Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Women's Full Ordination Controversy

Wisdom Quarterly editors

Samaneris (novice nuns) circumabulating Shwedagon Pagoda, Rangoon, Burma (AFP).

In an unprecedented historical act, Australia's Ajahn Brahm, a senior abbot in the Thai Forest Tradition of Theravada Buddhism, conducted a reinstatement ceremony at his Australian monastery for a group of four nuns to make them fully ordained bhikkhunis, the highest level of Buddhist monastics.

The bestowing of full ordination for women -- which lapsed centuries ago with no easy way to restore it or, as some argue, with no legitimate way to restore it at all -- is revolutionary. However, women were reinstated a few years ago in India using senior Mahayana nuns as preceptors, through the brave work of some monks from Sri Lanka. (Currently, it is possible to ordain in the US as a higher ordination nun at West Virginia's Bhavana Society, pictured, under the auspices of the Sri Lankan abbot Ven. Gunaratana, "Bhante G").


Novices on their way to full ordination as Theravada nuns through the Bhavana Society of West Virginia (bhavanasociety.org)

But Ajahn Brahm's actions is sure to help legitimize female ordination. It has even been argued that the rules banning women from higher ordination after the lapse of the Bhikkhuni Order was due to rules invented by men or monks, not by an actual decree or set of eight special rules binding only on women laid out by the Buddha.

The Theravada lineage is the oldest extant Buddhist tradition. It maintains the disciplinary regulations (Vinaya) that facilitate the survival of the Sangha and extend the duration during which the Dharma exists in the world. The rules laid out by the Buddha are only altered during formal councils, of which there have been very few in the past 25 centuries. But part of the problem as to whether any rule can be altered at all falls at the feet of Ananda (and perhaps Mara). The Buddha is reputed to have said that after his passing, the Sangha could gather and change the minor rules but not the major rules. Ananda had a momentary lapse. So affected was he by the news of the Buddha's impending demise (parinirvana), that he failed to asked the Buddha which were which.

The Buddha conferring ordination to the first Buddhist nun, his mother, Maha Pajapati

The controversy sparked by female ordination in the first place, a momentous decision for a world religion, is dwarfed by the controversy to re-establish the practice after it lapsed. Some Buddhist countries, like Thailand, never had a Bhikkhuni Sangha (Buddhist Order of Nuns). Ajahn Brahm, although a Westerner and the abbot of a monastery and (lower ordination) nunnery in Australia, was ordained in the Thai tradition. This makes his actions quite radical, and one can imagine that it is not a popular move among very pious Thai Buddhists afraid to deviate in any way from orthodoxy.

Nevertheless, Thailand is quite progressive, particularly with regard to gender and sexual politics. (Thailand, after all, has a third gender, the kathoey). One prominent university professor decided she wanted to be recognized as a fully ordained Buddhist nun (a bhikkhuni rather than a "novice" or 10 precept samaneri). And this caused quite a stir in Thai society, where monks enjoy a particularly prominent status and wield tremendous influence. Individual monks of course do not have much say, but the Sangha does. It is an integral part of society. The "Sangha" is represented, then, not by ordinary monks but by abbots and long standing elders (theras) who have quite a bit of say in secular matters.

This entire episode is quite sad. For other Buddhist traditions -- Chinese Mahayana, Tibetan Vajrayana, and independent Western movements -- have longstanding Bhikkhuni Orders. And those nuns have only helped the tradition as a whole. Theravada has always had 10 Precept Nuns, who look and act like fully ordained monastics. Their status is already subordinated to that of men because of the eight special rules (of dubious origin) for women. So it is not clear what would be lost by their ordination. But what there is to gain is clear -- the dispensation (sasana) would be complete. Women would fully participate in society. The Sangha would be strengthened and enlarged. Women would have the same opportunity to gain enlightenment and enjoy the full support of society. Fear and sexism have kept this from happening for long enough.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Kalyani: Dependent Origination

(WQ) Bay Area Dharma Talks: Kalyani speaking to a crowd of 200 in Daly City near San Francisco on Saturday Nov. 14, 2009 at a Theravada Dhamma Society marathon meditation and teaching event with Pa Auk Sayadaw. Other speakers also making three hour presentations include authors Shaila Catherine (Focused and Fearless), Stephen Snyder and Tina Rasmussen (Jhanas Advice), as well as James MacDonald and others.
  • See them webcast live on VZOchat (ID: yadanagonyee). Nightly beginning at 6:30 pm.


Kalyani's opening remarks with Pa Auk Sayadaw and other monks behind her (WQ)

Dependent Origination

Paticca Samuppada is so simple a concept -- the idea that all things that arise do so only in dependence on causes and supporting con-ditions. But as the Buddha warned Ananda (DN 15), it should never be thought of as actually being simple or obvious. For it is deep and profound (with 12 links or causal-factors that lead to the arising of suffering, existence, and rebirth). And it is on account of not seeing this Dependent Arising that you and I have traveled from birth to birth in this "continued wandering on" called Samsara. For with birth has come old age, sickness, and death -- and this entire mass of suffering.

Wisdom Quarterly had three interview questions for the speaker, a skilled meditator and one of the Sayadaw's foremost American students:

  1. What is Dependent Origination?
  2. What is it for?
  3. And how is it done?

Dependent Origination or Dependent Arising or "Conditioned Co-genesis" is the examining of the present, the future, and the past looking at 12 links so that one can understand how and why we are here now. It is a general law on how things co-arise and a means of discerning the particular karma that led to this life.

More importantly, one examines these links to gain the "eye of the Dharma" (stream-entry) -- that is, for direct insight in meditation. Sariputra quotes the Buddha to suggest how important this topic is, "Whoever sees the Dharma sees Dependent Origination, and whoever sees Dependent Origination sees the Dharma" (MN 28). Those causal links are: (1) ignorance, (2) karma-formations, (3) consciousness, (4) materiality-mentality, (5) six sense doors, (6) contact, (7) feeling, (8) craving, (9) clinging, (10) continued-existence, (11) birth, (12) old-age-and-death. In brief, Dependent Origination is an analytical meditation topic leading to vipassana (insight). What it's for is to gain a foothold to gain enlightenment.

The process is straightforward but not at all intuitive. It would not naturally occur to someone to discern these factors at the mind door and then to check them. That is why a good teacher is essential. Pa Auk Sayadaw is just such a teacher, rare in the world. His (free) books, lectures, retreat handouts and interview instructions make him a rare enlightened teacher capable of bringing the Abhidharma down from the shelf and into real life. Directions on how Dependent Origination in meditation is done will make little sense to anyone not engaged in meditation or who, although engaged, has not yet mastered the jhanas. Therefore, practice practice practice. It isn't just meditation. Practice virtue, setting nirvana as the goal of every good thing you do. Then those wholesome deeds become paramis that make this meditation possible and extraordinarily fruitful.

Faith (saddha) Discourse

Wisdom Quarterly translation: Saddha Sutra (AN 5.38)


There are these five beneficial results of confidence (saddha) for lay followers. What are the five?

  1. When good people [noble ones and such] in this world show compassion, they first show compassion to confident people, not those lacking confidence.
  2. When they visit, they first visit confident people, not those lacking confidence.
  3. When they accept gifts [or hospitality], they first accept gifts from confident people, not those lacking confidence.
  4. When they teach the Dharma, they first teach it to confident people, not those lacking confidence.
  5. A confident person (with faith well placed), at the break up of the body, after death, rearises in a good destination, even in celestial worlds.
These are the five beneficial results of confidence.

A lay follower replete with confidence [in Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha] is like a large Bo tree growing at a crossroads: It is a haven for birds that come from four directions. Just so a confident lay follower is a haven for monks, nuns, male lay followers (upasakas), and female lay followers (upasikas).

A great Bo tree laden with figs and leaves
With shoots and roots and abundant fruit
There birds of every feather rest and rejoice together
In an environment they call home
Who seeks fruit finds fruit
Who seeks shade finds shade
It is just the same with a person of faith
Who is virtuous, humble, gentle, sensitive, caring, and mild
To such a person come those unfettered
Who are free from greed, hate, and delusion
Who are a great field of merit for the world
They teach a Dharma that dispels all ill
Which to understand frees one from all fetters culminating in nirvana

Ask a Brahmin: 3 Kinds of Faith


Hinduism Today's Satguru Bodhinatha Veylanswami reads his Publisher's Desk article (Oct-Nov-Dec 2009 issue) on the three stages of faith: blind faith, informed conviction, and personal realization.

Faith in Buddhism
In Buddhism, faith (Sanskrit, Śrāddha; Pali, Saddhā) is the initial acceptance of the Bud-dha’s teachings, prior to the acquisition of right under-standing and right thought. Buddhism does not rely on supernatural authority or the word of the Buddha but claims rather that its teachings can all be experientially verified. Starting on the Eightfold Path (the Buddhist system of spiritual progress) involves, however, a provisional acceptance, through faith, of the Buddha and his teachings that is later confirmed by direct experience and by the growth of right understanding.

Some Buddhist commentators have analyzed three kinds of faith or saddhā: affective (devotional), conative (involving effort), and cognitive (rational).

In the devotional sects of Mahāyāna Buddhism, faith is elevated to a dominant position [just as it is in devotional Hindu sects], equal to wisdom, as being for most people the appropriate way of reaching salvation in this present unenlightened age. Among the Pure Land sects, for example, sincere invocation of the name of the Buddha Amitābha is sufficient to ensure rebirth of the faithful in his Western Paradise (the Pure Land). Source

  • Buddhist teacher Sharon Salzberg (author of Faith) describes the journey as having three interlocking stages: bright faith, verifying faith, and abiding faith.

Shaila Catherine: Concentration to Insight



(Google Talks) Shaila Catherine, author of Focused and Fearless, speaks to ordinary meditators who wish to attain extraordinary states of meditation with ease. Through her book she offers a creative and contemporary slant on this ancient path of happiness and wisdom.

Blended with contemporary examples, pragmatic exercises, and how-to instructions that anyone can try, this book provides a wealth of tools to cultivate non-distracted attention in daily life and retreat.

Shaila Catherine has been practicing meditation since 1980, with seven years of accumulated silent retreat experience. She has been teaching since 1996 in the USA, India, Israel, England, and New Zealand. She studied at the Sharpham College for Buddhist Studies in England and dedicated six years to studying with masters in India, Nepal, and Thailand. Shaila's current focus is the development of concentration and the deep states of absorption called jhana under the Ven. Pa Auk Sayadaw.

She is the founder of Insight Meditation South Bay based in Mountain View, California. This event took place on May 14, 2008, as a part of the Authors@Google series.

"Focused and Fearless" (book review)

Jhana is a powerful meditative technique that opens the way to unfettered joy, radiant calm, and abiding happiness. Focused and Fearless presents this ancient meditative tradition as interpreted through the practice of a contemporary American teacher (pictured at right). As such it represents a landmark shift in Theravadan Buddhism by bringing jhana into the reach of busy practitioners. The book speaks to both non-meditators and meditators from any tradition, helping those who simply want to understand how to attain extraordinary states with ease while offering a creative, contemporary slant on this ancient path of happiness and wisdom. An engaging mix of contemporary examples, practical exercises, and how-to instructions that anyone can try, Focused and Fearless is an accessible, friendly, and wise guide that is ideal for both novices and the more seasoned practitioner who wishes to explore advanced meditative states.
  • Focused and Fearless: A Meditator's Guide to States of Deep Joy, Calm, and Clarity (now in paperback) Shaila Catherine (author)
"CONCENTRATION is a central feature of a contemplative life, cultivated through formal meditation practice and also through any of a variety of other daily activities..." More>>

Focused and Fearless is a reliable and pragmatic guide to the practices of absorption concentration, or jhana. It presents them within the broader context of the path of liberating the mind from suffering and dissatisfaction through non-clinging. The descriptions of these practices are clearly based in Shaila Catherine's own intensive and systematic exploration of them while also being solidly based in the Buddha's discourses and the commentarial tradition. Her writing is very clear and a joy to read. Whether you are simply curious about the jhanas or are interested in practicing with them, Focused and Fearless is a highly recommended practice guide.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (SF)


John Perkins addressing a full house on Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009, SF Green Fest (WQ)

(WQ) This weekend's San Francisco Green Festival served as a platform for new green products, raw vegan foods, alchemical elixirs, sustainable practices, ecological product lines, and exciting speakers. One of the highlights was author John Perkins.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man provides an account of Perkins' time with the National Security Agency (NSA) as an accountant hired by the US government to corrupt and control foreign governments. If their leaders would not be corrupted, the "jackals" would be sent in to assassinate democratically elected and installed leaders (such as Saddam Hussein), or in a worst case scenario, the military would unleash its full force to coerce countries into cooperating with US dictates at the expense of its environment, its population, and its economic future. Perkins in this undermining role together with the CIA therefore described himself as an "economic hit man."


Reasons we are in the Middle East

Monday, November 16, 2009

Are we all Hindus now? (Yes)



It's true. As Americans, we are all more "Hindu" than ever. What does that mean? There was no "Hinduism" at the time of the Buddha. The world came into being when the British wanted to understand the astonishing diversity they found in India -- which rejects nothing choosing instead to assimilate everything.



The Buddha was NOT a Hindu, as so many popularly say. He was an Indian -- but only because then India was much larger, an empire extending from principality to loosely affiliated principality -- rooted in Vedic culture with Sanskrit speaking Brahmins all around who practiced Brahmanism, not Hinduism.

Indians had dharmas or teachings they followed -- led by charismatic visionaries who stood up at the crossroads and marketplaces and took on a following. The world then as now follows sects more than religions. (Religion is a general label of convenience that, although it does not define us we yet identify with, and there are more than 200 kinds of Christianity in America alone).

These sects differed so much that we would not call them the same religion. Indians had no concept of "religion." Life itself was religion, and spirituality (and, sadly, superstition) pervaded all aspects of life. The Buddha is called a Hindu by Hindus today because of the long standing custom to assimilate rather than distinguish, to fashion a great interdependent and harmonious whole rather than to distinguish parts. But we distinguish and enjoy our disharmony and individuality. Buddhism and Jainism were protest movements against the established "religious" movement of the day, the aforementioned Brahmanism, which was weighed down by ritual, custom, interpretation, and dogma.

The priestly caste controlled spirituality. Jesus similarly rejected the temple and Jewish tradition, and just as he was reigned in to be its greatest proponent, the Buddha rebelled against Brahmanism (and the absolute authority of the Vedas) in search of the Truth directly, without recourse to any teacher or sectarian teaching. (He left his yoga instructor gurus Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputra because their dharmas, which Siddhartha succeeded in mastering, had failed to liberate anyone from suffering or dukkha).



He did not reject India, asceticism, or yoga. What he did instead was move far from his familiar surroundings on a heroic journey in search of enlightenment -- a rite of passage, if you will. He abandoned severe asceticism as fruitless for attaining the ultimate goal, which is found by the balanced effort he came to call the Middle Way. And he replaced the physical hardships of "yoga" as bodily-mental control by force of will into a sustainable and harmonious system, a gradual path that elevates one.

Some may say he went the way of the Tao or the path of least resistance. He was mistaken then as having given up, when in fact what he gave up was ego and its tiny effort. People -- namely, the Five Ascetics, who were his companions in the search for enlightenment -- mistakenly thought he abandoned the struggle when in fact what he abandoned was struggling. He resisted and fought the stream of the world and Samsara just enough to escape the traps of birth, old age, sickness, death, and rebirth and with this round all the inherent unpleasantness, woe, ill, and misery. He gave up illusion and suffering for Truth and freedom, ignorance for enlightenment, and continued becoming for the unexcelled peace of nirvana.

So someone may say we are all more Hindu now than ever. It's true with the caveat that there was never any Hinduism until the British Western mentality made it so and sold it to the Indians, who then consolidate the threads that ran through the rich diversity of its spiritual landscape: reincarnation, heavenly planes, Brahma, avatars, magic (yogic powers), faeries (devas), extraterrestrial (angelic/alien) knowledge and social obligations handed down from above along with moral "laws," institutions, and governance practices... And like the Buddha, Americans question and rebel against what is handed down. (The Kalama Sutra is an excellent synopsis of what the Buddha thinks is wise to reject).

What was once a puritanical JudeoChristian structure with no freedom from religion has become a great country by its diversity and assimilation of views. There's even room for Christianity. But nowhere is it accepted that it will be the same sexist, dogmatic, hierarchical nonsense brought over from England and the Old World. This is the new world and the founding traditions are able to trace their authentic roots, which touch Buddhism, the Far East, and the wisdom of many ancient culture (including the Earth traditions of Europe that imperialistic Christianity tried to blot out to become the world religion it is today). American society in general and Christianity in particular are made better and truer -- that is, more authentic by the integrity of historical honesty which is both idealistic and inspiring, flawed and begging to be made right.

Wisdom Quarterly does not shirk the shameful things this country has done and continues to do as a Western power and ruthless empire. But it also does not seek to shame it and wallow in our privileged guilt. To find the Truth, let's face the truth and do something about it. Bush and Cheney were the worst leaders in a list of horrific leaders. Let's not let Obama go the same direction. Catholic and Protestant hypocrisies make one wonder how Christianity can ever be reconciled with a good and honest life. Let's not let the Church, Inc. and televised evangelical ministries mislead us. Let's embrace the world to uplift everyone on the planet.

Yes, we're more Hindu than ever -- and in that way more American, too, and Christian, and Buddhist, and goodness maybe even more Islamic too. After all, we were never so Zen as we were after World War II. First we bomb, then we embrace. It isn't now and it never was the citizens making war. It's the government, it's the world-bankers, it's the war-profiteers in corporate offices and the halls of power who do that. We just sheepishly go along, played by the CIA, the dishonest media, and well meaning jackals in religious, business, and showbiz attire. Doubt what is worthy of doubt, as the Kalama Sutra says. One is right to doubt. And accept what makes sense after an honest and unbiased assessment. The truth is still the truth whatever the lies and distortions have been.

We're proud to be Buddhists, we're proud to be Americans (not at all proud of the wars started or fought in our name), we're proud to be lots of things...and if like the Buddha we get called Hindus, that's all right too. No one is asked to convert to anything other than the degree of truth and freedom one can bear to live with.

"We are all Hindus now" (Newsweek)

NEWSWEEK (Aug. 31, 2009 issue)


America is not a Christian nation. We are, it is true, a nation founded by Christians, and according to a 2008 survey, 76 percent of us continue to identify as "Christian" (the lowest percentage in American history).



Of course, we are not a Hindu nation either — neither a Muslim, Jewish, nor Wiccan one. A million-plus Hindus live in the United States, a fraction of the billion who live on Earth.

But recent poll data show that conceptually, at least, we are slowly becoming more like Hindus and less like traditional Christians in the ways we think about God, ourselves, each other, and eternity.

The Rig Veda, the most ancient Hindu scripture, says: "Truth is One, but the sages speak of it by many names." A Hindu believes there are many paths to God. Jesus is one way, the Qur'an is another, yoga practice is a third. None is better than any other; all are equal. The most traditional, conservative Christians have not been taught to think like this.

They learn in Sunday school that their religion is true, and others are false. Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me."


Americans are no longer buying it. According to a 2008 Pew Forum survey, 65 percent of us believe that "many religions can lead to eternal life" [which may include the "deathless state," a synonym of nirvana] — including 37 percent of white evangelicals, the group most likely to believe that salvation is theirs alone.

In addition, the number of people who seek spiritual truth outside church is growing. Thirty percent of Americans call themselves "spiritual, not religious," according to a 2009 NEWSWEEK Poll, up from 24 percent in 2005. Stephen Prothero, religion professor at Boston University, has long framed the American propensity for "the divine-deli-cafeteria religion" as "very much in the spirit of Hinduism. You're not picking and choosing from different religions, because they're all the same," he says.

"It isn't about orthodoxy. It's about whatever works. If going to yoga works, great — and if going to Catholic mass works, great. And if going to Catholic mass plus the yoga plus the Buddhist retreat works, that's great, too."

Then there's the question of what happens when you die.

Christians traditionally believe that bodies and souls are sacred, that together they comprise the "self," and that at the end of time they will be reunited in the Resurrection. You need both, in other words, and you need them forever. Hindus believe no such thing. At death, the body burns on a pyre, while the spirit — where identity resides — escapes. In reincarnation, central to Hinduism, selves come back to earth again and again in different bodies.

So here is another way in which Americans are becoming more Hindu: 24 percent of Americans say they believe in reincarnation, according to a 2008 Harris poll. So agnostic are we about the ultimate fates of our bodies that we're burning them — like Hindus — after death.


More than a third of Americans now choose cremation, according to the Cremation Association of North America, up from 6 percent in 1975. "I do think the more spiritual role of religion tends to deemphasize some of the more starkly literal interpretations of the Resurrection," agrees Diana Eck, professor of comparative religion at Harvard. So let us all say "OM."

For reaction from Wisdom Quarterly, see following post:

Female Ordination (TV)

A look at Bhikkhuni Dhammananda's battle to be accepted as a Thai Buddhist nun then Amani Zain meets young British women who want to be fashionable and modest.

The Pregnant Nun

"Octomom" Nadya Suleman, Halloween costume as pregnant nun with babies dressed as devils (dailymail.co.uk)

THERE WAS ONCE A YOUNG WOMAN who had only been married for a short time when she realized that her true calling was to be a nun (bhikkhuni) rather than a wife. Her good husband’s heart broke to hear her ask permission to leave him. But because he loved her dearly, he allowed her to go and fulfill her wish.

She thus entered the nunhood and became a disciple of Devadatta, little knowing that she was already pregnant at the time. As the months rolled by, her condition became obvious. The other nuns took her to see Devadatta, who demanded that she disrobe. However, she refused to do so.

“Why should I disrobe,” she asked, “if I have not broken any monastic rule?” Instead, she went to the Buddha and became one of his disciples. While the Buddha knew that she had not violated any of the monastic precepts, for the sake of her good name as well as that of the Order, the Buddha requested a public hearing of her case in the presence of the king. The aim of doing so was to prove the blamelessness of this nun once and for all and to remove the last traces of doubt that anyone might have concerning her condition.

The expectant mother was then thoroughly questioned by one of the Buddha’s female followers who was able to establish that the nun had indeed become pregnant while she was still a lay woman and not after having entered the nunhood. A monk appointed by the Buddha to oversee the case then made a public declaration of the nun's blamelessness. Everyone gathered to hear the proceedings, including the king, returned home satisfied.

When the nun gave birth to a baby boy, the king adopted him as his very own son. However, at the age of seven, upon learning that his mother was a nun, the little boy left the palace and became a novice. At the age of 20, he underwent full ordination and became a monk. Proceeding to the forest, after diligent practice consisting of balanced-effort (both calm and consistent, rather than straining and striving) he attained complete enlightenment (arhantship). Thereafter, he continued to live in the forest alone for more than twelve years.

When his mother finally got to see him again, she could not contain her excitement. She ran up to him with tears of joy in her eyes. The son, however, remained equanimous saying to her, “You are acting like a worldly mother and not as one who has entered the Order. Have you not learned the joy of restraint?” Then to emphasize his point, he walked away -- knowing full well that if he had greeted his mother otherwise, she would have remained emotionally attached to him and her own spiritual and meditative progress would have been hampered.

But unaware of her son’s deeply compassionate motives, the mother at first could not get over how harshly he had treated her. She was heartbroken. Later, however, she began to understand that her son was trying to help her. With her new understanding in mind, she practiced more diligently and consistently and began to realize the futility of all emotional attachment. Letting go of such attachment, she too became an arahant (arhat, saint, completely enlightened disciple).

The monastics who knew the story of the pregnant nun and her son remarked that if the mother had been foolish enough to disrobe as Devadatta had bid her, she and her son would not have become saints. “They were lucky, Venerable Sir,” they added, “to have come to you for their guide (sarana).” The Buddha replied, “In trying to attain arahantship, you must strive diligently and depend on yourself rather than anyone else.”

One indeed is one’s own refuge (sarana). What other refuge can
there be? With oneself thoroughly controlled, one can
attain a refuge which is difficult to attain.
Dhammapada 160


COMMENT

Some American Buddhists might argue that monasticism should be condemned. It's unnatural, it's outdated, it's severe asceticism. But Wisdom Quarterly asks the question, What is the point of renunciation, celibacy, a peaceful life, and meditation? It is not an end in itself, not something to be undertaken because workaday life is too hard or painful.

Monasticism -- at least temporary ordination -- is wisely undertaken to achieve the goals that otherwise elude us. If one's meditation is not going well, renounce. And not so mysteriously, the mind will rest on its object and lead to remarkable attainments in virtue, concentration, and insight. These goals are both excellent mundane karma and phenomenal supramundane karma.

Buddhist temples in the US and in Buddhist countries encourage temporary ordination. Such ordinations are not binding commitments to chanting, chastity, and poverty. Rather, grasped correctly, they are extraordinarily rare opportunities to make merit, meditate, and experience a tremendous amount of freedom -- freedom from the cramped dustiness of household life with its debts, obligations, and worries. It is a remarkable thing that Buddhism was the first world religion to establish nunneries to give women the same opportunities as men for their education, participation in society, and enlightenment. And Wisdom Quarterly backs these goals 100%. The Buddha's dispensation would be incomplete without a Bhikkhuni Sangha.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Sex tape "biggest mistake" of her life

Buddhist Views on Masturbation


(WQ) What can be said about the clown princess of poor taste, media-starlet Carrie Prejean? Not much that isn't already being said. Reports surfacing today reveal that her "sex tape" was not a one off wonder, a "biggest mistake" of my life for a person I loved, as she claims. There were many such tapes sent to a young man she met on Myspace and dated for a total of four days.

What this all touches on is the über-sensitive topic of masturbation. Is it natural? Yes. Is it normal? Probably not. It is not a "necessity" as so many obsessed with the practice maintain. For instance, it is not seen in the wild among our first cousins the chimpanzees; yet, it cannot be stopped when those same chimps are imprisoned in concrete cages called zoos. As industrialized moderns locked in 12x12 rooms and even smaller cubicles -- exposed to very graphic media (thank you, Carrie Prejean), high gloss distortions of unattainable beauty, and the sexualization of everything on sale in the marketplace -- it is little wonder we behave like chimps in cages.

Is masturbation harmful? It isn't helpful. Nor is it "release" and a necessary relief, as is frequently claimed, when we ourselves are fueling the fire of sexual craving by seeking out provocative media.

What does our collective JudeoChristian heritage have to say about it? Surprisingly little. References to "onanism" (based on the Biblical story of Onan) have nothing whatsoever to do with masturbation. The "spilled seed" reference made famous by the story was in fact the self-interested result of coitus -- Onan's failure to fulfill a social obligation (impregnating his brother's widow) in defiance of a god's law: The "god" in the story sounds more like a Sumerian or Egyptian extraterrestrial-overlord than the God of Christianity. Be that as it may, the god in the story kills Onan on the spot for using the disastrous (or often-tried-and-quite-untrue) "withdrawal method."

A thorough search of the Bible for a literal prohibition on masturbation yielded only this incident as displeasing to Jehovah? Yes, but that hasn't kept Christians from condemning the practice as vehemently, and somewhat hypocritically, as various commandments. The Christian God may not be against masturbation, but conservative Christians sure are. Except for one (thank you again, Carrie Prejean).

What does Buddhism have to say about masturbation? Quite a bit more than other traditions. To progress in virtue (sila, restraint with regard to sensual craving), unselfishness (dana, generosity), and meditation (bhavana) one is wise to limit one's exposure to provocations. If someone masturbates, it is not so much that it is a terrible stain on one's mind (from a Buddhist psychological or Abhidharma point of view) but rather an unbeneficial habit being strengthened.

To shame it is to compound the act needlessly, making matters much worse. It is not sex that the Buddha warned against (for workaday Buddhists) but rather sexual misconduct. And that is very clearly defined as sexual intercourse with the ten prohibited persons (none of whom are oneself):

Sexual "misconduct" (kamesu micchacara) means sex with someone who is dependent on or "protected" by one's: parents, spouse, relatives, religious group, the state, or otherwise made off limits (as by a committment or relationship or decree).

The monastic discipline (Vinaya) prohibits masturbation for monastics. The Eight Precepts prohibit it for lay practitioners. Yet the Five Precepts generally incumbent on human beings, and Buddhists in particular, do no specifically bar the practice. One should not therefore think that it is encouraged or tacitly condoned. It is not, but neither is it a grave karmic act with heavy consequences. Purposely fueling sensual desire, on the other hand, is a dangerous thing exacerbated and strenghtened as masturbation becomes an ingrained habit or addiction.

The cause of unsatisfactoriness (dukkha: ill, woe, agitation, suffering) is sensual craving. To provoke the mind/heart/body then relieve it through masturbation is a fool's errand, a vicious circle. In fact, it is no "relief" at all. The Buddha compared it to a person suffering from a terrible skin condition with open sores. To a person suffering from unbearable itching, placing one's arm in a fire and cauterizing the wound will feel like pleasure. To anyone else, it would be unthinkably unpleasant to place one's own arm in fire. Such is the distortion caused by an itch like sexual craving.

(The prevalent practice of cutting, incomprehensible to most parents, takes advantage of the same phenomenon: The psychic pain of an individual, usually female and usually quite young and not infrequently sexually abused, is so great that the manifest and controllable pain of cutting is experienced as relief. There is a temporary psychological feeling of control or mastery and a rush and release of endorphins, the sort of endogenous chemicals released by spiritual self-mortification and extreme austerities...akin to anorexic and bulimic practices).

Sutra: The Use of Sex (AN IV.159)
On one occasion a Buddhist nun fell in love with Ananda, the Buddha's attendant. She feigned an illness to get him to visit her bedside. Perceiving her mind and understanding the situation, Ananda gently spoke to her on the foul aspects of the body in order to free her from the grip of passion:

  • This body has come into being through food; yet based on food, food can be abandoned.
  • This body has come into being through craving; yet based through craving, craving can be abandoned.
  • This body has come into being through conceit; yet based on conceit, conceit can be abandoned.
  • This body has come into being through the sexual act, but in regard to the sexual act the Buddha has advised the destruction of the bridge.

[Commentary: Setughata. This seems to be a metaphorical way of saying that a monastic should totally uproot sexual desire. The point of Ananda's discourse is that even food, craving, and conceit, which are normally factors of bondage, can be skillfully employed to attain enlightenment (arhatship). But with sexuality there is absolutely no skillful way it can be used for the goal of the higher life.]

Tantric sex, which is superior to ordinary sex, may have some practical benefits. But using it as a means to enlightenment is like treating an illness with the illness. Use media wisely because stories like Carrie Prejean's are not going anywhere...but the front page.

(FOX News) Carrie Prejean says a steamy [masturbation] tape she made for an ex-boyfriend a few years ago was “the biggest mistake” of her life. The former [Christian conservative] Miss California USA told Fox News’ Sean Hannity Monday that she shot the racy tape by herself for a boyfriend she loved when she was 17. Later he “betrayed” her and sold it.

“They can call it whatever they want to call it, but it was the biggest mistake of my life,” Prejean told Hannity. “I was all by myself and I was sending a boyfriend at the time who I loved and cared about a video of me…I was not having sex with anybody and you call it whatever you want.”
Prejean, now 22, said she was young and exhibited bad judgment at the time. “I was a teenager at the time and never did I think it would ever come out. But it was bad judgment and it’s embarrassing and it’s humiliating to be talking about this now on national TV if you can imagine.” More>>

Most Powerful People in the World (and why)


Most powerful people in the world
(Forbes) The list includes media giants and the leader of the most populated country on the planet. But who's No. 1? - U.S., China under fire - Find world populations - China's warning to U.S.

Ven. Sariputra on Power

(WQ) Power seems to derive from two principal sources -- wealth and a following (the charisma to inspire others to follow). One of the Buddha's chief male disciples, Ven. Sariputra, explained how one gained both by elucidating the deeds (karma) that result in money and influence. To put it succinctly: Those who gave in the past are, as a result, subsequently wealthy. (In the sutras this is frequently, but not exclusively, in a future life). Those who encourage others to give will in the future have a large following. Those who do both will have both; those who do neither will have neither.

(By the way, please give. Giving benefits both giver and receiver. Moreover, give understanding that karma ripens even if its results are not immediately apparent).

The famous scholar-monk Ven. Pa Auk Sayadaw explains that even criminals, bad business people without ethics, and thieves are themselves only successful in their enterprises because of GOOD karma in the past. (See The Workings of Kamma for full explanation).

What they do (their actions) with the profitable results ripening as a result of former deeds is their present karma (action, choice, intention). This conditions their present experience. But when these results are exhausted, the riches evaporate. Similarly, even shoddy business people and awkward entrepreneurs will have an easier time of it because of good karma, whereas excellent business plans and million dollar ideas may not succeed for those lacking a karmic basis for wealth.

Such is the mystery of karma, which does not concern itself with our interpretations of "right" and "wrong," "fair" and "unfair." It is quite impersonal and unbiased. Therefore, give. It benefits the giver (immediately and in the future) and others right away.

Whom to bestow gifts on for the greatest results? The Buddha explained that those with the greatest virtue (sila) make the greatest recipients. The results of actions done to them or for them, explains the Sayadaw, are the weightiest and most far reaching. It is notable that one's parents make excellent recipients for the giver -- even if they would only be ordinary recipients to someone else. Even a gift given to an unvirtuous beggar brings great results, because as a human being that person is still of a caliber not found in subordinate worlds. Therefore, it is wise to view everyone who asks out of need as one's "best friend" offering an excellent opportunity to gain substantial merit.

"The gift of the Dharma excells all gifts." The Sangha of monks and nuns are called an "incomparable field of merit for the world," which applies to the accomplished Noble Sangha as represented by ordinary monastics. To give to anyone (any being), however, bears profitable results for the giver making for one a store of merit useful in whatever one wishes. This applies to wishes for ordinary worldly wealth up to and including the supreme goal of enlightenment and liberation through knowing and seeing nirvana.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Buddhism at Work


What is Work? Buddhist Discernment on the Job
Sharon Glassman

Note to readers: A few weeks ago, I got an email inviting me to part of a Green Books Campaign sponsored by Eco-Libris, a for-profit enterprise that promotes books printed on non-virgin paper and funds the planting of trees in Africa and Central America.

This review of Discernment: Educating Mind and Spirit (Lantern Books) is part of the Green Books campaign -- and a fitting next step in this ongoing series about Work. Some people read sports books to unwind. Other folks read cook-books, or travel books. I read books on Buddhism.

Reading about folks who meditate, or cross-culturally explore, or practice right livelihood is my version of armchair traveling. "Enlightenment" is not one of my recurring Work To-Do List items (although I have voiced the occasional, enlightened sounding character on TV). But I find comfort -- and practical work advice -- in the gap between The Buddhist Authors' Balanced Approach to Life and my Whirling Dervish approach to same. More>>

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Burma claims will release Aung San Suu Kyi

Diplomat says jailed opposition leader will be allowed to organize her party for elections next year.

Burma's opposition leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, may soon be released so she can play a role in next year's election, a senior Burmese diplomat has said.

"There is a plan to release her soon...so she can organize her party," Min Lwin, a director-general in the foreign ministry, told the Associated Press. He gave no details and it was unclear whether Aung San Suu Kyi would be allowed to campaign or stand for election.

Despite the conciliatory remarks, the country's constitution includes provisions that bar her from holding office and ensure the primacy of the government in the military.

The Nobel peace prize winner has spent 14 of the last 20 years under house arrest. In August a court sentenced her to an additional 18 months after an American, John Yettaw, swam across a lake to her villa in Rangoon and stayed overnight. More>>


Aung San Suu Kyi and the US envoy Kurt Campbell after their meeting in Rangoon (Hla Hla Htay/AFP/Getty Images).

UFOs: "Vatican looks for alien life" (AP)

Vatican looks to heavens for signs of alien life
VATICAN CITY — E.T., phone Rome. Four hundred years after it locked up Galileo for challenging the view that the Earth was the center of the universe, the Vatican has called in experts to study the possibility of extraterrestrial alien life and its implication for the Catholic Church.

"The questions of life's origins and of whether life exists elsewhere in the universe are very suitable and deserve serious consideration," said the Rev. Jose Gabriel Funes, an astronomer and director of the Vatican Observatory.

Funes, a Jesuit priest, presented the results Tuesday of a five-day conference that gathered astronomers, physicists, biologists, and other experts to discuss the budding field of astrobiology — the study of the origin of life and its exis-tence elsewhere in the cosmos. More>>