believe in), "Bábá" (aka Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar, the founder of Ananda Marga), all of us who, though we seem to die, are in fact endlessly rearising an instant later in the process of rebirth (patisandhi,rearising, relinking, reappearance) known as the Wheel of Death and Rebirth (samsara), which has touched ALL beings, even Maha Brahma the imagined "Creator God" of this universe, the gods (other brahmas, which fall into the category of other "shining ones" called devas), hellions (narakasinniraya the "downward path," "downfall," roughly speaking the purgatories since no world is eternal, not even the worst and lowest "hell," which is called Avici), animals (tiracchāna), ghosts (petas), dragons/reptilians (nagas), and other strange creatures like trolls (kumbhandas), ogres (rakshasas), nature spirits or monsters/protectors (yakshas), and avians (garudas/suparnas), fairies (apsaras), dryads (salabhanjikas), angels (lower devas, particularly the gandhabbas/gandharvas), demons (asuras), and devils (maras)...
We'll never die. We're not about to fall off this.
It's strange to face death. There Death is, here life be, who will win out? Eventually, Death (Mara) wins almost every time. It's the "almost" that's the key. When does it not win?
The Buddha and the arhats (fully enlightened beings) do not die. It may seem as if they do. They go away. The reason they do not "die" is because death necessarily entails rebirth. Where there is birth, necessarily there is death. With death comes rebirth, with birth comes redeath. This is the cycle of endless suffering known among the Indian religions as samsara.
We die and are reborn, not arhats who no longer cycle.
It is not quite correct to say "endless" because it can be brought to an end, to cessation, and deconstructed. It is just as well to refer to it as endless because it will not be ending by itself. Samsara has no expiration date, no natural completion, no coming to a standstill on its own.
So long as there is fuel, the fire keeps raging. What fuels samsara? Karma (activities) rooted in attachment, aversion, and ignorance (the Three Poisons usually rendered greed, hatred, and delusion or lobha, dosa, and moha). Since each act has the power to produce an exponential number of results (vipaka and phala), it will not be exhausted anytime soon.
This problem of death -- the loss of everything we love and are attached to in our foolishness as if the things we love and cling to were not of a nature to fall away -- was solved by the Buddha. This is the great significance of his great awakening (maha bodhi).
What does it matter to us? Good for him that he overcame all that can harm and upset. But what about us? That's just it! He did not awaken and depart. He awakened and stayed for 45 years, teaching until he established the Dharma (Teaching) and a competent Sangha (a spiritual community of those successfully Taught). Now, what does "successful" mean?
It means that the Buddha and his fully enlightened disciples established a method of teaching that produces more and more enlightened disciples, both humans and devas. The ordinary Monastic Sangha or Spiritual Community of monks and nuns are a great treasure in the world because they study, memorize, and retain the Teaching.
By their practice of it, as well as that of non-monastic disciples, there is a constant supply of arhats, non-returners, once-returners, and the various kinds of stream-enterers (the most fruitful field of merit) in the world. These four categories or pairs of individuals (counted as those who experience the supramundane paths and fruits or magga-phala) constitute the "noble ones" (Aryan disciples).
The first stage of enlightenment or awakening results in a guarantee of enlightenment within at most seven more rebirths, but the arhat has made an end of all suffering and all further rebirth in this very life.
The Buddha taught his Teaching in a way that an ordinary individual of average intelligence could successfully practice it to the end of suffering in this very life/
Death is coming
It's odd to be reminded that we are but ephemeral phenomena, arising and passing away, hurtling toward destruction. "Not having been, they come to be; once having been, they cease." What does? The Five Aggregates clung to as self. What are those?
They are the constituents of being, called "aggregates" because there are heaps of them, categories of them. There is the feeling group (vedana khandha), the pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral. They are impermanent, unsatisfactory (disappointing), and impersonal.
It's unimaginable that they would be impersonal because they feel like they are the most personal things of all. But mindful observation of them with a mind intensified by the absorptions (jhanas) reveals how ephemeral they are, constantly rising and falling, unable to fulfill, and not at all under our control. They do not belong to us. Feelings feel and belong to feelings. It is, ultimately speaking, feeling that feels, not "us" -- not a me, myself, or I, not a self, soul, ego, personality, being, or atman.
We would never penetrate and accept this until we see it for ourselves with an open and intensified mind. In ignorance, we fear all sorts of things, including wisdom. But wisdom/the Truth has the power to set us free. Who will gain stream entry? Only those who penetrate this ultimate truth -- discerning in all things the Three Facts or Characteristics of All Existence.
Because the ultimate truth is everywhere the same, it can be realized anywhere. But it is much easier to realize in some places over others. The easiest place to realize it is on the human plane (the manussya loka), which extends far beyond the Earth we know.
Project Blue Beam is live? (Blakwoodz) Jan. 9, 2025: The LA fire has become massively unstable, consuming almost everything in its way. And it totally seems like this whole fire is not natural. It surely looks like everything that's going on is a planned event. Someone very powerful might be in control. The Hollywood Hills are on fire and evacuations are taking place right now. This is beyond control. Winds are widespread. Speculations have been raised, questions about whether this is Project Blue Beam being activated. Is it the mythical Anti-Christ [what Dr. Ammon Hillman calls the "antidote"] before the second coming of Jesus [the kristos or "anointed," who dosed himself by the application of an ointment of medicinal psychedelic-like compounds from poisons]. The question, however, is Why are these things happening mostly in America? Prophecy: 2025 might be the final year of our life. Second channel: @blakwoodz2 All links: linktr.ee/Blakwoodz. Business contact: blakwoodzbusiness@gmail.com
Exciting stories of life and death
I'm from Hollywood to make killing 'n dying cool
The fire raged on the mountain there in the distance. The wind blew it away, up and over the foothills. Who dreamt is could turn back and eat the town? The wind raged, cars exploded, and houses -- homes of real people -- were set ablaze by embers (or directed energy weapons). They would soon be incinerated. One could fight the valiant fight with a fire extinguisher. But it was too late, the flames too far gone, eating the roof, crawling into the walls. Buildings set one next to the other, sharing a wall, they would all come down. No firefighters fought these flames, but looked on overwhelmed. What are they for if not to fight and save buildings, property, people? Who knows? There were overtime wages to collect. A planned catastrophe made to look like just the confluence of natural circumstances, who can prove otherwise? Sure, there were arsonists at play, but were they coordinated, acting alone, part of a conspiracy? Insurers collect premiums but provide no replacement. It's just too big to cover one's worth of premiums. Of course, people were paying for many, many years only to get the shaft when they needed that protection. The government (we the people by another name) will bail them out. The CEOs already made their billions, why not privatize the profits and socialize the costs? It's the disaster-capitalist way. Just ask Naomi Klein. How long will we go on spinning in this spin cycle?
Samsara is an ocean that pulls us out to sea, where we bounce around, cold, alone, only to drown in a whirlpool. Even if we struggle, join others, and hang in a long time, Death wins by coming on again. Is there no end to it?
Tower of strength takes to the sea
Scours ocean via quay
Same old story: muscle bound and gory
Brand new story: death without glory
Infinite story: so new, so hoary
Build a tower of strength and watch it weaken
Construct high hopes as the brightest beacon
Watch the seagulls eat the trash
You contemptuously ditch
Do you know a seagull?
Do you know a wreck?
Are you tired of the tide?
Are you tired of the tide?
Roll in a rock pool, come let's hide
Do you know a raging wind?
Do you know a seagull?
Do you know a wreck?
Do you know a raging wind?
Are you tired of the tide?
Are you tired of the tide?
Roll in a rock pool, come let's hide
Tower of strength takes to the sea, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh
Is there "life after death"? It's better to think of it as there being life after life (after life...ad nauseum). This process of karma (deeds) bringing about their results (resultants and fruits) is unending. It can be ended, brought to a standstill, but it will not ever stop on its own. Anyone who fears ending should know ahead of time that death is not it. One will transition out of here, lose all that is loved, and reappear elsewhere -- not one place but any of countless places where those former deeds willed, carried out, and accumulated can bear their results. Death is terrible for that reason. It is not terrible for the reason we mainly fear in ignorance, that it somehow signals the end of everything. It does not signal the end of anything, except perhaps active firsthand participation in what we're used to. But there is more, much more, and endless amount of more. And this is not good. While it should allay fears of disappearing forever, it (rebirth) should not please one into thinking the game goes on for more playtime even after the screen reads "Game over." Yes, this round stops abruptly only for another one to stop. The Buddha when he awakened saw this playing out incessantly for ALL living beings, faring along according to their karma. He saw his own countless past lives in general and in their details. "Long enough have we all wandered in this samsara, long enough to be done with it," he taught. But we aren't done with. We don't want to be done with it. And why? Because we don't see it for what it really is. We do not see its three universal characteristics: It's radically impermanent, it's never going to fulfill or satisfy us, and it's impersonal. What does it mean to be "radically" impermanent? Isn't that just that our new house eventually becomes dilapidated and falls down in 100 years or so? No! That's obvious impermanence. The Buddha wasn't harping on that. What he was harping on was radical (from the root or radix) transience, flux, change from moment to moment. "Everything is hurtling toward destruction," were his final words, "so work out your liberation [from suffering] with diligence." There's no time to waste, so brief is a human life, so rare to ever hear the Buddha Dharma. There's no time to argued, the Beatles urged. We have this moment. What is the most valuable way to use it as it slip away from us? We can accrue good (skillful, useful, beneficial, profitable, wholesome, resulting in wished for and pleasant results) karma, or we can accrue the best karma -- actions that bring about the end of all action. The practice is about doing what must be done to end suffering. There is so much suffering to come, stretched out before us so much further than we can see or fathom. To make an end of it, to stop grasping at trivial things for real knowledge and vision worthy of noble (enlightened) ones, that is something in line with why the Buddha taught and what dismayed Mara who, if he had his way, would trap us in the Sensual Sphere for all time. This is no place to be. The Sensual Sphere is where the animal, human, and hells are along with Sense Sphere heavens. There is much better pleasure than sensuality, and there is freedom beyond that. Do good, and do the best good (meditate for calm and insight) to gain freedom.
Clinically dead man sees the afterlife, shown truth about our dimension (NDE)
(The Other Side NDE) Bill Letson's NDE (near-death experience) trip to the afterlife was mind-expanding. This short video is about what that California man learned from his experience in 1994. He never forgot and for years had no words for it. His NDE took him on a trip through the afterlife, where he was shown amazing truths about life on earth and the unreality of death.
(SEEKER TO SEEKER) The impersonal law of karma and the impersonal process of rebirth are bedrock teachings of the Buddha. [All things -- in an ultimate, not a conventional, sense -- are impermanent, unable to fulfill or satisfy, and impersonal: understanding how and why is the meaning of awakening, of being enlightened and free. It is not obvious, or the Buddha would have seen no necessity of teaching these things. But they are necessary to know-and-see for us to be able to let go and be free of all suffering] They are also the most problematic ones. To some, karmic rebirth seems like outdated superstition. It ruins the image of Buddhism as a rational philosophy of life. Within the Buddhist tradition, too, karma and rebirth raise difficult questions. If the Buddha taught only the impersonal (anatta, "no-self") doctrine or karma and rebirth, everything would have been fine. But he insisted both that all things are without self (impersonal) and that there is karma and rebirth. Now, if there is no self, who or what gets reborn? And if there are no selves, how can you or I or anyone have karma (or undergo rebirth)? And how does karma pass or cross over from one life to the next? And does karma suggest our lives are predetermined – that there is no free will? If so, why does the Buddha teach that so much effort be put into improving our lives and gaining liberation here and now in this very life?
The impersonal process keeps rolling after our experience here, which is just one of an uncountable number of reappearances we experience, and the process, which is like a dream, does not stop until we awaken. People who go through NDEs lose their fear of death, seeing what really happens as the process cycles and cycles.
But, c'mon, there is a "self," right? Well, there's not a self really, but there conventionally-speaking, of course there's a self. It's the one speaking now and the one being spoken to, and all that we identify with. What do we identify with? Body, feelings, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness(es). Looked at closely, however, it becomes clear that none of these are actually the "self" they seem to be when integrated all together. So a much better question to ask is, If there's not a self, is there nothing, or what is there? The answer to this is very clearly, and the Buddha explained this again and again to those who could see: There is Dependent Origination, a process by which things come into being. There is not "nothing," but there is in a very deep sense no-thing. What's a "thing"? A thing is an amalgamation, something composed of constituents, like a cross. What is a cross +? It's just two lines, neither of which is a cross. But when placed together just so, what is there? Aah-aah-aah, careful. When placed together, there are just two lines, but that's not what the mind sees. The mind misinterprets reality and sees something new arise, an illusion. Yes, there's a line, two in fact, so there's not nothing. (This is also interesting, there isn't really a line, because a line itself is a "thing," an amalgamation of parts that are not a line). There comes into being a thing, and the characteristics of that thing are threefold: it is impermanent (coming into being utterly dependent on its conditions), and it is unsatisfactory (utterly incapable of fulfilling or satisfying), and most shocking of all, it is impersonal (empty, utterly dependent on constituent-things that are not it but without which there is not the illusion of it having come into being). Very intelligent and kind people would go argue with the Buddha to show he that he was crazy to claim there was no self, no soul, no ego, no atman (or personality, permanent soul or essence of the person). They were amazed that anyone, much less someone so famous and intelligent, willing to hold such a view. The Buddha kindly showed them that he was not holding a view, they were. They were clinging to sakkaya-ditthi (personality-view) and it was much to their detriment, and asked how he could possibly explain things, anything, without reference to a self, the Buddha very cogently showed that he understood the misunderstanding and alarm caused by this knowledge. He explained everything in terms of Dependent Origination without any difficulty. One might think, then as now, that the Buddha contradicted himself every time he, conventionally speaking, said "I" or "mine" or used the self-referential term "Tathagata? (Wayfarer, Thus Come One, Well Gone One), but no enlightened person is confused by the use of conventional speech: If we say to a child, "When the Boogieman comes, I'm going to tell him that you were misbehaving," who but a child would think that binds us to a belief in an actual Boogieman who cares about a kid's behavior? We say it because that is what a child will understand not because we have misunderstood nor because by saying it we suddenly become confused and lose an argument: "I say there is no self." "Aha! you just 'I' thereby proving there is a self." "Oh, gee, Bob, you got me there; there's no getting around that logic. WHAT DOES IT MATTER THAT THERE IS, ultimately speaking, NO SELF? Why even bother to say such a preposterous thing that is going to upset so many of our commonsense sensibilities, the structure of our language, the whole proposition of the world we think we are trapped in? THERE IS AT LEAST ONE GREAT REASON FOR THAT: There is no enlightened person outside the unique Teaching (Doctrine, Dharma) of the impersonality of all things. It is what must be penetrated and understood, known-and-seen, to enter upon the very first stage of enlightenment (bodhi, awakening) called stream entry. So it is of the utmost importance to have at least a conceptual understanding of what we cannot accept, don't want to accept, and may even be afraid of. It is not bad news that there is no self. There is what there is, and that is what there has been all this time we were ignorant of it. We will not turn into a piece of unsmoke when we realized the Buddha was really wise -- wise beyond all measure and comprehension, imponderably so -- when he set out what all buddhas of the past, present, and future realized and taught for the liberation of beings. "Hey, what about that +?" "What about it? There it is. Just as there are lines (even though there really aren't), there are crosses, conventionally speaking, and if it's useful to give something a name and a definition and a patent, do it. That doesn't mean it really comes into being ultimately speaking, for what would it mean if it were real? The Buddha talks in detail about that. For instance, if there really were a self, it should do as I wish it to, but it doesn't. Whatever there is, it's not under my control. I don't wish for it to grow old, sickly, then die. I wish for it to always be young, never get sick, and surely never die. But the darn thing does anyway. I wish for it to be strong, beautiful, loved, but it isn't. It's not following my dictates but some other impersonal laws or forces that are a mystery to me. So before I call it mine, or think of it as personal, I should at least be able to exercise basic control over it, right?" "Right, but you don't." "Right, yet everyone calls it mine and trains me to see it as mine and makes me to worry about it and take all responsibility..." "It seems too hard to learn this intellectually." "Right, so go have fun reading the Heart Sutra, and maybe one day it will sink in in a sudden flash of illumination. ;)
Seers in ancient India came to understand that death is not fearful because "everything ends" but because, yet again, we are cut off from loved ones, all that we cling to, all that we imagine ourselves to be, and undergo the difficulties of rebirth or relinking again and again. And it is not, as the popular conception goes, all for some higher purpose of getting better and better, learning lessons, and evolving. The Buddha clearly saw and reported that it is like rollercoaster, swirling out of control, taking us up and plunging us down. We hanker, grasp, desire, and chase pleasures wherever we can find them, getting into all kinds of karmic trouble for a long, long time, rarely meeting with a good teaching and examples that take us in the other direction. All of us are beset by "mixed" karma, some skillful, some unskillful, and what deed conditions the next rebirth is like the toss of dice, a cr*pshoot, which makes it fearful. It is very hard to be sure what the next reappearance will be because it depends on the nanosecond of passing, and even the best meditators rarely gain that much control of their thinking, emotions, and consciousness to ensure that it is something welcome and wished for awaiting us. What awaits us is NOT set but the product of our own deeds throughout this life. If we were ruled by the past, there would be no sense. If it was all fate and fixed, there would be no doing, no acting, no deeds that would matter. They do matter, and that means our thoughts, words, and deeds have tremendous sway over all we experience here and now as well as then and there. The Buddha in his day was never called a "Buddhist" but he was frequently referred to as a Karmavadin, "a teacher of the efficacy of deeds" to bring about appropriate results. So straightening up now will have exponential effects for the future, long into the future, over countless lives to come. Making an end of rebirth now limits suffering and brings it to a complete end for those wise enough to see why this is such a tremendously rare and good thing.
Dalai Lama 2019; Bill Leston, The Other Side NDE, Dec. 28, 2022; Seeker to Seeker, March 8, 2024; Eds., Wisdom Quarterly
(The Other Side NDE) ⭐ Nurse Penny Wittbrodt encountered death, or what we think of as "death" judging from this side. From the other side, the afterlife, it looks very different. The mystics were right. Seers through the ages have really been seeing something we will all eventually see when it is too late to make use of the knowledge. If only we had come to believe and understand while living, the next phase (lives after lives without end) could have been comforting rather than our worst nightmare of annihilation and obliteration, which many scientific types look forward to because it would mean nothing was ever going to come of ill-done and well-done deeds in this and countless previous lives. When Wittbrodt had a near-death experience (NDE), it taught her about life. That was the most amazing thing. We do not die in any final sense. We may lose loved one, this body, this situation, and all that we hold dear, but there is continuation, reappearance elsewhere (blissful or dreadful or not completely unlike here). She saw her death from her own and then a disembodied perspective, which gave purpose to all the moments she had had here on Earth, the good, the bad, the ugly, and precious few lofty moments. The story of crossing over is mind-bending, glimpsing our potential to reappear in a heaven (one of many) or in any of 31 Planes of Existence in countless worlds. Stories come in from around the globe 🌍 ➡️ tinyurl.com/helptheothersidende🙏 See more of Penny Wittbrodt and her NDE here ▶️ witthealthcoaching.com. #nde#neardeathexperiences
The "soul" (self) is not immortal. It dies from moment to moment in life whether we notice or not. The process continues after "death." So we are neither immortal nor do we end by death.
.
Science finally uncovers what really happens
What happens after we die? While many scientists believe that death is the end, quantum physics suggests that it might not be as simple as we think.
This new scientific idea challenges everything we know about life and "death." By looking at concepts like the interconnectedness of all things and the nature of consciousness, here’s to a whole new perspective on life after death.
Biocentrism challenges our understanding of death and life
I tried to do my part for predictive programming, showing that there was no Death (T-Swift)
Before this, Dr. Lanza focused on researching embryonic stem cells and cloning, working with both animals and humans. [Illegal human cloning?] He is also an adjunct professor at Wake Forest UniversitySchool of Medicine in North Carolina.
I'll reappear in another place in another body?
According to biocentrism, death might not be what we think it is. Instead of seeing death as the end of life, this theory suggests it could be an illusion, something created by the way we perceive the world.
The idea is that time and space, as we understand them, are not fixed. Our awareness of these concepts might shape what we experience as life and death.
The theory doesn’t deny that our physical bodies die, but it suggests that our experience of death might not be the final event we think it is.
By studying stem cells and regenerative medicine, Dr. Lanza is working to explore how life can be extended or even renewed [as happens anyway according to the science-friendly Eastern traditions, in a recycling modality known as samsara].
Why lately has science been promoting suicide euthanasia, abortion, infertility, LGBTQIA+?
His research into cloning and stem cells shows that the boundaries of life might not be as clear-cut as we once believed.
If we can manipulate biological processes, it suggests that life—at least the biological part of it—could be much more flexible than we realize. More:
But I hate him so much because he's so full of hate, and I hate hate and people who hate!
Why are you mad? - Oh, I'dunno, no reason.
Can anger grow so bad that it eats us alive? But anger is "natural," and it's not good to hold it in. Science has found that people who express their anger, say by beating a pillow, significantly worsen. Acting out what is a transient emotion into a practice trigger-and-response.
Every time I hear that man's name, I get so triggered and p*ssed off, I'm just like Whoopi Goldberg cussing like I did when I was best friends with Mr. Trump, who often hired to me to cuss with my filthy mouth during my act.
Shut the h*ll up, Kids, before I beat you! - Yeah, you heard Mom, shut the h*ll up! - No, you!
.
The way to "manage" anger is to let it all hang out, behave irrationally, right? What could be healthier? When anger arises, watch it mindfully (non-reactively). If that is impossible, apply the immediately-effective antidote of metta (loving-kindness).
If feeling cold indifference towards others and their plight, practice karuna (compassion).
If not happy enough and wishing to instantly be happy, engage in mudita (joy in others' joy), the opposite of schadenfreude.
(What's that? It's delight in the misfortune of others, like poor Mr. Trump, who has to wear an adult diaper and fouls himself daily, which is why his baggy pants are so ill-fitting and wrinkled and his posture so extraordinarily bad, pushing his butt out and behind him. Just ask firsthand witness Noel Casler.)
What's wrong with anger if I don't hurt anyone?
One of the very dysfunctional things about anger is that, without realizing it, we often use it as the basis of our bad habits: I have to drink, I have to party, I have to get my grind on...or I'll explode. First, make things internally intolerable with messy emotions. Then "solve" the distress with a dysfunctional coping method.
Angry activist dies from heart attack and discovers we are all one (NDE)
(Coming Home) Mr. David Williamson shares the story of his near-death experience, dying of a heart attack brought on by hypertension after years of intense anger-fueled activism in support of the Black community.
During his encounter on the Other Side, he is surprised to realize that we are All One, while experiencing himself as a glowing orb of light and learning that no experience in this human life is ever lost or wasted.
Mr. Williamson shares how the experience transformed the way he views life now and how it changed the way he relates to all other people.
"We are creating our next life right now in this moment, with our attention"
- David Williamson
Follow David Williamson on his Substack to connect with him, receive articles he writes, and learn about workshops he may offer ⇨ dwilliamson.substack.com.
Subscribe to newsletter ⇨ cominghomechannel.substack.com where Coming Home explores the meaning and purpose of near-death experiences in the modern age. CH writes about the intersection of spirituality, life after death, comparative religion, philosophy, depth psychology, modern culture, and most of all how we can all stay connected to the truth that living doesn't end when we die in this life. Connect on Facebook ⇨ cominghomechannel. Instagram ⇨ cominghomechannel.
David Williamson (Coming Home NDE (video), June 27, 2023; Dhr. Seven, Ani, Melissa MacKay of insightla.org (video recommendation), Wisdom Quarterly COMMENTARY
All materials on this site are submitted by editors and readers. All images, unless otherwise noted, were taken from the Internet and are assumed to be in the public domain.
In the event that there is still a problem, issue, or error with copyrighted material, the break of the copyright is unintentional and noncommercial, and the material will be removed immediately upon presented proof.
Contact us by submitting a comment marked "private."
Do not follow this journal if you are under vinaya or parental restrictions. Secure protection by Sucuri.
Wisdom Quarterly: American Buddhist Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at creativecommons.org/about/licenses.
