Showing posts with label questions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label questions. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Dear Buddha: Who created the universe?


It's a question we (metaphysical thinkers, philosophers, and intellectuals) love. We would probably all want to know. That someone may have been the foolish monk Ven. Malunkyaputta. Here's how the Buddha answered to subdue his delusion, ignorant confusion, and pernicious wrong views.

Metaphysical questions
Malunkyaputta, do not trouble yourself with such Qs
Once when presented with a problem of metaphysics (questions that go "beyond physics") by the Buddhist monk Malunkyaputta, the Buddha calmly responded with the Parable of the Poisoned Arrow.

On that occasion, Ven. Malunkyaputta had been meditating when he got distracted and started pondering. The hindrance of skeptical doubts arose in his mind, realizing that he had never gotten the answer to all of the usual "spiritual" questions seekers were usually in search of. All of those unanswered (some might even say unanswerable, the imponderable questions that plague Homo sapiens or "thinking human").
  • Is the physical world finite or infinite?
  • Did the universe have an origin, and will it end?
  • Who created this Universe?
  • Is the soul the same as the body or different?
  • What becomes of a fully enlightened person after death?
  • And so on ad nauseum. There is really no end to possible metaphysical speculations.
  • There is even a Buddhist text that summarizes all of the view prevalent at the time of the Buddha, which is called the Brahmajāla Sutta or "The Net of All-Embracing Views."
  • "Views" (ditthi) generally refers to wrong views (miccha-ditthi) unless otherwise qualified with samma- ("right-") views. They are as dangerous as a thicket one will get caught up in; it is far better to set them aside, awaken, and with an enlightened mind try to recall what they were when they used to make sense because they will not make sense -- and will not arise -- to the awakened (enlightened) mind/heart.
  • Ven. Malunkyaputta did not stop there. He threatened the Buddha that he would quit the monastic life and disrobe if he did not get answers to these things.
  • The Buddha gave him a powerful parable, asked him if the Buddha had ever promised to answer such questions in exchange for him becoming a monastic disciple, and thereby encouraged him to pursue the Path to the end of all suffering at which time he could see for himself independent of any teacher or teaching. This was that parable:
When one is shot with an arrow smeared with poison, that wounded person's family may summon a doctor to have the poison removed and provide an antidote [9].

But what if the wounded person refuses to let a doctor do anything until such time as certain important questions are answered? What if the wounded person demands first to know:
  • Who shot me with this arrow?
  • What is that person's caste and job?
  • WHY did that person shoot this arrow?
  • What kind of feather was used in its tail?
  • What kind of wood was used in its shaft?
  • What kind of poison was smeared on its tip?
  • What was the method the poison was procured?
One who demands first to have answers to all of that would surely die long before such questions were answered.

So, too, Malunkyaputta, a meditator will die long before getting such [fruitless metaphysical] questions answered.

It is no different for one who follows the Middle Way, which teaches only those things necessary to realize enlightenment (direct knowing-and-seeing for oneself).

Things not helpful and not necessary (but harmful and misleading), the Buddha (the Tathagata or Wayfarer, the Supremely Awakened One) does not teach.

It is because those types of questions are not helpful in one's quest for enlightenment that they have been left undeclared. More (Nontheistic religion)

More, more? Enough has been said, but for those persistent thinkers who question
I have more questions, Sir. - Ask them.
NOTE
: It is not because they can't be answered. They can (but any answer will be misleading, confusing, entering a thicket of views). It is not because a Supremely Awakened Buddha does not know; such an extraordinary being does know. But it is precisely because those questions are not useful (but a detriment) that the great Teacher -- concerned with the welfare and wellbeing of students -- sets aside such things and leaves them undeclared.

A disciple, a student, also sets them aside and pursues this path-of-practice to its culmination: awakening in this very life. Then one may ask all such questions.

One will not ask them because they will not arise because they will not make sense once one understands and penetrates DEPENDENT ORIGINATION (paticca-samuppada).

One may even answer them for others on their quest who ask such loaded questions, but to do so will be a disservice to them which the Awakened One has avoided, set aside, and left undeclared.
  • It would be like asking the question, "Have you stopped beating your wife? Yes or no!" What is the right answer? There isn't one. There's an explanation but not an answer.
  • A more ancient example that still makes sense is the question, "When this fire goes out, which way does it go: up, down, sideways?" It doesn't "go" somewhere, for it ceases when its causes-and-conditions cease because, really, it never had an independent existence (an existence independent of those very causes and condition: fuel, wick, heat, oxygen, and process-of-combustion...
  • In exactly the same way, when we ask about the "soul" (the "self," atta, atman, ego, personality, being, consciousness), "Where does it go after death? To annihilation? To eternal life? Which is it?!" The question is wrong, so any answer will be misleading and mistaken. But there is an answer:
  • The Buddha formulated that answer in accordance with ultimate truth: Dependent Origination. "When this is, that comes to be; when this is not [present], that does not come to be." Or it may also be phrased more poetically as, "Not having been, they come to be; once having been, they cease." What? Those things. Which things? All composite things (nirvana being the only compact, a.k.a. non-composite, thing and so not a "thing," no-thing yet not "nothing") but most importantly the Five Aggregates clung to as self.
  • That is why the Heart Sutra says, "Form (the first aggregate or heap) is emptiness, and emptiness is form." A better modern translation would be to say, "Form is impersonal [not self], and the impersonal is form." Then the exact same thing is then said of the remaining four aggregates: feelings, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness(es), the khandha or skandhas in Sanskrit.
  • The Buddha also went into greater detail when he answered, "What things?" with "the ALL that is burning."
How could this possibly be true? There are many who have followed the Middle Way, who have avoided four foolish (and detrimental) questions and pursued four wise (and beneficial) questions. What are they?
  1. Was I in the past?
  2. What was I in the past?
  3. Will I be in the future?
  4. What will I be in the future?
The fool ponders such thing fruitlessly, full of wrong view, caught in a thicket of views. However, the wise pursue four other questions which the Buddha has suggested, commended, and advocated:
  1. What is dukkha (disappointment, suffering, pain)?
  2. What is its cause?
  3. What is its solution?
  4. What is the way to its solution?
These, indeed, are of great benefit. They are known as the Catu-Ariya-Sacca, the Four Ennobling (Enlightening) Truths, the fourth being this very Ennobling Eightfold Path declared by the Buddha.

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Are whites racist? No! Well, sometimes 😟


Minari (award-winning film)
In the award-winning Korean-American movie Minari, there is a touching scene. The Korean daughter is having a tough time fitting in in Whiteland, USA. She's pretty, but she's not white. Then one day, by an act of God, a popular blonde girl approaches her and speaks. It's all going to be okay after all; she's being accepted by the cool kids! The blonde asks, Can I say something in your language and you stop me as soon as I say something you understand? I want to see if I'm speaking correctly?

Trump loves white children just like Adolf did.
The Korean girl is mesmerized -- She's talking to me! She wants my opinion! She's learned my language to be able to communicate with me! She's the bridging the gap! Sure, I can do that, the Korean girl answers. Then the blonde girl says this (winning the movie Oscar nominations in the process), "Ching-chong, ching-chong, ching-chong."

America first means white nationalists first.
She and we are crushed, devastated. The blonde girl smiles cruelly. Are whites really that racist? Well, sometimes. It's not that whites went through Scouts and Brownie training (America's Hitler Youth and Brown Shirts programs for boys and girls), so much as it is a general insensitivity. Look at this white rapper appropriating Black culture to diss an Asian segment of the population. Come on, it's all in fun. She's just trying to go viral:


"Woah Vicky (Ching Chong Bitch)"
(Entertainment Vids) Oct. 10, 2017: All rights belong to WoahVicky Diss track against RiceGum, so STFU if you don't like it. It ain't for you! Back off.

Saturday, January 13, 2024

Q: An "easy" Dharma book to read?

Ashley Wells, Dhr. Seven, CC Liu, Wisdom Quarterly QUESTIONS FOR THE EDITORS
Be sincere. The only "stupid" question is the one we are too afraid to ask.
.
What the Buddha Taught
The Comments Section is open to any and all questions concerning life, the universe, and everything, but especially the Buddha's Teachings known as the Dharma (Dhamma).

Dan Eckhart asked an interesting question recently: Can you guys recommend an easy Dharma book to read?
Answer: Yes, Dan. Try Who Ordered This Truckload of Dung? by awakened Buddhist comedian-in-robes Ajahn Brahm.
Apparently, Dan doesn't want to get bogged down in lists and Pali and Sanskrit terminology. He's a Westerner and wants some Western straight talk. Of course, we would always recommend What the Buddha Taught by Ven. Rahula as a concise text (Theravada).


When Things... (Pema Chodron)
But an American Buddhist nun would give all male authors a run for their money with the most down to earth Tibetan Buddhist advice: When Things Fall Apart.

It's from the pen of Pema Chodron (pemachodronfoundation.org) and talks about recovery, wound healing, and developing the heart when we're all already enlightened anyway (after all, "Samsara is nirvana" in the Mahayana imagination).

Sayalay Susila: This is a simple Abhidhamma book explained by the great Pa Auk Sayadaw.
.
Unraveling Mysteries Mind/Body
The back-to-basics Buddhism of Theravada (the "Teaching of the Enlightened Elders" from the time of the Buddha) imagines no such thing. Samsara (endless rebirth), in a sense, is the antithesis of nirvana.

The Path to Happiness (Susila)
That is, if anything can be the opposite since nirvana is the only thing that is not a [conditioned, compounded] "thing."

For more on that, see the work of the Malaysian Burmese Buddhist nun Sayalay Susila (sayalaysusila.net) and the book she wrote with Wisdom Quarterly's very own Dharma Editor Seven.

Friday, January 5, 2024

Hillary Supporter offended by Dave Chappelle

Mike MacRae, Jimmy Dore (TJDS); Pfc. Sandoval, Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Hillary Supporter OFFENDED by Dave Chappelle’s comedy special because of trans jokes, which Chappelle mentions to poke Netflix executives and fans with a hot stick, which is what even mentioning the word "trans" is nowadays.

Establishment rockers Green Day goes even more elitist, gay, and idiotic?

Wednesday, November 29, 2023

US Jews realize we were LIED to by Jews

Racheal152 (Star Trends), 11/12/23; Sheldon S., Ashley Wells (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Jewish diaspora realizing that we've been L!£D to the whole time
American JewBu (Buddhist)
(Star Trends) Premiered Nov. 12, 2023: There are good people, some born Jewish, and they speak up when they realized they have been lied to for so long. The world was deceived, but no one more so than Zionist Jews themselves. (Somehow the Ultra-Orthodox kept their heads while suffering the most anti-Jewish discrimination, as the other blended in and "passed" for white since this is really about the European/Ashkenazi experience, joining the IDF to go kill for a homeland and ethno-state, an occupation and apartheid).

Never again! At least not to us. I mean, next time we'll do unto others before they do us...again.
There's a Jewish Voice for Peace and other groups that say no to Zionist Israel (jvp.org).

#hispanic #alabama #israel #palestine#israel#tiktokvideos #americanhistory #blackhistory #hispanic #africanamericanhistory #florida #alabama #asianhistory #black #affirmativeaction

Wednesday, November 1, 2023

Is Gen Z brain dead? lol (video)

Brainworms via Leon Lush, 8/3022; Seth Auberon, Crystal Q. (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly

Is Gen Z actually brain dead? (It's not looking good youths)
(Leon Lush) Gen Z is pulling out all the stops to make themselves look less good than they actually are. Maybe it's drugs, shyness, or being phone-schooled. But who needs knowledge anyway when we can just work on having tons of followers and TikTok views instead?

This is a continuation of the series "Ruin Your Life in 30 Seconds or Less," which is how Brainworms started. 👕 Merch: leonlush.com/shop. 🎶 The music used: leonlush.com/epidemic. (It's perfect for avoiding copyright issues).

Sunday, February 26, 2023

Witchcraft w/ Trump forewoman Emily Kohrs

I don't want to tell you my secrets. Well, I do. But I'm not. I'm tight-lipped like judge wants.
Witchcraft items found on Emily Kohrs' Pinterest.com account, which is a bit oddball.

Grand jury forewoman under fire after interview(s)
I'm a bubbly character.
(Inside Edition) Feb. 22, 2023. The forewoman of the grand jury investigating Ex-Pres. Donny Trump is under fire after partaking in many interviews. Emily Kohrs just wrapped up an eight-month investigation into alleged election interference by Trump and his crony companions in Georgia. Kohrs was seen trying hard not to say something she shouldn't about the case during an interview. Legal experts are baffled at Kohrs’ decision to speak out, which puts her at the center of attention and potentially gets Trump out of trouble. Now, Trump is going after the forewoman on his laughable Twitter-like platform "Truth Social."
(CNN) Maggie Haberman reacts to Trump grand jury foreperson statements

Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Harvard study reveals secret to being likable

Margaret Pan, Medium.com, Jan. 18, 2023; G. P. MalalasekeraDictionary of Pali Proper Names; Ananda (Dharma Buddhist Meditation), Dhr. Seven (ed.), Wisdom Quarterly
California Gov. Gavin Newsom: Let me see. What makes you so likeable? Your personality?
What does it take to be likeable and popular? Does science know? (lexica.art)
.
Margaret Pan
It’s not being polite, helpful, or having a good sense of humor. It might be an inconvenient truth, but being likable is something we all (deep down) crave [except for the disagreeable people Prof. Jordan Peterson points out].

Is the secret being mysterious?
That’s because it makes life easier. If we think that people are born charming, we’re mistaken:

Likability can be learned and honed, just like any other skill.

But what is it that makes a person likable? According to a new Harvard study, described in an HBR article, the secret to being more likable and improving interpersonal bonding isn’t being polite, helpful, or having a good sense of humor.

It’s asking more questions. We all want to feel someone is interested in us. The research examined the role of asking questions in interpersonal relationships.

Harvard colleagues scrutinized thousands of natural conversations among participants who were getting to know each other, either in online chats or on in-person speed dates. The researchers told some people to ask at least nine questions within 15 minutes and the rest to ask no more than four within 15 minutes.

Am I "hot" or not? What does it take to be liked?
In the online chats, the people who were randomly assigned to ask many questions were better liked by their conversation partners. Among the speed daters, people were more willing to go on a second date with partners who asked more questions.

It makes sense: We all want to feel someone is interested in us. People tend to talk a lot about themselves, especially when they’re trying to impress someone. But that’s not the best strategy to make a positive impression.

When we show genuine interest in people — by asking them questions regarding their lives, thoughts, and feelings — and shift the focus of the conversation from ourselves onto others, that’s how we win them over.

There is a catch though. According to the findings of the research, the order of the questions we ask others has a significant effect on how they will respond.

If we want to build up trust, rapport, and intimacy, we should start with relatively shallow and insignificant questions and progress to more private/deep ones. More
The Buddha on the Four Bases of Popularity
Dhr. Seven, DISCUSSION, Wisdom Quarterly
In the "Advice to Householders" sutra (Sigalovada Sutta), the Buddha proclaims that there are Four Bases or Foundations of Popularity. Some people are popular, some are not. Why are they? It is because they have built up the habit and practice of these four things:
  1. generosity
  2. sweet speech
  3. helpfulness to others
  4. impartiality to all.
Unfortunately, as important as this sutra would be to the world of non-monastic Buddhists, it is a conglomeration of discourses patched together rather than kept separate. The amalgamation was not done very well as the closing verses refer back to parts that are not in the body.

The summary says one is popular by these four habits, but they are not mentioned in the body. And no one seems to notice or be able to do anything about it to fix it. A scholar might find the original sutra(s) somewhere in some tradition (outside the Pali language of the Theravada school) -- in Chinese, Sanskrit, Prakrit, or Tibetan texts -- but until one does, we only have this reference.

Karma: It's everywhere we're going to be.
Certainly, giving makes us popular with others. The good karma of dana is very meritorious, as we let go and do not cling to what we have but instead share it. Sweet speech is always welcome no matter what we are saying. Being helpful and coming to the aid of others is certainly going to win friends. Being impartial rather than biased and favoring some over others is a little more surprising, but who doesn't like a fair person? Such people are beloved everywhere.

Karma is the cause of our conditions and circumstances (fruit or phala), whether we are being good or bad. And we will meet with the results of our actions, speech, and intentions everywhere we go.

Venerable Ananda (the Buddha's son or cousin, according to different traditions) was very popular, more so than wise Sariputra and Khema. But "luckiest" of all was the Buddhist monk with the best karma Ven. Sivali (Sīvalī Thera).

The luckiest Buddhist
The good karma of lucky Ven. Sivali
Ven. Sīvalī was declared by the Buddha as foremost among recipients of gifts (A.i.24). It is said (ThagA.i.138; Ap.ii.495; AA.i.139) that when the Buddha visited Khadiravaniya-Revata, he took Ven. Sīvalī with him because the road was difficult and provisions were scarce.

[This would suggest that Ven. Sivali had better luck than the Buddha himself, having practiced generosity longer or better than the Bodhisatta, or it may mean that Sivali was in the receiving phase of his merit more so than anyone else around.]

Ven. Sīvalī went to the Himalayas with a large number of others to test his good luck. The devas provided them with everything they needed. On Gandhamādana mountain range a deva named Nāgadatta entertained them for seven days on milk rice. Source

Monday, February 25, 2019

Planet Earth is what shape? (video)

ODD Reality, 2/20/18; Pfc. Sandoval, Seth Auberon (eds.), Wisdom Quarterly


Planet Earth? 2019 Documentary II
ODD TV
Is the Earth a planet? No. It is a plane without a t. The Earth is actually flat and round, not globular. What an outrageous thing to say, and what a stupid thing to believe! We have all been told it's a globe, and who can question that? The truth is that THE TRUTH DOES NOT FEAR INVESTIGATION, Part 1 and 2 by Hibbeler Productions. It is a good documentary comprising clips from many other investigative pieces by many creators. ODD TV/ODD Reality. RedBubble: redbubble.com/people/oddtv... Facebook: ODDTV. SoundCloud: overdosedenver... Twitter: oddtv3 Instagram: odd_tv_yout...

(Big Think) Earth is not flat. Here are three "proofs."

Friday, February 9, 2018

Meditation, Q&A with ENLIGHTENED teacher!

Four Noble Truths, UWest Pali Society, Dhamma US, Dhr. Seven, Ananda M., Wisdom Quarterly
What is the path to enlightenment, the bodhi-magga? It lives in the oral transmission.

PasaDharma - Dharma Meditation Initiative - Dharma Punx - Disclosure Project - MARC

Our free retreat will be hosted by LA's Buddhist university, UWest, Rosemead, SGV

    Friday, December 1, 2017

    "Los Angeles Weekly" sold and gutted!

    (laweekly.com, 10:27 PM, Nov. 29, 2017); Editors, Wisdom Quarterly

    Who owns the publication [L.A. Weekly]?
     
    It’s a question we should ask no matter what we’re reading. In Latin there’s a phrase, Cui bono? It roughly translates as “Who’s benefiting?” It’s a good idea to know who’s profiting in any situation. Why? So we can make educated decisions.

    The new owners of the L.A. Weekly don’t want us to know who they are. They are hiding from us. They’ve got big black bags with question marks covering their big bald heads.
     
    These new owners just laid off nine hardworking journalists [out of 13]. Why? For sport? To start anew? To fulfill a blood vendetta that is centuries old?
     
    Maybe they have a good reason. Maybe they don’t. We don’t know. You don’t know. No one knows but them. Who owns [the L.A. Weekly]? It’s a fair question. Who’s benefiting? We deserve to know. Source

    Friday, October 13, 2017

    When God met the Buddha (sutra)

    Edited by Dhr. Seven, Amber Larson, and Ananda from (buddhasutra.com), "Sakka's Questions," Sakkapanha Sutra, for Wisdom Quarterly


    God consults the Buddha
    Sakka in Christian lore is Archangel Michael
    Thus have I heard. Once the Buddha was staying in Magadha, east of Rajagaha (Rajgir, India), by a Brahmin village called Ambasanda, to the north of the village on Mount Vediya, in the Indasala Cave.

    And at that time Sakka/Indra, King of the Gods (Devas) [Sakka Devanam Indo, another form of Sakya, the Buddha's clan name] felt a strong desire to see the Buddha. And Sakka thought: "Where is the Blessed One, the fully-enlightened Buddha, now staying?" Then, perceiving where the Buddha was, Sakka said to the other devas of the Realm of the Thirty-Three:

    "Gentlemen, the Blessed One is now staying Magadha, to the east of Rajagaha, by a Brahmin village called Ambasanda, to the north of the village on Mount Vediya, in the Indasala Cave [which must not have been called that yet, as it means the "Hall Where Inda or the Lord Was Greeted"]. How would it be if we were to go and visit the Blessed One?"
     
    "Very good, Inda, and may good fortune go with you," replied the lords of the World of the Thirty-Three.
     
    Then Sakka said to [the angel] Pancasikha of the gandhabbas: "The Blessed One is staying in Magadha, to the east of Rajagaha, by a Brahmin village called Ambasanda, to the north of the village on Mount Vediya, in the Indasala Cave. I propose to go visit him."
     
    "Very good, Inda,’ said Pancasikha and, taking his yellow beluva-wood lute, he followed in attendance on [the deva King] Sakka. And just as swiftly as a strong person might stretch a flexed arm or flex a straight arm Sakka, surrounded by the Thirty-Three Gods and attended by Pancasikha, vanished from the space World of the Thirty-Three and appeared in Magadha, to the east of Rajagaha, by a Brahmin village called Ambasanda, to the north of the village on Mount Vediya.
     
    Then a tremendous light shone over Mount Vediya illuminating the village of Ambasanda -- so great was the power of the [extraterrestrial archangels or] gods -- so that in the surrounding villages they were saying: "Look! Today, Mount Vediya is on fire! It’s burning! It’s engulfed in flames! What is the matter that Mount Vediya and Ambasanda are lit up like this?" And they were so terrified that their hair stood on end.
     
    Then Sakka said: "[Angel] Pancasikha, it is hard for the likes of us to get near the Tathágata [the Wayfarer, the Buddha] when they are enjoying the bliss of meditation and therefore withdrawn into the seclusion of absorbed meditation]. But if you, Pancasikha, were first to attract the ear of the Blessed One, then we might afterwards be able to approach and see the Blessed One, the fully enlightened Buddha."
     
    "Very good, lord," said Pancasikha. And carrying his yellow beluva-wood lute, he approached the Indasala Cave, thinking: "As far as this is neither too far nor too near to the Buddha for him to hear my voice." Then he stood respectfully to one side. Then accompanying the strains of his lute, he sang these verses extolling the Buddha, the Dharma, the Arhat-Sangha, and love:

     
    Lady, your good father Timbaru greet,
    O, sunshine fair, I give him honor due
    By whom was sired a maid as fair as you
    Who is the cause of my dear heart’s delight.
     
    Delightful as the breeze to one who sweats,
    Or as cooling drink to one who thirsts,
    Your radiant beauty is to me as dear
    As the Dharma is to Arhats
    [as the Liberating-Teaching is to Liberated Ones].
     
    Just as medicine to one who’s ill
    Or nourishment to one who’s starving still,
    Bring me, gracious lady, sweet release
    With cool water from my consuming flames.
     
    The elephant, oppressed by summer heat,
    Seeks a lotus-pool upon which float
    Petals and pollen of that flower
    So into your bosom sweet I’d plunge.
     
    As an elephant, urged by the goad [whip],
    Pays no heed to [opposing pricks of lance and spear,
    So I, unheeding, know not what I do,
    Intoxicated by your beauteous form.
     
    By you my heart is tightly bound in bonds,
    All my thoughts are transformed, and I
    Can no longer find my former course:
    I’m like a fish that’s caught by baited hook.
     
    Come, embrace me, maiden fair of thighs,
    Seize and hold me with your lovely eyes,
    Take me in your arms, it’s all I ask!
    My desire was slight at first, O maid
     
    Of waving tresses, but it grew apace,
    As grow the gifts that Arhats [worthy ones] receive.
    Whatever merit I have gained by gifts
    To those noble ones, may my reward
     
    When it ripens, be your love, my sun!
    Just as that Sage would be rejoiced, if he
    Were to gain supreme enlightenment,
    So I’d rejoice to be made one with you.
     
    If Sakka, Lord of Three and Thirty Gods,
    Were perchance to grant a boon to me,
    It’s you I’d crave, my love for you so strong.
    Your father, maid so wise, I venerate
     
    Like a sal tree fairly blossoming,
    For his offspring’s sake, so sweet and fair."
     
     
    When he heard this, the Buddha said: "Pancasikha, the sound of your lute strings blends so well with your song [voice], and your song with the strings, that neither prevails excessively over the other. When did you compose these verses on the Buddha, the Dharma, the Arhat-Sangha, and love?’
     
    "Venerable sir, it was when the Blessed One was staying on the bank of the river Neranjara, under the goatherd’s banyan tree prior to his [your] enlightenment. At that time I fell in love with the Lady Bhadda, bright as the sun, the daughter of King Timbaru of the gandhabbas. But the lady was in love with someone else. She favored Sikhaddi, the son of Matali the Charioteer. And when I found out that I could not win the lady by any manner or means, I took my yellow beluva wood lute and went to the home of King Timbaru of the Gandhabbas, and there I sang those verses. And, venerable sir, having heard the verses the Lady Bhadda Suriyavaccasa said to me:

    There is a "Hall of Truth" for the Sakiyans and another in heaven for the devas: Sudhamma

    "'Sir, I have not personally seen that Blessed One, though I heard of him when I went to the Sudhamma Hall of the Gods of the Thirty-Three to dance. And since, sir, you praise that Blessed One so highly, let us meet today." And so, venerable sir, I met the lady, not then but later."
     
    Then Sakka thought, "Pancasikha and the Blessed One are in friendly conversation," so he called to Pancasikha:

    "My dear Pancasikha, salute the Blessed One from me, saying, "Lord Sakka, King of the Gods, together with his ministers and followers, pays homage at the feet of the Blessed One."
     
    "Very good, lord," said Pancasikha, and did so.
     
    "Pancasikha, may Sakka, King of the Devas, his ministers and followers be happy, for they all desire happiness: shining ones (devas), humans, titans (asuras), reptilians (nagas), (angels) Gandhabbas, and whatever other groups of beings there are!" for that is the way the Tathagatas greet such mighty beings.

    After this greeting, Sakka entered the Indasala Cave, saluted the Buddha, and stood respectfully to one side, and the Devas of the Thirty Three, with Pancasikha, did the same.
     
    Then in the Indasala Cave the rough passages became smooth, the narrow parts become wide, and the pitch-dark cavern became bright, owing to the power of the shining ones (devas). Then the Buddha said to Sakka:

    "It is wonderful, it is marvelous that the venerable Kosiya [referring to King Sakka], with so much and so many things to do, should come here!"

    "Venerable sir, I have long wished to visit the Blessed One, but I have always been so busy on behalf of the Devas of the Thirty Three that I was unable to come. Once the Blessed One was staying at Savatthi in the Salala hut, and I went to Savatthi to see the Blessed One.
      
    "At that time the Blessed One was seated in some form of profound meditation (jhana), and King Vessavana’s wife, Bhunjatu, was waiting on him, venerating him with palms together [in anjali mudra].

    "I said to her: 'Lady, please salute the Blessed One for me and say, "Sakka, King of the Gods [of the World of the Thirty Three], with his ministers and followers, pays homage at the Blessed One’s feet."

    "But she said, "Sir, it is not the right time to see the Blessed One; he is in retreat."

    "Well then, lady, when the Blessed One rises from his meditation, please tell him what I have said."

    "Venerable sir did the lady salute you on my behalf, and does the Blessed One remember what she said?"
     
    "She did salute me, King of the Devas, and I remember what she said. I also remember that it was your reverence’s chariot-wheels [chariots of the gods, space ship, vimana] that roused me from my meditation."
     
    "Venerable sir, those gods who were reborn in the Heaven of the Thirty-Three before I was have told and assured me that whenever a Tathagata, a fully-enlightened arhat Buddha arises in the world, the ranks of the devas increase, and those of the titans [their enemies] decline in numbers. In fact I have witnessed this myself.

    "There was, venerable sir, right here in Kapilavatthu [one of the Buddha's three hometowns, likely modern Bamiyan, Mes Aynak, and Kabul, Afghanistan] a Sakyan girl called Gopika, who had confidence/faith in the buddhas, the Dharma, and the Sangha [the Three Jewels or Treasures, the Enlightened Teacher, the Teaching of Enlightenment, and the Enlightened Students] who observed the precepts scrupulously.

    "She rejected the status of a woman and developed the thought of becoming a man. Then, after her death, at the breaking up of the body, she went to a happy [rebirth] destination, being reborn in a heavenly state among the Devas of the Thirty-Three, as one of our sons (deva-putras), becoming known as Gopaka the devas’ son [lit., Gopaka Devaputra, which means "Gopaka-reborn-among-the-devas"].

    Also, there were three monks who, having observed the supreme-life (brahmachaya or "way that leads to brahma," to the supreme, the worlds higher than the Sensual Sphere) under the Blessed One, had been reborn in the inferior condition of angels (gandhabbas). They lived indulging in the pleasures of the five senses as our attendants and servants.

    "At this, Gopaka rebuked those five, saying: 'What were you about, sirs, that you did not listen to the Blessed One’s teaching? I was a woman who had confidence in the Buddha… I rejected the[lure and] status of a woman… and was [therefore] reborn among the Devas of the Thirty-Three and am known as Gopaka Devaputta.

    "But you, after having observed the supreme-life under the Blessed One, have been reborn in the inferior life condition of messengers/servants/entertainers of the devas (which is what the lowly gandhabbas are, better than ordinary mortals, longer-lived and more beautiful than humans, but certainly not immortal)!" And being thus rebuked, two of those devas immediately [began to meditate and] developed mindfulness, and so attained to the Realm of the Retinue of Brahma. But one of them remained addicted to sensual pleasures.
     
    Gopaka spoke:
     
    "Disciple once of the One-Who-Sees,
    The name I bore then, Gopika.
    The Buddha and Dharma firmly trusting,
    I served the Sangha [of monastics] cheerfully.
     
    For loyal duty paid to him
    See me now, a Sakka son,
    Mighty in the Threefold World
    Resplendent, Gopaka by name.
     
    Then former monks I saw, who’d reached
    No higher than angel’s rank,
    Who before had human birth
    And led the supreme-life the Buddha taught.
     
    We supplied [donated] their food and drink
    And waited on them in our homes.
    Had they no ears, that they thus blessed
    Still could not grasp the Buddha’s Teaching?
     
    Each for himself must understand
    That Dharma taught by One-Who-Sees,
    And well-proclaimed. I, serving you,
    Heard the Noble-One’s good words,
     
    And so I’m reborn, a Sakka son,
    Mighty in the Threefold Heaven
    Resplendent, whereas you,
    Though you studied under the Prince of Men
     
    And led the matchless-life he taught,
    Have reappeared in a humble state
    And not attained appropriate rank.
    A sorry sight it is to see!
     
    One’s Dharma-fellows sunk so low
    That, angel-spirits you,
    But come to wait upon the gods,
    While as for me -- I am transformed!
     
    From household life and female, I
    Am now reborn a male, a god,
    Rejoicing in celestial bliss!"
    When thus rebuked by Gopaka,
     
    Disciple true of Gautama [the Buddha],
    In sore distress they all replied,
    "Alas, let’s go, and strive amain
    And be no longer others’ slaves!"
     
    And of the three, two struggled well,
    And bore in mind the Teacher’s word.
    They purified their hearts of lust,
    Perceiving peril in desires,
     
    And like the elephant that bursts
    All restraining bonds, they broke
    The fetters and the bonds of lust,
    Those fetters of the Evil One [Mara]
     
    So hard to overcome -- and thus
    The very gods, the Thirty-Three
    With Indra and Pajapati,
    Who sat enthroned in Council Hall,
     
    These two heroes, passions purged,
    Outstripped and left them far behind.
    On seeing which, Vasava, dismayed,
    Chief amidst that throng of gods
     
    Cried: "See how these of lesser rank
    outstrip the gods of the Thirty-Three!"
    Then hearing of his ruler's fears,
    Gopaka said to Vasava:
     
    Lord Indra, in the world of men
    A Buddha, called the Sakyan Sage [Sakyamuni],
    Has gained mastery over lust,
    And these his pupils, who had failed
     
    In mindfulness when claimed by death,
    Have now regained it with my help.
    Though one of them is left behind
    And still among angels dwells,
     
    These two, on highest wisdom set,
    In deep absorption (jhana) spurn the gods!
    Let no [Buddhist] disciple ever doubt
    That truth may yet be realized
     
    By those who dwell in these abodes.
    To one who has crossed the flood and made
    An end of doubts, our homage is due.
    To the Buddha, Victor, Blessed One, we give it.
     
    Even here, they gained the truth, and so
    Have passed beyond to greater eminence.
    Those two have gained a higher place than this
    In realms of Brahma’s Retinue. And we
     
    Have come, O Lord [Vasava], in hope that we may gain
    That truth, and, if the lord will give us leave,
    To put our questions to the Blessed One."
     
    Then the Buddha thought: "Sakka has lived a pure life for a long time. Whatever questions he may ask will be to the point and not frivolous, and he will be quick to understand my answers.’ So the Buddha replied to Sakka with this verse:

    "Ask me, Sakka, all that you desire!
    On what you ask, I’ll put your mind at rest."
      
    Sakka's questions
    Being thus invited, Sakka, King of the Devas, put his first question to the Buddha:

    1. "By what fetters, sir, are beings bound -- gods (devas), humans, titans, reptilians, angels, and whatever other kinds of beings there may be -- whereby, although they wish to live without hate, harming, hostility or aggression, and in peace, they yet live in hate, harming one another, hostile and aggressive?"

    This was Sakka’s first question to the Buddha, who replied: 

    "King of the Gods, it is the bonds of jealously and avarice that bind beings so that, although they wish to live without hate… they yet live with hate, harming one another, hostile and aggressive.’ This was the Buddha’s reply.

    And Sakka, delighted, exclaimed: "So it is, venerable sire! So it is, Wayfarer! Through the Buddha’s answer I have overcome my doubt and uncertainty!"
     
    Then Sakka, having expressed his appreciation, asked another question: 

    "But sir, what gives rise to jealousy and avarice? What is their origin, how are they born, how do they arise? Owing to the presence of what do they arise, and owing to the absence of what do they arise?

    "Jealousy and avarice, King of the Gods, arise from like and dislike. This is their origin, this is how they are born, how they arise. When these are present, they arise. When these are absent, they do not arise."
     
    "But, sir, what gives rise to like and dislike?… Owing to the presence of what do they arise, and owing to the absence of what do they not arise?"
     
    "They arise, King of the Gods, from desire (craving, tanha)… Owing to the presence of desire, they arise, and owing to the absence of desire they do not arise."
     
    "But, sir, what gives rise to desire?"
     
    "Desire, King of the Gods, arises from thinking [reflecting]… when the mind/heart thinks about something [reflects in an unmindful way], desire [craving] arises. When the mind does not, desire does not arise."

    "But, sir, what gives rise to [unmindful attention, reflection]?"
     
    "[Unmindful reflection] arises from the tendency to proliferation… when this tendency is present, unmindful reflection arises. When it is absent, unmindful reflection does not arise."

    "Well, sir, what practice has that disciple undertaken who has reached the right way which is heedful and leading to the cessation of the tendency to proliferation?"
      
    Two Kinds of Happiness
    Fake Buddha quotes are fun, often clever, yet completely non-canonical.

    "King of the Gods, I declare that there are two kinds of happiness -- the kind to be pursued and the kind to be avoided. The same applied to unhappiness and equanimity.
      
    "Why have I declared this in regard to happiness? This is how I understood happiness: When I observed that in the pursuit of some happiness, unwholesome factors increased and wholesome factors decreased, then that happiness was to be avoided.

    "And when I observed that in the pursuit of some happiness unwholesome factors decreased and wholesome ones increased, then that happiness was to be pursued and sought after.

    "Now, of such happiness as is accompanied by unmindful reflection and pondering, and of that which is not so accompanied, the latter is the more excellent. The same applies to unhappiness and to equanimity.

    "And this, King of the Gods, is the practice that disciple has undertaken who has reached the right way… leading to the cessation of the tendency to proliferation." Sakka expressed his delight at the Buddha’s answer.
     
    Then Sakka, having expressed his appreciation, asked another question:

    2 "Well, sir, what practice has that disciple undertaken who has acquired the restraint required by the training rules?"

    "King of the Gods, I declare that there are two kinds of bodily conduct -- the kind to be pursued and the kind to be avoided. The same applies to conduct of speech and to the pursuit of goals. Why have I declared this in regard to bodily conduct?

    "This is how I understood bodily conduct: When I observed that by the performance of certain actions, unwholesome factors decreased and wholesome ones increased, then such bodily action was to be followed. That is why I make this distinction.

    "The same applies to conduct of speech and the pursuit of goals. And this, King of the Gods, is the practice that disciple has undertaken who has acquired the restraint required by the training rules." And Sakka expressed his delight at the Buddha’s answer. Then Sakka asked another question: 

    3. "Well, sir, what practice has that disciple undertaken who has acquired control of one's own sense faculties?’
     
    "King of the Gods, I declare that things perceived by the eye are of two kinds -- the kind to be pursued and the kind to be avoided. The same applies to the things perceived by the ear, the nose, the tongue, the body, and the mind.’

    At this, Sakka said, "Venerable sir, I understand in full the true meaning of what the Blessed One has outlined in brief. Venerable sir, whatever object is perceived by the eye, if its pursuit leads to an increase of unwholesome factors and a decrease of wholesome ones, that is not to be pursue. If its pursuit leads to a decrease of unwholesome factors and an increase of wholesome ones, such an object is to be pursued.

    "After the same applies to things perceived by the ear, the nose, the tongue, the body, and the mind. Thus I understand in full the true meaning of what the Blessed One has outlined in brief, and through the Buddha’s answer I have overcome my doubt and rid myself of uncertainty." Then Sakka asked another question:

    4. "Sir, do all wandering ascetics and Brahmins teach the same doctrine, practice the same discipline, want the same thing, and pursue the same goal?’
     
    ‘No, King of the Gods, they do not."
     
    "But, sir, why not?"
     
    "The world, King of the Gods, is made up of many and various elements. This being the case, beings adhere to one or other of these various things. And whatever they adhere to they become powerfully addicted to, and they declare: ‘This alone is the truth; everything else is false!’ Therefore, they do not all teach the same thing or pursue the same goal."
     
    "Sir, are all wandering ascetics and Brahmins (temple priests) fully proficient, freed from bonds, perfect in the supreme-life? Have they perfectly reached the goal?"
     
    "No, King of the Gods."
     
    "Why is that, sir?"

    "Only those who are liberated by the destruction of craving are fully proficient, freed from the bonds, perfect in the supreme-life, and have perfectly reached the goal.’
     
    Then Sakka, having delighted in and expressed his approval of the Blessed One's words, said to him:

    "Craving (clinging, yearning, pining) is a disease, craving is a boil, craving is an arrow. It seduces one, drawing one into this or that state of being (rebirth), which is why one is reborn in high states and low. Whereas other outside [non-Buddhist] Brahmin priests and wandering ascetics gave me no chance to ask them these questions, the Blessed One has answered at length, so that he has removed the arrow of my uncertainty and perplexity."
     
    "King of the Gods, do you recall having asked other priests and wanderers these questions?"
     
    "Yes, venerable sir, I recall having asked other priests and wanderers these questions."
     
    "If it is no inconvenience, could you tell me how they answered?"
      
    "It is no inconvenience when sitting with the Blessed One or one like him."
     
    "Then tell me, King of the Gods."

    "Having gone to those whom I considered to be Brahmins (temple priests teaching the Vedas) and wandering ascetics (Buddhist monastics practicing the Dharma) living in isolated dwellings in the wilderness, I asked them these questions. But when asked by me, they were at a loss. Being at a loss, they asked me in return, 'What is your name?'
     
    "Being asked, I responded, 'I, dear sir, am Sakka, the King of the Gods.'
     
    "So they questioned me further, 'But what karma did you do to attain to this state?'
     
    "So I taught them the Dharma as far as I had heard and mastered it [explaining the good actions and merit I had accrued that resulted in me being reborn as Sakka, King of the Gods]. And they were gratified with just this much: 'We have seen Sakka, King of the Gods, and he has answered our questions!'

    "So, instead of my becoming their disciple, they simply became mine. But I, venerable sir, am the Blessed One's disciple, a stream-winner (first stage of enlightenment), steadfast (of unshakeable confidence in the Buddha's enlightenment and the Dharma/Enlightening Teaching, and the other enlightened-disciples' enlightenment), never again destined for [subhuman] states of woe but headed for full-awakening."
     
    "King of the Gods, do you recall ever having previously experienced such happiness and joy?"

    "Yes, venerable sir, I do."
     
    "How and when do you recall ever having previously experienced such happiness and joy?"

    The war in heaven rages on.
    "Once, venerable, the gods and the titans (devas and asuras) were arrayed in battle. And in that battle the devas won when the titans lost. Having won the battle, as the victor in the battle, this thought occurred to me: 'Whatever has been the divine nourishment of the titans, whatever has been the divine nourishment of the devas, the devas will now enjoy them both.'

    "But my attainment of happiness and joy was in the sphere of violence and weapons. It did not lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calm, direct knowledge, enlightenment, to nirvana.

    "But my attainment of happiness and joy on hearing the Blessed One's Dharma is in the sphere free of violence, the sphere free of weapons. It leads to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calm, to direct knowledge, enlightenment, to nirvana."
     
    "And, King of the Gods, what things do you call to mind when you are experiencing such satisfaction and happiness as this?"

    "Venerable sir, at such a time, six things come to mind at which I rejoice:

    "I who merely as a god (deva) exist, have gained
    The chance, by karma, of another earthly life."
    That, venerable sir, is the first thing that occurs to me.

    "Leaving this suprahuman realm of gods (devas) behind,
    Unerringly I’ll seek the [human] womb I wish to find.’
    That, venerable sir, is the second thing…
     
    "My problems solved, I’ll gladly live by the Buddha’s Dharma,
    Controlled and mindful, and with clear mindfulness filled.
    That, venerable sir, is the third thing…
     
    "And should thereby enlightenment arise in me,
    As one-who-knows I’ll dwell and there await the end.
    That, venerable sir, is the fourth thing…
     
    "Then when I leave the human world again, I’ll be
    Once more a deva, one of highest rank.’

    That, venerable sir, is the fifth thing…
    ‘More glorious than devas are the peerless gods,
    Among whom dwelling I shall make my final home.’
    That, venerable sir, is the sixth thing that occurs to me.

    "And these are the six things at which I rejoice:
    ‘Long I wandered, unfulfilled, in doubt,
    In quest of the Tathagata [the Buddha]. I thought
    Hermits who lived in seclusion and austere
     
    Must surely be enlightened: I’ll seek them.
    "What must I do to gain success, and what
    Course but leads to failure?" -- But thus asked,
    They could not tell me how to tread the path.
     
    Instead, when they found out that I am king
    Of the gods, they asked me why I’d come to them,
    And it was I who taught them what I knew
    Of Dharma, and at that, rejoicing, they
     
    Cried: "It’s Vasava, the lord, we’ve seen!"
    But now -- I’ve seen the Buddha, and my doubts
    Are all dispelled, my fears are allayed,
    And now to the Enlightened One I pay
    Homage due, to him who’s drawn the dark
     Of craving, to the Buddha, peerless,
    Mighty Hero, Kinsman of the Sun!
    Just as Brahma’s honored by the gods,
     
    So likewise today we honor you,
    Enlightened One, and Teacher unsurpassed,
    Whom none can equal in the human world,
    Or in space, dwelling place of the gods!

    Then Sakka, King of the Gods, said to Pancasikha of the gandhabbas: "My dear Pancasikha, you have been of great help to me for gaining the ear of the Blessed One. For it was through your gaining his ear that we were admitted to the presence of the Blessed One, the Arhat, the supremely enlightened Buddha. I will be a father to you; you shall be king of the gandhabbas, and I will give you in marriage to Bhadda Suriyacaccasa, whom you desire."
     
    Then Sakka, King of the Gods, touched the earth with his hand and said three times:
     
    Homage to the Worthy One, the Blessed One, the Rightly Awakened One!
    Homage to the Worthy One, the Blessed One, the Rightly Awakened One!
    Homage to the Worthy One, the Blessed One, the Rightly Awakened One!
     
    While this explanation was being given, there arose in Sakka the dustless, stainless Dharma eye: "Whatever is subject to origination is subject to cessation" -- as it also arose in his following of devas.

    Such were the questions tht the Blessed One answered at Sakka's bidding. So this discourse is called "Sakka's Questions."