Showing posts with label appeal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label appeal. Show all posts

Monday, December 29, 2025

Why do men look so much younger now?


Touch me now. It doesn't matter. I've got breast armor. I'm failed pop idol Catty Purry Brand.
.
I wish, I wish I were Daisy from Great Gatsby
It seemed to begin when I was a kid in middle school. I couldn't wait to get to the ninth grade so I could be all grown up like the seniors. They had mustaches, cars, and girls fawning all over them. But a strange thing happened, and I saw and noticed it in slow motion. Neither I nor my classmates were ever getting any older. We were the same people being promoted through the grades. The older kids left school never to be seen again, so there was no direct comparison. But in my I remember thinking that by the 9th grade, there was no real noticeable change. Sure, there was progression. We didn't freeze in time. What I mean is, we didn't become them. The 7th graders did NOT grow up to look like the 9th graders of our youth. What was going on? It might all be perspective, but everyone began to notice.

Japanese pederast gave us K-Pop looks (hormones)
San Fran pedophile whitewashed faces gave us it.

British perv or international comedic genius?
When we were kids, all the "kids" on TV were actually adults in the role of children. So if we saw ourselves in them, we were deceived. Just think of Dawson's Creek, Romeo + Juliet (with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes), My So-Called Life with Jared Leto, Strangers with Candy (the only honest show, featuring young Old Lady Amy Sedaris and young sparkly gay couple Paul Dinello and Stephen Colbert (the gay version), MTV shows like Undressed (a sexy adult soap opera for tweens), Saved by the Bell (with sexpot Tiffani [Amber] Thiessen), to say nothing of my favorite show.


Attention whurs strippers stole the US sitcom?
That would be Mr. Show with Bob and David that gave us Sarah Silverman, Jack Black (who must have sold his soul to the Devil to be looking like he does), David Cross, Bob Odenkirk, Brian Posehn, SpongeBob SquarePants (Tom Kenny)... They were old and balding then, so what to make of now?

Tell them then give the people what they want.
There was also Once Upon a Time in Hollywood with breakout superstars Julia Butters, Margaret Qualley, and a virtually unknown bleach blonde with Barbie tendencies and a taste for extreme metal, I think going by the name Margot Robbie.

Now we're all dying, and we're not even rich, famous, or part of the Hollywood (Illuminati) elite.

It's almost as if the Buddha were right:
  1. All things are hurtling toward destruction (radically impermanent),
  2. unable to satisfy or ever fulfill us (disappointing), and
  3. utterly impersonal (not self).
These are called the Three Characteristics of All Conditioned Phenomena. We are conditioned phenomena (mind-body nama-rupa psycho-physical, well, not so much "entities" as "trans-i-ties."


There must be a "self"! Or else who's writing -- and who's reading? - There is a self, an atta or atman. Touch your chest; there's the self. It does no good to think, "Is there a 'self' or is there not a 'self'?" What is useful is to ask, What is the nature of that "self" that for sure is existing right here right now?

It is (as impossible as it will ever actually be to believe but actually possible to see) utterly impersonal. This is why Buddhism is not a faith.
  • CAN YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS "NOT SELF" BUSINESS? IT SEEMS LIKE A JOKE. - Yes. It is possible to explain with an analogy. Let's say I say, "There's no such thing as a 'car.'" Then pointing you'll say, "You're crazy. It's right there! They're everywhere. Cased closed!"
  • But I'll say, "I didn't say there isn't anything that looks like a 'car.' The illusion exists, and it's quite useful to designate assemblages of things and cling to them as real entities, but the fact is -- in an ultimate sense -- there is no such thing as a car. You might ask, "What is there then?"
  • To that I will point to all the parts that, when put together, give the illusion of a new thing coming into existence. It sure seems to come into existence. It can do things the parts couldn't, and conventionally speaking, it is new to existence. But it never really makes it. It is unreal, an illusion.
  • "What's the proof?" you say.
  • I say, "Let's take it apart and find it." We proceed to disassemble the whole assemblage, and when we come to the last two pieces and separate them, do you think a 'car' will fall out?
  • No, it was never like that!
  • Exactly! And what was it like? Let's say a car is composed of 5,000 pieces but really only needs five (5): wheels, frame, motor, steering wheel, and brake. Is there a 'car' in there, or do these exist independently?
  • They exist independently. We don't need those particular pieces. Any set of wheels, frame, motor, steering device, and brake will do.
  • Do you see? The 'car' does not come into being and, of course, never goes out of being, in an ultimate sense. An illusion arises, and an illusion goes away, and this "illusion" is a convenient descriptor of that assemblage.
  • I don't get it.
  • Let's make it easier. Fire does not exist.
  • That's easier?
  • Yeah, because now you can point and say, "You're crazy. That's it right there. There's fire everywhere. Case closed!"
  • I will then counter by pointing out that what we call "fire," what we regard as real and existing and being "fire," is actually an illusion that arises utterly dependent on five factors.
  • What five? It is just one thing, a fundamental element!
  • Not at all. The five (and there can be more, but let's keep it to five fundamental ingredients which, when present, reliably give the persistent illusion of fire): fuel, heat, oxygen, wick, and the mysterious process-of-combustion. (We can go on and on analyzing "fire" into parts, but the one thing that is sure is that it is all parts, not a compact thing in itself).
  • How do we know that?
  • We know that because when present, Bam! The illusion arises. When any is missing, the illusion goes away. Put the five together (in a functionally coordinated way) and there it is, "fire." Take any way, and where has it gone? Where does fire go when it goes out?
  • Up? No, I don't know, into oblivion?
  • Does it wait in oblivion to come back? Because, let's say we remove oxygen, it will go right out. Add the oxygen back, and it will roar back. Where was it in the meantime?
  • It was not anywhere. It does not actually "go" out. It becomes unmanifested.
  • It becomes nonexistent, except it doesn't really come into and go out of existence either. It just seems to. Why? Because it is conditionally originated, that is, dependently originated. When this is, that comes to be. When that is not, it does not come to be.
  • Oh, I kinda get it. I don't believe it! I think people, and fire, and cars are real. Real REAL.
  • Can you begin to see, however, how and why someone might say they're unreal?
  • Not really. That's crazy.
  • It's crazy to our conventional way of worrying and needing to cling to illusions. But let's say we wanted to be free of illusions, then wouldn't it be great to disillusion ourselves?
  • Disillusion?
  • Awaken, enlighten, clearly see what's really there?
  • Well, yeah, sure if we could be sure that that really is the Truth.
  • We can. The Buddha saw it, pointed to it, and invited us to come and see, to clearly see the Truth, not to believe him or anyone else. We with our own purified and intensified eyes, heart, mind could come and see. Where is the car before the parts-of-a-car are assembled?
  • It isn't anywhere.
  • Where will it go when disassembled again?
  • It won't "go" anywhere.
  • Now you're getting it! It doesn't come or go because it was never really what it seemed to be. Illusion arises, that's for sure, and the illusion of the loss of it, that, too, is sure. But it isn't reality.
  • Why would anybody talk like this?
  • One (such as the Awakened One, the historical Buddha) would talk like this because we are clinging to pain (suffering, distress, disappointment) and the unreal. He wanted to move us to reality, and that means waking up to what's REALLY there and what's been there all along.
  • What's that?
  • Self and not-self.
  • Aha! So there is a self?
  • Yes, conventionally speaking. But ultimately speaking, no. There is no self.
  • You're crazy. It's right there. I'm pointing at it. Case closed.
  • And what are you pointing at?
  • At you, Dummy! I can also point to myself, Smarty.
  • Good, good. I say you're pointing at a body.
  • Well, sure, but within that body there's a soul, and that's the self!
  • Good, very good. The body is an illusion; you can see that much. Now let me disassemble the soul/self you're sure is in there. What are the components of "self"?
  • There are no components! It's a highly mysterious fusiform whale carcass thingy with feelings.
  • Ha ha ha. There is a body; that's one thing, but it is no thing. It is components. We can disassemble, reassemble, add, subtract, but still it's just a functional assemblage of parts. The "self" is partly that and partly four other things.
  • Things? What things?
  • Invisible things -- feelings, perceptions, mental formations, and a mysterious process we call consciousness. Whatever else we want to add to "self," it is at least these fundamental five things, these Five Aggregates clung to as "self."
  • Oh. I think I'm starting to see. You're not crazy, but you're speaking dangerously. Aren't you afraid you're going to vanish in a puff of unsmoke for talking like this?
  • What would vanish, the illusion? I'd be glad to get rid of it. It has cause incalculable misery (dukkha) and disappointment, chasing after things for it, never being able to satisfy or fulfill it. Ah, to be free!
  • Free of "self"?
  • No, free of the persistent illusion of "self" traveling and rearising life after life in this samsara, this Wheel of Rebirth, of Life and Death, of endless suffering (unsatisfactoriness)!
  • Yeah, I guess that would be good, but what about taking rebirth in a permanent heaven and having a good time all the time till the end of time?
  • Nice alternative, but it doesn't exist. The longest most enduring heavens all come to an end eventually. It may take a great aeon (maha-kalpa), but beings (dynamic becomings) fall away to continue on according to their just desserts which we call karma. And because of greed, hatred, and delusion (lust, aversion, and ignorance), our many unskillful deeds in pursuit of things will yield many painful results for a long, long time. It would be far better to awaken to the Truth.
  • Well, I won't argue with that. But who can say what the "Truth" is?
  • The Awakened One, the Buddha, and those enlightened ones who have awakened by practicing the Teaching (the Dharma) of the Awakened One(s).
Faith (saddha, confidence, truth, conviction) is useful but not nearly as important as a shamanistic attitude to actually come see the Buddha's Teaching, investigate it, and confirm it. It won't liberate us because it's true; it will liberate us because we PRACTICED whether or not we "believed" (had faith) in advance. Better to doubt and question AND practice than to completely "believe" and not practice.
  • Modern Buddhists try to explain this away by various analogies, many of which amount to Hinduism with different gods and bodhisattvas. It's actually very easy to grasp intellectually and not be confused, almost impossible to accept, as if by accepting we would instantly disappear in a puff of unsmoke (as in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy). We will not. The habitual tendency or "conceit" (māna) to conceive, think, and speak in terms of I-and-other is very strong and not easily wiped away, but actually wiping it away is key to awakening from illusion and clinging and suffering. It is the missing key to enlightenment.
  • Even Mahayana, which often speaks like a school of Hinduism, could understand this if it only paid attention to its most prized and popular discourse, the Heart Sutra. It's not about love, feelings, and emotions; it's about getting to the heart of wisdom through the perfection of wisdom.
  • What is there if not a self/soul? - There are Five Aggregates clung to as self. - Who clings?! - The aggregates, steeped in ignorance, cling and have aversion/fear. Released from the illusion (disillusioned), there is freedom and realization that the ultimate Truth was always true. - How does [the illusion of] self arise? - It comes about through Dependent Origination.
  • Talking about "Emptiness" (Śūnyatā) and "Suchness" (Tathātā) obscures the fact that what the Five Aggregates clung to as self are devoid of is an abiding, enduring HEART, core, essence. Conditioned things do not last even one moment because in the sub-moments there is arising, turning, and falling away. This is true at a submicroscopic level of atoms (kalapas) and mind-moments (cittas), mind and body, name and form.
  • All that is "self" bears the Three Marks of Existence mentioned above.
  • And this is great news because to really see it, even for a moment, transforms the heart/mind, releases us from illusion, as we are able to effortlessly let go of clinging and be free through the perfection of wisdom, the direct experience of the Truth.
  • This does not happen by accident. It happens by higher training.
Erin Brockovich, WQ: ABJ racked up another million views.






Friday, October 24, 2025

Beauty is only skin deep? Transformed

C'mon, now, don't fight dirty. It leads to anger.
Do "Beauty and the Beast" relationships really exist, and do they produce little beauties?
(Extraordinary People) "I just want to look normal" and have children not stare at me anymore.
Enlightenment: I love her inside, so it doesn't matter if my wife's surgery is successful or not.

Thursday, March 20, 2025

See Led Zep's Robert Plant live (5/6)

I like me a bit of Zen on me own without the lads. Wish Jimmy had played on more tracks.
.

I'll never get old but will just get better.
Who? There's this British guy, a old hippie, who became famous for his bluesy caterwauling in front of Jimmy Page's magnificent guitar work. Robert Plant was the frontman for the biggest rock band in the world (ahead of pop stars like The Beatles, The Stones, The Black Flag, and LA's own Wasted Youth, plus a million other small bands few have ever heard of). The great thing about Plant was not just that he was a good singer and a rockstar, but rather that he may have written some intelligent lyrics for the band, words akin to the intelligent stuff Pink Floyd was putting out in London's Acid Scene in the Sixties.


Robert Plant's Carry Fire
Has been Robert Plant of Led Zeppelin fame plays live, even though most of the world has not seen him. They'd like to, of course, but that's assuming he's backed by Jimmy Page, John Paul Jones, and Jason Bonham. That reunion may take a while. However, Plant is singing live for an audience in May 2025.

It's a hit: "APT." Rose ft. Bruno Mars


Rosé poses with blonde curly hair, gazing at the camera for her solo album cover Rosie
.
Bruno Mars is a second-rate drummer but a darn good singer as he tries to outshine a phenom named Rose (New Zealander/South Korean of K-Pop supergroup Blackpink) in "APT." a mega hit that deserves a listen or is worthy of being put on rotation for constant replay. Step aside, Princess Olivia, and never mind, Consort Doja. Wow, Rose is a rocker with her brash pronunciations and catchy lyricism. It's like she swallowed Britney's spunk with a Shakira chaser.
  • Rain Paris; Melodicka Bros ft. Greta (Xeria), Joe, and Dave; Rose, Bruno Mars; Eds., Wisdom Quarterly

Monday, September 18, 2023

Women dating hitting the wall (video)

FBE Capital, June 11, 2023; Seth Auberon, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Why older women hit the wall when dating | "girls" in their 30s, 40s, 50s struggling to date
(FBE Capital) When older women "hit the wall" in the dating market, they point the finger at everyone and everything but themselves. So let's take a look at what's actually going on, when women in their 30s, 40s and 50s are struggling to date and find love. What do you think?

With all of the changes in modern dating, older women are not having as much fun with online dating apps, as they were led to believe they would, since many eligible men in their age range are also being pursued by women in their 30s and 20s. This dries up the dating pool for older women and causes a lot of frustration. Meanwhile, it seems poor young guys have next to nothing but their video games, transgenderism, and Asperger's to fall back on.

VIDEO STRUCTURE
  • 00:00 Intro
  • 01:03 The reality of the wall
  • 02:20 How women create and maintain the wall
  • 03:49 The "knowing your worth" fallacy [overestimation]
  • 05:14 Two Types of Women
  • 06:08 Why are romantic women single?
  • 07:21 Self-sabotage good relationships
  • 08:36 Women "helping" women
  • 10:11 Good old-fashioned delusion
Older women are led to believe that dating will be a lot easier as they get older, since they now "know their worth," have tons of experience with guys, and know exactly what they want and what they don't want. But the reality is not only are these absolutely not the things that men are looking for. Then these women add even more traits and requirements to the mix that make it virtually impossible for them to ever be happy with any prospect they meet. True when and where taped, New York, 2022/2023.

Sunday, March 19, 2023

An Indian father (Live in Pasadena)

Freddie Lane (YouTube, 3/19/23); Eds., Wisdom Quarterly

At Minute 18:00, a Navajo father comes to the mic with his two sons -- all spirit runners along with the Apaches of San Carlos, Arizona. He gives a moving account of his acceptance by Apache Tribal Chairman Dr. Wendsler Nosie Sr. and his extended family. Almost crying, he shares his gratitude for being allowed and encouraged to run, eat, and feel at home as a guest on sacred land in Arizona.

This was a spiritual gathering with Nigos'dzan ("Mother Earth") among the oak trees of the Great Gathering Place, Hahamongna (Pasadegna, now Pasadena), in the foothills of tribal Los Angeles next to the glimmering Mars Ground Control that is JPL or NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (original Jack Parsons's Lab, a Satanic figure and good friend of Scientology's L. Ron Hubbard) at the headwaters of the Los Angeles River (formerly El Rio Porciuncula).


This week Pasadena Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will vote on whether or not to grant the Apache Stronghold a restraining order on a corporate mining interest, Resolution Copper (RSC), that is seeking to acquire public land now part of the Tinto National Forest in Arizona to create a crater where a mountain now stands using "blockade" mining, which are controlled earthquakes meant to destroy, pulverize, and transport the land to a processing center to extract copper.
Apache Nation asks federal court to halt proposed copper mine at Oak Flat
(DemocracyNow.org, 10/25/21 edited by Wisdom Quarterly)
With a totem pole on the bed of a truck, Apache Stronghold is on a Spiritual Convoy
.
Indigenous advocates fighting to protect Oak Flat -- a historic site in eastern Arizona sacred to the San Carlos Apache Nation and other Native American communities -- argued their case against a proposed copper mine in federal court Friday. The legal efforts at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena are being led by the grassroots group, Apache Stronghold.

Native communities have long warned the massive copper mine would destroy Oak Flat, depriving them of their religious rights and other freedoms.

Dr. Wendsler Nosie Sr., founder of Apache Stronghold and former chair of the San Carlos Apache Nation, says: “We heard it loud and clear in Indian Country that anything on federal land is not safe. Nothing is holy, and nothing is sacred to them. That was clearly spoken. The [emotions] that run through us is the fact that it answers the question that we are still prisoners of war in this country.”

The copper mine is being run by Resolution Copper (RSC), a [foreign] joint venture of multi-national mining corporations BHP and Rio Tinto.
Defending the Sacred: Water Protectors
Amy Goodman (democracynow.org), Wisdom Quarterly

Sunday, September 18, 2022

Modern obsession with BUTTS (video)

Third Paradigm, Sept. 3, 2022; Special WQ Correspondent Seymour Butts, Wisdom Quarterly
Don't look at my bubblegum butt! OK, look. (This whole social media obsession is too much).

Modern obsession with butts | Evolutionary psychology | anthropology
How are females objectified?
(Third Paradigm) Modern social media and the for-profit sex industry is replete with female objectification and fixation on certain body parts.

This video presents a two-fold analysis of this phenomenon. Whereas the first part looks at the evolutionary roots of sexual preference, the second looks at a philosophical/psychoanalytic account of modern-day sexual objectification and hyper accentuation of sexually pronounced body parts.

Goblins and other subhumans love butts and twerking demonstrations (Nekrogoblikon).
.
REFERENCES
  • Robert L. Moore, King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine
  • Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, 1844-1900. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006
  • McGilchrist Iain. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. Yale University Press 2009. Citation.
  • Paglia, C. (1990). Sexual personae: Art and decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. MLA
  • Sacks, Oliver, 1933-2015. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales. New York: Summit Books, 1985
  • #philosophy #psychology #anthropology #evolution #sexual #Jungian #objectification #butt #butts
CONTENTS
  • 00:00 - First part of the video
  • 00:05 - Introduction to the contents of the video
  • 00:49 - What constitutes an object of sexual attraction
  • 01:50 - Standard explanation
  • 02:35 - Natural and sexual selection
  • 03:39 - Steatopygia
  • 04:58 - Cue of biological sex
  • 07:12 - Cue of quantity and availability of reproductive fat
  • 08:18 - Cue of center of body mass
  • 10:28 - Cue of current pregnancy
  • 11:07 - Cue of parity
  • 11:32 - Cue of ability to cope with stress
  • 12:30 - Cue of sexy daughters
  • 13:27 - Artificial augmentation of body parts
  • 15:20 - Second part of the video
  • 15:40 - Camille Paglia | Sexual Personae
  • 18:31 - Abrahamic and pagan religions
  • 19:48 - Sexual objectification
  • 20:02 - Neo-Jungian Analysis
  • 21:07 - Ian McGilchrist | Master and his emissary
  • 22:55 - Oliver Sacks | Prosopagnosia
  • 23:40 - Nietzsche | Inverse cripple
  • 24:53 - Dehumanization and objectification
  • 25:31 - Plastic surgery
  • 25:52 - Corpus callosotomy
  • 26:14 - Sexual body part recognition hypothesis
  • 27:04 - Martin Heidegger | Deworlding
  • 27:47 - Closing of video
  • 28:28 - Chapters
Support on Patreon (patreon.com/thirdparadigm). To support via PayPal (paypal.me/Thirdparadigm) #philosophy #psychology #anthropology #butts #objectification

Monday, June 29, 2009

Appeals Court bars 2 Suu Kyi witnesses


YANGON – Burma's highest court rejected an appeal Monday by Aung San Suu Kyi's lawyers to reinstate two key witnesses in a trial that could send the pro-democracy leader to prison for five years. High Court judge Tin Aung Aye rejected the appeal because it was "intended to disturb and delay the trial," court officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.
The court's ruling means only two people will testify in Suu Kyi's defense at her trial, which resumes Friday, and that a verdict could be reached in a week or two. The 64-year-old Nobel Peace laureate is charged with violating the terms of her house arrest when an uninvited American man swam secretly to her lakeside home and stayed for two days.

"This is very unfair. The court had allowed 14 prosecution witnesses but only allowed two from the defense," said Nyan Win, one of Suu Kyi's lawyers. "We tried our best to have the trial conducted according to the law but it has failed." More>>