Showing posts with label the myth of hinayana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the myth of hinayana. Show all posts

Friday, July 3, 2026

Theravada: 'What the Buddha Taught'


  • Theravada: "Teaching" (vada) of the [Enlightened] "Elders" (theras). How old were these elders? They were of all ages because it has to do with seniority (how many rains retreats as a monastic). They were the first disciples of the historical Buddha, the theris (nuns) and theras (monks).
  • Buddhist canons: Tipitaka ("Three Baskets")
  • Pali canon: Pali language collection of texts
  • Theravada Abhidhamma ("Higher Doctrine")
British Buddhist monk explains

What the Buddha Taught
What the Buddha Taught
This comprehensive, compact, lucid, and very faithful account of the Buddha’s Teachings (Dhamma) persistently enjoys great popularity in colleges, universities, and theological schools both in America and abroad.

“An exposition of Buddhism conceived in a resolutely modern spirit.”—from the Foreword.

“For years,” says the Journal of the Buddhist Society, “the newcomer to Buddhism has lacked a simple and reliable introduction to the complexities of the subject. Dr. Rahula’s What the Buddha Taught fills the need as only could be done by one having a firm grasp of the vast material to be sifted. It is a model of what a book should be that is addressed first of all to ‘the educated and intelligent reader.’ Authoritative and clear, logical and sober, this study is as comprehensive as it is masterly.”

A classic introductory book to Buddhism, What the Buddha Taught, contains a selection of illustrative texts from the original Pali canon texts, including the suttas (discourses, sutras) and the Dhammapada ("Imprint of the Dhamma," specially translated by the author), 16 illustrations, and a bibliography, glossary, and index. More
  • What the Buddha Taught: Revised and Expanded Edition with Texts from Suttas and Dhammapada by Walpola Rahula (author) and Paul Demieville (foreword)

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Save oneself or everyone else?

Save oneself or save everyone else? Buddhism's most dangerous question
(Buddha's Wisdom) May 6, 2026: ⚡ FOR 2,000 YEARS BUDDHISM HAS BEEN FIGHTING ITSELF...AND NO SIDE HAS WON YET. Is personal enlightenment (arahantship) selfish?

The Bodhisattva Ideal (BPS)
Buddhism's two greatest paths ideals, that of the Arhat and that of the Bodhisattva, have been locked in the most consequential debate in Buddhist history since the first century CE.

What began as a philosophical disagreement between Mahāyāna and [Hinayana schools until they were all destroyed and] Theravāda Buddhism [arose]. It became something far more dangerous: a 2,000-year argument about what "liberation" (vimutti, moksha) actually means, who it's for, and whether saving oneself first is an act of wisdom or an act of cowardice.

TIMESTAMPS
  • 00:00 The [apocryphal] trial of Śāriputra [where Ven. Sariputra, male disciple "foremost in wisdom," comparable to Ven. Khema, female disciple "foremost in wisdom" used as a stick figure to represent first the Hinayana ("Lesser Vehicle"), a pejorative epithet, and later the Theravada ("Teaching of the Elder Enlightened Disciples of the Historical Buddha") to attack them with Brahminical and Hindu residues on what the Buddha Taught]
  • 02:01 The debate we've been building to
  • 04:19 The prosecution — Mahāyāna's real case
  • 08:10 The defense — the sentence that stops everything
  • 13:19 The trap — who is taking this infinite vow?
  • 18:26 The real wound — self-view in spiritual clothing
  • 24:01 The dissolution — each path guards the other
  • 29:19 The same mountain
🔍 DISCOVER
  • Why the [apocryphal Mahayana invented discourse] Vimalakīrti Sūtra placed the arhat (Pali arahant) ideal on trial
  • How the Lotus Sūtra reframed personal liberation through the One Vehicle (Ekayana) teaching
  • Why Theravāda’s strongest defense begins with one simple fact: the Buddha called himself an was called an arahant
  • How the Diamond Sūtra complicates the bodhisattva vow through no-self (anatta) and emptiness (shunyata)
  • Why Vajrayāna Buddhism refuses to take sides in this debate...and what that refusal reveals about both paths simultaneously
📚 SOURCES AND FURTHER READING: (with affiliate links)
  • Primary [Mahayana] Buddhist texts: Vimalakīrti Sūtra (Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra) — Robert Thurman translation recommended https://amzn.to/3QTtGSD
  • Diamond Sūtra (Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra) — Red Pine translation recommended https://amzn.to/3OP9Mro
  • Lotus Sūtra (Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sūtra) — Burton Watson translation recommended https://amzn.to/4d2JFqh
  • Primary [Theravada] texts: Majjhima Nikāya (Collection of "Middle Length Discourses" from the Pali canon) — Ariyapariyesanā Sutta (MN 26) — Bhikkhu Bodhi translation https://amzn.to/4dcS2y9
  • Pāli canon — Nikāya (collection of) discourses on the brahma-vihārās ("Four Divine Abidings" of loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity or dispassionate looking on) 
Scholarly and Modern Resources
  • Paul Williams — Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations https://amzn.to/4evxKCq
  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (translator) — The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha https://amzn.to/3OMwqkd
  • Étienne Lamotte — The Teaching of Vimalakīrti
  • Peter Harvey — An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics https://amzn.to/42e1RH9
  • Nāgārjuna — Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Jay Garfield translation recommended) https://amzn.to/4w8J0Lr
  • Rupert Gethin, The Foundations of Buddhism https://amzn.to/4d5IG7h
🙏 Exploring Buddhism, Theravāda, Mahāyāna, the arhat path, the bodhisattva vow, Buddhist enlightenment (bodhi), no-self (anatta), and Buddhist philosophy for the first time? Maybe subscribing to Buddha’s Wisdom would be helpful. The Buddhist Schools Series goes deeper every video. 📱 Join community on Instagram (buddhaswizdom), Facebook (buddhaswizdom), X (x.com/BuddhasWizdom), Spotify (open.spotify.com/show/5ndnBU5...), TikTok (buddhas.wisdom). ☕ Support the channel: buymeacoffee.com/buddhaswisdom, paypal.me/buddhaswisdom. #Buddhism #Arhat #Bodhisattva #Theravada #Mahayana #BuddhistPhilosophy #Enlightenment #BuddhistDebate #Vajrayana #DiamondSutra #VimalakiriSutra #BuddhistSchools #Dharma #BuddhasWisdom #nirvana #BuddhistSchools #NoSelf #LotusSutra. How this was made auto-dubbed audio tracks for some languages were automatically generated. More

Meditate w/Bhikkhu Bodhi, Vesak, sutra study


CLASS INFO: Wednesdays 7:00–8:00 pm (EDT) with Bhikkhu Bodhi
Our Theravada JuBu teacher Bhikkhu Bodhi
Dear Dharma Students, please join us tonight (May 6, 2026) at 7:00 pm for a meditation session over Zoom by clicking here.

Each Wednesday evening, from 7:00 to 8:00 pm, Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi leads a meditation session over Zoom. The session consists of a 15-minute vandana (chanting Pali verses of homage) followed by a 45-minute guided meditation.

All are welcome to join. The texts for recitation are attached separately. Please see class page on website (BAUS.org/en) for chanting text. Miss it? Don't worry. This is a recurring meeting from 7:00 pm to 8:00 pm (EDT, New York time), Wednesdays.

With metta,

Chuang Yen Monastery/BAUS
  • Join Zoom Meeting us02web.zoom.us/s/83540900862?pwd=V1VkL0NhVEVnbGU4RnByNVJGRUhNUT09
  • Meeting ID: 835 4090 0862
  • Passcode: 368764
  • Subscribe to eNews from BAUS
  • One tap mobile +16468769923,,83540900862#,,,,*368764#
  • US (New York) +13017158592,,83540900862#,,,,*368764#
  • US (Washington DC) Dial by location +1 646 876 9923
  • US (New York) +1 301 715 8592
  • US (Washington DC) +1 312 626 6799
  • US (Chicago) +1 253 215 8782
  • US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799
  • US (Houston) +1 669 900 6833
  • US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 835 4090 0862, Passcode: 368764
  • Find local number: us02web.zoom.us/u/kcYniDdmfU
  • DONATION
  • BAUS (The Buddhist Association of the U.S.)
  • 美國佛教會, 2020 Route 301 Carmel, NY 10512
  • contact@baus.org
More activities at Chuang Yen Monastery (BAUS)­ for May 2026
Dates: Saturdays, May 2, 9, and 23. Time: 6:30 am to 8:30 am (PT) - 9:30 am to 11:30 am (ET) On Saturdays, Bhikkhu Bodhi leads a full morning program of meditation and sutra study.

May 2nd and 9th is a "hybrid" program in-person and online. The May 23rd class online only this month. The online class can be accessed through Zoom. Please note: To participate in this class, one must register with BAUS ahead of time: Sign up for class with Bhikkhu Bodhi

The Sanctuary Within with Ven. Youmin
Instructor: Ven. Youmin Date: May 10th, time: 10:00 am-11:30 am and 1:30-3:00 pm. Place: Woo Ju Memorial Library. Lead by Ven. Youmin, we will explore the ancient mechanics of the mind through the art of breath, deconstruct the filters of our perception, and gain a definitive framework for stress management. This is more than a lecture, it is a mental operating system upgrade. THE SANCTUARY WITHIN with Ven. Youmin 4/19 & 5/10

VESAK 2026: "Buddhist Christmas" in New York: the Buddha’s Birthday Celebration
Date: Sunday, May 17, 2026, 10:00 am to 12:00 pm. Place: The Great Buddha Hall at Chuang Yen Monastery. All are invited to celebrate Vesak, commemorating the birth of the historical Gautama Buddha (Shakyamuni). We will recite the Sutra on the Merit of Bathing the Baby Buddha and make a Grand Meal Offering to all the Buddhas. BAUS invites everyone to sponsor the lighting of a blessing lamp or other blessing or memorial services.
Group meditation Wednesdays on Zoom
Group Meditation on Zoom w/Bhikkhu Bodhi
Group Meditation over Zoom, Wednesdays, 7:00 pm-8:00 pm. Platform: Zoom. Every Wednesday evening, from 7:00 to 8:00 pm, Bhikkhu Bodhi leads online group meditation. The session consists of a 15-minute vandana (chanting verses of homage), followed by a 45-minute guided meditation, either on loving-kindness or on mindfulness of breathing.

Temple of Enlightenment (TOE)
  • 3070 Albany Cresent Bronx, NY 10463
  • TOE Meditation Class and Dharma Talk with Ven. Subodha
Instructor: Ven. Subodha, Sundays, 10:00 am to 11:30 am on Zoom and in person at TOE on Tuesdays from 7:00 pm to 8:30 pm. Location: Temple of Enlightenment Meditation Program. In person only at the Temple of Enlightenment in the Bronx.

  • Bhikkhu Bodhi (BAUS); Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, April 13, 2026

Buddhism split: Mahayana emerged


(Buddha's Wisdom) Heretical new texts turn the historical Buddha Shakyamuni's Dharma (Doctrine) on its head, infusing it with the Old Vedic Religion of the Brahmins, Taoism, Hinduism, and later thought, sometimes directly opposing what Gautama Buddha taught about nirvana and samsara and many other things, including the Ten Perfections (reduced by Mahayana to six) and the 31 Planes of Existence (reduced to six)...

Sunday, May 25, 2025

The Three Buddhisms: A Great Divide


The THREE SCHOOLS of BUDDHISM explained: Theravāda, Mahāyāna, Vajrayāna
(Buddha's Wisdom) May 25, 2025: 🔍 THE 3 PATHS TO ENLIGHTENMENT: WHICH ONE SPEAKS TO YOU?

How did one teacher's simple message create three different paths to enlightenment? Three monks sit in meditation...but they’re not seeking the same thing.

One follows the Buddha’s exact words (Theravada). Another vows to save every living being (Mahayana). The third uses esoteric [Vedic, Brahminical, Hindu, tantric] practices hidden for centuries.

How did Buddhism split into three radically different paths — and what does it mean for our spiritual journey today?


TIMESTAMPS
  • 00:00 - Three monks, different goals
  • 03:16 - Chapter 1: Theravada - The Way of the Elders
  • 07:25 - Chapter 2: Mahayana - The Great Vehicle
  • 11:33 - Chapter 3: Vajrayana - The Diamond Vehicle
  • 15:44 - Chapter 4: When Buddhism meets itself
  • 18:53 - The One Mind: Which path did the Buddha intend?
DISCOVER
  • Why Buddhism split into three schools after the Buddha's passing into final nirvana
  • The dangerous mission that saved Theravada Buddhism from extinction
  • How Avalokiteshvara's broken heart created the Mahayana revolution
  • The secret tantric techniques that promise enlightenment in a single lifetime
  • Why mixing Buddhist traditions might be exactly what the modern world needs [at least that's what we as Americans seem to think]
🙏 Subscribe to Buddha’s Wisdom for weekly stories, history, and teachings that bring ancient insight into modern life. Join community: Instagram: buddhaswizdom. Facebook: buddhaswizdom. Support the channel: buymeacoffee.com/buddhaswisdom

SOURCES
  • The Pali canon (Theravada texts)
  • Lotus Sutra (Mahayana literature)
  • Tibetan Book of the Dead (Vajrayana teachings) 
  • Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction by Damien Keown
  • The Heart of Buddhist Meditation by Ven. Nyanaponika Thera
#buddhism #theravada #mahayana #vajrayana #buddhawisdom #spiritualjourney #mindfulness #buddhistexplained #easternphilosophy
  • Buddha's Wisdom, May 25, 2025; Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Alan Watts: The Buddhist Secret (audio)

Alan Watts (alanwatts.org) via What do you desire?; A. Larson, Dhr. Seven, Wisdom Quarterly

.
The Buddhist Secret
Zen's circle or ensō (faena.com)
Over time as fewer people realized enlightenment, Mahayana (Maya-yana?) came up with newer and more creative ways to trick oneself into realization, with the paradoxes of Zen, and stories of not trying, skillful means (upayas) and methods (yanas). Alan Watts explains them in the context of what this latter day form of Buddhism, which takes itself back by patriarchs to 200 years after the passing of the now little regarded historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, the "Sage of the Shakyas [Saka/Scythians]" Shakyamuni.
.
What Mahayana set up in place of what the historical Buddha taught was falling back on Brahminical teaching based on the Vedas that today are generally referred to as Hinduism when in fact Buddhism, like Jainism, began as a revolutionary, anti-establishment wandering ascetic (shramana vs. brahmana) movement school. Buddhism in Japan, famous for Zen which it imported from China, came upon the conception of jah-riki vs. tah-riki: If self cannot become enlightened, then it must be done by other (likened to the Protestant Christian concept of "grace" over "works").

"We don't think our way into right action, but we can act our way into right thinking" is a good recovery-based summary of two of the factors of the Noble Eightfold Path. Support the WDYD channel to promote the great work of Alan Watts at patreon.com/whatdoyoudesire.
  • Part 1: How Can You be Enlightened?
  • Part 2: You are the Whole Cosmos
  • Part 3: Why the World Depends on You
  • Part 4: Be Comfortable Under Any Circumstances
  • Part 5: The Buddhist Secret (this video)

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

What is "Theravada" Buddhism? (Part 1)

John Bullitt (Buddhanet.net); Amber Larson, Dhr. Seven, Crystal Quintero, Wisdom Quarterly

Buddhismo Hispano (btmar.org)
Theravada (Pali language: thera "elders" + vada "word, doctrine") means the "Doctrine of the Elders." [The "elders" are the first disciples -- enlightened monks and nuns -- of the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama.] 
  • See Part 2
  • NOTE: "Theravada" in American English is pronounced "terra vodda" becuase the "th" sound in Pali is pronounced like the "th" combination in "hothouse." 
"Theravada" is the name for the school of Buddhism that draws its scriptural inspiration from the Pali canon, or Tipitaka ["Three Baskets" containing the sutras, monastic discipline, and Higher Teaching], which scholars generally accept as the oldest record of the Buddha's Teachings or Dharma.

For many centuries, Theravada has been the predominant religion of Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia; today Theravada Buddhists number over 100 million worldwide. In recent decades Theravada has begun to take root in the West -- primarily in Europe, Australia, and the United States.
 
The many names of Theravada
The Buddha addresses the Five Ascetics and sets rolling the Wheel of the Dharma.
 
Theravada Buddhism goes by many names. The Buddha himself called the spiritual movement he founded Dhamma-Vinaya, "the Doctrine and Discipline," in reference to the two fundamental aspects of the system of ethical and spiritual training he taught.

Owing to its historical dominance in southern Asia (India/Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Burma, Cambodia, Laos), Theravada is also identified as "Southern Buddhism." By contrast "Northern Buddhism" migrated north from India/Afghanistan into Tibet, China, Japan, Korean, Mongolia, Siberia, Russia (the USSR's Central Asian "stans" and North Asia).
 
Theravada is sometimes misidentified as "Hinayana" (the "Lesser Vehicle"), in contradistinction to the self-proclaimed "Mahayana" (the "Great Vehicle"), which is usually a synonym for Tibetan Buddhism, Zen, Ch'an, and other expressions of Chinese Buddhism.

But the use of "Hinayana" as a pejorative insult has its origins in earlier schisms within the monastic community that ultimately led to the emergence of what would later become Hindu-influenced Mahayana.

Today, however, scholars of every Buddhist (and non-Buddhist) persuasion often use the term "Hinayana" without pejorative intent [-- and attempt to attach it to Theravada as the only remaining early school. The actual Hinayana schools all, such as the Sarvastivada, all went extinct.]
 
Pali (not Sanskrit): the language of Theravada
Students help revive ancient Pali language in modern India (indiatimes.com).
.
The language of the Theravada canonical texts is Pali, a relative of Magadhi, the language probably spoken in central India during the Buddha's time. Most of the sutras the Buddha delivered were memorized by Ven. Ananda, the Buddha's cousin and close personal attendant.

Shortly after the Buddha's final-nirvana around 480 BCE, the monastic community -- including Ananda -- convened to recite all the sutras they had heard during the Buddha's 45 years of teaching.

Each recorded discourse therefore begins with the indicator/disclaimer, Evam me sutam -- "Thus have I heard." The teachings were passed down within the monastic community following a well-established oral tradition. By about 100 BCE the Tipitaka was first fixed in writing in Sri Lanka by Sinhalese scribe-monks.

Of course, it can never be proven that the Pali canon contains the actual words uttered by the historical Buddha (and there is ample evidence to suggest that much of the canon does not). The wisdom the canon contains has nevertheless served for centuries as an indispensable guide for millions of followers in their quest for enlightenment or awakening from delusion and dream-like suffering.

Many students of Theravada find that learning the Pali language -- mainly just a little bit here and there -- greatly deepens their understanding of the Buddha's path of practice toward the realization of nirvana in this very life.
 
A brief summary of the Buddha's Teachings

What follows is a brief synopsis of some of the key teachings of Theravada Buddhism, leaving out a great deal, but leaving in enough that even this much will be enough to get one started on the way of investigation and exploration.

Shortly after his great awakening, the Buddha ("the Awakened One") delivered his first discourse, in which he laid out the essential framework upon which all later teachings were based. It consists of the Four Noble Truths, four fundamental principles of nature (Dharma) that emerged from the Buddha's penetrating assessment of the human (and deva) condition that serve to define the entire scope of Buddhist practice.

These ennobling truths are not fixed dogmatic principles, but living experiences to be explored individually in the heart of the sincere spiritual seeker:
  • 1. The Noble Truth of [the Truth of] dukkha (disappointment, unsatisfactoriness, suffering, distress): life is fundamentally fraught with unsatisfactoriness and disappointment of every description.
  • 2. The Noble Truth of the Cause of dukkha: the cause of our dissatisfaction is craving (tanha) in all its forms.
  • 3. The Noble Truth of the Cessation of dukkha: an end to all that unsatisfactoriness can be found through the relinquishment and abandonment of craving.
  • 4. The Noble Truth of the Path leading to the cessation of dukkha: there is a way of achieving the end of all unsatisfactoriness, namely the Noble Eightfold Path.
To each of these Four Noble Truths the Buddha prescribed a specific task the practitioner can carry out: the first Noble Truth is to be comprehended; the second abandoned; the third realized; the fourth developed.

The full realization of the third Noble Truth paves the way for the direct penetration (personal experience) of nirvana, the transcendent freedom (liberation, deliverance, emancipation, release, moksha) that stands as the final goal of all of the Buddha's varied teachings.

The ultimate Noble Truth -- the Path -- contains a prescription for the relief of all unhappiness and for our directly experienced release, once and for all, from the painful and wearisome cycle of rebirth and death (samsara) to which -- through our own ignorance (avijja) of the Four Noble Truths -- we have been bound for countless aeons. CONTINUED IN PART 2

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Understanding Maitreya Buddha

CC Liu, Maya, Crystal Quintero, Wisdom Quarterly; Bhikkhu Bodhi (BAUS) ASK MAYA

Question: Recently K.K. Shrivastava contacted Wisdom Quarterly with an appetizing offer, asking if we would be willing to probe his claim about Maitreya Buddha. That would having go through 20 pages of text containing plainly written and easily verifiable facts supporting his mysterious contention.
Answer: We would love to, particularly because the future Buddha is widely misunderstood and been made much of and possibly distorted in the service of a universalist-Buddhist message, a "greater vehicle" (maha yana) for all to cross over on going from this painful and fraught samsara to that secure and joyful nirvana -- without perceiving any duality (because of Hindu-Advaita influence on this school) in the process.

Gandhara Maitreya Buddha (asianart.org)
Dear K.K. Shrivastava, please send us (or help us locate) your scholarship, and you can start with the abstract or brief summary. 

While we wait -- and while others realize the dual offer is also open to them to write for Wisdom Quarterly or ask us any question -- we should explore the original story of Maitreya/Metteyya ("friend," from the Sanskrit maitri/Pali metta, a proper name referring to loving-kindness, loving-friendliness, altruistic help).

Because the historical Buddha had mentioned 24 supremely enlightened teaching buddhas in the past, and many other nonteaching (pacceka) buddhas
 
Arahants, Bodhisattvas, and Buddhas
Bhikkhu Bodhi
I. Competing Buddhist Ideals The arhat ideal [enlightenment for all] and the bodhisattva ideal [enlightenment for none as everybody is already enlightened, and everyone should become a martyr and messianic/maitreyanic "savior" saving an infinite number of living beings first] are often considered the respective guiding ideals of [a simplistic understanding of] Theravāda Buddhism and Mahāyāna Buddhism.

This assumption is not entirely correct, for the Theravāda tradition has absorbed the bodhisattva ideal [and many Mahayanists in the past and now would indeed strive for the stages of enlightenment] into its framework and thus recognizes the validity of both arhatship and buddhahood as objects of aspiration.

It would therefore be more accurate to say that the arhat ideal and the bodhisattva ideal are the respective guiding ideals of Early Buddhism [Sarvastivada and the Hinayana schools, of which Theravada is not one but gets called one because of its age and its keeping with early ideals and teachings] and Mahāyāna Buddhism.

"Early Buddhism" is not the same thing as Theravāda Buddhism that exists in the countries of South and Southeast Asia. It refers to the type of Buddhism embodied in the archaic Nikāyas [collection, division, volume, assemblages of sacred texts] of Theravāda Buddhism and in the corresponding texts of other schools of Indian Buddhism that did not survive the general destruction of Buddhism in India.
 
It is important to recognize that these ideals, in the forms that they have come down to us, originate from different bodies of literature stemming from different periods in the historical development of Buddhism.

If we fail to take this fact into account and simply compare these two ideals as described in Buddhist canonical texts, we might assume that the two were originally expounded by the historical Buddha himself. Then we might suppose that the Buddha -- living and teaching in the Gangetic plain in the fifth century B.C. -- offered his followers a choice between them, as if to say: "This is the arhat ideal, which has such and such features, and that is the bodhisattva ideal, which has such and such features. Choose whichever one you like."
  • There is also a third model of Buddhist spiritual life, that of the pacceka-buddha (Sanskrit pratyeka), which is similar in many respects to the disciple arhat, except that the disciple arhat attains enlightenment under the guidance of a teaching buddha, and other gains enlightenment without any outside guidance [after an incredibly long time and a great deal of effort and uncertainty with no ability to teach the Path to others]. Otherwise, the combination of qualities that constitute this type is essentially the same. In the literature of the Buddhist systems, we often read of three types of fully enlightened ones -- disciples ("hearers," Pali sāvakas), nonteaching (pacceka) buddhas, and supremely or perfectly enlightened teachers (sammā sam buddhas, Sanstrit śrāvakas, pratyeka-buddhas, and samyak sam buddhas). And of the three vehicles (yānas) that lead to these attainments.
The Mahāyāna sūtras, such as the "Great Perfection of Wisdom" (Mahā Prajñā-Pāramitā Sūtra) and the Lotus Sūtra (Saddharmapuṇḍarīka Sūtra), give the impression that the Buddha did teach both ideals. Such sūtras, however, are certainly not archaic. To the contrary, they are relatively late attempts to schematize the different types of Buddhist practice that had evolved over a period of roughly 400 years after the Buddha's final nirvāṇa.
 
The most archaic Buddhist texts -- the Pali [an exclusively Buddhist language] Nikāyas and their counterparts from other early schools (some of which have been preserved in the Chinese Āgamas and the Tibetan Kanjur) -- depict the ideal for the Buddhist disciple as the arhat.

The Mahāyāna sūtras, composed a few centuries later in a Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit, depict the ideal for the Mahāyāna follower as the bodhisattva. Now some people argue that because the arhat is the ideal of Early Buddhism, while the bodhisattva is the ideal of later Mahāyāna Buddhism, the Mahāyāna must be a more advanced or highly developed type of Buddhism, a more ultimate teaching compared to the simpler, more basic teaching of the Nikāyas.

That is indeed an attitude common among [average or unlearned] Mahāyānists, which I will call "Mahāyāna elitism." An opposing attitude common among conservative advocates of the Nikāyas rejects all later developments in the history of Buddhist thought as deviation and distortion, a fall away from the "pristine purity" of the ancient teaching. I call this attitude "Nikāya purism."
 
Taking the arhat ideal alone as valid, Nikāya purists reject the bodhisattva ideal, sometimes forcefully and even aggressively.
 
I have been seeking a point of view that can do justice to both perspectives, that of the Nikāyas and the early Mahāyāna sūtras, a point of view that can accommodate their respective strengths without falling into a soft and easy syncretism, without blotting out conceptual dissonances between them, without abandoning faithfulness to the historical records -- yet one which also recognizes that these records are by no means crystal clear and are unlikely to be free of bias.

This task is difficult. It is much simpler to adopt either a standpoint of "Nikāya purism" or one of "Mahāyāna elitism" and hold to it without flinching. The problem with these two standpoints, however, is that both are obliged to neglect facts that are discomforting to their respective points of view.
 
Although I am ordained as [an American] Theravāda Buddhist monk, in this paper I am not going to be defending the opinions of any particular school of Buddhism or trying to uphold a sectarian point of view. For six years, I have lived in Chinese Mahāyāna monasteries, and my understanding of Buddhism has been particularly enriched by my contact with the teachings of the Chinese scholar-monk Master Yinshun (1906-2005) and his most senior living pupil, Master Renjun, the founder of Bodhi Monastery in New Jersey. My first purpose is to draw out from the texts what the texts say explicitly, and also what they imply, about these two competing ideals of the Buddhist life. More

Thursday, June 26, 2014

What is Mahayana Buddhism? (video)

Amber Larson, Seth Auberon, CC Liu, Wisdom Quarterly; Alan Watts ("Eastern Wisdom and Modern Life," KQED TV, San Francisco); The Partially Examined Life
Mahayana pantheon of saints surround Catholic-style Kwan Yin (Dlakme/flickr)
Mahayana monastics of the "northern" school, Far East (Ian's/flickr.com)

What is the later "Great Vehicle" (Maha-yana) school of Buddhism, and why is it so mixed up with ancient Vedic Brahmanism and modern Hinduism?

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Amazing India (video)

Dhr. Seven, Ashley Wells, Wisdom Quarterly (BRAHMANISM CO-OPTED BUDDHISM)
The spectacular and iconic Muslim art of the Taj Mahal, Agra, India (sjpaderborn)
(Shakti Gyana) This is the second episode of a five-part documentary on the history of Hinduism explained in Western perspective. 

Om, the primordial sound of the universe
This explanation of Brahmanism/Hinduism should not be taken as absolute fact but rather as an interpretation. What ancient Brahmanism evolved into was directly influenced by the historical Buddha's Dharma (Buddhism). This became modern Hinduism.
 
It is closely related to Mahayana-Buddhism, a popular reform movement from the more austere Buddhist schools, most of which became defunct. The strawman Mahayana and Brahmin philosophers set up to decry they called Hinayana, the "Lesser Vehicle." It refers to Sarvastivada and other sects. Theravada is not one of the "Hinayana" schools of thought, but as the only other extant and viable Buddhist school, laypeople often equate them.

There are sheaths or bodies within this body
The Buddha's teachings run contrary to the Vedas, the views of the ancient Brahmins, and modern Hinduism. Those teachings survive in Theravada Buddhism. What makes Mahayana so popular?
 
Many of the peculiar Mahayana "innovations" are actually reformulations of the very things the Buddha rejected. The Buddha did not arrive on the scene to affirm the Vedas but to correct strong misconceptions. Those misconceptions reassert themselves again and again.

Only by the realization of certain counterintuitive truisms, like the eternal existence of a self or unchanging soul (atta, atman) can one finally breakthrough to liberating insight, find enlightenment, and glimpse nirvana. Endless lip service given to discerning "emptiness" (shunyata) in place of anatta, finding a "higher self" or "true self" rather than no-self (anatta), essentially personalizing the impersonal, identifying with timeless verities, or mistaking consciousness as self... all of these very high minded notions miss the mark.

So long as mind is bound by even subtle traces of greed (sensual lust), aversion (fear, hate), and delusion (ignorance, wrong view), it is not released. Temporarily suppressing these defilements through samadhi (purifying-concentration) and jhana (dhyana, meditative absorptions) will not in itself lead to Buddhist enlightenment. Only when it is used as a foundation for the practice of insight by turning persistent attention (mindfulness) to four posts or foundations: body, feelings, mind, and mind objects, all of which are defined in details in the Maha Satipatthana Sutra.
 
Welcome to India

(BBC.co.uk/programmes) This observational series continues to explore what life is really like in some of the densest neighborhoods on the planet: the backstreets of India's mega-cities. A popular tactic for people here, so adept at operating in a crowded world, is turning the stuff others would call waste into an opportunity. Johora started out as a rag-picker, but through building a bottle recycling business on a railway embankment, she has big ambitions for her family of seven kids. When the local gangsters increase their protection payment demands, she boldly takes out a big loan and attempts to push her illegal business to another level. (Episode 2 of 3).

Monday, June 25, 2012

Is "Satori" Enlightenment?

GROWING UP MARA with Mara Schaeffer, Dhr. Seven, and Amber Dorrian, Wisdom Quarterly

Q: Is satori enlightenment? 
A: I was just listening to Joseph Goldstein talk about this yesterday in his outstanding "Abiding in Mindfulness" series. (I'm up to Talk 39.) He says they're pretty much the same thing.
  • But of course they are technically different: Satori is an "epiphany" in Zen, whereas kensho is the deeper realization. Buddhist enlightenment means bodhi (fully awakening from the illusion of existence independent of the Five Aggregates of Clinging); this is a permanently liberating insight not the commonly mentioned realization of "oneness" (nonduality).
Mara: Same thing, more or less.
  • No, very different. This may seem like quibbling. This may be quibbling. But it is the central disagreement between the two main Buddhist schools today, the more orthodox Theravada and the more reformed Mahayana. (There are no "Hinayana" schools still in existence, the last one being the ancient Sarvastivada).
Mara: People call Theravada a Hinayana ("Smaller Vehicle") school. I guess that's a mistake. But Mahayana is the true way, what the Buddha implicitly meant even though he didn't say it.
 
"Buddhism" (the Buddha Dharma) was reabsorbed by Brahmin priests into their religion. Vedic Brahminical teachings had quite a different view of "enlightenment" (samadhi) and "liberation" (moksha). The sense of oneness with Brahman (GODHEAD), the universe, or every living being everywhere is NOT enlightenment. 
  
Melting into the universe (reversing our sense of separation), merging with the "great reality behind the illusion" (which is one description of Brahman) is NOT enlightenment. The Buddha corrected that view and explained to the Brahmins on many occasions that they were mistaken. Those are wonderful spiritual things and surely worthy of attaining, but they are not the final enlightenment the Buddha was talking about. They are not what the historical Buddha called nirvana, the ultimate.
  
Some Brahmins listened and directly saw what the Buddha was talking about. But Brahmanism co-opted Buddhism, subsumed it into their outlook, and incorporated the Buddha into their pantheon as yet another god-man, merely an incarnation of Vishnu out to deceive people away from the Truth. 
   
(One hears today how great it is that Hinduism and Buddhism get along so well, each revering the Buddha. The fact is, Hinduism lessens then essentially disregards the Buddha, who opposed the ultimate authority of the sacred Vedas and many other Brahminical teachings).
 
Brahmins developed Mahayana Buddhist philosophy. Theravada held on as closely as it could to what the historical actually Buddha taught -- how he went against the stream of convention -- avoiding the assumptions and additions of the Brahmins.
  
"Just sitting" (zazen) is only one part of Zen training (Elheiji Zen monastery, Japan/Art.com)
   
Many Mahayanists today seem to have no idea that this happened, and they sound like Hindus using slightly different terms for the same things. That's beautiful. But that's not Shakaymuni Buddha Gautama's Dharma (teaching, message, dispensation). 
   
Moreover, this Brahmin Mahayana-Hindu philosophy went on to serve as the basis for Christianity. (Christianity pulls from traditions all over the world, taking everything Pagan that ever stood in its way and making it its own).
   
If the Buddha had just arisen to agree with Brahmins, to support the Vedas, to be an incarnation (avatar) of the God trinity, Buddhism would be Hinduism. As alike as they seem, they diverge radically as to what constitutes enlightenment (bodhi) and liberation (nirvana).
   
The Brahmins always assumed that rebirth with the God Brahma, or more impersonally merging with the godhead Brahman, is the ultimate.
   
These are not enlightenment
The Buddha showed that all else fell short of ultimate liberation: rebirth of any kind, life in heaven(s), psychic powers, being God, oneness with all, concentration (kinds of samadhi), bliss, and epiphanies all fall short of stream entry (the first stage of Buddhist enlightenment) and the ultimate, nirvana.
  
Much meditative bliss may arise, but Four Signs keep one on track: aging, sickness, death...
   
The absorptions (jhanas) -- as important as they are to the goal -- do not lead to enlightenment. They lead to rebirth in those exalted states Brahmanism would call "nirvana" or liberation. All rebirths are impermanent; they are not-self; they are unsatisfactory (dukkha, disappointing).
   
The end of suffering through Buddhist enlightenment is final. It is nonclinging by liberation of the heart/mind to all that it clings to. What does it cling to most? It clings to the Five Aggregates of Clinging -- body, feelings, perceptions, formations such as volition, and consciousness. 
   
Ancient Brahmins and modern Hindus believe consciousness is the true self, the immortal or permanent soul, the unchanging "witness," the watcher, the knower behind the knowing. But Shakyamuni Buddha went to great pains to show that this was NOT the case. Consciousness is an impersonal aggregate, a heap, a constituent group, a transient process. It is not any kind of "self" that can actually be clung to.
Mara: How does one go beyond satori to actual Buddhist enlightenment?
  • Stages of Buddhist enlightenment progressively eradicate the ten fetters (samyojana) that bind one to samsara, the otherwise endless round of rebirth and disappointment. Traditionally Buddhism speaks of four stages. Actually the texts divide them in different ways for different reasons. The best explanation is found in the ancient commentarial The Path of Freedom (Vimutti Magga). Abhidharma scholars looked at these stages in different ways.
Mara: Is satori one of them?
   
A series of epiphanies may make one very wise, conventionally speaking, but one would be no closer to actual enlightenment and final nirvana if the fetters were not being uprooted. If Zen Buddhism means such an uprooting, then satori would be a stage. But that is not how satori is used. Kensho could be. But let's look at the fetters to be uprooted.
   
The first and most difficult fetter to uproot is at the very heart of the problem -- the one it never seriously occurs to us to actually question: "self view" (sakkaya ditthi), the sense that we are some unchanging self or soul (atta) independently willing, worrying, and having the experience, the homunculus behind the knowing, the "little man" in our head looking out of the eyes and working a control panel.
  
Mara: Goldstein -- the founder of Insight Meditation Society in Barre, Massachusetts [whom Wisdom Quarterly believes to be at least a stream enterer, along with Jack Kornfield and Sharon Salzberg, trained as they were in the Burmese and Thai Theravada tradition and by Dipa Ma in India] -- discussed the question, "Does enlightenment happen all at once in a 'flash of insight' or gradually over time?"
  
He says that some masters hold to one view, and equally reputable masters hold to the other view. Both are correct.
  • Yes. It happens one way for some, the other for others. Yet on reflection it is always gradual, that is, based on causes and conditions that were cultivated over time, sometimes many lives. How then is the other true? If efforts in previous lives come to fruition with no effort in this life, enlightenment will seem sudden and unprompted -- "a flash of insight."
Mara: Adyashanti talks about this also in his "The Nature of Enlightenment" series.
   
Satori
My experience? A person has that one profound mystical experience that hits like a lightning bolt and totally rearranges the psyche [personality, heart, mind, spirit, "soul"]. 

  
One experiences a shattering of the individual ego as one realizes a transcendental self existing not only within the personal self but in all beings everywhere.
  • This is exactly the popular view Brahminism/Hinduism clings to, which the Buddha rejected as a definition of enlightenment or liberation. Brahmin priests and Jain ascetics (brahmanas and shramanas) -- those temple priests who hold the Vedas as the ultimate authority and those wandering ascetics who, like the Buddha, reject them -- hold the wrong view that consciousness is the soul, the self, the thing to be identified with, the shared essence connecting everyone.
  • The Buddha understood that ALL constituents of soul or self (atta) are actually impersonal (an-atta, "not-self"). 
  • Clinging to Brahman (GOD, Godhead, the Universe, the All) or consciousness is not enlightenment, not liberation from rebirth and suffering.
  • However sublime the experience or subtle the defilement, it shows that one has NOT broken through to the first and foremost liberating insight taught by the historical Buddha.
  • This is probably why Mahayana Buddhism sees such a de-emphasis on the historical Buddha (Shakyamuni) and an emphasis on a pantheon of "Buddhas" -- just like the pantheon of Hindu "gods" it reflects -- with one True Buddha (like True Brahman). Instead of the avatars Brahmanism/Hinduism reveres and awaits, bodhisattvas become the focus of Mahayana.
Mara: I don't know much about the Hindu view.
  • Few Mahayana Buddhists do. They talk like Hindus without realizing it, and they call that Hinduism they're talking about all the time "Buddhism" without realizing it.
Mara: Give IT any name you like. As one's meditation practice grows, there continue to be flashes of insight, chutes and ladders of expansion, loss, and growth within the new perspective over the years. This is the spirit [prana, spiritus, subtle energy, chi, breath, fine-material] path.
  
As one's dreamwork practice grows, the Dream-maker within becomes an active source of visionary insight and understanding. With brilliantly articulated images that are amazing in their depth and wisdom, one learns to work with them daily and translate them into meaning.

   
This is the soul path. For me, both practices are essential for wholeness, the head and the heart, like two eyes, each complementing the other, one looking inside and one outside to see one panoramic world extending beyond the limits of the seen, rich, and complex in depth, breadth, and height. 
  • That yogic experience of Brahman (union), samadhi, and nonduality must be nice that you speak this way. Hooray! It formed the basis of the Indus River Civilization that a buddha eventually arose in. (See "A Higher Teaching").