Showing posts with label Greco-Buddhist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greco-Buddhist. Show all posts

Saturday, September 27, 2025

Greco-Buddhism in Hellenistic Far East



BOOK: Greco-Buddhist Relations in the Hellenistic Far East
Dr. Olga Kubica, University of Wroclaw
Author Dr. Olga Kubica has 4.4 out of 5 stars with four ratings. This book provides the first comprehensive and interdisciplinary view of the relationship between the Greeks and Buddhist communities in ancient Bactria and Northwest India [Scythian Gandhara, now Afghanistan and Pakistan], from the conquests of Alexander the Great to the fall of the Indo-Greek kingdom circa 10 AD.

Greco-Buddhist Relations...
The main thesis is the assumption that, despite the presence of mutual relationships and interactions between the Greeks and Buddhist inhabitants of the Hellenistic Far East, the phenomenon known conventionally as "Greco-Buddhism" never truly occurred.

The individual chapters of this book provide an analysis of the main sources for Greco-Buddhist relations, mainly textual, but also archeological [excavated sites] and numismatic [coinage].
Who are the Hazara people?
The methods of philological and historical research are used in combination with postcolonial approaches to the study of the Greeks in India, drawing from sociological research on ethnicity and intercultural relations.

It is a rich source of information for anyone interested in Greco-Buddhist relations and is a great starting point for further research in this area.

This volume (1st edition) is a valuable resource for students and scholars working on the Greco-Bactrian and Indo-Greek kingdoms, both classicists and those working on early Indian history, as well as those working on cultural exchange in the Hellenistic world. More

Sunday, July 6, 2025

Ancient Greeks converted to Buddhism

(Religion for Breakfast) Greece is very far away from the heartland of Early Buddhism in proto-India and parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan (ancient Gandhara). But thanks to Alexander the Great, Hellenistic and Buddhist cultures came into contact (and fusion) in the 4th century BCE, creating a cultural synthesis known as Greco-Buddhism.
  • 00:00 A Greco-Bactrian Buddhist Inscription
  • 1:41 The Hellenistic "Far East"
  • 4:10 Pyrrho: A Buddhist for Greece?
  • 7:42 Ashoka and his Dharma Conquest
  • 10:23 King Menander [King Milinda]: The Most Famous Greek Buddhist
  • 13:26 Greco-Buddhist Art of Gandhara
  • 15:23 Syncretism?
  • 16:44 [Sponsor:] Nebula!
Indie creators being awesome Thumbnail art by @hotcyder Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images and Reuters

Thursday, February 20, 2020

"Divine Beings" museum exhibition (Feb. 20)

Norton Simon Museum (norton.org); CC Liu, Crystal Quintero (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly
Vishnu Riding Garuda, 320-500 CE, Eastern India or Bangladesh, Gupta Period
.
Parinirvana, Tosa Yukihiro 土佐行広 (Japan,
Muromachi Period, 1338-1573), circa 1451
A new exhibition at the Norton Simon Museum features works by Asian artists in response to spiritual concepts: "Divine Beings" spotlights six exceptional works, five of which are loans that include four Buddhist paintings from China, Korea, and Japan linked with Buddhism and one Hindu sculpture from Eastern India or Bangladesh.

Visitors are invited to explore the relationships between these and more than 30 selected works from the Norton’s vast Greco-Buddhist (Gandharan) collection on view within five Chinese galleries. Some representations of Buddhist, Hindu, and Taoist gods and demigods (devas) take the form of humans, such as the Three Taoist Star Lords (ETs?)

Zhao Changguo 趙 昌 國 (Chinese, active 16th century), Three Taoist
Star Lords Playing Weiqi in Autumn Mountains Ming Dynasty, 1500s

Other works depict real or mythological animals, such as the dragon (naga), phoenix (garuda), tiger, owl, ox, horse, and crane, which are believed to possess supernatural abilities, acting as guardians or mounts (transport) for deities and/or disembodied "souls" (gandharvas). Within the structure of time-honored artistic and philosophical conventions, each artist has thoughtfully given form to traditional beliefs about the fundamental nature of existence. It runs between February 20–June 30, 2020. More

Monday, December 9, 2019

Whatever happened to "South Park"? (video)

Entertain The Elk, 3/6/19; Dhr. Seven, Pat Macpherson, Amber Larson (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly


This is an exploration into the history of South Park, its meteoric rise in popularity from that one time space aliens gave Cartman an anal probe in the episode "Cartman Gets an Anal Probe" (S1 E1), the unique story writing style, and the episode that sparked its downfall into mediocrity.

NOTE: It's not our intention to offend anyone's religious sensibilities. Because of that, the image* of Muhammad has been blurred out in this video. The maker of this video hopes everyone can understand and respect this decision (even if one may not agree with it) so as to still enjoy the video.
  • PATREON - patreon.com/entertaintheelk
  • INSTAGRAM - @EntertainTheElk
  • TWITTER - @EntertainTheElk
  • WEBSITE - entertaintheelk.com
*Thou shalt have no graven images
Gandharan Greco-Buddhist art
[Everyone should know that many religions begin with an aniconic period not representing the founder or god or the ineffable. But over time this is ignored. Zen gets a zero (enso), the Tao gets a yin-yang, and Buddhism gets Greco-Buddhist statues.

The same was true of the Buddhism and an aniconic period. Apparently, the historical Buddha did not want to be glorified or limited or identified with one body.

When people in his day wanted to honor him, he redirected them to honoring the dharma, the ultimate truth, and allowed only symbols like an enlightenment tree or a symbol to represent him.

His country of Gandhara, Central Asia (hometown Bamiyan, Afghanistan, according to Dr. Ranajit Pal) loved him so much however and the population there was not Buddhist yet, so they ignored or never heard any such injunction, so the first and oldest representations we have of the Buddha as a human being are from Gandhara/Afghanistan (ranajitpal.com).

It seems "Shakya Land" was Gandhara at that time, and it is Gandharan art/Greco-Buddhist art that produced the first and quite possibly most beautiful examples of a Eurasian-looking man of 6 feet with black hair, blue eyes, and fair golden skin, as the texts describe him. But all the Asian countries have made him in their image, as happens with most icons like Issa of Nazareth (Jesus Christ), but not Mohammed, whose followers the Muslims/Mohammedans keep to the relatively new religion's injunction not to represent or make graven images and idols of religious figures and gods.

This is particularly important in Islam today because of a controversy about what Muhammed actually looked like, with Sunni and Shia hoping for their side to be vindicated, elevated, and celebrated. So to keep the peace, one must not show any image, as has been chosen here, even though we all side with Matt and Trey in their right to do whatever they want to insult, demean, or mock religions and their icons. It's funny even if it's hurts feelings, sensibilities, or religious decrees.]

Monday, August 31, 2009

The White (Caucasian) Huns


Gandharan-style Buddha (Asian Art Museum of San Francisco/Albill Flickr)

The White Huns (Hephthalites)
Silkroad Foundation (silk-road.com)

The Religion
Although Sung Yun and Hui Sheng reported that the Hephthalites did not believe in Buddhism, there is ample archaeological evidence that this religion was practiced in territories under Hephthalite control. According to Liang shu, the Hephthalites worshipped heaven and fire, a clear reference to Zoroastrianism. However, burial sites seem to indicate the normal practice of disposing of the dead, which is against Zoroastrian belief.
The Origins
The few Hephthalite (Ephthalite) records provide a fragmentary picture of their civilization and empire. Their background is uncertain. They probably stemmed from a combination of the people of the Tarim basin and the Yueh-chih. There is a striking resemblance in the deformed heads of the early Yueh-chih and Hephthalite kings on their coins. According to Procopius's History of the Wars, written in the 6th century, the Hephthalites:
Depiction of "White Hun" (allempires.net)

"[White Huns] are of the stock of the Huns in fact as well as in name: however, they do not mingle with any of the Huns known to us. They are the only ones among the Huns who have white bodies...."

Ephthalites was the name given to them by Byzantine historians, Hayathelaites by the Persian historian Mirkhond, and sometimes Ye-tai or Hua by Chinese historians. They are also known as the White Huns, distinct from the Huns who, led by Attila, invaded the Roman Empire.

They are described as a kindred steppe people who originally occupied the pasture-lands in the Altai mountains of southwestern Mongolia.

Toward the middle of the 5th century, they expanded west probably because of the pressure from the Juan-juan, a powerful nomadic tribe in Mongolia. Within decades, they became a great power in the Oxus basin and the most serious enemy of the Persian empire.

Gandharan style Buddha (Asian Art Museum of San Francisco/Albill Flickr)

Westward Expansion
When the Hephthalites gained power, Kushan and Gandhara were ruled by the Kidarites, a local dynasty of Hun or Chionites tribe. The Hephthalites entered Kabul and overthrew Kushan. The last Kidarites fled to Gandhara and settled in Peshawar. In about 440 A.C.E. the Hephthalites further took Sogdian (Samarkand) and then Balkh and Bactria.

The Hephthalites moved closer and closer toward Persian territory....The Hephthalites became the superpower of Middle Asia. They not only destroyed part of the Sassanian Empire in Iran but also intervened in their dynastic struggles...

Eastward Expansion into the Tarim Basin
With the stabilization at the western border, the Hephthalites extended their influence to the northwest into the Tarim Basin. From 493 to 556 A.D., they invaded Khotan, Kashgar, Kocho, and Karashahr. The relationship with Juan-juan and China were tightened. The Chinese record indicated that between 507 and 531, the Hephthalites sent thirteen embassies to Northern Wei (439-534) via a king named Ye-dai-yi-li-tuo.

The [Aryan?] Invasion of India
During the 5th century, the Gupta dynasty in India reigned in the Ganges basin and with the Kushan Empire occupied the area along the Indus River. India knew the Hephthalite as Huna by the Sanskrit name. The Hephthalites or Hunas waited until 470, right after the death of the Gupta ruler Skandagupta (455-470), to enter India from the Kabul valley after the conquest of Kushan. They continued along the Ganges and ruined every city and town.

The noble capital, Pataliputra [located by Ranajit Pal], was reduced in population to a village. They persecuted Buddhists and burned all the monasteries. Their conquest was accomplished with extreme ferocity, and the Gupta regime (414-470) was completely extinguished.

For thirty years the northwestern India was ruled by Hephthalite kings. Some of the Hephthalite kings ruling India are found on coins. The most famous ones were Toramana and Mihrakula, ruling India in the first half of the 6th century.

The Language
There are numerous debates about Hephthalite language. Most scholars believe it is Iranian [Aryan] for the Pei Shih states that the language of the Hephthalites differs from those of the Juan-juan (Mongoloid) and of the "various Hu" (Turkic); however, some think the Hephthalites spoke Mongol tongues like the Hsien-pi (3rd century) and the Juan-juan (5th century) and the Avars (6th-9th century).

According to the Buddhist pilgrims Sung Yun and Hui Sheng, who visited them in 520, they had no script, and the Liang shu specifically states that they have no letters but use tally sticks. At the same time there is numismatic and epigraphic evidence to show that a debased form of the Greek alphabet was used by the Hephthalites.

Since the Kushan was conquested by Hephthalites, it is possible they retained many aspects of Kushan culture, including the adoption of the Greek alphabet. More>>

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Buddhism Reaches Burma


Burma: fierce Naga warrior, famed even in the time of the Buddha (allmyanmar.com)

Enlightened Missionaries originally spread Buddhism
Soon after his Great Enlightenment, the Buddha sent out 60 enlightened disciples. They had the mandate to spread the good news (of liberation) to the world, with no two going in the same direction. They made it to Alexandria, Greece, Afghanistan, Persia, and the teaching of these Great Elders (Maha Theras) eventually made it to the Middle East (by way of Saint Issa), right to the religious powder keg known as Jerusalem. The teachings traveled throughout Asia, by way of the Silk Route which had as much to do with commerce as culture.

Eventually, because Chinese missionaries were blown far off course, Buddhism made it to the pre-European-contact New World. It revolutionized cultures wherever it went, often meeting heavily Animistic indigenous views and melding with them. For example, pre-Buddhist Tibet practiced Bon, Japan practiced Shinto, and China was steeped in ancestor worship.

Closer to home (the Buddha after all lived in Northern India, or what was known as the "Middle Country" portion of Jambudvipa, lit. "the Rose Apple Island," the ancient name of the Indian subcontinent), missionaries arrived in Burma. However, as history records, it was not until a few hundred years later -- during the reign of an empire -- that a Buddhist Council made a concerted effort to establish the teachings in Myanmar (which, of course, bore different borders and different clan and tribal allegiances than the Naga, Karen, Mon, majority Burman, and others seen today).

Burmese tribesmen, young girls from the mountainous region (allmyanmar.com)

Buddhism in Myanmar: A Short History
Roger Bischoff (Access to Insight)

Missionaries of the Third Buddhist Council
The Third Buddhist Council was held during the reign of Emperor Asoka in the year 232 BCE in order to purify the monastic order (Sangha), to reassert orthodox teaching, and to refute heresy. But the work of the Council did not stop there.


18th century Burman replete with Indochinese influences (allmyanmar.com)

With the support of Emperor Asoka, experienced teachers were sent to border regions in order to spread the teachings of the Buddha. This dispersal of missionaries is recorded in the Mahavamsa, a Sri Lankan chronicle on the history of Buddhism:

When the Thera ("Elder") Moggaliputta, the illuminator of the religion of the Conqueror, had brought the (third) council to an end and when, looking into the future, he had beheld the founding of the religion in adjacent countries, then in the month of Katthika he sent forth theras, one here and one there.

The thera Majjhantika he sent to Kasmira and Gandhara [Kashmir and Afghanistan], the thera Mahadeva he sent to Mahisamandala [the region girding the Himalayas]. To Vanavasa he sent the thera named Rakkhita, and to Aparantaka the Yona named Dhammarakkhita; to Maharattha he sent the thera named Mahadhammarakkhita, but the thera Maharakkhita he sent into the country of the Yona. He sent the thera Majjhima to the Himalaya country and together with the thera Uttara, the thera Sona of wondrous might went to Suvannabhumi...12

According to the Sasanavamsa [the "great history of the dispensation"], the above mentioned regions are the following: Kasmira and Gandhara is the right bank of the Indus river south of Kabul; Mahisamandala is Andhra; Vanavasa is the region around Prome; Aparantaka is west of the upper Irrawaddy; Maharattha is Thailand; Yona, the country of the Shan tribes; and Suvannabhumi is Thaton (Burma). The Sasanavamsa mentions five places in Southeast Asia where Asoka's missionaries taught the Buddha's doctrine, and through their teaching many gained insight and took refuge in the Triple Gem [Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha].

There are two interesting features mentioned in the text. First, in order to ordain nuns (bhikkhunis), other bhikkhunis had to be present, and secondly, the Brahmajala Sutra ["The All-Embracing Net of Views Discourse"] was preached in Thaton.

The Sasanavamsa goes on to describe sixty-thousand women ordaining in Aparanta. It states that women could not have been ordained without the presence of bhikkhunis, as in Sri Lanka where women could only be ordained after Ven. Mahinda's sister Sanghamitta had followed her brother there. In this case, it is surmised that bhikkhunis must have followed Dhammarakkhita to Aparanta at a later stage.

The Brahmajala Sutra, which the arhats ["enlightened"] Sona and Uttara preached in Thaton, deals in detail with the different schools of philosophical and religious thought prevalent in India at the time of the Buddha. The fact that Sona and Uttara chose this discourse to convert the inhabitants of Suvannabhumi indicates that they were facing a well-informed public, familiar with the views of Brahmanism [early brahmin caste leaning Hinduism] that were refuted by the Buddha in this discourse. There can be no doubt that only Indian colonizers, not the Mon people of Burma, would have been able to follow an analysis of Indian philosophy as profound as the Brahmajala Sutra.